• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:55
CEST 17:55
KST 00:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru0BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation StarCraft 1 & 2 Added to Xbox Game Pass CN community: Firefly accused of suspicious activities
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32420 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7047

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7045 7046 7047 7048 7049 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 05 2017 18:33 GMT
#140921
On March 06 2017 03:25 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 03:10 xDaunt wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:58 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

They are likely talking about different things since Trump is being so vague (because he doesn't know himself what he is angry about).
Clapper probably denies there was a wiretap for Trump himself while Obama's people talk about the server

There are really two things that I want to know. First, I want to see what is in the FISA affidavit. This is particularly interesting given that the original application was apparently denied. Second, I want to know the extent to which FISA-acquired info was leaked. These are the two areas where the Obama administration could get in trouble. Of course, it could also be that the FISA affidavit verifies Trump-Russian collusion, but I doubt it given all of the statements from various people saying that there is no evidence of such a link.

Well you should ask Trump since it seems that as President he has access to de-classify the FISA.

Since he instead did not blow the lid of the biggest corruption case of the decade and buried Obama is disgrace, but rather tweeted about the Apprentice ratings I'm going to remain somewhat sceptical of his 'proof'.

Well, it appears that he is trying to get access to the subject FISA file, so we will see soon enough. And I don't blame him for tweeting a little prematurely. He has bumped the Sessions nonsense from the headlines.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
March 05 2017 18:34 GMT
#140922
It kind of bumped itself from the headlines for being mostly nonsense.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
March 05 2017 18:39 GMT
#140923
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 05 2017 18:41 GMT
#140924
White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on Sunday that President Donald Trump was only speaking about the “very real potential” that former President Barack Obama had wiretapped his presidential campaign.

Trump accused Obama of ordering the wiretapping in a series of tweets on Saturday morning.

“How low has President Obama gone to tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!” Trump tweeted.

In an interview on ABC News’ “This Week,” guest host Martha Raddatz asked Sanders why the president had made the allegations so confidently.

“I think that this is, again, something that if this happened, Martha ―” Sanders began.

“If, if, if, if,” Raddatz interjected. “Why is the president saying that it did happen?”

“He is going off of information that he’s seen that has led him to believe that this is a very real potential,” Sanders replied.

Sanders suggested that Trump was merely asking for the matter to be investigated as part of any official investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged ties to, or communications with, Russia.

“If they’re going to investigate Russia ties, let’s include this as part of it. So that’s what we’re asking,” Sanders told Raddatz.

“He’s made it very clear what he believes and he’s asking that we get down to the bottom of this,” she added. “Let’s get the truth here.”

Sanders would not provide additional information about the basis for Trump’s claims, other than to say that he was taking media reports about it “seriously.” Right-wing news sites Breitbart and Heat Street are the only news outlets suggesting that Obama personally ordered Trump’s wiretapping. Those sites link to mainstream news sources like The New York Times that do not make those claims definitively.

An Obama spokesman denied on Saturday that the president ever became personally involved in ordering wiretapping. The FBI requires a warrant to eavesdrop. And the Department of Justice, of which the law enforcement bureau is a part, prizes its independence.

Sanders struggled on Sunday to explain Trump’s certainty that Obama had wiretapped him. Raddatz pressed her to respond to one of Trump’s actual tweets making the accusations.

“I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!” Trump tweeted Saturday morning.

“I would say that his tweet speaks for itself there,” Sanders said.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 05 2017 18:45 GMT
#140925
On March 06 2017 03:39 ChristianS wrote:
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?

What do you mean by no proof? There's been quite bit of reporting on a FISA application being made and granted.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-05 18:48:44
March 05 2017 18:46 GMT
#140926
On March 06 2017 03:45 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 03:39 ChristianS wrote:
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?

What do you mean by no proof? There's been quite bit of reporting on a FISA application being made and granted.


What does "there's been quite a bit of reporting" mean? That Donald Trump was wiretapped has been denied by James Clapper.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39172719

How is this more than just rumors?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 05 2017 18:49 GMT
#140927
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
March 05 2017 18:51 GMT
#140928
On March 06 2017 03:39 ChristianS wrote:
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?

regardless of justification, it is effective, and trump is good at doing it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 05 2017 18:53 GMT
#140929
On March 06 2017 03:51 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 03:39 ChristianS wrote:
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?

regardless of justification, it is effective, and trump is good at doing it.


