• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:47
CET 10:47
KST 18:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros5[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win52025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!9BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION1Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams10Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest4
StarCraft 2
General
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed
Tourneys
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment
Brood War
General
SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ladder Map Matchup Stats
Tourneys
[ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
KPDH "Golden" as Squid Game…
Peanutsc
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
The Benefits Of Limited Comm…
TrAiDoS
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1477 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8825

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8823 8824 8825 8826 8827 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
September 25 2017 16:19 GMT
#176481
On September 26 2017 01:17 Dromar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 00:53 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:11 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:10 zlefin wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:02 NewSunshine wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:58 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:52 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:44 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:28 Sadist wrote:
[quote]



Its devisive because people are idiots and arent asking why they are kneeling even though its been said over and over.


People dont stand in their homes when watching on tv. Is that disrespectful?

Our president is a divisive scumbag. If you want to talk about divisive look at the orange bag of hot air.


Our president is at least trying to unite the country into one unified nation by bringing national pride back and at least have the courage to fully stand up to NK's dictatorship.

You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?


Dude you are putting words into people's mouth and that's not cool.

It temporarily left during the election (or even prior to that as dems was carefully setting up for a Hillary win, but failed) when dems played identity politics by pitting LGBT/PoC/women against white heterosexual males.

It was basically identity politics vs economical nationalism in 2016 and we all know what decision people came to.

So I know you and others like to say "identity politics" like it's some kind of filthy word, but what would you have discriminated peoples do? All the systemic racism PoC face, the rights continuously being contested/denied for LGBT folk, and even the sexism that women put up with, you just want them to keep quiet and not rock the boat?

Identity politics is real politics. Because when you're constantly treated like shit because of how you look or how you live, your existence has been made political by the people doing it. Plain and simple.


You can clearly protest without painting one subset of the nation into horrible monsters.

And using violent manners in shutting down dissenting thoughts in various platforms is DEFINITELY NOT helping.

Instead it would be much more efficient to be to nice to dissenting voices and present them with provable facts (none of that wage gap/rape epidemic bs) first instead of going at it w/ "You are racists/sexists/(insert your favorite buzzword here) if you are not with us!".

Plain and simple.

you're not presenting us with provable facts to support your arguments.


I'm presenting you with logic and reason.

This is the problem. You are not. How is it logical to say the president is trying to unite the country? Almost none of his actions ever have had that effect. His number one way to respond to questions is blaming someone else or saying 'but what about this other person he/she is worse than me'. He holds grudges against those who don't agree with him and constantly flames them instead of trying to understand their reasoning. He is rude and calls people names. There is no way to logically conclude from this that he is trying to unite a nation. Just none.


Well, I'm not saying that I agree with RiK, but...

There is a logical basis from which to say that Trump is trying to unite the country. There's a ton of evidence to support the notion that Trump is incompetent and incapable of doing things without messing them up. Based on that and his actions, one could presume that at least some of his unnecessary comments on Twitter are an attempt to rebuild national pride and unite the people, as RiK suggests. He's just really bad at it and has no clue that what he's doing is the opposite.

Trying and succeeding are two different things. Whether or not you think this logical basis is the most reasonable one is up to you.

I think that is a charitable interpretation of Trump's actions, and one that I could get behind. It doesn't change much, though.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
September 25 2017 16:21 GMT
#176482
On September 26 2017 01:19 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:17 Dromar wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:53 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:11 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:10 zlefin wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:02 NewSunshine wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:58 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:52 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:44 RealityIsKing wrote:
[quote]

Our president is at least trying to unite the country into one unified nation by bringing national pride back and at least have the courage to fully stand up to NK's dictatorship.

You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?


Dude you are putting words into people's mouth and that's not cool.

It temporarily left during the election (or even prior to that as dems was carefully setting up for a Hillary win, but failed) when dems played identity politics by pitting LGBT/PoC/women against white heterosexual males.

It was basically identity politics vs economical nationalism in 2016 and we all know what decision people came to.

So I know you and others like to say "identity politics" like it's some kind of filthy word, but what would you have discriminated peoples do? All the systemic racism PoC face, the rights continuously being contested/denied for LGBT folk, and even the sexism that women put up with, you just want them to keep quiet and not rock the boat?

