• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 00:04
CET 06:04
KST 14:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Dark completes military service, returns to SC211[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage19Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175
StarCraft 2
General
Dark completes military service, returns to SC2 Greetings.. No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Dark returns! GSL CK #7 4v4 Team Battle (Nov 19) soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
Korean players' earnings Hit New All-Time High! SOOP Hosts SC1 & SC2 Event Tournament: Kevin Scrim BW General Discussion Recommended BW Settings for Mouse and Video List of top players active on ShieldBattery
Tourneys
[BSL23] Ro16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Bisu's Team vs Shuttle's Team 2026-11-14
Strategy
Pluto's TvP 5Marine 2Medic Push Simple Questions, Simple Answers Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Free Space RTS Game, optimised f. Phone/Tablet etc List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Trading/Investing Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13067 users

PSA: Possible Nerf to your favorite Weapon - Page 5

Forum Index > Diablo 3
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Blix
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands873 Posts
January 22 2013 18:40 GMT
#81
Burrfoot, does your table apply to dual wield? eg. i have 2 weaps, both with socket and emerald. As i understand it, the emerald applies to both weaps and the ruby only to the one it's in? If i have a slow and a fast weapon, would it make sense to put an emerald in the slow one and a ruby in the fast one.. etc etc =) Also, i assume that the critdamage in your table refers to the crit dmg you have after removing the emerald?
Conquer yourself not the world. - Descartes
Burrfoot
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States1176 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-24 11:20:27
January 22 2013 19:12 GMT
#82
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=394773

On January 23 2013 03:40 Blix wrote:
Burrfoot, does your table apply to dual wield? eg. i have 2 weaps, both with socket and emerald. As i understand it, the emerald applies to both weaps and the ruby only to the one it's in? If i have a slow and a fast weapon, would it make sense to put an emerald in the slow one and a ruby in the fast one.. etc etc =) Also, i assume that the critdamage in your table refers to the crit dmg you have after removing the emerald?


Added the missing chart. Your % ruby is averaged between your two weapons if they are diff speeds. I'm leaning towards emeralds for both still.
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Davlok-1847/career
ximae
Profile Joined January 2011
181 Posts
January 22 2013 19:34 GMT
#83
no wonder i bought a 1257 dps cd + socket wand so cheap.... now what to.... do flip it or keep it.


my main weapon is a chants anyways so im not too worried, but i liked the dps increase for pvp and archon runs.
saborcat_16
Profile Joined January 2013
1 Post
Last Edited: 2013-01-22 20:24:59
January 22 2013 19:49 GMT
#84
What about this: http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/305/monkwep.jpg
plizz help, In my calculations lost ~`100 dmg per wep or this nerf is only for weapon with soc ?
calder
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada44 Posts
January 22 2013 21:49 GMT
#85
Blue post from bnet....

"We do our best to ensure that we alert the community in advance of game changes (just like we did for the Legendary Item Improvements), and in this particular case, I wanted to jump in to reassure everyone that “black weapons” (i.e. weapons with the MinMaxDamage Affix) are not going to be nerfed in patch 1.0.7, and we have no plans going forward to nerf them.

Known Issues are just that, bugs that we know about. They are NOT necessarily bugs that are going to be fixed. The MinMaxDamage bug has been a bug known to us since July of last year, however, we did not want to fix a bug that would effectively nerf a large number of existing weapons. That’s why we did not fix the bug in any previous patch that we've released since the bug was found, nor are we fixing it in patch 1.0.7. Currently, the plan is that at such a time that we address the bug, the bug fix will only apply to newly created items, so as to not adversely affect existing items."

http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/7593743038?page=15#294

Brevity is... wit.
Burrfoot
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States1176 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-22 22:36:50
January 22 2013 22:06 GMT
#86
Great news, I updated the first post. Pretty much expected nothing to happen after seeing the MinMaxDam being listed all the way back in 1.04 known issues.

