|
On May 28 2015 02:46 Sn0_Man wrote: man the best part about this k koke track rtz keeps listening to is the charlie sloth interjections his voice is amazing my dream job is to be one of those chump dj's who just scream like an idiot and just hit tons of soundboard effects all of the time for no reason PERFECT SONIC BOOM HADOUKEN
|
tfw non-Swedes are complaining about alcohol
|
On May 28 2015 02:45 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2015 02:41 andyrau wrote:United States law gives the Justice Department wide authority to bring cases against foreign nationals living abroad, an authority that prosecutors have used repeatedly in international terrorism cases. Those cases can hinge on the slightest connection to the United States, like the use of an American bank or Internet service provider. is this true wtf legal paramedic p6 pls respond also It was later revealed by England’s bid chief that four ExCo members had solicited bribes from him for their votes; one asked for $2.5 million, while another, Nicolas Leoz of Paraguay, requested a knighthood. lmao I mean, anyone can bring a lawsuit against anyone from another country under US law. The same goes for criminal charges. All that is required is a connection to the US in some way. Enforcement is another question. But as a rule, you can ask a court for anything you want. The question is if they are going to listen to you or not. i think what i'm surprised at is the fact that we have jurisdiction over anything that is tangentially related to the country
i find it weird that we can domestically try, indict, and punish foreign nationals for crimes they committed in other countries just by having data sent through a server located stateside. assuming that the country has extradition agreements ofc
|
we have finally died boys no longer dying
|
gg we lost
and passive bb I never left you don't worry
|
|
|
who cares but i must point out that csgo is at its peak while dota2 is 17%~ under it
|
a giant csgo operation just released which obviously boosts playercounts significantly.
Good to see CSGO growing that much though
|
On May 28 2015 02:49 andyrau wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2015 02:45 Plansix wrote:On May 28 2015 02:41 andyrau wrote:United States law gives the Justice Department wide authority to bring cases against foreign nationals living abroad, an authority that prosecutors have used repeatedly in international terrorism cases. Those cases can hinge on the slightest connection to the United States, like the use of an American bank or Internet service provider. is this true wtf legal paramedic p6 pls respond also It was later revealed by England’s bid chief that four ExCo members had solicited bribes from him for their votes; one asked for $2.5 million, while another, Nicolas Leoz of Paraguay, requested a knighthood. lmao I mean, anyone can bring a lawsuit against anyone from another country under US law. The same goes for criminal charges. All that is required is a connection to the US in some way. Enforcement is another question. But as a rule, you can ask a court for anything you want. The question is if they are going to listen to you or not. i think what i'm surprised at is the fact that we have jurisdiction over anything that is tangentially related to the country i find it weird that we can domestically try, indict, and punish foreign nationals for crimes they committed in other countries just by having data sent through a server located stateside. assuming that the country has extradition agreements ofc Well the crime needs to fall under US law and involve the US in some way. In this case, the fraud is related to the World Cup which we are a part of. And the Justice Department has to care enough to bring the case. If its some random crime that doesn't really involve the US, they won't care.
The wording in that article is weird because that is sort of how most international law works. If you commit a crime against a US company/citizen while in France, the US will try to charge you with that crime. If you are from the US or not doesn't really matter.
Edit: Also, these cases are nightmares in general. Civil cases are even worse from all the info I have received.
