EPT[TI3] Playoffs Day 5 - Page 190
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
blobrus
4297 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
I'm sure that aegis deny really fucked with their minds. | ||
|
hyptonic
2155 Posts
he falls off and orange had a shitton of lockdown for him. if orange gets that aegis, navi sits behind their towers, that bad fight in dire woods doesnt happen, those fail bb's never happen, puck never gets his hex, enigma doesnt get his blink. this game would be totally different. and orange has run mushi od as their 1 before and has proven that it does dmg late | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:38 Asha` wrote: No one likes game advantages. They make for fucking boring finals 80% of the time. Agreed. | ||
|
snarl
Canada812 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:36 Plansix wrote: And it doesn't matter because lifestealer would rock their face, everyone would have BKBs and Bane would pop like a zit. Rage doesn't last forever. Once it wears off, if Mushi just manmodes and attacks him he will die. But he couldnt because he had no aegis so he ends up running away doing NOTHING | ||
|
LeCruci
Romania403 Posts
| ||
|
potatomash3r
Australia417 Posts
| ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:38 Asha` wrote: No one likes game advantages. They make for fucking boring finals 80% of the time. I've seen some sick FGC matches that wouldn't be possible without winner's advantage. Plus it's called double-elimination for a reason, so that everyone can lose once and still stay in the tournament | ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:38 thebig1 wrote: I spent the whole game trying to explain to people that it wasn't close to being over, Na'Vi had a better team as the game went on, and that Orange would have a time going high ground, but I didn't actually think Na'Vi would win. As for if the Aegis deny making a huge difference. There isn't really a way of knowing. They could have got the tower and denied a bunch of gold/xp for a while, but Na'Vi always had the chance of getting a lucky teamfight. of course it was a huge difference, because the aegis deny made it a guaranteed loss for orange | ||
|
StoRm_res
Switzerland891 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:37 Ramiz1989 wrote: Wait, there isn't WB advantage? O.o My friends told me that there is. Well, Na'Vi have already 3 games under their belt and thats kindof a disadvantage when going into a BO5 ^^ | ||
|
Blasphm
France5 Posts
| ||
|
Y
254 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:36 Lachrymose wrote: ... I can't really see a way Navi can win TI3 and look like the best team which is never a very good taste for a tournament. I completely disagree. If you want some kind of 'best team' metric that's more reliable, you need to run a multiple-round Swiss tournament instead of double elimination. It's just that noone (apart from the MtG community) cares about Swiss tournaments because it takes away all the tension, suspense and drama of traditional finals, with people actually dropping out. Anyways, I feel like [A], Na'Vi and Orange would all have been worthy winners of this, so I'm happy already. | ||
|
EnvyUK
England467 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:37 ForTehDarkseid wrote: You don't take psychological effect in account. Nobody is saying that if Aegis was on Orange it was like instant win, but the game wouldn't have ended so abruptly. Anyone who denies that is a blind NaVi fanboy. Within the past few pages someone literally just said if Orange had aegis Na'Vi would have lost. | ||
|
ForTehDarkseid
8139 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:39 Plansix wrote: Oh I am sure that fucked with them. However, its their job to recover and you can't claim otherwise. I am saying NaVi got incredibly lucky and people are making sound like it was the biggest comeback in history of Dota, that's it. | ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
Disagreed. | ||
|
trinxified
Canada7774 Posts
| ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:39 WindWolf wrote: I've seen some sick FGC matches that wouldn't be possible without winner's advantage. Plus it's called double-elimination for a reason, so that everyone can lose once and still stay in the tournament having no winner's advantage is absolutely atrocious for alliance. i don't know what the organizers were thinking. | ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
this pic made me sad =( | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On August 12 2013 07:40 StoRm_res wrote: Well, Na'Vi have already 3 games under their belt and thats kindof a disadvantage when going into a BO5 ^^ But they kind of have huge momentum going in | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
| ||