For those that like colorful pictures:
US Forum Link:
[image loading]
Historical Screenshot: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Davlok-1847/career
Black Gun
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Germany4482 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-22 23:19:48
January 22 2013 23:19 GMT
#87
great news. the interesting part are the last 2 lines though:

Currently, the plan is that at such a time that we address the bug, the bug fix will only apply to newly created items, so as to not adversely affect existing items


this basically means that one day they will fix the bug, which will make all weapons created from that point on much weaker. thus, it might be a wise idea to stock black dam weapons, hoping that they one day become highly-sought "legacy black damage weapons". just like everyone who bought a nats set in the early patches to sell it now would make a huge profit.

what i want to say is that you should consider to not sell your old black-dam weaps once you purchased an upgrade - getting some mil for them now might be a bad deal when you can sell them for much higher in the future.
"What am I supposed to do against this?" - "Lose!" :-]
Piousflea
Profile Joined February 2010
United States259 Posts
January 23 2013 00:22 GMT
#88
On January 23 2013 08:19 Black Gun wrote:
great news. the interesting part are the last 2 lines though:

Show nested quote +
Currently, the plan is that at such a time that we address the bug, the bug fix will only apply to newly created items, so as to not adversely affect existing items


this basically means that one day they will fix the bug, which will make all weapons created from that point on much weaker. thus, it might be a wise idea to stock black dam weapons, hoping that they one day become highly-sought "legacy black damage weapons". just like everyone who bought a nats set in the early patches to sell it now would make a huge profit.

what i want to say is that you should consider to not sell your old black-dam weaps once you purchased an upgrade - getting some mil for them now might be a bad deal when you can sell them for much higher in the future.


I don't think they will fix the bug until the expack (which would presumably introduce totally different weapons and endgame scaling), it would make too big of a difference in existing itemization.
Seek, behold, and reveal the truth
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
January 23 2013 01:52 GMT
#89
On January 21 2013 23:53 LSN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 02:20 Black Gun wrote:
On January 21 2013 02:10 Doso wrote:
On January 21 2013 01:41 Pokebunny wrote:
No way in hell this is intentional / will go through... there would be an outrage.


They did it before with the reduced Attack Speed.

back then, the game was just released. this means that the amount of funds and time investment destroyed by the ias nerf was much smaller than what it would be now.

additionally, everyone with half a brain could see that ias was overpowered back then. the bug discussed in this thread would, however, not have been noticed if not for the issues with the marquise ruby.

i dont think there is a balance problem right now, the only imbalance would be created by the marquise rubies. as i said above: why not just make them +0-300 instead of +150-150? problem solved and no need to piss off the majority of the already tiny remaining playerbase...


first: +150-150 = +0-450 or = + 100-250; not 0-300

second: yes they can't nerf all those echoing furies, rares etc. It will not happend!

third: "but they did it with ias nerf before ..."; bullshit! ias nerf was announced long before they actually did it. It affected all weapons that had ias in the same way. A weapon that had ias still had ias after and was better for its purpose (high as) than other weapons without ias, the ias was not removed but about halfed. If they now change this black dmg a lot of weapons with min/max dmg and high average dps will become much worse than they were before. They would become actually useless in many cases. Many top tier items what people paid fortunes for would become nearly worthless.

fourth: solution: blizzard will fix this for future drops and let the existing weapons stay as they are just like legacy legendaries (e.g. legacy nat set with its overpowered hatred reg bonus).

fifth: get one of these black damage weapons now as long as they are available

sixth: the people who spread the word about all these black dmg items will be nerfed are gonna buy yours if you sell it now!

seventh: just as it happened with the gems and falling prices. (bla bla gems will become worth 100k like on asia, see where they are now).


anything else will cause alot of damage to the game


who did exactly explain you what is gonna happen?

I wonder how some people could have expected anything else than this!
0nLin3
Profile Joined January 2013
3 Posts
January 23 2013 02:17 GMT
#90
A really bad decision made by blizzard.
Burrfoot
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States1176 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 02:58:15
January 23 2013 02:55 GMT
#91
Follow up response: Link US Forums

[image loading]

Essentially stating, they know about (probably), don't care enough to fix it (whatever it is), and will get to it someday (when you least expect it!). Making me feel this. :-D
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Davlok-1847/career
Nekovivie
Profile Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2599 Posts
January 23 2013 10:50 GMT
#92
On January 23 2013 11:17 0nLin3 wrote:
A really bad decision made by blizzard.


I don't see why, nerfing the majority of the weapons in the game would really upset the playerbase.

