• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:02
CET 07:02
KST 15:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros9[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win62025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION2Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams10Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest5
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four DreamHack Open 2013 revealed RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros
Tourneys
Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Kirktown Chat Brawl #9 $50 8:30PM EST 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment
Brood War
General
What's going on with b.net? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ladder Map Matchup Stats Map pack for 3v3/4v4/FFA games BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Grand Finals BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Challenge: Maths isn't all…
Hildegard
more word salad -- pay no h…
Peanutsc
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2257 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8406

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8404 8405 8406 8407 8408 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
August 14 2017 23:59 GMT
#168101


Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15723 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 00:00:52
August 14 2017 23:59 GMT
#168102
On August 15 2017 08:59 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/897223558073602049



LMAO. People first rush to defend him, imploring us to realize this isn't just a result of pressure and that he really believes this stuff. And thennnnn he posts this.

On August 15 2017 08:58 Gahlo wrote:
I'd be happy with starting on proportional EC splitting like Maine and Nebraska do.


Applied to all states, does that not just end up being the popular vote?
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24725 Posts
August 15 2017 00:00 GMT
#168103
On August 14 2017 20:31 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2017 06:37 micronesia wrote:
On August 14 2017 04:52 m4ini wrote:
On August 14 2017 04:46 micronesia wrote:
I think DPB is talking about extremists in the USA, and in general it's not unreasonable to think that the left-wing extremists by some measures are less dangerous or violent than the right-wing extremists. What it comes down to is what exactly you are referring to. I'm sure the worst left-wing extremists can give the worst right-wing extremist a run for his/her money, but if you back it up to the 1% of the population in each direction, you will see statistically significant differences in displayed behaviors. I haven't researched this but it wouldn't surprise me if each group acted out in different ways (although both groups do some pretty bad things lets be honest).


While possibly to some extend true, that's no different to the situation in germany.
Or anywhere else I suppose. But any examples you give of the situation in Germany are not necessary what the situation is in the USA (what the thread is about) or anywhere else. I sympathize with the problem you have described in Germany (isn't there a headline right now that some American tourist did a Nazi salute and then got beat up by some random German person?)


That reasoning will get you nowhere though. People in germany are not magically different. If your argument is "it's not what the situation in the US is - fair enough. But as i pointed out, you quite literally go down the exact same route as germany did which led to what happened on G20 or generally on every first of may.
You originally disagreed with DPB's characterization that the extremists on the right and left are very different in their nature and the severity of their behavior. Your proof was examples in Germany. Now you are saying the the difference may exist in the USA but eventually the left will be 'just as bad' as the right because that's what ultimately happened in Germany. I understand what you are trying to prevent here, and generally I agree with it, but you are going about this conversation the wrong way.

Show nested quote +
Left wing extremists took over houses and turned certain parts of cities basically into "law free zones". Not entirely, but close enough. That wasn't seen as a problem, with exactly the justification you just brought up. "They don't do harm, they don't bother anyone really"
Where did I say this? Can you point to it?


The entire post i was quoted was trying to point out that left wing extremists generally aren't as bad (less violent, less dangerous), hence shouldn't be condemned as much. As farvacola pointed out with his statistics, that's just plain wrong: there's no difference in quality of the violence, not even in death toll (relative). You just have less left wing extremists, something that will go up especially with a president that has to be opposed and is an extremist himself.
You used 'you' to refer to someone else instead of me which I was confused by. Now I understand what you are/were saying. Generally, you condemn more heinous crimes and groups more strongly than the less heinous. That doesn't mean you don't condemn the less crime or group, but you don't have to treat them exactly the same. Attempts to make the less heinous entities seem as bad as the more heinous entities may result in making the more heinous entities seem a little less bad, which is counterproductive. You seem inconsistent in whether or not you actually think the left extremists are just as bad as the right extremists. Saying they can be just as bad is something I would agree with.

