EDIT: $10 buys 1000 coins. For a <1000 follower user, 1 coin buy you 1 like equivalent of a boost to your tweet in the tweet feed. Higher follower users have to spend more to promote their tweets. Promotions are hidden from end viewers, only the payer knows.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8548
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Wulfey_LA
932 Posts
EDIT: $10 buys 1000 coins. For a <1000 follower user, 1 coin buy you 1 like equivalent of a boost to your tweet in the tweet feed. Higher follower users have to spend more to promote their tweets. Promotions are hidden from end viewers, only the payer knows. | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
RvB
Netherlands6192 Posts
On August 25 2017 12:20 OuchyDathurts wrote: The case in point has arrived. Classical Liberal is one in the same as a Libertarian. Old dead people with crackpot ideas that have no basis on this planet populated by this species. Which is why we've moved on to bigger and better ideas as we understand the world and the nature of man and society more and more. Nothing Kwark said contradicts anything I said. Fresh coat of paint on tired bad ideas. Crackpot ideas like Liberal democracy (guess where that name comes from), the rule of law, property rights, free markets, free trade etc? Classical liberalism is and has been hugely influential in western society. You're obviously clueless to what liberalism actually entails. | ||
Introvert
United States4660 Posts
On August 25 2017 11:38 m4ini wrote: You were harping on about how the "minority party always is supposed to compromise". When ACA was passed, democrats had the majority. How much is left of the original ACA? Who had to compromise because yet again, republicans turned out to be nothing more but obstructionist old fuckers? In regards to your blackmail "argument", don't be an idiot. And i mean it, you're talking like one. There's no give or take. There's one thing both sides want and need (budget), but one side decided to tack something on to get it passed because they know that nobody would be retarded enough to vote on it on its own. Your anecdotal bullshit of "word on the streets" and "i know a guy" doesn't add anything. But hey, lets compromise. Give me 1000 dollars or i shoot your imaginary dog. Since this obviously isn't blackmail, it shouldn't be a problem - right? edit: to be clear, your "argument" of give and take would only work if we talked about improving ACA, and to get that passed, you have to promise republicans the wall money. The budget is not that, it's a basic government "function". If someone back in 1828 said "give me all the dublones or i poison the well", what would you call that? Ah, then you misunderstood. I put those things in quotes because other people have said them. When the GOP was out of power that was the common line. Republicans were supposed to go along. This compromise line of rhetoric was really popular 2011-2014, while the GOP was still a minority in the Senate but the Democrats no longer had anything close to 60 for sure votes. The great Obamacare enticement to the GOP was, as I recall, "well it's not single payer!" And for the record the debt-ceiling is separate from the budget, which helps create this fiasco every time it comes up; it also helps this separation and lack of urgency I'm talking about. And for the millionth time no one is going to hold it hostage. I assume the Democrats won't, a few senators will vote no, but way more than enough will vote yes, and on we will go. There is only brinkmanship or blackmail when it might actually succeed (politically speaking). But I don't think we are going to agree here. And their was a politico article a few weeks ago that mentioned Democrats "playing hard to get" but we'll see. wasn't really central here. Edit: "what is left of the original ACA?" Uh, all of it? Everything except the Supreme Court 7-2* excepted Medicaid expansion. *The logic behind each vote was complicated so it depends on how you count | ||
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On August 25 2017 14:04 RvB wrote: Crackpot ideas like Liberal democracy (guess where that name comes from), the rule of law, property rights, free markets, free trade etc? Classical liberalism is and has been hugely influential in western society. You're obviously clueless to what liberalism actually entails. Liberalism and conservatism involve those things as well, they're just not absolutist in nature. That absolutism is what makes "Classical Liberalism" and Libertarian ideas worthless in the real world. That stuff only works if you're living ins some fantasy utopia. Unfortunately for that set of ideas and their clueless adherents we now know it doesn't work. The rule of law without justice is a lie, free markets are not the end all be all, property rights must have limits, free trade comes with consequences. The world would be even more of a smoking hell hole than it is if we were following the Ayn Rand model of society. Regulation is a good and necessary thing because at the end of the day the world is populated by Chimps so some stuff has to be curtailed to protect us from destroying ourselves and our planet to make a buck. Libertarianism is Astrology for men. We know its a cute thought experiment but it doesn't hash out so we've evolved the ideas to better suit what we live in. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22736 Posts
| ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11933 Posts
On August 25 2017 12:29 Wegandi wrote: Interesting. Britain has a long great liberal tradition. Almost on par with France (no disrespect there). From Richard Overton to John Locke to Cato's Letters to Cobden and Bright to Mill and Bentham. I always hated how Americans use the word liberal to mean the complete opposite of what a liberal is. Well they don't. Liberals from Europe would vote for Clinton if they were in America. Hell one of my liberal friends even said he would vote for Sanders in this specific election cause Clinton sucked and obviously he wasn't going to vote Trump. Edit: although you're correct in the sense that when a European says something/someone is very liberal he means they're more rightwing while when an American says something/someone is very liberal he means they're more leftwing. | ||
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
A government watchdog is accusing U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin of using a government plane to secure a good view of Monday’s eclipse. It’s the second time this week Mnuchin and his wife, Louise Linton, are under scrutiny for their travels – after an Instagram post from Linton listing the designer clothing she wore on the plane was widely criticized. The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) have alleged that the couple planned a trip using a government plane specifically to secure a view of the eclipse on Monday. Mnuchin and Linton went to Lexington, Ky., to attend a luncheon sponsored by the Louisville chamber of commerce. They also “headed to Fort Knox…to tour the bullion reserve at the Army post and view the eclipse,” the CREW outlines. CREW is asking the Department of Treasury to release all documents pertaining to their travel. Officials at CREW made the request after a “public firestorm” following an Instagram post from Linton after the trip. “In a response to a comment on the post, Ms. Linton snapped back in a post highly critical of the commenter and defended her lavish lifestyle and the government-paid trip,” CREW wrote in the request for information. The post showed the newlywed couple getting off the government plane, and mentioned several of the designer labels she was wearing, including Tom Ford and Hermes. The public post, which has since been deleted, received instant criticism by users, who slammed Linton for bragging about her wealth and using a government plane. But it was Linton’s reply to user Jenni Miller, who had commented, “Glad we could pay for your little getaway #deplorable,” that drew the most criticism. “Cute! Aw!!! Did you think this was a personal trip?! Adorable!” Linton wrote. “Do you think the US govt paid for our honeymoon or personal travel?! Lololol. Have you given more to the economy than me and my husband? Either as an individual earner in taxes OR in self sacrifice to your country?” Linton has since apologized for the post calling it “inappropriate and highly insensitive.” Bloomberg News reports that the couple is supposed to reimburse the Department of Treasury for the cost of Linton’s travels. A spokesman told CNN that Linton “does not receive compensation for products she mentions.” This isn’t Linton’s first controversy. Last year, the little-known actor apologized amid criticism of a self-published memoir about her time living in Africa, and was forced to withdraw the book. Critics said the book was inaccurate, and it was even condemned by the government of Zambia. Source | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Artisreal
Germany9234 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8937 Posts
On August 25 2017 22:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/CNN/status/901067781713436672 This is going to be both good and bad to watch. Depending on the response, we could be seeing the end. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On August 25 2017 22:48 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: This is going to be both good and bad to watch. Depending on the response, we could be seeing the end. The Trump hysteria is so comical I'm wondering if you're talking the end of Trump as president or the end of Texas. "His response was so bad to this hurricane that we consulted lawyers and they said it was 'basically high crimes and misdemeanors, just go for it bro.'" | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On August 25 2017 23:00 Plansix wrote: https://twitter.com/GammaCounter/status/901078566246416385 FEMA head was appointed by Trump, Senate has yet to confirm him as part of Schumer's unprecedented slow-down of the pace of approving presidential nominees. This won't backfire on Democrats at all. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42008 Posts
| ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/20/senate-confirms-trumps-nominee-to-head-fema.html | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
On August 25 2017 22:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/CNN/status/901067781713436672 As opposed to one of those innocuous disasters. | ||
| ||