Imagine you're just a casual player, you don't read forums or patch notes, you just play.

You see your weapon has gone from 1300 DPS to 1100 overnight. That player would be extremely disappointed/annoyed.

Accepting it would upset the playerbase, and leaving it, is actually the best decision.
If you are not supporting K-Pop you are hurting E-Sports.
Douillos
Profile Joined May 2010
France3195 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 10:57:37
January 23 2013 10:57 GMT
#93
On January 20 2013 15:19 Burrfoot wrote:
This Thread is no longer valid! Blue has clarified their position:

[...]

Thanks for reading, and at this point, I only expect the bug to be fixed at the next MAJOR gear reset - probably the next expansion. When maybe they will buff Elemental Damage to be cool or something.

Original Thread for reference:
+ Show Spoiler +
Thought this topic was worth making for those that don't read the patch notes too carefully. The change isn't active on PTR yet as far as I can tell, but it is something that will likely get addressed, specifically due to the new red gems. I always make a point to cash out before every patch , and this is no different. IAS Nerf, New Legendaries, Monk Snapshot etc, I always believe it was my duty to cash out before something bad happens ( Exhibit A: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
)

The bug fix in the PTR 1.07 notes:
[image loading]
(edit: clarification, it is not in the patch notes, but in the 1.07 Known Issues list, which is why it isn't verifiable nerfage on PTR atm : US Forums Link )

The main hypothetical reason was to allow the new boosted Red Gems to work properly if they are +150 min and +150 max damage, as it would have varying affects on different weapons unless this "bug" is fixed. (Some weapons would benefit much more than others)

What popular weapons are likely affected by this bug? "Black Weapons" or those with +Min and +Max. But only if their damage range is fairly close - Windforce is a "black" weapon, but is/will not be affected because it's min damage is much lower than its max damage. The way damage calulations have worked with the MinMaxDam affix, was that since the min damage and bonus was added first, if the Base Min + Min affix > Base Max, then the Base Max got set equal to Base Min + Min affix + 1 , and then the Max affix added on top of the new Base Max.

What does that mean exactly? Would probably be best to just show some examples of some popular weapons:

Skorn: May get nerfed from 1428.2 to 1309.8
[image loading]

Echoing Fury: May get nerfed from 1300.2 to 1137.8
[image loading]

Rare Spear: May get nerfed from 1245.6 to 1069.2
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Rare Wand: May get nerfed from 1304.1 to 1090.95
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Windforce: Not getting 'nerfed' because the base min damage + min affix is still < base max. Interestingly enough if it did calculate, it would be less damage than on live. (1333 vs 1407)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


As for your beloved Manticores, WKL, Shenlongs (ok maybe just me), they are not affected because they are ELEMENTAL DAMAGE, and are added after the "black" / base damage is affected.

Manticore: (elemental damage with +31 max)
[image loading]

tl;dr Pay attention to what happens with how Blue responds or addresses this "bug fix" listed above. Your weapons may be worth much much less if it goes thru as suspected.

I took the Echoing Fury example above: and with the +150minmax gem on 1.06 now it would bump from 1300 dps to 1757dps. If the bug is fixed, the 1300 would drop to 1137, but with a +150minmax gem would get boosted to 1442, which is what I suspect Blizz's goals are.
[image loading]
(side note: if the Windforce listed above had a socket, it would then be bugged with the 150 gem and get boosted from 1407 to 1851 bugged, but only 1752 with it fixed)

edit: #2 Adding some additional Info from a post further along the thread: Link

Here is a Link to the "MinMaxDam" affix possibilities Blizzard mentioned: http://www.d3lexicon.com/affix

[image loading]

As the discussion drifted to buffing instead of nerfing, elemental damage weapons being allowed to benefit from +% Damage on weapon would result in this crappy 200k 992.5 dps Shenlong (ignore the socket) to get buffed to 1133 dps (elem damage moved from after to before the 1.5 multiplier )

[image loading]

One important twist in this conversation from the 1.03 Patch:
[image loading]

This could mean that all that will get fixed is the below amulet will change from "+28-57 damage" to +28 Minimum +29 Maximum. There are other discoveries people have made that I should probably mention where a large +min damage bonus from jewelry 'over-whelms' a +max affix and resulting in zero damage bonus. (but only when testing really low level weapons where the affixes are greater than the base damage - but further testing required for confirmation, each value has several hidden #s associated with it)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


