• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:08
CEST 13:08
KST 20:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202559RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
[Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 977 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5089

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5087 5088 5089 5090 5091 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 22 2016 02:23 GMT
#101761
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 22 2016 02:29 GMT
#101762
On September 22 2016 11:23 Danglars wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/778737382220701696

"Brought to you by the Film Actors Guild."
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
September 22 2016 02:31 GMT
#101763
On September 22 2016 11:10 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 10:54 Dan HH wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:32 oBlade wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:24 Dan HH wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:17 oBlade wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:05 Nevuk wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:59 ticklishmusic wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:30 ticklishmusic wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:11 Nebuchad wrote:
[quote]

I would argue that if you are a social democrat and you voted for Clinton over Sanders, you did something wrong, yeah. Of course you don't have to be a social democrat to be honest or informed, so I reject the negative connotation that you put on the other types of voters.


How does the ability of the two candidates to deliver tangible progress towards what I want play into a decision?


Well I would suggest you vote at the midterms so that Bernie gets to play with politicians who aren't going to stop him from delivering tangible progress towards what you want. Which was part of what Bernie was saying was required, by the way. But that will be true under Clinton as well, so get on that.

On top of that, this notion that Bernie wouldn't be able to compromise and wouldn't be able to do shit is really based on air. He's supporting Clinton right now. That's called a compromise.

Start from a social democrat position, then compromise, or start from a "center left" (GH's words, I would have said "center right"), then compromise. Seems pretty clear to me which one is more likely to get you to social democracy.


I've voted in pretty much every single election since I became 18 (which isn't that many because I'm still pretty young), so not sure where that assumption came from.

You have an incorrect view of the political situation in the US. We are more conservative than Europe or wherever you're from - we have Donald Trump as the Republican party nominee for crying out loud, and ridiculous religious freedom bills frequently make it to the governor's desk. I temper the kindof liberal things I'd like to see based on the reality I live in.

Sanders is able to negotiate with Clinton because they are actually pretty close, and I think he's actually fairly realistic. Negotiating with the Republicans who made the ACA a party-line vote is a whole different ball game.

Eh, Trump is actually a lot less conservative than the average GOP politician. The GOP party platform is something of an abomination this year. The US is more conservative than most western countries, though.

On September 22 2016 09:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:30 ticklishmusic wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:11 Nebuchad wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:02 ticklishmusic wrote:
[quote]

Those who supported Clinton in the primary are either corporate sell-outs (not liberal enough) or naive (low information)?


I would argue that if you are a social democrat and you voted for Clinton over Sanders, you did something wrong, yeah. Of course you don't have to be a social democrat to be honest or informed, so I reject the negative connotation that you put on the other types of voters.


How does the ability of the two candidates to deliver tangible progress towards what I want play into a decision?

I want a better healthcare system. To sound kind of lame, my big goal for my career and my life is to improve our healthcare system somehow. If we could go to Medicare for All, some NHS-style model or something I would be pretty enthused. However, the reality is we're not because the US healthcare system is a gargantuan, tangled entity with stakeholders (not only greedy doctors and insurance companies) that make that sort of revamp impossible. So, what I chose is a candidate who can get us to a better place. Pushing for improvements to the ACA. Restrictions on pharma pricing. Paid leave. Mental health coverage.

Things like that. First downs, not Hail Mary's.


And what I'm trying to say is that if you look at the Manchin family and this EpiPen thing, then you combine it with Hillary's shift from the "medicare for all" idea to an "insurance premiums for-profit for all", and her fundraising/speech $ sources, we'd see that she's a perpetuator, not a reformist. Also, that this is a pattern across multiple issues, not specific to healthcare.

I actually understand the argument that people are making for supporting Hillary, what they aren't getting is that I think they are being swindled. That the rational choice they've come to is indeed rational if Hillary was an honest broker, but she's not.

They are falling for the same scam that Warren fell for. They think they are special, that Hillary is lying and swindling some people to move forward, but she's not tricking them. They see Warren begging Hillary to at least start with not just taking her big Wall st donors and immediately giving them positions in her administration, which Hillary is blowing off already. Then think to themselves, "but she'll improve healthcare", ignoring how as I'm pointing out, she's actually part of the problem.

Though I think most here are actually aware of what's going on at this point and they just don't want to deal with what that means.

For me it comes down to memories of W and the fact that he made Pence his VP after promising Kasich unlimited power if he took the VP slot. A Pence (nominally, Trump) administration rubber stamping literally all the batshit stuff the GOP house has come up with would be horrendous. An immediate repeal of Obamacare would affect me greatly, personally, though in the long term Hillary is insanely flawed on that front as well.

The only consolation I have is that Trump was supposedly trying to undo the Pence pick the night after he announced, lol. So he may actually try to do the job.

It takes a lot of faith in an anonymous NYT source to believe someone would work their ass off for 18 months to let someone else be president.

Kasich confirmed it

It's the same alleged source no matter whether the hearsay comes from the NYT or Politifact or Stephen Hawking or someone as publicly anti-Trump as Kasich. The combination of the implausibility and convenience of the story means it's something to take with a grain of salt, which politics has no shortage of.