|
On May 28 2015 03:00 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2015 02:49 andyrau wrote:On May 28 2015 02:45 Plansix wrote:On May 28 2015 02:41 andyrau wrote:United States law gives the Justice Department wide authority to bring cases against foreign nationals living abroad, an authority that prosecutors have used repeatedly in international terrorism cases. Those cases can hinge on the slightest connection to the United States, like the use of an American bank or Internet service provider. is this true wtf legal paramedic p6 pls respond also It was later revealed by England’s bid chief that four ExCo members had solicited bribes from him for their votes; one asked for $2.5 million, while another, Nicolas Leoz of Paraguay, requested a knighthood. lmao I mean, anyone can bring a lawsuit against anyone from another country under US law. The same goes for criminal charges. All that is required is a connection to the US in some way. Enforcement is another question. But as a rule, you can ask a court for anything you want. The question is if they are going to listen to you or not. i think what i'm surprised at is the fact that we have jurisdiction over anything that is tangentially related to the country i find it weird that we can domestically try, indict, and punish foreign nationals for crimes they committed in other countries just by having data sent through a server located stateside. assuming that the country has extradition agreements ofc Well the crime needs to fall under US law and involve the US in some way. In this case, the fraud is related to the World Cup which we are a part of. And the Justice Department has to care enough to bring the case. If its some random crime that doesn't really involve the US, they won't care. The wording in that article is weird because that is sort of how most international law works. If you commit a crime against a US company/citizen while in France, the US will try to charge you with that crime. If you are from the US or not doesn't really matter. This sort of ventures into the "what if" scenario, but what happens if it was legal in France, but not legal in the USA? Would you still get charged?
I'm asking in general, not about FIFA.
|
On May 28 2015 03:04 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2015 03:00 Plansix wrote:On May 28 2015 02:49 andyrau wrote:On May 28 2015 02:45 Plansix wrote:On May 28 2015 02:41 andyrau wrote:United States law gives the Justice Department wide authority to bring cases against foreign nationals living abroad, an authority that prosecutors have used repeatedly in international terrorism cases. Those cases can hinge on the slightest connection to the United States, like the use of an American bank or Internet service provider. is this true wtf legal paramedic p6 pls respond also It was later revealed by England’s bid chief that four ExCo members had solicited bribes from him for their votes; one asked for $2.5 million, while another, Nicolas Leoz of Paraguay, requested a knighthood. lmao I mean, anyone can bring a lawsuit against anyone from another country under US law. The same goes for criminal charges. All that is required is a connection to the US in some way. Enforcement is another question. But as a rule, you can ask a court for anything you want. The question is if they are going to listen to you or not. i think what i'm surprised at is the fact that we have jurisdiction over anything that is tangentially related to the country i find it weird that we can domestically try, indict, and punish foreign nationals for crimes they committed in other countries just by having data sent through a server located stateside. assuming that the country has extradition agreements ofc Well the crime needs to fall under US law and involve the US in some way. In this case, the fraud is related to the World Cup which we are a part of. And the Justice Department has to care enough to bring the case. If its some random crime that doesn't really involve the US, they won't care. The wording in that article is weird because that is sort of how most international law works. If you commit a crime against a US company/citizen while in France, the US will try to charge you with that crime. If you are from the US or not doesn't really matter. This sort of ventures into the "what if" scenario, but what happens if it was legal in France, but not legal in the USA? Would you still get charged? I'm asking in general, not about FIFA. The US likely wouldn't care but I can't think of a way it would come up. It would need to be a crime a foreign national committed against a US citizen or company. So you're dealing with stuff like fraud, assault or some other direct crime. Most countries have laws against things like that. Its can't be drugs or some other charge where the US and the country in question would differ, because why would the US bring that charge?(and they likely couldn't because all drug charges relate to you being in the US with the drugs)
|
the dotaverse is boring today
|
On May 28 2015 03:39 Sn0_Man wrote: the dotaverse is boring today You should see the SC2verse; it's signifcantly more boring.
|
the contrast being that the dotaverse is occasionally interesting
maybe if we got new immortalzzzz
|
I bet we get immortals today or tomorrow now that the images leaked
|
On May 28 2015 03:43 Sn0_Man wrote: the contrast being that the dotaverse is occasionally interesting
maybe if we got new immortalzzzz Were the preview images not enough? I mean, you could be freaking out how Valve is trying to kill 3rd party tournaments? I hear some people are into that and how greedy Valve is.
|
I mostly wanna see if immortals release actually influences prize pool rate of increase or not also to see what the super rare one is and if I got any :3
|
I'm a bit skeptical that we'll hit over $10m.
|
isn't there no golden version this time? heard its a ward or something
|
On May 28 2015 03:47 IntoTheheart wrote: I'm a bit skeptical that we'll hit over $10m. ? 10m is essentially already achieved 15 is the questionable total, we wont reach it unless the immortals cause a substantial uptick comparable to last year
|
|
|
|
|
|