• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:37
CEST 09:37
KST 16:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy0GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding0Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen ASL21 General Discussion [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group E
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Korean words The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1983 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6503

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6501 6502 6503 6504 6505 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 05 2017 00:10 GMT
#130041
American history being lost rapidly, in the South no less.

Louisiana is losing its coast at a rapid rate because of rising sea levels, development and sinking marshland. Officials are trying to rebuild those marshes and the wetlands, but much of the coast can't be saved. This makes Louisiana's history an unwitting victim. As land disappears and the water creeps inland, ancient archaeology sites are washing away, too.

Richie Blink was born and raised in Plaquemines Parish, La. — way down south of New Orleans along the Mississippi River. Now he works for the National Wildlife Federation.

When he was a kid, his dad showed him a special place in Adams Bay, where they'd go fishing.

"We would come out of the floodgates and my dad would say 'Head for the Lemon Trees!'" Blink says.

What's locally known as the "Lemon Trees" is a stand of weathered old trees on a grassy tuft of land. It's a well-known landmark for fishermen, but Blink says they would rarely stop there to hunt or fish because it's a sacred Native American site.

"The legend goes that you were always to bring some kind of sacrifice, so somebody left some lemons for the ancestors," Blink says.

And those grew into big trees with grapefruit-sized lemons. But as land was lost to the Gulf of Mexico, saltwater made its way into the freshwater marsh, killing off the trees and other plants.

The trees stand like skeletons on the edge of this scrappy, wind-beaten island. Waves beat against the dirt, washing it away, exposing shards of ancient pottery.

"You can see, it's just everywhere ... there's just shards of it all over the place," Blink says. "This is earthen pottery made by natives. This site is in the process of being destroyed. It only has a few more years left."

This ancient Native American site is an important archaeological find. It's one of many historic sites being forever lost to the Gulf as rising seas and saltwater intrusion eat away at Louisiana's fragile marshes. Two sites like this are lost each year.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
January 05 2017 00:13 GMT
#130042
On January 05 2017 09:07 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
I honestly think the quickest way China could punish Trump is fuck him over economically.

What would China do that wouldn't fuck themselves over even worse at this point?
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
January 05 2017 00:15 GMT
#130043
On January 05 2017 09:07 Doodsmack wrote:
Trump now planning to revamp the CIA and other intelligence agencies? Siding with Assange over them? Any doubts that he was going to let his vanity influence policy should be long gone lol.

I don't really have a problem with cleaning house at the same intelligence agencies that purposefully carried Obama's water on any number of issues (particularly those concerning the Middle East) for purely political reasons.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-05 00:18:47
January 05 2017 00:17 GMT
#130044
On January 05 2017 09:13 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 09:07 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
I honestly think the quickest way China could punish Trump is fuck him over economically.

What would China do that wouldn't fuck themselves over even worse at this point?


Push Asia into the RCEP and the US out of the region which is very possible now that Trump has ditched TPP.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 05 2017 00:31 GMT
#130045
On January 05 2017 09:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 09:07 Doodsmack wrote:
Trump now planning to revamp the CIA and other intelligence agencies? Siding with Assange over them? Any doubts that he was going to let his vanity influence policy should be long gone lol.

I don't really have a problem with cleaning house at the same intelligence agencies that purposefully carried Obama's water on any number of issues (particularly those concerning the Middle East) for purely political reasons.


If nothing else it doesn't seem like it has much of an end goal in mind. Other than that they'll be especially suck-uppy to trump.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
January 05 2017 00:33 GMT
#130046
Hopefully he'll get them to actually release proof when they think that a foreign country wanted to influence the election.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
January 05 2017 00:38 GMT
#130047
On January 05 2017 09:31 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 09:15 xDaunt wrote:
On January 05 2017 09:07 Doodsmack wrote:
Trump now planning to revamp the CIA and other intelligence agencies? Siding with Assange over them? Any doubts that he was going to let his vanity influence policy should be long gone lol.

I don't really have a problem with cleaning house at the same intelligence agencies that purposefully carried Obama's water on any number of issues (particularly those concerning the Middle East) for purely political reasons.


If nothing else it doesn't seem like it has much of an end goal in mind. Other than that they'll be especially suck-uppy to trump.

As far as I am concerned, the worst case scenario is that we will get the same politicized intelligence that we had under Obama. There really isn't much to lose.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
January 05 2017 00:45 GMT
#130048
This is super messed up but it's going to be huge politically.

Chicago police currently have four people in custody over a Facebook Live video that showed a group of people holding a man hostage and torturing him.