Show nested quote +
and most importantly the all time favourite "they're not as bad as right wing extremists" - and keep in mind, we have a considerably lower bar for what counts as right wing extremism based on our past.
Obviously if the right wing extremists and the left wing extremists are equally bad (in Germany), then it's incorrect and potentially damaging to say the left wing extremists are not as bad as the right wing extremists. If the right wing extremists are worse than the left wing extremists, then it's correct to say the right wing extremists are worse than the left wing extremists. Using the fact that right wing extremists are worse than left wing extremists to try to justify a position that the left wing extremists aren't a problem is certainly a poor way to go about this discussion, but arguing that people shouldn't say the right wing extremists (in a given country) are worse even when they are is a bit unreasonable.


Again, as farvacola pointed out, they're not just equally bad in germany. You also are arguing as if you established the fact that left wing extremists are "better", something that i find rather funny. If anything, it's opinion against opinion here, because the only statistically relevant difference between right wing and left wing extremism is that you have less of it. And no, that doesn't mean that left wing extremists generally are less deadly, it simply means that you have less left wing extremists than right wing extremists.
I consider less of it to be better... perhaps if you don't make that distinction then much of what we seem to disagree about dissolves. I even said earlier that I expect the worst left-wing extremists would give the worst right-wing extremist a run for his or her money. No argument there.

Show nested quote +
It's possible that the german/european ANTIFA is further "evolved" than the american one, but that doesn't stop them evolving.
Perhaps it could evolve. But potentially banning people from discussing facts will tend to make things worse... not better.
Extremism is extremism. There's no justification or "well they're not bad". Left, right, religious: it all ends up being the same, just with different reasoning.
Even if there is only one extremist in the whole country? Speaking in absolutes about groups of people tends to make you wrong.


So who's doing that? Banning people from discussing facts? I don't see the correlation between "banning from discussing facts" (which has nothing to do with extremism) and what we're talking about.
You have made it clear you don't want people making the case that the left-wing extremists aren't as bad, even if by some measures they are, because of the detrimental effect such statements will have on the country and how it will drive the U.S. into the situation Germany ended up in, that you described. That is essentially banning people (socially not literally) from discussing facts.

Anyway, lets move on.
Why do you consider it acceptable to provide a whole list of counterpoints in a discussion and then follow it up with a "let's move on"? If you had made a couple of passing comments, instead of providing various counterpoints, and said "let's move on" I'd be inclined to agree... and the thread itself already has since quite a few hours passed.

You guys think that left wing extremism is fine,
If that's what you think then you clearly didn't get anything out of this discussion.

you deal with that later down the line. Keep one thing in mind though: extremists (regardless of ideology) are violent. Nurturing violent groups in a country where you can buy deadly weapons at a kiosk might be the not the best idea (as was clearly shown with right wing extremists, these are nurtured too). But what do i know, left wing extremism would never go violent apart from the fact that they're as likely to go violent and kill people as a right wing extremist.

I generally won't argue with you there, although I do wish you'd temper your absolute statements a bit.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4851 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 00:01:49
August 15 2017 00:01 GMT
#168104
On August 15 2017 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:58 Gahlo wrote:
I'd be happy with starting on proportional EC splitting like Maine and Nebraska do.


Applied to all states, does that not just end up being the popular vote?


Those states don't do it proportionally anyways, it's by district (and popular vote).
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35160 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 00:05:04
August 15 2017 00:03 GMT
#168105
On August 15 2017 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:59 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/897223558073602049



LMAO. People first rush to defend him, imploring us to realize this isn't just a result of pressure and that he really believes this stuff. And thennnnn he posts this.

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:58 Gahlo wrote:
I'd be happy with starting on proportional EC splitting like Maine and Nebraska do.


Applied to all states, does that not just end up being the popular vote?

From what I looked at briefly, winner gets 2 and then the rest is split by district.
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4937 Posts
August 15 2017 00:13 GMT
#168106
On August 15 2017 08:58 zlefin wrote:
getting people to care; or understand the need to fix it; is hard. what's really hard is that since most people won't know how to fix it; they won' tbe able to intelligently and correctly select the people trying to fix it from all the other people.

at any rate, there's some good research in the political science field at least.


Would you be able to elaborate on that research in political science, or at the very least point me to it?
Taxes are for Terrans
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21941 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 00:42:11
August 15 2017 00:36 GMT
#168107
On August 15 2017 08:06 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 07:53 Uldridge wrote:
So, personally, what would you do to try to improve a broken system. Or are you happen with a status quo?