Except this time it hasn't worked as he is now punting to Congress to open an investigation they don't want to do and could be a huge can of worms.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13837 Posts
March 05 2017 18:54 GMT
#140930
The ends generally justify the means in politics. Winners write the history a lot more short term then in real life.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
March 05 2017 18:55 GMT
#140931
Can Obama sue for defamation if it all turns out to be bollocks?
Neosteel Enthusiast
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 05 2017 18:59 GMT
#140932
On March 06 2017 03:55 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Can Obama sue for defamation if it all turns out to be bollocks?

Probably not. It's really hard to win defamation suits when's you're a public figure.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
March 05 2017 19:00 GMT
#140933
On March 06 2017 03:55 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Can Obama sue for defamation if it all turns out to be bollocks?

legally, I believe he could. politically, it'd be a mess.
Not sure to what extent sovereign immunity could be used to delay a civil lawsuit.
i'm sure our resident lawyers would know on the topic. iirc in general it's very very rare to see defamation lawsuits from politicians against each other for what they've claimed about each other. of course that's in part because most politicians hedge their words enough.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-05 19:05:58
March 05 2017 19:04 GMT
#140934
Video shows heated Oval Office meeting (CNN's words, not mine)

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/03/05/heated-oval-office-meeting-bannon-trump-nobles-newday.cnn

Man the White House needs to learn how to use blinds or something
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
March 05 2017 19:06 GMT
#140935
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

Because Obama's people would have more access to FISA documents than the staff of the currently sitting president?

They don't know if there was a wiretap or not because they're not privy to that information. But they do know that the President is not, and cannot be, involved in a court granted wiretap request.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 05 2017 19:12 GMT
#140936
On March 06 2017 04:06 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

Because Obama's people would have more access to FISA documents than the staff of the currently sitting president?

They don't know if there was a wiretap or not because they're not privy to that information. But they do know that the President is not, and cannot be, involved in a court granted wiretap request.

You should go read the FISA statute. The court grants the request that the president makes through the attorney general.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44106 Posts
March 05 2017 19:19 GMT
#140937
On March 06 2017 03:04 LegalLord wrote:
Much as I am not enamored with Trump, at this point I might wonder whether or not his predecessor specifically set him up to fail by creating an executive underclass that would necessarily be hostile towards him.


Trump repeatedly sets himself up to fail because he refuses to take the office of the president seriously. Obama didn't make a qualified candidate suddenly unqualified, and the people who are hostile to Trump tend to be upset reactively (after Trump does something dumb), not proactively.

On March 06 2017 03:14 biology]major wrote:
Trump is doing a terrible job, that is all


Agreed. He tries to blame everyone else, but he has no one to truly blame but himself.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
March 05 2017 19:33 GMT
#140938
On March 06 2017 04:12 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 04:06 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

Because Obama's people would have more access to FISA documents than the staff of the currently sitting president?

They don't know if there was a wiretap or not because they're not privy to that information. But they do know that the President is not, and cannot be, involved in a court granted wiretap request.

You should go read the FISA statute. The court grants the request that the president makes through the attorney general.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802

Didn't realize there was a Trump Birther movement going on, but thanks for saying that Trump is not a US person?
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Toadesstern
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Germany16350 Posts
March 05 2017 19:39 GMT
#140939
On March 06 2017 04:33 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 04:12 xDaunt wrote:
On March 06 2017 04:06 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

Because Obama's people would have more access to FISA documents than the staff of the currently sitting president?

They don't know if there was a wiretap or not because they're not privy to that information. But they do know that the President is not, and cannot be, involved in a court granted wiretap request.

You should go read the FISA statute. The court grants the request that the president makes through the attorney general.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802

Didn't realize there was a Trump Birther movement going on, but thanks for saying that Trump is not a US person?


“As part of that practice, neither Obama nor White House official ever ordered surveillance on any US citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is false,” Mr Lewis said.


duh. We all saw it comming the day they made the announcement. Will we get an investigattion into wether or not Trump is actually an US citizen?
<Elem> >toad in charge of judging lewdness <Elem> how bad can it be <Elem> also wew, that is actually p lewd.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
March 05 2017 19:39 GMT
#140940
On March 06 2017 03:45 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 03:39 ChristianS wrote:
So it's justified to tweet falsehoods (or accusations for which you have no proof) if you don't like the current news cycle?

