EPTap is the most tryhard mode that's for sure, you don't have to queue for it. i've had 20 games in ranked so far and not once were the picks delayed until minions spawned. usually people decide their heroes when the game is 30s from starting. i dont see a problem here.
Ranked matchmaking coming to Dota 2 - Page 34
| Forum Index > Closed |
Please keep the QQ to a minimum if you do not like this update. We are happy to hear your reasoning for not liking a ranked system, but no "OMG VOLVO WHY" posts. | ||
|
toemn
Germany915 Posts
ap is the most tryhard mode that's for sure, you don't have to queue for it. i've had 20 games in ranked so far and not once were the picks delayed until minions spawned. usually people decide their heroes when the game is 30s from starting. i dont see a problem here. | ||
|
Valhalla44
Bosnia-Herzegovina983 Posts
 . | ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34510 Posts
On December 16 2013 04:13 BlitzerSC wrote: Anybody knows what's the highest MMR right now ? I need to compare my MMR to something ^^. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255359¤tpage=4554#91079 The last line. | ||
|
Yergidy
United States2107 Posts
On December 16 2013 04:17 Firebolt145 wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255359¤tpage=4554#91079 The last line. Damn, he's higher than dendi. | ||
|
ZeaL.
United States5955 Posts
| ||
|
AndyJay
Australia833 Posts
I was 4.3k after placement matches and I've since lost 5 games straight and I'm not at 4.2k. I do think those numbers in the blog were a bit 'forgiving', as in 4k is not as high a benchmark as it sounded in the blog. | ||
|
Aldehyde
Sweden939 Posts
On December 16 2013 06:28 AndyJay wrote: It is based off your non ranked mmr. You play one game and some people are 4.5k and some people are 2.5k, there's no way it pulls that out of one game. I was 4.3k after placement matches and I've since lost 5 games straight and I'm not at 4.2k. I do think those numbers in the blog were a bit 'forgiving', as in 4k is not as high a benchmark as it sounded in the blog. The blog mentioned the rating for non-ranked I believe. It definitely said they didn't know how the rating would look in ranked. | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
On December 16 2013 07:14 Aldehyde wrote: The blog mentioned the rating for non-ranked I believe. It definitely said they didn't know how the rating would look in ranked. I would imagine most of the higher ranked players (>3000) which equates to about the top 20% of the normal matchmaking pool would be playing ranked while most of the lower ranked players (<3000) would care far less and probably not be playing ranked. Thus the numbers would be skewed heavily, being 4000 mmr would make you top 1% of the entire dota matchmaking pool but maybe only top 15% in the ranked pool. | ||
|
Jaug
Sweden249 Posts
On December 16 2013 07:21 synapse wrote: I would imagine most of the higher ranked players (>3000) which equates to about the top 20% of the normal matchmaking pool would be playing ranked while most of the lower ranked players (<3000) would care far less and probably not be playing ranked. Thus the numbers would be skewed heavily, being 4000 mmr would make you top 1% of the entire dota matchmaking pool but maybe only top 15% in the ranked pool. This would make sense. I think I could be a good benchmark here. I have always been pending between High and Very high skill level (old system) and my rating is 3690 after 15 games. Might not be that high for ranked mm, but for entire pool its probably among the top. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
| ||
|
AndyJay
Australia833 Posts
| ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
the party rank doesn't have to be with the same party everytime right | ||
|
Vaelone
Finland4400 Posts
| ||
|
Coil1
128 Posts
On December 16 2013 07:21 synapse wrote: I would imagine most of the higher ranked players (>3000) which equates to about the top 20% of the normal matchmaking pool would be playing ranked while most of the lower ranked players (<3000) would care far less and probably not be playing ranked. Thus the numbers would be skewed heavily, being 4000 mmr would make you top 1% of the entire dota matchmaking pool but maybe only top 15% in the ranked pool. Is 4k really the top 1%? | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
Its the thing that gets lost. It happened all the time in the LoL ladder as well. People forget that the sheer number of players means that being "good" (i.e. knowing what you are doing, how to play, communicate, etc) will put you in the top % of all players. It may not feel that way in games, but thats how matchmaking works: its designed to make even games. Always remember: there are a TON of Dota players in the world. Chances are if you come to TL, you are already in the top % of players simply because you have the desire to learn more. Which counts for a LOT. | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
4k is just a number. If Valve wants 1% ? 4k then they alter some stuff and there u go, 1% in 4k zone. I think they maybe aim for it, but now we are seeing alot of players ending up in that zone. | ||
|
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
developer 1 dota_game_account_debug You also get some other interesting facts like the number of successful reports. | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Darkren
Canada1841 Posts
Get on my level to be honest im quite surprised seing as pros are at around 5000, im not far away Road to ti4, just wait till i show u how dagon jugg is truly powerfull | ||
| ||