Does it really not matter? Because before he confirmed it was just the librul media making shit up. Now we've gone to Kasich saying it and maybe he's lying, maybe not. I assume you're not suggesting his aide is some deep undercover Hillary plant misleading Kasich, if this was a lie chances are Kasich is in on it.

I also disagree with you that it's implausible given Trump's initial reaction to Pence and what comes out of his mouth whenever he talks about FP or international agreements, but that's another matter.

Yes, it really doesn't. "That's what they tell me" is what you're referring to by confirmation.

It was a rhetorical question. The reaction of the Trump supporters here went from 'bullshit' at the NYT article to 'take it with a grain of salt' at Kasich.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 22 2016 02:31 GMT
#101764
On September 22 2016 11:23 Danglars wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/778737382220701696

That's a pretty lame ad if it wasn't done ironically.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 22 2016 02:33 GMT
#101765
Damn left Hollywood, having opinions and shit. How dare they use their fame for anything but entertainment?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 22 2016 02:35 GMT
#101766
On September 22 2016 11:33 Plansix wrote:
Damn left Hollywood, having opinions and shit. How dare they use their fame for anything but entertainment?

The bigger problem is that the ad itself is pretty stupid.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
hunts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2113 Posts
September 22 2016 02:37 GMT
#101767
On September 22 2016 11:35 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 11:33 Plansix wrote:
Damn left Hollywood, having opinions and shit. How dare they use their fame for anything but entertainment?

The bigger problem is that the ad itself is pretty stupid.


Maybe Hillary has to fight stupid with stupid? It's clear that you can't get through to trump supporters with facts and reason and logic, so maybe stupid ads to battle the stupid shit trump says is the only way?
twitch.tv/huntstv 7x legend streamer
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
September 22 2016 02:39 GMT
#101768
On September 22 2016 11:33 Plansix wrote:
Damn left Hollywood, having opinions and shit. How dare they use their fame for anything but entertainment?

It's not that they have opinions but the ad was corny as hell, to the point of fremdschämen
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5583 Posts
September 22 2016 02:41 GMT
#101769
On September 22 2016 11:31 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 11:10 oBlade wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:54 Dan HH wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:32 oBlade wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:24 Dan HH wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:17 oBlade wrote:
On September 22 2016 10:05 Nevuk wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:59 ticklishmusic wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:30 ticklishmusic wrote:
[quote]

How does the ability of the two candidates to deliver tangible progress towards what I want play into a decision?


Well I would suggest you vote at the midterms so that Bernie gets to play with politicians who aren't going to stop him from delivering tangible progress towards what you want. Which was part of what Bernie was saying was required, by the way. But that will be true under Clinton as well, so get on that.

On top of that, this notion that Bernie wouldn't be able to compromise and wouldn't be able to do shit is really based on air. He's supporting Clinton right now. That's called a compromise.

Start from a social democrat position, then compromise, or start from a "center left" (GH's words, I would have said "center right"), then compromise. Seems pretty clear to me which one is more likely to get you to social democracy.


I've voted in pretty much every single election since I became 18 (which isn't that many because I'm still pretty young), so not sure where that assumption came from.

You have an incorrect view of the political situation in the US. We are more conservative than Europe or wherever you're from - we have Donald Trump as the Republican party nominee for crying out loud, and ridiculous religious freedom bills frequently make it to the governor's desk. I temper the kindof liberal things I'd like to see based on the reality I live in.

Sanders is able to negotiate with Clinton because they are actually pretty close, and I think he's actually fairly realistic. Negotiating with the Republicans who made the ACA a party-line vote is a whole different ball game.

Eh, Trump is actually a lot less conservative than the average GOP politician. The GOP party platform is something of an abomination this year. The US is more conservative than most western countries, though.

On September 22 2016 09:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:30 ticklishmusic wrote:
On September 22 2016 09:11 Nebuchad wrote:
[quote]

I would argue that if you are a social democrat and you voted for Clinton over Sanders, you did something wrong, yeah. Of course you don't have to be a social democrat to be honest or informed, so I reject the negative connotation that you put on the other types of voters.


How does the ability of the two candidates to deliver tangible progress towards what I want play into a decision?

I want a better healthcare system. To sound kind of lame, my big goal for my career and my life is to improve our healthcare system somehow. If we could go to Medicare for All, some NHS-style model or something I would be pretty enthused. However, the reality is we're not because the US healthcare system is a gargantuan, tangled entity with stakeholders (not only greedy doctors and insurance companies) that make that sort of revamp impossible. So, what I chose is a candidate who can get us to a better place. Pushing for improvements to the ACA. Restrictions on pharma pricing. Paid leave. Mental health coverage.

Things like that. First downs, not Hail Mary's.


And what I'm trying to say is that if you look at the Manchin family and this EpiPen thing, then you combine it with Hillary's shift from the "medicare for all" idea to an "insurance premiums for-profit for all", and her fundraising/speech $ sources, we'd see that she's a perpetuator, not a reformist. Also, that this is a pattern across multiple issues, not specific to healthcare.

