• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:00
CEST 00:00
KST 07:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou19Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four3BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET7Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)81
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle RSL Season 3 Qualifier Links and Dates $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? SnOw's Awful Building Placements vs barracks BW General Discussion BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament
Strategy
[I] TvP Marine Usage Roaring Currents ASL final Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Chess Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Benefits Of Limited Comm…
TrAiDoS
Sabrina was soooo lame on S…
Peanutsc
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1623 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9808

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9806 9807 9808 9809 9810 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4850 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 00:51:38
January 31 2018 00:49 GMT
#196141
On January 31 2018 09:31 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
Sanctions and the oligarch list, Nunes memo, McCabe and in a few hours while I enter a deathlike sleep, State of the union. Ryan calling for a cleansing of the FBI.

Welp.
This week is going in the books.


McCabe was removed due to the IG report by Wray and Ryan's comments were, as is usual for Republicans, taken way out of context.

+ Show Spoiler +


and

+ Show Spoiler +
House Speaker Paul Ryan called Tuesday to “cleanse” the FBI as he openly backed the release of a controversial memo that purportedly details alleged surveillance abuses by the U.S. government.

“Let it all out, get it all out there. Cleanse the organization,” Ryan, R-Wis., said.

He added: “I think we should disclose all this stuff. It’s the best disinfectant. Accountability, transparency — for the sake of the reputation of our institutions.”


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/30/paul-ryan-calls-to-cleanse-fbi-backs-surveillance-memo-release.html
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 00:55:38
January 31 2018 00:53 GMT
#196142
That Paul Ryan quote is some fucking shit. House Republican are total sycophants. They are all about protecting Trump and being the rubber stamp for the Orange king.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 00:54:43
January 31 2018 00:54 GMT
#196143
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

you posted a bad article and were called out on it, and now you seem angry cuz you were called out on it.

aside from that i'm not sure what your point is here.


that ryan quote is indeed laughable given how he obviously doesn't mean it in the slightest. just the standard lies of a politician.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 01:11:53
January 31 2018 01:04 GMT
#196144
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

Trump railed against 5 black men being exonerated for murder charges through DNA evidence. The. Man. Is. A. Huge. Racist. His immigration policies will be viewed through the African countries being shit holes lens.

And post better articles. Make better arguments than liberals are mean. Don’t back racial charged immigration policies that are championed by people known for turning a blind eye to white nationalist.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4850 Posts
January 31 2018 01:11 GMT
#196145
On January 31 2018 10:04 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

Trump railed against 5 black men being exonerated for murder charges through DNA evidence. The. Man. Is. A. Huge. Racist. His immigration policies will be viewed through the African countries being shit holes lens.

And post better articles. Make better arguments than liberals are mean.


So because Trump is a racist his offer is racist. Good work.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 01:16:20
January 31 2018 01:15 GMT
#196146
On January 31 2018 10:11 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 10:04 Plansix wrote:
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

Trump railed against 5 black men being exonerated for murder charges through DNA evidence. The. Man. Is. A. Huge. Racist. His immigration policies will be viewed through the African countries being shit holes lens.

And post better articles. Make better arguments than liberals are mean.


So because Trump is a racist his offer is racist. Good work.

You don’t see democrats turning to Bill Clinton for sexual harassment policies? If you feel your ideas have merit, choose a better person to advocate for it. If you worry about it being called racist, don’t have it pushed by a known racist which decades of racist acts. It kinda fucks up your message.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
pmh
Profile Joined March 2016
1363 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 01:29:48
January 31 2018 01:20 GMT
#196147
On January 31 2018 04:00 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 03:27 Danglars wrote:
On January 31 2018 03:19 m4ini wrote:
I still haven't really seen any of the usual suspects like Danglars etc explain the non-sanctions away so far. Still thinking of a way to come up with a reason, or does that one look so bad that you simply prefer to not argue for it?

Constitution, wasn't that a thing held in high regards, or is that only if it suits your argument?

it's getting to the point where ever reporter is going to have to record every meeting so they can show tapes on what was said


Actually, that's what they do anyways. You can't write the article while interviewing. The question simply is, does the journalist still have them.

I’m not paid to answer to ... suspicions and whispers directed at nobody and lacking concrete framing. Much like all the usual suspects that want our health insurance system to resemble enlightened Europe say little when our abortion regulations are brought closer to Europe’s. I wasn’t really expecting any, nor is it necessary to give your two cents on every subject.