Identity politics is real politics. Because when you're constantly treated like shit because of how you look or how you live, your existence has been made political by the people doing it. Plain and simple.


You can clearly protest without painting one subset of the nation into horrible monsters.

And using violent manners in shutting down dissenting thoughts in various platforms is DEFINITELY NOT helping.

Instead it would be much more efficient to be to nice to dissenting voices and present them with provable facts (none of that wage gap/rape epidemic bs) first instead of going at it w/ "You are racists/sexists/(insert your favorite buzzword here) if you are not with us!".

Plain and simple.

you're not presenting us with provable facts to support your arguments.


I'm presenting you with logic and reason.

This is the problem. You are not. How is it logical to say the president is trying to unite the country? Almost none of his actions ever have had that effect. His number one way to respond to questions is blaming someone else or saying 'but what about this other person he/she is worse than me'. He holds grudges against those who don't agree with him and constantly flames them instead of trying to understand their reasoning. He is rude and calls people names. There is no way to logically conclude from this that he is trying to unite a nation. Just none.


Well, I'm not saying that I agree with RiK, but...

There is a logical basis from which to say that Trump is trying to unite the country. There's a ton of evidence to support the notion that Trump is incompetent and incapable of doing things without messing them up. Based on that and his actions, one could presume that at least some of his unnecessary comments on Twitter are an attempt to rebuild national pride and unite the people, as RiK suggests. He's just really bad at it and has no clue that what he's doing is the opposite.

Trying and succeeding are two different things. Whether or not you think this logical basis is the most reasonable one is up to you.

I think that is a charitable interpretation of Trump's actions, and one that I could get behind. It doesn't change much, though.


Oh I agree completely. I think it's much more likely that Trump just starts shit "for the ratings," and to make himself feel good/important/powerful. But I thought I'd bring it up nonetheless.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9629 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:25:28
September 25 2017 16:22 GMT
#176483
On September 26 2017 01:18 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:14 NewSunshine wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:03 xDaunt wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:59 Velr wrote:
@reality
If you would start your statements with a reason or even a little argument, posters probably would react diffrently to you.

There have been plenty of people as far out there, compared to most people here, as you that managed to get into actual discussions.
Most not long term but well, atleast there were actual exchanges.

About half of the people responding to him are shitposting. Singling RiK out for the shittiness in the thread is badly misplaced.

He barged into the thread with a garbage post that showed no education on actual issues, and doubled down when people called him on it. Garbage in, garbage out. You and Danglars know this very well.

Not really. I see the same type of shit in response to most of my posts, as does Danglars. Y'all are oblivious to how shitty most of your posting is on a consistent basis.

not to be a parrot here but i think he covered that under garbage in garbage out

jokes aside, well put sunshine. i think that most accurately and generously sums shit up. kudos on being more elegant.
thePunGun
Profile Blog Joined January 2016
598 Posts
September 25 2017 16:22 GMT
#176484
wow just skimming through ...what's up with all the "he said, she said" bs?
"You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him find it within himself."
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 25 2017 16:24 GMT
#176485
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 25 2017 16:25 GMT
#176486
On September 26 2017 00:27 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 00:23 Plansix wrote:
RealityIsKing comes here to troll up this thread from time to time by making wild claims with no evidence. Like claiming that “this is why Trump won,” but providing nothing to prove he is correct. When challenged, he argues that he doesn’t need to provide evidence because he is the all powerful logical, rational thinker.

Hes not even on wufflys level where he doesn't even put much effort into them. Mostly just inane obvious famebait from the sc2 strategey dark ages.

Definitely a king among shitposters/flamebaiters/and trolls. I'm guessing that's the principal reason he arouses ire. Libs dot want posters moving in on their territory.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21939 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:27:05
September 25 2017 16:26 GMT
#176487
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9629 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:31:09
September 25 2017 16:29 GMT
#176488
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 25 2017 16:31 GMT
#176489
On September 26 2017 01:26 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.


Clearly said that at that point, it stopped being about the NFL/flag issues.

That's some irrelevant ass response right there.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9629 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:37:11
September 25 2017 16:32 GMT
#176490
On September 26 2017 01:31 RealityIsKing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:26 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.


Clearly said that at that point, it stopped being about the NFL/flag issues.