What do you mean by no proof? There's been quite bit of reporting on a FISA application being made and granted.

Wait, you need to make up your mind. People initially talked about how the FISA tap had been reported on for weeks, and was to do with his server that seemed like it might be talking with the Russians, not some Watergate-like tap of his campaign:

On March 05 2017 03:34 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
A good number of tweets that make a good point:


You said we shouldn't assume that's the wiretap he's talking about.
On March 05 2017 03:50 xDaunt wrote:
It strikes me as rather presumptuous to conclusively declare what wiretaps Trump is referring to without waiting for clarification from his Administration.

Okay, fair enough, maybe he's talking about a different wiretap, of Trump Tower maybe. Then when people say he should release his proof if it's some other legal or illegal tap of Trump Tower, you say he's still in the process of getting access to it:
On March 06 2017 03:33 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2017 03:25 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 06 2017 03:10 xDaunt wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:58 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 06 2017 02:55 xDaunt wrote:
I find it interesting that Clapper is denying that there was a FISA wiretap granted, but Obama's people are hedging their answers so much as to imply that there was one.

They are likely talking about different things since Trump is being so vague (because he doesn't know himself what he is angry about).
Clapper probably denies there was a wiretap for Trump himself while Obama's people talk about the server

There are really two things that I want to know. First, I want to see what is in the FISA affidavit. This is particularly interesting given that the original application was apparently denied. Second, I want to know the extent to which FISA-acquired info was leaked. These are the two areas where the Obama administration could get in trouble. Of course, it could also be that the FISA affidavit verifies Trump-Russian collusion, but I doubt it given all of the statements from various people saying that there is no evidence of such a link.

Well you should ask Trump since it seems that as President he has access to de-classify the FISA.

Since he instead did not blow the lid of the biggest corruption case of the decade and buried Obama is disgrace, but rather tweeted about the Apprentice ratings I'm going to remain somewhat sceptical of his 'proof'.

Well, it appears that he is trying to get access to the subject FISA file, so we will see soon enough. And I don't blame him for tweeting a little prematurely. He has bumped the Sessions nonsense from the headlines.

When I say he shouldn't make shit up or accuse without proof just to change a news cycle, you refer back to the earlier ones that had been reported on already.

So either he's talking about the wiretaps the FBI did investigating his server, in which case the earlier-quoted tweet chain applies, or he's talking about another illegal wiretap for which he has proof, in which case he should put up the proof or shut up, or he's still in the process of obtaining proof, in which case he shouldn't have started slinging accusations until he had proof.

So which is it?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Prev 1 7045 7046 7047 7048 7049 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
11:00
WardiTV June Groups A & 1/2C
YoungYakov vs SpiritLIVE!
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
WardiTV1118
IndyStarCraft 246
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 292
IndyStarCraft 246
ProTech79
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 10068
Sea 3848
EffOrt 1375
Stork 564
Snow 520
Mini 393
Light 370
actioN 267
ZerO 254
ggaemo 249
[ Show more ]
Nal_rA 158
Mong 89
Sacsri 89
Trikslyr61
Sea.KH 59
sSak 55
Sharp 51
Hyun 42
Movie 37
GoRush 32
Aegong 27
Terrorterran 19
Backho 16
Shine 14
yabsab 5
Dota 2
Gorgc13080
XcaliburYe478
syndereN373
Counter-Strike
fl0m4852
olofmeister2891
Stewie2K933
Foxcn335
byalli242
rGuardiaN82
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor118
Other Games
tarik_tv9269
singsing1758
B2W.Neo1510
Beastyqt453
Lowko242
FrodaN239
crisheroes214
XaKoH 178
Mew2King93
gofns85
KnowMe75
QueenE65
ZerO(Twitch)22
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1201
Other Games
BasetradeTV35
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 8
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 52
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4082
League of Legends
• Nemesis9284
• Jankos1756
• TFBlade1349
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
8h 5m
GSL Code S
17h 35m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 10h
GSL Code S
1d 17h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.