It does do a good job at hurting a lot of the "but hilary" arguments, though. A lot of the core thoughts behind people who voted for trump focused around "he can't fuck up things too badly, and I really dislike abortion". For the senate to vote 98-2 in favor of sanctions against our major military enemy, and then the Trump administration to ignore it, certainly says something about how Trump can only do so much damage.

I'll phrase it this way: How important do you think those sanctions were? Why do you think it passed 98-2?


Not that important in the grand sceme of things.
The sanctions are just a token mostly,it is the option to go after almost everyone they want in rusia.
But they will never do that,money always comes first. Exxon will keep doing business with rusia and so will many other American companys. If everything rusia does is so horrible then why American companys keep doing business with rusia,could someone explain me this?

98-2 doesn't say anything about the importance of a subject by the way,it just shows that everyone did agree on a subject.

And how is rusia the major military enemy of the usa?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 31 2018 01:23 GMT
#196148
Except that the President defied the will of congress by not implementing the sanctions in the manner they requested. And since when do we give a shit about which billion dollar company is willing to do buisness with whom? That doesn't make any nation bad or good. This isn't even about bad or good, this is about Russia messing with our democratic process.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
January 31 2018 01:30 GMT
#196149
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

For all that was written in that article, the only substance it actually offered for justifying cuts to present levels of legal immigration was this part.
because, apparently, morality requires that immigration levels remain frozen at their current levels, even if it means that the cultural, linguistic, ethnic, and racial character of the country changes significantly as a result.

Not sure how much numbers differ between sources, but the Migration Policy Institute found that the White House immigration plan for U.S. citizens to no longer be able to sponsor parents, adult children and siblings for green cards would reduce legal immigration by about 36%, or 288,000 per year.

Is a 36% reduction enough? Just a start? What do you feel justifies the U.S. reducing legal immigration to such a degree?
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 31 2018 01:32 GMT
#196150
On January 31 2018 10:15 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 10:11 Introvert wrote:
On January 31 2018 10:04 Plansix wrote:
On January 31 2018 09:46 Introvert wrote:
Who am I allowed to quote as saying that either Trump's plan or wanting to decrease legal immigration generally is racist? I mean we had Dick Durbin saying that the phrase "Chain migration" was offensive and Schumer saying that the Trump plan was "anti-immigrant" which is about as close to racist as you can get. We can find people in this thread saying something like wanting to reduce legal immigration is because you don't like brown people. The ACLU called Trump's plan white supremacist.

Also, the article doesn't mention places like the CoC because it's not about them. Hello? Basic reading skills.

But if not, I'm glad to hear that wanting reduced legal immigration is a legitimate, morally acceptable position and that's Trump's plan was incredible generous.

Trump railed against 5 black men being exonerated for murder charges through DNA evidence. The. Man. Is. A. Huge. Racist. His immigration policies will be viewed through the African countries being shit holes lens.

And post better articles. Make better arguments than liberals are mean.


So because Trump is a racist his offer is racist. Good work.

You don’t see democrats turning to Bill Clinton for sexual harassment policies? If you feel your ideas have merit, choose a better person to advocate for it. If you worry about it being called racist, don’t have it pushed by a known racist which decades of racist acts. It kinda fucks up your message.


This is exactly right, you can’t vote for the guy who wants a Muslim database and then be surprised when every policy proposal that deals with classes of people is treated as highly suspect. His motive is clear.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 31 2018 01:33 GMT
#196151
And the article talks about how the racial make up of the country will change and implies that isn't a good thing. If it wants to avoid racially charged theme, why bring that point up?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
pmh
Profile Joined March 2016
1363 Posts
January 31 2018 01:52 GMT
#196152
On January 31 2018 10:23 Plansix wrote:
Except that the President defied the will of congress by not implementing the sanctions in the manner they requested. And since when do we give a shit about which billion dollar company is willing to do buisness with whom? That doesn't make any nation bad or good. This isn't even about bad or good, this is about Russia messing with our democratic process.



Well it is a bit hypocrit to impose sanctions on a few random individuals while at the same time let the billion dollar deals between companys go through. Like what exactly is the point of those sanctions?
They wont sanction people if it would threaten exxon,s business in rusia,or the business of other big companys. So in the end the sanctions are not that important. They make life of a few individuals a bit more difficult but they wont change anything about the big money flows. If 1 individual cant do business anymore,then someone else will take his place.