Police were made aware of the video on Tuesday afternoon. The video, shot by a young black woman, shows four people kicking, hitting and cutting a young white man while he was tied up.

During the beating, you could hear the attackers yelling “f*** Donald Trump! F*** white people!” along with other racial slurs.

The victim is now being treated at the hospital for his injuries. Meanwhile, no charges have yet been filed.

We will update this story as more comes in.

Watch the video above, via FOX 32.


http://www.mediaite.com/online/f-donald-trump-f-white-people-4-in-custody-for-torturing-man-live-on-facebook/

(CBS) — Four people are in custody after a disturbing live-streamed video of a duct-taped man allegedly being tortured on Chicago’s West Side.

In the video, the victim’s clothes were cut, he was peppered with cigarette ashes, and then his hair cut with a knife until his scalp bled.

Several people can be seen laughing and eating as the attack is going on.

The incident took place Tuesday in an apartment on the 3400 block of West Lexington on Chicago’s West Side, a police spokesperson said.

The victim, who has special needs, was a high-risk missing person from northwest suburban Crystal Lake, police say.

Police say he traveled to Carol Stream to meet a friend. They ended up in a stolen car, driven to the West Side, where the attack took place.

Four people are now in custody. The victim was treated and released, police said.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2017/01/04/four-people-in-custody-after-alleged-kidnapping-torture-is-live-streamed/
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3304 Posts
January 05 2017 00:46 GMT
#130049
On January 05 2017 08:38 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 08:29 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:28 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:23 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:16 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:31 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:25 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:02 LegalLord wrote:
Next time around the Democrats should push universal healthcare rather than an ultimately short-sighted slop of compromise.


They didn't have enough democrats supportive of universal healthcare last time, but hopefully we see a somewhat Bernie'esque rebirth so the party can get away from the era of Clinton.


Not if Kwiz/Mag has anything to say about it. I'm telling you, Clinton's running in 2020 if her health holds up.


I'm fairly certain neither Kwiz nor Me have argued for Clinton to run again. Us asking you for evidence when you make wild claims and accusations doesn't really count as us suggesting Clinton run again.


No, you haven't directly, but you both have defended her wing of the party's positions. I don't remember which, but I vaguely remember one of you making the case that universal healthcare wasn't stopped by Democrats or whatever.

I've defended not making demagogic pie in the sky promises founded on faulty analyses and populist slogans, and not displaying a glaring lack of knowledge and a general incompetence on matters essential to the president's job, if that's what you're referring to. Also, saying "universal healthcare was stopped by Democrats" removes all context, namely that projects for a universal healthcare system were pushed by Democrats, including HRC, and failed to garner enough votes because of some conservative Democrats and because of complete opposition by the GOP.

The truth is there were enough Democrats to pass whatever they wanted, but not enough Democrats (elected officials anyway) actually wanted it. 73% of Democrats/leaners want the ACA replaced with a federal plan.

That's what I just said.


Yeah, so shouldn't they have fallen in line?

I obviously wish those Democrats who defected had supported it, yes, like I've said throughout the years. What are you arguing exactly?

I think he's doing a sort of tu quoque on centrist Democrats not supporting universal healthcare as a justification for more extreme liberals not supporting Hillary Clinton. It doesn't really land here though, since you'd probably criticize both groups for not falling in line with the party consensus, which is a perfectly consistent position.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23810 Posts
January 05 2017 00:50 GMT
#130050
On January 05 2017 09:46 ChristianS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 08:38 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:29 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:28 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:23 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:16 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:31 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:25 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:16 Mohdoo wrote:
[quote]

They didn't have enough democrats supportive of universal healthcare last time, but hopefully we see a somewhat Bernie'esque rebirth so the party can get away from the era of Clinton.


Not if Kwiz/Mag has anything to say about it. I'm telling you, Clinton's running in 2020 if her health holds up.


I'm fairly certain neither Kwiz nor Me have argued for Clinton to run again. Us asking you for evidence when you make wild claims and accusations doesn't really count as us suggesting Clinton run again.


No, you haven't directly, but you both have defended her wing of the party's positions. I don't remember which, but I vaguely remember one of you making the case that universal healthcare wasn't stopped by Democrats or whatever.

I've defended not making demagogic pie in the sky promises founded on faulty analyses and populist slogans, and not displaying a glaring lack of knowledge and a general incompetence on matters essential to the president's job, if that's what you're referring to. Also, saying "universal healthcare was stopped by Democrats" removes all context, namely that projects for a universal healthcare system were pushed by Democrats, including HRC, and failed to garner enough votes because of some conservative Democrats and because of complete opposition by the GOP.

