• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:41
CEST 02:41
KST 09:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
BW caster Sayle BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
[I] TvP Strategies and Build Roaring Currents ASL final [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2615 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9078

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9076 9077 9078 9079 9080 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
October 29 2017 01:05 GMT
#181541
On October 29 2017 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 09:13 Adreme wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:25 Slaughter wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
The U1 is just run of the mill "greasing the wheels" imo. Putin knows Clinton hates his guts, but wanted the investment and knew she had significant influence over the deal.

Rather than deal with her and her allies being obstinate for the sake of spiting Putin it was easier to add her/Bill to the "people we're giving money that totally aren't bribes".

I guess Republicans need some "uranium" angle for it to be a big deal/make sense, but for me it just looks like standard influence peddling, the "favor" is Hillary not vindictively undermining the deal which she knows someone she hates wants.

If 2016 taught us anything about Hillary, refusing to give people she's mad at what they want is kinda her kink.


So are you saying because Hillary hates Putin she made him essentially pay extra for a deal that probably would have been made anyway?


I'll go even further, 1/15 of possible influence that we have no evidence was used somehow counts as "significant" in some people's eyes.


TIL Hillary had little to no influence over the Democratic political apparatus.

TIL "influence" is the same as absolute control.

There's still like a couple dozen steps between "Hillary hates Putin" and "Hillary has political influence" and "Hillary was the driving force behind the Uranium One deal", and I think quite a few people in this thread are waiting for those steps to be filled in by the people who keep treating this topic seriously.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23428 Posts
October 29 2017 01:22 GMT
#181542
On October 29 2017 10:05 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote:
On October 29 2017 09:13 Adreme wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:25 Slaughter wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
The U1 is just run of the mill "greasing the wheels" imo. Putin knows Clinton hates his guts, but wanted the investment and knew she had significant influence over the deal.

Rather than deal with her and her allies being obstinate for the sake of spiting Putin it was easier to add her/Bill to the "people we're giving money that totally aren't bribes".

I guess Republicans need some "uranium" angle for it to be a big deal/make sense, but for me it just looks like standard influence peddling, the "favor" is Hillary not vindictively undermining the deal which she knows someone she hates wants.

If 2016 taught us anything about Hillary, refusing to give people she's mad at what they want is kinda her kink.


So are you saying because Hillary hates Putin she made him essentially pay extra for a deal that probably would have been made anyway?


I'll go even further, 1/15 of possible influence that we have no evidence was used somehow counts as "significant" in some people's eyes.


TIL Hillary had little to no influence over the Democratic political apparatus.

TIL "influence" is the same as absolute control.

There's still like a couple dozen steps between "Hillary hates Putin" and "Hillary has political influence" and "Hillary was the driving force behind the Uranium One deal", and I think quite a few people in this thread are waiting for those steps to be filled in by the people who keep treating this topic seriously.


Well I'm not one of the "Hillary was a driving force behind the deal" folks so not much I can do for them I suppose.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14036 Posts
October 29 2017 01:32 GMT
#181543
The point is that even if she was the driving force behind the deal somehow theres still no way for it to , in reality world, be bad in any way for her to have done it.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
October 29 2017 01:42 GMT
#181544
On October 29 2017 10:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 10:05 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On October 29 2017 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote:
On October 29 2017 09:13 Adreme wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:25 Slaughter wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
The U1 is just run of the mill "greasing the wheels" imo. Putin knows Clinton hates his guts, but wanted the investment and knew she had significant influence over the deal.

Rather than deal with her and her allies being obstinate for the sake of spiting Putin it was easier to add her/Bill to the "people we're giving money that totally aren't bribes".

I guess Republicans need some "uranium" angle for it to be a big deal/make sense, but for me it just looks like standard influence peddling, the "favor" is Hillary not vindictively undermining the deal which she knows someone she hates wants.

If 2016 taught us anything about Hillary, refusing to give people she's mad at what they want is kinda her kink.


So are you saying because Hillary hates Putin she made him essentially pay extra for a deal that probably would have been made anyway?


I'll go even further, 1/15 of possible influence that we have no evidence was used somehow counts as "significant" in some people's eyes.


TIL Hillary had little to no influence over the Democratic political apparatus.

TIL "influence" is the same as absolute control.

There's still like a couple dozen steps between "Hillary hates Putin" and "Hillary has political influence" and "Hillary was the driving force behind the Uranium One deal", and I think quite a few people in this thread are waiting for those steps to be filled in by the people who keep treating this topic seriously.


Well I'm not one of the "Hillary was a driving force behind the deal" folks so not much I can do for them I suppose.

Well, apparently no one in this thread is. So I don't know why this discussion keeps going.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23428 Posts
October 29 2017 01:45 GMT
#181545
On October 29 2017 10:32 Sermokala wrote:
The point is that even if she was the driving force behind the deal somehow theres still no way for it to , in reality world, be bad in any way for her to have done it.