Reforming elections would go a long way to keeping very rich donors from spoon feeding their views to candidates. But the system isn’t as broken as people say.

We are just in a cycle where the post WW2, post Vietnam/civil right politicians are cycling out. The new politicians have no great conflict or struggle to use as a touchstone for real crisis. The Iraq war was a side show that left America bitter and war weary. The closest we came was 2007 and we managed to pull out of that. And without crisis, there is a total lack of leadership. The parties are devoid of leaders and they have stuffed shirts instead. Or people who got support by voting no nothing for 6 years. They will fail and be replaced. Hopefully this election cycle, but maybe not.

But to be honest. There is not really way to “fix the system”. This government is a reflection of the US people. A bunch of people who grew up in an era where the biggest crisis was 9/11. And if you look at how our political parties and voters failed to respond to that, its sort of makes sense that shit is fucked. We sent to war with a random nations because we were high on patriotism and let ourselves be lied to.

I don't think I buy this line of reasoning.
US politicians are shit because they haven't been in a big crisis?
So why is the rest of the world more or less functional when they haven't been in any bigger crisis?
Why is it that only the US politicians needs a major struggle to keep him focused on actually doing his job?

As for the discussion on how to fix the political system. I'm inclined to say you can't. Because people are the problem, be it as voters or as politicians.
Who knows, maybe I will live to see the day we turn to advanced AI to handle governing.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 15 2017 01:02 GMT
#168108
On August 15 2017 09:36 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:06 Plansix wrote:
On August 15 2017 07:53 Uldridge wrote:
So, personally, what would you do to try to improve a broken system. Or are you happen with a status quo?

Reforming elections would go a long way to keeping very rich donors from spoon feeding their views to candidates. But the system isn’t as broken as people say.

We are just in a cycle where the post WW2, post Vietnam/civil right politicians are cycling out. The new politicians have no great conflict or struggle to use as a touchstone for real crisis. The Iraq war was a side show that left America bitter and war weary. The closest we came was 2007 and we managed to pull out of that. And without crisis, there is a total lack of leadership. The parties are devoid of leaders and they have stuffed shirts instead. Or people who got support by voting no nothing for 6 years. They will fail and be replaced. Hopefully this election cycle, but maybe not.

But to be honest. There is not really way to “fix the system”. This government is a reflection of the US people. A bunch of people who grew up in an era where the biggest crisis was 9/11. And if you look at how our political parties and voters failed to respond to that, its sort of makes sense that shit is fucked. We sent to war with a random nations because we were high on patriotism and let ourselves be lied to.

I don't think I buy this line of reasoning.
US politicians are shit because they haven't been in a big crisis?
So why is the rest of the world more or less functional when they haven't been in any bigger crisis?
Why is it that only the US politicians needs a major struggle to keep him focused on actually doing his job?

As for the discussion on how to fix the political system. I'm inclined to say you can't. Because people are the problem, be it as voters or as politicians.
Who knows, maybe I will live to see the day we turn to advanced AI to handle governing.

I cannot look at the dumpster fire that is the conservative run GOP and not think "man, this is a group of people who have no idea how we ended up in the Great Depression. They think its a thing stupid people did a long time ago and we will never fall for that again." And I cant look at the Democrats and think this is the party of labor that created all the support systems that we benefit from now. This group that is more interested in optics and purity tests than results. They aren't scared of fucking up or causing massive harm or a war. At some level, they have bought into the left vs right pro-wrestling coolaid. And the US voters did too.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
August 15 2017 01:03 GMT
#168109
On August 15 2017 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:59 Nevuk wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/897223558073602049



LMAO. People first rush to defend him, imploring us to realize this isn't just a result of pressure and that he really believes this stuff. And thennnnn he posts this.

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:58 Gahlo wrote:
I'd be happy with starting on proportional EC splitting like Maine and Nebraska do.


Applied to all states, does that not just end up being the popular vote?


Nah, proportional EC vote includes the 2 bonus votes per Senator such that smaller states are still favored.
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4937 Posts
August 15 2017 01:11 GMT
#168110
On August 15 2017 10:02 Plansix wrote:
scared of fucking up or causing massive harm or a war. At some level, they have bought into the left vs right pro-wrestling coolaid. And the US voters did too.