TL;DR edit #2! This is why the topic was titled: POSSIBLE, no one will know for sure if this is what will happen or if this is what they meant by their vague known bug fix wording. Here is a TL;DR post from further in the thread:

On January 22 2013 00:18 Burrfoot wrote:
Decided to summarize the MinMaxDam bug and theorized pending bug fix in this post. This doesn't take into account the Jewelery discrepancy or the disparity between Elemental Weapon damage not benefiting from % Damage like "black weapons" do. This post mostly wants to highlight the reasoning behind the why some believe Blizz will end up fixing the weapon damage someday, if not in 1.07. The bug fix is listed as a "Known Issue" currently in 1.07 and we should all know a by now that a whole lot of known issues make it onto the Live servers and stay that way for months.

This "Known Issue" has been known for ages (since launch), for example, here is the Known Issues List for Patch 1.05
[image loading]

Another example of a known issue since LAUNCH making it all the way until 1.07 to "fix" was the widely known Monk-snapshot. It was discovered on launch, listed as a known issue around 1.03 and finally got fixed on the 1.07 PTR. + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
So just the mere fact the the MinMaxDam bug is listed under the Known Issues in 1.07 and was in the game since launch and not listed in the actual PTR patch notes makes it anyone's guess on to when it will actually get fixed (my money is on Patch 1.12). The main wrinkle is how this issue will interact with the new buffed Rubies, and why I brought it up in this post. Blizzard stated that they wanted Rubies to be an OPTION for certain weapon types, but not the only option. There is some middle ground to play and to me personally, would make sense to require this bug be fixed, as in Blizzard's eyes it would hopefully promote weapon variety and gem variety.

[image loading]

Echoing Fury:
A fast popular weapon. With a +150 gem on 1.06 Live today that would result in a 35% dps improvement from 1300 to 1757. A fix would make the +150 gem be 27% improvement.

Skorn
A slow 2-h weapon. With a +150 gem on 1.06 Live today that would result in a 23% dps improvement from 1428 to 1761. A fix would make the +150 gem be 17% improvement.

Manticore
A slowish 2-h Crossbow, with a significant amount of damage from Elemental. With a +150 gem on 1.06 Live today that would result in a 24% dps improvement from 1372 to 1705. A fix would make the +150 gem be 20% improvement.

Calamity
A VERY FAST 1-h Crossbow. With a +150 gem on 1.06 Live today that would result in a 51% dps improvement from 1111 to 1682. A fix would make the +150 gem be 35% improvement. On live today Calamity Benefits from the bug, but with a +150 gem, will benefit in a pretty massive bonus that would surely make it better than the equivalent Crit Damage Gem.

Shenlong
A FAST 1-h fist, with a significant amount of damage from Elemental. With a +150 gem on 1.06 Live today that would result in a 37% dps improvement from 992 to 1356. A fix would make the +150 gem be 35% improvement. On live today Shenlong DOES NOT BENEFIT from the bug, but WITH a +150 gem, will benefit from the bug, but much less so due to the elemental damage (net 2% vs no bug).


So how much money did you make off this story? I saw quite a few black weapons at crazy low prices ))))))))))
Look a giraffe! Look a fist!!
Douillos
Profile Joined May 2010
France3195 Posts
January 23 2013 10:58 GMT
#94
On January 23 2013 11:55 Burrfoot wrote:
Follow up response: Link US Forums

[image loading]

Essentially stating, they know about (probably), don't care enough to fix it (whatever it is), and will get to it someday (when you least expect it!). Making me feel this. :-D



I dont appreciate being rick*rolled in the morning :D
Look a giraffe! Look a fist!!
Burrfoot
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States1176 Posts
January 23 2013 11:25 GMT
#95
On January 23 2013 19:58 Douillos wrote:
I dont appreciate being rick*rolled in the morning :D


I don't know what you are talking about!