Which I'm not arguing against in the first place (regarding signing off). I'm just saying it looks similar (though less direct/egregious) than other instances of international wheel greasing like the UBS thing for example.

Hillary Clinton intervened to help it out with the IRS. And after that, the Swiss bank paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million for speaking gigs. The Wall Street Journal reported all that and more Thursday in an article that highlights huge conflicts of interest that the Clintons have created in the recent past.

The piece begins by detailing how Clinton helped the global bank.

“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. “Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according to the foundation and the bank,” they report. “The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.”


Source

But that's just me.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43167 Posts
October 29 2017 02:03 GMT
#181546
On October 29 2017 10:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 10:32 Sermokala wrote:
The point is that even if she was the driving force behind the deal somehow theres still no way for it to , in reality world, be bad in any way for her to have done it.


Which I'm not arguing against in the first place (regarding signing off). I'm just saying it looks similar (though less direct/egregious) than other instances of international wheel greasing like the UBS thing for example.

Show nested quote +
Hillary Clinton intervened to help it out with the IRS. And after that, the Swiss bank paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million for speaking gigs. The Wall Street Journal reported all that and more Thursday in an article that highlights huge conflicts of interest that the Clintons have created in the recent past.

The piece begins by detailing how Clinton helped the global bank.

“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. “Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according to the foundation and the bank,” they report. “The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.”


Source

But that's just me.

Speaking fees from people you had to deal with in your professional capacity as an employee is basically as conflict of interesty as you can get. If you did that shit in the private sector you'd get fired but somehow when your employer is the population of the United States you don't.

But I really don't get why the Clinton Foundation gets dragged into this, especially when CF money can't be used by the Clintons for their own purposes and given the bank in this case didn't even give the CF any money. That's just "throw in buzzwords the reader may have heard of" journalism.

Also Swiss banks don't give the US (or any other government) shit, the fact the IRS only got a fraction doesn't mean that Hillary deliberately went easy on them. Not cooperating with foreign governments is basically the Swiss bank business model. It's what they're for.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
October 29 2017 02:18 GMT
#181547
On October 29 2017 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 09:13 Adreme wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:25 Slaughter wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
The U1 is just run of the mill "greasing the wheels" imo. Putin knows Clinton hates his guts, but wanted the investment and knew she had significant influence over the deal.

Rather than deal with her and her allies being obstinate for the sake of spiting Putin it was easier to add her/Bill to the "people we're giving money that totally aren't bribes".

I guess Republicans need some "uranium" angle for it to be a big deal/make sense, but for me it just looks like standard influence peddling, the "favor" is Hillary not vindictively undermining the deal which she knows someone she hates wants.

If 2016 taught us anything about Hillary, refusing to give people she's mad at what they want is kinda her kink.


So are you saying because Hillary hates Putin she made him essentially pay extra for a deal that probably would have been made anyway?


I'll go even further, 1/15 of possible influence that we have no evidence was used somehow counts as "significant" in some people's eyes.


TIL Hillary had little to no influence over the Democratic political apparatus.


Her department has a votejust like the other departments did. Nobody has shown anything resembling evidence she got involved in this decision outside of the person who isn't her reviewing it and okaying it since not every job is handled by the CEO.

Now we not only are assuming that to be true (it's a small leap but not a huge to assume it) we are also going to assume, with no evidence that she went to 14 other departments to lobby a yes vote with no one saying a word or any proof if this leaking several years later just to get the rights to a thing that i assume makes them money in the future, but they both don't need to make nukes and can't use for it anyway.


Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
October 29 2017 03:08 GMT
#181548

How time flies.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14036 Posts
October 29 2017 04:34 GMT
#181549
Its important to note that nate silver credits the medias reaction to the comey letter as the decisive moment in the election and not the letter itself.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
October 29 2017 04:46 GMT
#181550
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
October 29 2017 04:51 GMT
#181551
You can imagine how badly Trump wants to fire Mueller.

Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21915 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-29 10:02:02
October 29 2017 10:00 GMT
#181552
On October 29 2017 13:51 Doodsmack wrote:
You can imagine how badly Trump wants to fire Mueller.

https://twitter.com/tonyschwartz/status/924377602466418688

Which is why Mueller's name keeps getting mentioned in regards to this latest 'but Hillary'. If by some miracle it stuck it could have been used to call his impartiality into question.

On October 29 2017 10:42 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 10:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
On October 29 2017 10:05 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On October 29 2017 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote:
On October 29 2017 09:13 Adreme wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:25 Slaughter wrote:
On October 29 2017 07:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
The U1 is just run of the mill "greasing the wheels" imo. Putin knows Clinton hates his guts, but wanted the investment and knew she had significant influence over the deal.