So basically you're saying your country is run by the WWE? But I thought wrestling wasn't real...
Taxes are for Terrans
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 15 2017 01:13 GMT
#168111
On August 15 2017 10:11 Uldridge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 10:02 Plansix wrote:
scared of fucking up or causing massive harm or a war. At some level, they have bought into the left vs right pro-wrestling coolaid. And the US voters did too.


So basically you're saying your country is run by the WWE? But I thought wrestling wasn't real...

It isn't real until Trump retweets footage of WWE and then its real incitement to violence.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 15 2017 01:13 GMT
#168112
On August 15 2017 10:11 Uldridge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 10:02 Plansix wrote:
scared of fucking up or causing massive harm or a war. At some level, they have bought into the left vs right pro-wrestling coolaid. And the US voters did too.


So basically you're saying your country is run by the WWE? But I thought wrestling wasn't real...

We were lied to.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23443 Posts
August 15 2017 01:14 GMT
#168113
On August 15 2017 10:11 Uldridge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 10:02 Plansix wrote:
scared of fucking up or causing massive harm or a war. At some level, they have bought into the left vs right pro-wrestling coolaid. And the US voters did too.


So basically you're saying your country is run by the WWE? But I thought wrestling wasn't real...


On the contrary, Vince McMahon knows how to do his job.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
August 15 2017 01:23 GMT
#168114
On August 15 2017 09:13 Uldridge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2017 08:58 zlefin wrote:
getting people to care; or understand the need to fix it; is hard. what's really hard is that since most people won't know how to fix it; they won' tbe able to intelligently and correctly select the people trying to fix it from all the other people.

at any rate, there's some good research in the political science field at least.


Would you be able to elaborate on that research in political science, or at the very least point me to it?

I can't elaborate much (well, I could, but I haven't read the stuff in awhile, so it might be rather fuzzy); I can point to a few things.
There's the book in my sig on democracy done by some pol-sci people; which itself has a lot of citations to the other research in the field as well. I recommend it, it's a good read.
There's also the "wisdom of crowds" phenomenon, and research into places where it works well and where it doesn't (it doesn't work so well in voting).
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 01:26:54
August 15 2017 01:25 GMT
#168115
I know it is slate but this this animation about when confederate memorials were installed is excellent.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2015/07/civil_war_historical_markers_a_map_of_confederate_monuments_and_union_ones.html

Also to go with it:

I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15723 Posts
August 15 2017 01:28 GMT
#168116
On August 15 2017 10:25 Plansix wrote:
I know it is slate but this this animation about when confederate memorials were installed is excellent.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2015/07/civil_war_historical_markers_a_map_of_confederate_monuments_and_union_ones.html

Also to go with it:

https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/897255950951866368


Wow. Definitely the best argument against them I've ever seen. Certainly puts into context the thought behind building.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 01:31:33
August 15 2017 01:31 GMT
#168117


Topical, protestors took down a statue in NC (not the one that the white supremacists murdered for)


Also, reading the youtube comments on it may hurt your brain.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-15 01:41:06
August 15 2017 01:33 GMT
#168118
Trump campaign emails show aide’s repeated efforts to set up Russia meetings

Three days after Donald Trump named his campaign foreign policy team in March 2016, the youngest of the new advisers sent an email to seven campaign officials with the subject line: “Meeting with Russian Leadership - Including Putin.”

The adviser, George Papadopoulos, offered to set up “a meeting between us and the Russian leadership to discuss US-Russia ties under President Trump,” telling them his Russian contacts welcomed the opportunity, according to internal campaign emails read to The Washington Post.

The proposal sent a ripple of concern through campaign headquarters in Trump Tower. Campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis wrote that he thought NATO allies should be consulted before any plans were made. Another Trump adviser, retired Navy Rear Adm. Charles Kubic, cited legal concerns, including a possible violation of U.S. sanctions against Russia and of the Logan Act, which prohibits U.S. citizens from unauthorized negotiation with foreign governments.

