About the quick flip through the graphs, I think that if you just have to talk about the graph and its changes. If you keep the graph up on the screen while you discuss it, that should pretty much guarantee it will be up long enough for viewers to catch the details.
On November 13 2012 02:03 TanGeng wrote: Good job, LD!! ^_^
About the quick flip through the graphs, I think that if you just have to talk about the graph and its changes. If you keep the graph up on the screen while you discuss it, that should pretty much guarantee it will be up long enough for viewers to catch the details.
Tbh, I liked it before when you showed the graphs for just a brief while. For the viewer, all that's important is the peak of the graph (e.g. iG is leading by 7.5k gold), which you guys always mention and the shape of the graph, which we can catch in a glance.
Games 1 and 2 were really fun to watch. Game 3 was just an absolute crushing by iG. The flow of game 3 was hard to watch with all the pausing, but always fun to watch two powerhouse teams go at it. Can't wait to see how things shape up at WCG.
On November 13 2012 02:03 TanGeng wrote: Good job, LD!! ^_^
About the quick flip through the graphs, I think that if you just have to talk about the graph and its changes. If you keep the graph up on the screen while you discuss it, that should pretty much guarantee it will be up long enough for viewers to catch the details.
Tbh, I liked it before when you showed the graphs for just a brief while. For the viewer, all that's important is the peak of the graph (e.g. iG is leading by 7.5k gold), which you guys always mention and the shape of the graph, which we can catch in a glance.
Yeah, I personally prefer to just flip it as well.. it covers up too much of the screen and hurts the in game viewing experience otherwise IMO. Everybody's got an opinion eh
Yes LD, but you were having them open for 0.5 seconds. The difference between you and the viewer is that you know what button you pressed and immediately know what you're looking at. It really doesn't need to be more than 2-3 seconds but before it was just confusing. I think it's been fine the last couple of days.
I'm fine with 2 seconds. Intent watchers will catch it if it's on for 2-3 seconds. They'll catch it even if it's shorter than that if you given them a bit of a hint that it is coming. The short span will still confuse casual watchers or people who have it sort of in the background.
BTW that was one decked out Windrunner with a nice new portrait. In fact all the portraits with the headgear are nice and fresh.
I'm actually fine with not having anything at all, but that's just me. I like to guess and it makes me more inclined to keep watching when I don't just assume they can't come back based on a 15k gold lead and wonder to myself why I'm still watching.