That's some irrelevant ass response right there.


except you specifically called out the kneelers as being divisive in your second post. i’ll leave it to you to re-evaluate its relevance.


for your reference, lest you accuse me of mischaracterization again:
On September 25 2017 23:25 RealityIsKing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2017 23:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:17 RealityIsKing wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/912280282224525312

Come on people, stop with the identity politics. That's why dems lost 2016.

The issue of race is why they began kneeling in the first place.


Also brought more divisiveness into the country, which is bad.

Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 25 2017 16:33 GMT
#176491
On September 26 2017 01:29 brian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:25 Danglars wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:27 Sermokala wrote:
On September 26 2017 00:23 Plansix wrote:
RealityIsKing comes here to troll up this thread from time to time by making wild claims with no evidence. Like claiming that “this is why Trump won,” but providing nothing to prove he is correct. When challenged, he argues that he doesn’t need to provide evidence because he is the all powerful logical, rational thinker.

Hes not even on wufflys level where he doesn't even put much effort into them. Mostly just inane obvious famebait from the sc2 strategey dark ages.

Definitely a king among shitposters/flamebaiters/and trolls. I'm guessing that's the principal reason he arouses ire. Libs dot want posters moving in on their territory.


this is the only thing that makes sense. any tips on keeping you from being outraged for the sake of it next?

I've been offering my commentary on what's true about the political scene, protests, and the broader society. You'll have to get more specific on what you view as "outraged for the sake of it." Right now your side suffers from setting low standards that RiK meets and exceeds.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:43:51
September 25 2017 16:36 GMT
#176492


Weridly this tweet works in preview but not in post. Basically Anthony Weiner has gotten 21 months for sexting a minor
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:40:46
September 25 2017 16:38 GMT
#176493
If anything, the kneeling for the national anthem shows that there is no form of protest that is acceptable. It is silence, non-violent and harms no one. It is barely even disrespectful, since kneeling is still a sign of respect. Yet, it is deemed an attack on this fictional Unity of our nation by the president. Because suggesting that our county has divides is far more terrible than the things that caused the division.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 25 2017 16:43 GMT
#176494
On September 26 2017 01:32 brian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:31 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:26 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.


Clearly said that at that point, it stopped being about the NFL/flag issues.

That's some irrelevant ass response right there.


except you specifically called out the kneelers as being divisive in your second post. i’ll leave it to you to re-evaluate its relevance.


for your reference, lest you accuse me of mischaracterization again:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2017 23:25 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:17 RealityIsKing wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/912280282224525312

Come on people, stop with the identity politics. That's why dems lost 2016.

The issue of race is why they began kneeling in the first place.


Also brought more divisiveness into the country, which is bad.



Then he should quote those instead instead of a totally irrelevant one if he so wishes me to respond, but then again people can just backtrack not too far to see my explanation of the unnecessarily flag/anthem protest if you TRULY want to have a clear discussion instead of randomly quoting me to simply just be insulting.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28703 Posts
September 25 2017 16:43 GMT
#176495
The fact is that Trump's overall behavior throughout his entire life, and his campaign only exacerbated this, has been so offensive to so many people that there's virtually nothing he can possibly do to be a unifying figure, aside from upping his badness so that even more people unite in hating him. At this point he could cure cancer, and I'd still think he's a shitty guy.

Supporting him because he's a fighter and you thought he would lead your side to winning bigly, I can see the logic behind that, even if I don't support his goals or think he's competent enough to win lasting victories. But supporting him because he's a unifying figure? Doesn't fly. I can accept LL's argument that people liked Obama more than they liked his policies, there's definitely some truth to that. But there's significantly more truth to that there are more people who like Trump's policies than there are people who like him, and to be a unifying figure, you have to be liked.

(preemptive I don't think Hillary would have been a unifying figure either, even if I vastly prefer her policy wise)
Moderator
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 16:46:52
September 25 2017 16:46 GMT
#176496
Target is raising its minimum hourly wage for its workers to $11 starting next month and then to $15 by the end of 2020 in a move it says will help it better recruit and retain top-quality staff and provide a better shopping experience for its customers.

The initiative, announced Monday, is part of Target’s strategy to reinvent its business, which includes remodeling stores, expanding online and opening up smaller urban locations.

Target quietly raised entry-level hourly wages to $10 last year from $9 from the previous year, following initiatives by Walmart and others to hike wages in a fiercely competitive marketplace.