But Papadopoulos, a campaign volunteer with scant foreign policy experience, persisted. Between March and September, the self-described energy consultant sent at least a half-dozen requests for Trump, as he turned from primary candidate to party nominee, or for members of his team to meet with Russian officials. Among those to express concern about the effort was then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who rejected in May 2016 a proposal from Papadopoulos for Trump to do so.

The exchanges are among more than 20,000 pages of documents the Trump campaign turned over to congressional committees this month after review by White House and defense lawyers. The selection of Papadopoulos’s emails were read to The Post by a person with access to them. Two other people with access to the emails confirmed the general tone of the exchanges and some specific passages within them.

Papadopoulos emerges from the sample of emails as a new and puzzling figure in the examination of the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russian officials and their proxies during the 2016 election, now the subject of a special-counsel investigation.

Less than a decade out of college, Papadopoulos appeared to hold little sway within the campaign, and it is unclear whether he was acting as an intermediary for the Russian government, although he told campaign officials he was.

While the emails illustrate his eagerness to strengthen the campaign’s connections to the Russian government, Papadopoulos does not spell out in them why it would be in Trump’s interest to do so. His entreaties appear to have generated more concern than excitement within the campaign, which at the time was looking to seal the Republican nomination and take on a heavily favored Hillary Clinton in the general election.

But the internal resistance to Papadopoulos’s requests is at odds with other overtures Trump allies were making toward Russia at the time, mostly at a more senior level of the campaign.

Three months after Papadopoulos raised the possibility of a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, the president’s son Donald Trump Jr. and son-in-law Jared Kushner met with a delegation led by a Russian lawyer offering to provide damaging information on Clinton.

Manafort attended that Trump Tower session in June 2016, a meeting now under scrutiny in the special counsel’s collusion inquiry. But the new emails reveal that Manafort had rejected a request from Papadopoulos just the previous month to set up a meeting between Trump and Russian officials.

In July 2016 and again two months later, Jeff Sessions, then a senator and senior foreign policy adviser to Trump, met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

+ Show Spoiler +
And also in July, a few weeks after Papadopoulos asked his superiors whether other campaign advisers or aides could accept some of the Russians’ invitations, Carter Page, another foreign policy adviser, spoke at a Russian university in Moscow. Page said he made the trip independently of the campaign.

To experts in Russian intelligence gathering, the Papadopoulos chain offers further evidence that Russians were looking for entry points and playing upon connections with lower-level aides to penetrate the 2016 campaign.

Former CIA director John Brennan in May told the House Intelligence Committee that he had seen worrisome evidence of “contacts and interactions” between Russian officials and the Trump campaign, although he offered no specifics.

Steven L. Hall, who retired from the CIA in 2015 after 30 years of managing the agency’s Russia operations, said when told by The Post about the emails: “The bottom line is that there’s no doubt in my mind that the Russian government was casting a wide net when they were looking at the American election. I think they were doing very basic intelligence work: Who’s out there? Who’s willing to play ball? And how can we use them?”

Papadopoulos, a former intern and researcher at the conservative Hudson Institute, was on a list of campaign volunteers that Trump announced as his foreign policy advisory team during a meeting with The Post’s editorial board in March 2016. Trump called Papadopoulos an “excellent guy.”

Almost immediately, Papadopoulos came under scrutiny for his lack of experience. He graduated from college in 2009, and his LinkedIn profile cited his participation in a Model U.N. program for students among his qualifications. Papadopoulos did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Page, who has been the subject of a foreign surveillance warrant over his connections to Russia, said the Papadopoulos email exchange was another sign that the Russia communications were inconsequential.

“The entirely benign offer from a volunteer member of the Trump movement is infinitely less relevant than the real collusion in the 2016 election,” said Page, who was copied on the first Papadopoulos email communication in March. Page said in an email exchange Saturday that “the real scandal lies among Clinton and Obama associates who fed false evidence” to investigators that he said formed the basis of the federal warrant concerning him.

[Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe]

Papadopoulos made more than a half-dozen overtures on behalf of Russians or people with Russia contacts whom he claimed to know.

On March 24, Clovis, the campaign co-chairman who also served on the foreign policy team, reacted to one proposed Russia meeting by writing, “We thought we probably should not go forward with any meeting with the Russians until we have had occasion to sit with our NATO allies.”