On January 23 2013 19:57 Douillos wrote:
So how much money did you make off this story? I saw quite a few black weapons at crazy low prices ))))))))))


Over 9000!!

http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Davlok-1847/career
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 13:18:49
January 23 2013 13:07 GMT
#96
All people who blame blizzard for making this decision in here are significantly wrong. It is quite simple. One the one hand - never run a touching system (or smth like this)! On the other hand nobody has been penalized from this system yet. The guys who got those weapons paid extraordinary high prices and the other weapons are in fact weaker but proportionally cheaper than them. There is no single good reason to interfere into the market now. If they fix the bug in one or the other way for existing items in the future it will only result in: weapons that where purchased for 10-50m will be set to the quality and value of weapons that were purchased for 100m-2b or even more. This results in having a whole bunch of weapons of same quality without any major differences in quality and price. The top tier weapons would drop in value and rarity. Besides creating alot of anger in the community it even would be a bad decision in the view of game design. For this marquis ruby issue there are alot of work arounds that do not necessarily require a fix of black dmg weapons I am pretty sure.

So for what reason should blizzard do anything else than what they decided to do?

1. All guys with poor weapons want their pieces to be lifted to a higher quality level for free (yes we all like freebies, I like free beer) [the freebie guy, quite simple, didnt think about topic at all, just raises his voice cause there can be smth for free, unpolitical, does not go to elections oftenly because 1 vote makes no difference]

2. This whole story seems generally so wrong (which it is not in fact). Why are some weapons stronger than others? It can't be happening!! All must be same no matter what! Only bad people do wrong things. Wrong things must be fixed asap or you are bad people blizzard! I bet that over 70% (prolly 90%) of people who write here can and do not understand all aspects and possible outcomes of a decision in this scenario and furthermore the mechanics and effects of the bug onto the weapon dmg calculation and the impact on d3 economy of this issue at all. [the fairness guy, votes for left wing parties in politics, anti-capitalist, sometimes denies eating meat, tries to be pc in daily life]


no offense - just as simple as it is

;-)

p.s: the idea of adding any special abilities to elemantal dmg weapons is a good one
ximae
Profile Joined January 2011
181 Posts
January 23 2013 17:28 GMT
#97
when i read that blue post this morning i happily jumped into the ah and bought 3 very underpriced 1100dpsrs with cd + socket

hopefully ill be able to get a nice bite off them in the following days :D
willoc
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada1530 Posts
January 24 2013 01:13 GMT
#98
I love how they've known about the bug since July but haven't made any decisions or really any discussions since. They should just make it a feature if they are on the fence since keeping it the way it is hides information from the casual player. Putting in a nerf would make people unhappy and rightly so. Maybe they are just waiting on how to implement the feature in a special way rather than just stating how it works?
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
Diminisherqc
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada220 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-26 15:01:03
January 26 2013 15:00 GMT
#99
On January 21 2013 12:18 Burrfoot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 09:35 Diminisherqc wrote:
Hum out of topic ... but .. are you the same burrfoot that played wow a gnome warrior on earthen ring ?


You know, I've been asked that more than once while I was playing WoW, and my answer is always: YES! Last time I played was during the 10-day free MoP trial (unimpressed). My epic fail warrior:

[image loading]



ahaha nice ! ... i pvped with you for a while on er think you switched server over guild drama.. lol i was diminisher i dwarf warrior good old times.... played like 1 month of cata and got bored...anyway world a small vilalge fun to catch you somewhere else hehe
Burrfoot
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States1176 Posts
October 04 2013 03:00 GMT
#100
Confirmed the "black damage" bug will be fixed in all weapons that drop after Patch 2.0: Blue Post

[image loading]

Better late than never!
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Davlok-1847/career
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 56m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft375
RuFF_SC2 201
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 15
Rock 8
Icarus 8
League of Legends
JimRising 739
Reynor58
Counter-Strike
xp32
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor121
Other Games
summit1g9098
NeuroSwarm129
ViBE50
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV226
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota261
League of Legends
• Rush1222
Other Games
• Shiphtur297
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4h 56m
WardiTV Invitational
6h 56m
IPSL
11h 56m
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
14h 56m
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
SOOP
1d 4h
soO vs FanTaSy
WardiTV Weekly
1d 6h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
GSL
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
BSL
6 days
eOnzErG vs StRyKeR
Cross vs JDConan
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
IEM Kraków 2027
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.