The truth is there were enough Democrats to pass whatever they wanted, but not enough Democrats (elected officials anyway) actually wanted it. 73% of Democrats/leaners want the ACA replaced with a federal plan.

That's what I just said.


Yeah, so shouldn't they have fallen in line?

I obviously wish those Democrats who defected had supported it, yes, like I've said throughout the years. What are you arguing exactly?

I think he's doing a sort of tu quoque on centrist Democrats not supporting universal healthcare as a justification for more extreme liberals not supporting Hillary Clinton. It doesn't really land here though, since you'd probably criticize both groups for not falling in line with the party consensus, which is a perfectly consistent position.


It was Mag I was thinking of, which is why it didn't ring any bells for Kwiz. Mag thinks Bernie was the bad guy during the ACA for not wanting to cave into centrists holding healthcare hostage.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 05 2017 00:51 GMT
#130051
I'm not sure there's an argument that intelligence was more politicized under Obama. And I personally don't want intelligence agencies feeling the need to prove anything to the general public. But I guess Trump wants a compliant CIA.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-05 00:53:04
January 05 2017 00:52 GMT
#130052
The only congress person that actually really actively tried for single payer was Kucinich, who promptly had his district evaporated even after he caved when it turned out principles were in short supply while insurance industry cash was in extremely high supply.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
January 05 2017 00:53 GMT
#130053
I on the other hand feel that matters of public interest require some improved degree of transparency from organizations not known for honesty.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3304 Posts
January 05 2017 01:03 GMT
#130054
On January 05 2017 09:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 09:46 ChristianS wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:38 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:29 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:28 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:23 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 08:16 kwizach wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:31 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 05 2017 07:25 GreenHorizons wrote:
[quote]

Not if Kwiz/Mag has anything to say about it. I'm telling you, Clinton's running in 2020 if her health holds up.


I'm fairly certain neither Kwiz nor Me have argued for Clinton to run again. Us asking you for evidence when you make wild claims and accusations doesn't really count as us suggesting Clinton run again.


No, you haven't directly, but you both have defended her wing of the party's positions. I don't remember which, but I vaguely remember one of you making the case that universal healthcare wasn't stopped by Democrats or whatever.

I've defended not making demagogic pie in the sky promises founded on faulty analyses and populist slogans, and not displaying a glaring lack of knowledge and a general incompetence on matters essential to the president's job, if that's what you're referring to. Also, saying "universal healthcare was stopped by Democrats" removes all context, namely that projects for a universal healthcare system were pushed by Democrats, including HRC, and failed to garner enough votes because of some conservative Democrats and because of complete opposition by the GOP.

The truth is there were enough Democrats to pass whatever they wanted, but not enough Democrats (elected officials anyway) actually wanted it. 73% of Democrats/leaners want the ACA replaced with a federal plan.

That's what I just said.


Yeah, so shouldn't they have fallen in line?

I obviously wish those Democrats who defected had supported it, yes, like I've said throughout the years. What are you arguing exactly?

I think he's doing a sort of tu quoque on centrist Democrats not supporting universal healthcare as a justification for more extreme liberals not supporting Hillary Clinton. It doesn't really land here though, since you'd probably criticize both groups for not falling in line with the party consensus, which is a perfectly consistent position.


It was Mag I was thinking of, which is why it didn't ring any bells for Kwiz. Mag thinks Bernie was the bad guy during the ACA for not wanting to cave into centrists holding healthcare hostage.

I'm not sure how strong the comparison is anyway, though, considering that deciding on the next national policy for healthcare and campaigning against Donald Trump for president are not very similar things. There's a reasonable discussion to be had about what circumstances warrant more caving to the party's demands versus standing up for what you as an individual believe in. Policy discussions seem like a strong case for somewhere where you can be your own individual. Supporting the party's presidential nominee seems like just about the clearest case for a situation where you fall in line and support the party, especially with such a uniquely terrible opponent as Trump.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
January 05 2017 01:09 GMT
#130055
Trump is uniquely terrible as a candidate perhaps, but what is also true is that to both those on the left and right, so is Hillary.

The response to "the other side fielded someone buttfucking awful" isn't "let's prop up the least popular candidate who could possibly be matched up against said opponent."
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-05 01:21:54
January 05 2017 01:21 GMT
#130056
On January 05 2017 10:09 LegalLord wrote:
Trump is uniquely terrible as a candidate perhaps, but what is also true is that to both those on the left and right, so is Hillary.