But Target’s hike to $15 per hour far exceeds not only the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour but the hourly base pay at Walmart, the nation’s largest private employer, and plenty of its other retail peers whose minimum hourly pay now hovers around $10.

As part of its $2.7bn investment in workers, Walmart had raised its entry-level hourly pay for workers to $9 in 2015 and then to $10 in 2016. With Target’s large influence in the retail, its hike could force some rivals to match the pay in order to compete.

“We see this not only as an investment in our team but an investment in an elevated experience for our guests and the communities we serve,” Brian Cornell, CEO of Target, told reporters on a call Friday.

Target shares fell 2% early Monday morning as investors worried about how much the wage hike would hurt the bottom line. Target reiterated its third-quarter and full-year profit guidance but said that it would update investors early next year about how higher wages will affect long-term profits.

The changes come amid growing concern for the plight of the hourly worker. Thousands of workers have staged protests to call attention to their financial struggles and to fight for $15 hourly pay. Last November’s election of a Republican-controlled Congress dampened hopes of an increase in the $7.25 per-hour federal minimum wage. But advocates have continued to press for hikes on the state and local level.

At the same time, competition for workers has heated up, and retailers, worried by the threat of e-commerce, are falling behind. As shoppers get more mobile-savvy, retailers are seeking sales staff who are more skilled at customer service and in technology such as using iPads to check out inventory. But with the unemployment rate near a 16-year low, the most desirable retail workers feel more confident in hopping from job to job.

Thirty-two percent of all first jobs in the US are in retail, according to the National Retail Federation.

Hourly pay at restaurants and hotels is up 3.5% from a year earlier, a much better raise than the 2.5% gain for all employees. For workers at transportation and warehousing companies, where e-commerce growth is fueling hiring, pay is up 2.7% in the past year. Retailers, however, have lifted pay just 1.8% in the past year. That may be spurring more workers to leave for better opportunities: separate government data shows the number of retail workers quitting their jobs this year and last is at the highest in a decade.

The average hourly pay for cashiers is now $10.14, according to the Hay Group’s survey of 140 retailers with annual sales of at least $500m. A year ago, the hourly pay was $9.79.

Target says that its minimum hourly wage of $11 is higher than the minimum wage in 48 states and matches the minimum wage in Massachusetts and Washington. It says the pay hike will affect thousands of its more than 300,000 workers, but it declined to quantify the percentage of its workforce. It said the increase to $11 per hour will apply to the more than 100,000 hourly workers that Target will be hiring for the holiday season.

Target declined to say what the average pay will be for its hourly workers with the increased wages.

Ken Perkins, president of Retail Metrics, called Target’s decision “astute.” But he says only healthy rivals will be able to afford to match Target’s hourly pay hike, creating a larger divide between thriving stores and those that are struggling.

“Target is really trying to gain market share in an environment where there is tremendous upheaval,” Perkins said. But he believes that there may be only a few dozen retailers like Best Buy, Home Depot and Walmart that can mirror what Target is doing.

Target’s wage increases come as the discounter is seeing signs that its turnaround efforts are starting to win back shoppers

Walmart has been benefiting from an investment in its workers. The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer has seen lower turnover among workers and has gotten much better scores by customers for its service. Walmart’s namesake US division reported a 1.8% increase in revenue at stores opened at least a year during its fiscal second quarter, marking the 12th straight period of gains. Walmart’s wage investments, however, did take a big bite out of profits.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
September 25 2017 16:56 GMT
#176497
Target definitely styles itself as a somewhat classier-than-average retailer, so this move definitely makes perfect sense for them.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15723 Posts
September 25 2017 17:06 GMT
#176498
Target is A+. Way better version of Kmart.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9629 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-25 17:14:23
September 25 2017 17:11 GMT
#176499
On September 26 2017 01:43 RealityIsKing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:32 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:31 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:26 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:04 brian wrote:
you’re the only one flame baiting by denouncing in he harshest terms people that are ‘using violence’ in a discussion about peaceful protest..


If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.


Clearly said that at that point, it stopped being about the NFL/flag issues.

That's some irrelevant ass response right there.


except you specifically called out the kneelers as being divisive in your second post. i’ll leave it to you to re-evaluate its relevance.


for your reference, lest you accuse me of mischaracterization again:
On September 25 2017 23:25 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:17 RealityIsKing wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/912280282224525312

Come on people, stop with the identity politics. That's why dems lost 2016.