The whole position about caring for sanctions but not caring about American companys doing business with rusia (making money for both sides) comes across as inconsistent and opportunistic.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-31 02:11:20
January 31 2018 02:08 GMT
#196153
On January 31 2018 10:52 pmh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 10:23 Plansix wrote:
Except that the President defied the will of congress by not implementing the sanctions in the manner they requested. And since when do we give a shit about which billion dollar company is willing to do buisness with whom? That doesn't make any nation bad or good. This isn't even about bad or good, this is about Russia messing with our democratic process.



Well it is a bit hypocrit to impose sanctions on a few random individuals while at the same time let the billion dollar deals between companys go through. Like what exactly is the point of those sanctions?
They wont sanction people if it would threaten exxon,s business in rusia,or the business of other big companys. So in the end the sanctions are not that important. They make life of a few individuals a bit more difficult but they wont change anything about the big money flows. If 1 individual cant do business anymore,then someone else will take his place.

The whole position about caring for sanctions but not caring about American companys doing business with rusia (making money for both sides) comes across as inconsistent and opportunistic.

Russia is a oligarchy. It is ruled by a rich elite chosen to keep their wealth by Putin. The sanctions lock down their money, and by extension, their power. They do not exist in an open, capitalist market. No one will take their place.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23433 Posts
January 31 2018 02:28 GMT
#196154
On January 31 2018 11:08 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 31 2018 10:52 pmh wrote:
On January 31 2018 10:23 Plansix wrote:
Except that the President defied the will of congress by not implementing the sanctions in the manner they requested. And since when do we give a shit about which billion dollar company is willing to do buisness with whom? That doesn't make any nation bad or good. This isn't even about bad or good, this is about Russia messing with our democratic process.



Well it is a bit hypocrit to impose sanctions on a few random individuals while at the same time let the billion dollar deals between companys go through. Like what exactly is the point of those sanctions?
They wont sanction people if it would threaten exxon,s business in rusia,or the business of other big companys. So in the end the sanctions are not that important. They make life of a few individuals a bit more difficult but they wont change anything about the big money flows. If 1 individual cant do business anymore,then someone else will take his place.

The whole position about caring for sanctions but not caring about American companys doing business with rusia (making money for both sides) comes across as inconsistent and opportunistic.

Russia is a oligarchy. It is ruled by a rich elite chosen to keep their wealth by Putin. The sanctions lock down their money, and by extension, their power. They do not exist in an open, capitalist market. No one will take their place.


Perhaps we could force them into using so many proxies it becomes defacto socialism?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24720 Posts
January 31 2018 02:31 GMT
#196155
Maybe I'm speaking too soon but the State of the Union seems surprisingly tame. I don't see much of an effort to bring the people together but nothing has drawn gasps at least.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23433 Posts
January 31 2018 02:32 GMT
#196156
On January 31 2018 11:31 micronesia wrote:
Maybe I'm speaking too soon but the State of the Union seems surprisingly tame. I don't see much of an effort to bring the people together but nothing has drawn gasps at least.


Right as I watch him go on about that bullshit with the anthem lol
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 31 2018 02:38 GMT
#196157
I would not be surprised if before 2020 the GOP calls for elections being delayed at this rate.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35160 Posts
January 31 2018 02:39 GMT
#196158
I wonder how many of his cabinet he's pissed off.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 31 2018 02:42 GMT
#196159
Amazing.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 31 2018 02:50 GMT
#196160
All of a sudden the GOP supports Paid Family Leave. Either this a jump the shark moment or the Democrats are that fucking stupid to let Trump of all people get the jump on such an issue.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 9806 9807 9808 9809 9810 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 121
Codebar 61
ROOTCatZ 58
Livibee 56
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 387
UpATreeSC 102
Backho 100
Dewaltoss 66
Free 50
Artosis 9
NaDa 6
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K586
Super Smash Bros
PPMD105
Liquid`Ken49
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu460
Other Games
Grubby4918
FrodaN1881
fl0m701
shahzam591
Skadoodle268
C9.Mang0196
Maynarde88
Trikslyr35
ViBE32
Mew2King28
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL213
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 73
• davetesta25
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2226
League of Legends
• Doublelift2466
Other Games
• imaqtpie1508
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
13h
Online Event
18h
RSL Revival
1d 4h
RSL Revival
1d 12h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 13h
OSC
1d 17h
SKillous vs goblin
Spirit vs GgMaChine
ByuN vs MaxPax
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.