The response to "the other side fielded someone buttfucking awful" isn't "let's prop up the least popular candidate who could possibly be matched up against said opponent."


that some fools think hillary is uniquely terrible, rather than ordinarily terrible, is on the fools.
especially since hillary remains many many times more fit for the office than trump, and sadly many people aren't able to vote that intelligently.

also, you still hating on hillary sooo much, seriously, what's up with that?

sure we all would've liked a better candidate, and a wider field with more options, but we don't get what we want sometimes, and we should fix that too. but why not point to something constructive for that instead of harping on hillary so much?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
January 05 2017 01:26 GMT
#130057
On January 05 2017 10:21 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 10:09 LegalLord wrote:
Trump is uniquely terrible as a candidate perhaps, but what is also true is that to both those on the left and right, so is Hillary.

The response to "the other side fielded someone buttfucking awful" isn't "let's prop up the least popular candidate who could possibly be matched up against said opponent."


that some fools think hillary is uniquely terrible, rather than ordinarily terrible, is on the fools.
especially since hillary remains many many times more fit for the office than trump, and sadly many people aren't able to vote that intelligently.

also, you still hating on hillary sooo much, seriously, what's up with that?

sure we all would've liked a better candidate, and a wider field with more options, but we don't get what we want sometimes, and we should fix that too. but why not point to something constructive for that instead of harping on hillary so much?

Your "you just hate Hillary so much" cliche is getting tiresome. It's a pointless ad hominem deflection and you know it.

It just so happens to be directly relevant to Trump winning that his opponent was highly unpopular. Not even as a matter of my opinion but as a matter of fact.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4407 Posts
January 05 2017 01:31 GMT
#130058
Rand Paul reintroduces audit the fed bill, claims it has Trumps support.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/thehill.com/policy/finance/312662-audit-the-fed-bill-gets-new-push?amp?client=safari
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
January 05 2017 01:32 GMT
#130059
On January 05 2017 10:26 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 10:21 zlefin wrote:
On January 05 2017 10:09 LegalLord wrote:
Trump is uniquely terrible as a candidate perhaps, but what is also true is that to both those on the left and right, so is Hillary.

The response to "the other side fielded someone buttfucking awful" isn't "let's prop up the least popular candidate who could possibly be matched up against said opponent."


that some fools think hillary is uniquely terrible, rather than ordinarily terrible, is on the fools.
especially since hillary remains many many times more fit for the office than trump, and sadly many people aren't able to vote that intelligently.

also, you still hating on hillary sooo much, seriously, what's up with that?

sure we all would've liked a better candidate, and a wider field with more options, but we don't get what we want sometimes, and we should fix that too. but why not point to something constructive for that instead of harping on hillary so much?

Your "you just hate Hillary so much" cliche is getting tiresome. It's a pointless ad hominem deflection and you know it.

It just so happens to be directly relevant to Trump winning that his opponent was highly unpopular. Not even as a matter of my opinion but as a matter of fact.

it's not a pointless ad hominem deflection. it's a pointful ad hominem. the point is i'm asking you to please stop it. as have others in the thread. it's not helpful or productive in the slightest.
and it's not a deflection cuz it's on topic.

we know. WE KNOW already. you repeating it ad nauseam doesn't help. you're being like CNN when they cover the same event 24/7 for 6 months repeating the same stuff over and over.

why not try discussing solutions instead of harping on it over and over? or at least harp on it less often, like no more than once a day.
why do you insist on repeating it so much? anger? disgust at the situation?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14104 Posts
January 05 2017 01:53 GMT
#130060
On January 05 2017 09:17 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2017 09:13 xDaunt wrote:
On January 05 2017 09:07 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
I honestly think the quickest way China could punish Trump is fuck him over economically.

What would China do that wouldn't fuck themselves over even worse at this point?


Push Asia into the RCEP and the US out of the region which is very possible now that Trump has ditched TPP.

Very silly and ignorant idea considering the decades of Chinese agression over the SSC. Expecially considering the fragility of the Chinese economy and the competition the rest of the region is benefiting from. Not to mention the historical and religious problems other nations in the reason have.

Dali lama is gona die some day.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 6501 6502 6503 6504 6505 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 62
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 5877
GuemChi 2745
Shuttle 276
scan(afreeca) 91
soO 26
ajuk12(nOOB) 26
910 14
Sharp 14
Noble 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe87
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1178
Stewie2K1019
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King247
Other Games
summit1g9651
ceh9487
C9.Mang0441
Liquid`RaSZi373
m0e_tv271
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL8934
Other Games
gamesdonequick749
BasetradeTV173
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1311
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 23m
Kung Fu Cup
3h 23m
Replay Cast
16h 23m
The PondCast
1d 2h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 16h
WardiTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.