In the same email chain, Kubic, the retired admiral, reminded others about legal restrictions on meetings with certain Russian officials, adding, “Just want to make sure that no one on the team outruns their headlights and embarrasses the campaign.”

Undeterred, Papadopoulos alerted then-campaign manager Corey Lewandowski in an April email that he was receiving “a lot of calls over the past month” about arranging a Russia meeting.

“Putin wants to host the Trump team when the time is right,” he wrote on April 27.

On May 4, Papadopoulos forwarded Lewandowski and others a note he received from the program head for the government-funded Russian International Affairs Council. In it, Ivan Timofeev, a senior official in the organization, reached out to report that Russian foreign ministry officials were open to a Trump visit to Moscow and requested that the campaign and Russians write a formal letter outlining the meeting.

Clovis responded to the Timofeev invitation by noting: “There are legal issues we need to mitigate, meeting with foreign officials as a private citizen.”

The email chain does not show a response from Lewandowski, who did not return calls seeking comment.

Several weeks later, Papadopoulos forwarded the same message from Timofeev to Manafort, the newly named campaign chairman.

“Russia has been eager to meet with Mr. Trump for some time and have been reaching out to me to discuss,” the adviser told Manafort.

Manafort reacted coolly, forwarding the email to his associate Rick Gates, with a note: “We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips.”

Gates agreed and told Manafort he would ask the campaign’s correspondence coordinator to handle it — “the person responding to all mail of non-importance” — to signify this did not need a senior official to respond.

[FBI conducted predawn raid of former Trump campaign chairman Manafort’s home]

A spokesman for Manafort, whose Virginia home was raided by FBI agents three weeks ago as part of an investigation by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, said the email chain provides “concrete evidence that the Russia collusion narrative is fake news.”

“Mr. Manafort’s swift action reflects the attitude of the campaign — any invitation by Russia, directly or indirectly, would be rejected outright,” Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni said in a statement.

In an email to The Post, Timofeev confirmed that his organization had discussed a meeting with the Trump campaign in the spring of 2016.

The Russian International Affairs Council was created in 2010 by a decree of then-President Dmitry Medvedev as a project of various Russian government agencies. It is led by former foreign minister Igor Ivanov. Its board includes Russia’s current foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, as well as top Russian scholars and business leaders, among them the chairman of Alfa-Bank and Sberbank, two of Russia’s largest banks.

“We discussed the idea informally as one of the opportunities for . . . dialogue between Russia and the U.S.,” Timofeev said in the email. “RIAC often hosts meetings with prominent political figures and experts from the US and many other countries.”

He said the group would have been open to meeting with other campaigns.

Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said officials with the Democrat’s campaign have “no recollections or record” of having been contacted by the group. Similarly an adviser to Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign, former Russian ambassador Michael McFaul, said he could not recall any similar invitation.


Source

Sure this is totally normal. I think it is very odd that they would tell low level staff that meetings should be rejected outright, but then accept a meeting with Trump Jr down the line.

Edit: God bless those little activist. I mean, they are totally going to be charged and likely have to pay for repairs or something, but look at them go. Its the American way, wreck shit until the government does what you want.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
August 15 2017 01:42 GMT
#168119
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 15 2017 01:52 GMT
#168120
Looks like the full court press is on to oust Bannon. If Trump does it, I hope that Trump does it on his terms, with full understanding that the people pushing for Bannon's ouster do not have Trump's interests at heart.
Prev 1 8404 8405 8406 8407 8408 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 131
StarCraft: Brood War
ToSsGirL 122
Sacsri 45
Moletrap 10
Dota 2
XaKoH 546
League of Legends
JimRising 795
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox339
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor134
Other Games
summit1g19095
ViBE204
NeuroSwarm56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1118
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta62
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt539
• Jankos435
Upcoming Events
BSL Team A[vengers]
7h 58m
Cross vs Sobenz
Sziky vs IcaruS
SC4ALL
8h 58m
SC4ALL
8h 58m
BSL 21
12h 58m
Replay Cast
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 5h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
IPSL
6 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
BSL 21 Team A
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
SC4ALL: Brood War
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

YSL S2
BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.