The issue of race is why they began kneeling in the first place.


Also brought more divisiveness into the country, which is bad.



Then he should quote those instead instead of a totally irrelevant one if he so wishes me to respond, but then again people can just backtrack not too far to see my explanation of the unnecessarily flag/anthem protest if you TRULY want to have a clear discussion instead of randomly quoting me to simply just be insulting.

ok so, having done that, you have no explanation to offer? again, specifically, how a man kneeling against racial inequality is to blame for divisiveness?
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 25 2017 17:14 GMT
#176500
On September 26 2017 02:11 brian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2017 01:43 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:32 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:31 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:26 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:24 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:18 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:14 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:10 brian wrote:
On September 26 2017 01:07 RealityIsKing wrote:
[quote]

If you actually read my post, I specifically attached the violent act to antifa/BLM not for the NFL protest.

Again don't put words into people's mouth, its not cool.


except we were talking about the NFL, you laid out your thoughts on the nfl protest with your flame, and you made the violence/antifa straw man to attach to the conversation. how is it relevant? who are you talking to?


At that point, it was mainly Trump talk. This thread is about US politics in general, not NFL Politic talk. Thank you.

please, don’t avoid the question. and what an absurd reply. that doesn’t mean i can come here and tell you you’re an ignorant flame baiter and say it’s Congress’s fault for xyz reason and back pedal all day claiming ‘it’s congress and this is the us politics thread ok?’


Unless you are just here specifically to mischaracterize people that that criticize extremists, please don't cherry pick.

I was responding to:

"You're clearly trolling at this point. Bring national pride back? When did it ever leave? When we elected a black president? Did it leave then? I must have been asleep when national pride was lost. And each president has stood up to NK. They just never threatened them with unilateral war because...reasons?"

At that point, it stopped being about the NFL, it became about Trump uniting the country and making examples of people trying to divide it.

A man wanting equal rights for his race is now dividing the country by wanting everyone to be united in their rights.

Thats some backwards ass logic right there.


Clearly said that at that point, it stopped being about the NFL/flag issues.

That's some irrelevant ass response right there.


except you specifically called out the kneelers as being divisive in your second post. i’ll leave it to you to re-evaluate its relevance.


for your reference, lest you accuse me of mischaracterization again:
On September 25 2017 23:25 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 25 2017 23:17 RealityIsKing wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/912280282224525312

Come on people, stop with the identity politics. That's why dems lost 2016.

The issue of race is why they began kneeling in the first place.


Also brought more divisiveness into the country, which is bad.



Then he should quote those instead instead of a totally irrelevant one if he so wishes me to respond, but then again people can just backtrack not too far to see my explanation of the unnecessarily flag/anthem protest if you TRULY want to have a clear discussion instead of randomly quoting me to simply just be insulting.

ok so, having done that, you have no explanation to offer? again, specifically, how a man kneeling against racial inequality is to blame for divisiveness?


You can read my explanation on post #176463.
Prev 1 8823 8824 8825 8826 8827 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
09:00
Crank Gathers S2: Playoffs D2
CranKy Ducklings68
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 139
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 3973
actioN 511
Mong 438
Stork 406
PianO 194
Sharp 135
JulyZerg 88
Aegong 75
NaDa 33
Sacsri 24
[ Show more ]
HiyA 6
Free 6
Dota 2
XaKoH 519
ODPixel306
XcaliburYe147
canceldota62
League of Legends
JimRising 714
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss536
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor52
Other Games
summit1g13785
singsing1437
ceh9454
Happy206
Pyrionflax73
NeuroSwarm53
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL6467
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2506
• Lourlo616
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
2h 13m
WardiTV Invitational
2h 28m
ByuN vs Spirit
herO vs Solar
MaNa vs Gerald
Rogue vs GuMiho
CrankTV Team League
3h 13m
BASILISK vs Team Liquid
Epic.LAN
1d 2h
BSL Team A[vengers]
1d 4h
Dewalt vs Shine
UltrA vs ZeLoT
BSL 21
1d 9h
BSL Team A[vengers]
2 days
Cross vs Motive
Sziky vs HiyA
BSL 21
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
WardiTV TLMC #15
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
BSL 21 Team A
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.