Rather than deal with her and her allies being obstinate for the sake of spiting Putin it was easier to add her/Bill to the "people we're giving money that totally aren't bribes".

I guess Republicans need some "uranium" angle for it to be a big deal/make sense, but for me it just looks like standard influence peddling, the "favor" is Hillary not vindictively undermining the deal which she knows someone she hates wants.

If 2016 taught us anything about Hillary, refusing to give people she's mad at what they want is kinda her kink.


So are you saying because Hillary hates Putin she made him essentially pay extra for a deal that probably would have been made anyway?


I'll go even further, 1/15 of possible influence that we have no evidence was used somehow counts as "significant" in some people's eyes.


TIL Hillary had little to no influence over the Democratic political apparatus.

TIL "influence" is the same as absolute control.

There's still like a couple dozen steps between "Hillary hates Putin" and "Hillary has political influence" and "Hillary was the driving force behind the Uranium One deal", and I think quite a few people in this thread are waiting for those steps to be filled in by the people who keep treating this topic seriously.


Well I'm not one of the "Hillary was a driving force behind the deal" folks so not much I can do for them I suppose.

Well, apparently no one in this thread is. So I don't know why this discussion keeps going.

xDaunt and Danglers are, they just aren't willing to come out and say it because they will get roasted for it. They hand wave it instead and run every time they get called out on a lack of evidence.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23428 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-29 11:14:46
October 29 2017 10:28 GMT
#181553
On October 29 2017 11:03 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2017 10:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On October 29 2017 10:32 Sermokala wrote:
The point is that even if she was the driving force behind the deal somehow theres still no way for it to , in reality world, be bad in any way for her to have done it.


Which I'm not arguing against in the first place (regarding signing off). I'm just saying it looks similar (though less direct/egregious) than other instances of international wheel greasing like the UBS thing for example.

Hillary Clinton intervened to help it out with the IRS. And after that, the Swiss bank paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million for speaking gigs. The Wall Street Journal reported all that and more Thursday in an article that highlights huge conflicts of interest that the Clintons have created in the recent past.

The piece begins by detailing how Clinton helped the global bank.

“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. “Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according to the foundation and the bank,” they report. “The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.”


Source

But that's just me.

Speaking fees from people you had to deal with in your professional capacity as an employee is basically as conflict of interesty as you can get. If you did that shit in the private sector you'd get fired but somehow when your employer is the population of the United States you don't.


Yes

Also I hope the Mueller fans are ready for a ball full of disappointment..
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
October 29 2017 14:43 GMT
#181554


NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
October 29 2017 16:04 GMT
#181555
It's Sunday. I guess we should've known the "but Hillary" would be at its strongest today.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
October 29 2017 16:40 GMT
#181556





Also :

ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
October 29 2017 16:43 GMT
#181557
On October 30 2017 01:04 NewSunshine wrote:
It's Sunday. I guess we should've known the "but Hillary" would be at its strongest today.


Oh come now, we haven't seen Monday yet
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15723 Posts
October 29 2017 16:44 GMT
#181558
On October 30 2017 01:40 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924635359480303616

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924637600094326784
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924641278947622913
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924649059520073730
Also :
https://twitter.com/DavidBegnaud/status/924643805743083520

Wow. Someone clearly important is getting arrest by Mueller apparently.
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
October 29 2017 16:45 GMT
#181559
The more Trump tweets the more I kind of wish societies still exiled people, not sure who would take Trump and his shitty family though.
Never Knows Best.
Wulfey_LA
Profile Joined April 2017
932 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-29 17:21:57
October 29 2017 17:18 GMT
#181560
For trump to be this crazy, almost makes me think Kushner. Big question is what to Rs do when Trump goes full Nixon and fires Mueller to protect his beloved son in law.

If Republicans are going to cover for Trump as he upends the rule of law to protect himself and family members, then I would not regard this government as legitimate.
Prev 1 9076 9077 9078 9079 9080 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
LiuLi Cup #46 - Day 2
CranKy Ducklings219
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft143
SpeCial 95
Nathanias 93
CosmosSc2 54
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 671
Soulkey 208
NaDa 49
Dota 2
monkeys_forever337
PGG 124
League of Legends
ScreaM842
Cuddl3bear2
Counter-Strike
fl0m953
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox399
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor140
Other Games
summit1g9655
shahzam638
C9.Mang0293
Skadoodle169
Maynarde155
Trikslyr69
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick734
Counter-Strike
PGL374
Other Games
BasetradeTV46
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 68
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5102
Other Games
• imaqtpie1502
• Scarra1103
• Shiphtur224
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
10h 19m
Wardi Open
13h 49m
PiGosaur Monday
23h 19m
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Online Event
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.