I actually understand the argument that people are making for supporting Hillary, what they aren't getting is that I think they are being swindled. That the rational choice they've come to is indeed rational if Hillary was an honest broker, but she's not.

They are falling for the same scam that Warren fell for. They think they are special, that Hillary is lying and swindling some people to move forward, but she's not tricking them. They see Warren begging Hillary to at least start with not just taking her big Wall st donors and immediately giving them positions in her administration, which Hillary is blowing off already. Then think to themselves, "but she'll improve healthcare", ignoring how as I'm pointing out, she's actually part of the problem.

Though I think most here are actually aware of what's going on at this point and they just don't want to deal with what that means.

For me it comes down to memories of W and the fact that he made Pence his VP after promising Kasich unlimited power if he took the VP slot. A Pence (nominally, Trump) administration rubber stamping literally all the batshit stuff the GOP house has come up with would be horrendous. An immediate repeal of Obamacare would affect me greatly, personally, though in the long term Hillary is insanely flawed on that front as well.

The only consolation I have is that Trump was supposedly trying to undo the Pence pick the night after he announced, lol. So he may actually try to do the job.

It takes a lot of faith in an anonymous NYT source to believe someone would work their ass off for 18 months to let someone else be president.

Kasich confirmed it

It's the same alleged source no matter whether the hearsay comes from the NYT or Politifact or Stephen Hawking or someone as publicly anti-Trump as Kasich. The combination of the implausibility and convenience of the story means it's something to take with a grain of salt, which politics has no shortage of.

Does it really not matter? Because before he confirmed it was just the librul media making shit up. Now we've gone to Kasich saying it and maybe he's lying, maybe not. I assume you're not suggesting his aide is some deep undercover Hillary plant misleading Kasich, if this was a lie chances are Kasich is in on it.

I also disagree with you that it's implausible given Trump's initial reaction to Pence and what comes out of his mouth whenever he talks about FP or international agreements, but that's another matter.

Yes, it really doesn't. "That's what they tell me" is what you're referring to by confirmation.

It was a rhetorical question. The reaction of the Trump supporters here went from 'bullshit' at the NYT article to 'take it with a grain of salt' at Kasich.

It's equivalent bullshit, just repeated.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
September 22 2016 02:49 GMT
#101770
On September 22 2016 11:29 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 11:23 Danglars wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/778737382220701696

"Brought to you by the Film Actors Guild."


you're just upset that the best thing Trump gets is soap opera people and the duck dynasty guys
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 22 2016 02:49 GMT
#101771
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
September 22 2016 02:51 GMT
#101772
On September 22 2016 11:49 xDaunt wrote:
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.

Someone at BLM would probably let the Hillary campaign know they don't care.
Moderator
hunts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2113 Posts
September 22 2016 02:52 GMT
#101773
On September 22 2016 11:49 xDaunt wrote:
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.


I mean is BLM really associated with Hilary? I would imagine they would want to distance themselves from that group, as they are borderline terrorists, but I guess if they do they will lose the black vote which they need.
twitch.tv/huntstv 7x legend streamer
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 22 2016 02:54 GMT
#101774
On September 22 2016 11:51 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 11:49 xDaunt wrote:
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.

Someone at BLM would probably let the Hillary campaign know they don't care.

I'm sure that BLM doesn't care, but they should. Between Hillary and Trump, it's pretty clear which one is more likely to crack down on them.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 22 2016 02:55 GMT
#101775
On September 22 2016 11:51 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2016 11:49 xDaunt wrote:
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.

Someone at BLM would probably let the Hillary campaign know they don't care.

I was about to say, I don't think they give a fuck at all.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 22 2016 02:56 GMT
#101776
BLM is too amorphous to be associated with anyone.
borderline terrorists sounds a bit too far of a description though.

At any rate, there's already local people in NC who have cred in that community calling for peace, I don't think there's much more that can be done in that regard that isn't being done already.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
September 22 2016 02:57 GMT
#101777
On September 22 2016 11:49 xDaunt wrote:
Someone over at the Hillary campaign should really let BLM that they aren't doing her any favors in North Carolina.

I read that it's the first stage in Obama's takeover to prevent the election.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 22 2016 02:57 GMT
#101778
On September 22 2016 11:56 zlefin wrote:
BLM is too amorphous to be associated with anyone.
borderline terrorists sounds a bit too far of a description though.

At any rate, there's already local people in NC who have cred in that community calling for peace, I don't think there's much more that can be done in that regard that isn't being done already.

Apparently its all black people and they have the magical power to stop protests just by sending out a memo.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
September 22 2016 02:58 GMT
#101779
A lot of BLM people are to the left of Sanders, I don't think they care if they're hurting Hillary.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 22 2016 03:05 GMT
#101780
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 5087 5088 5089 5090 5091 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs CureLIVE!
Solar vs Classic
ComeBackTV 1435
Hui .373
TaKeTV 319
Fuzer 266
3DClanTV 164
Rex139
BRAT_OK 80
CranKy Ducklings76
JimRising 68
Reynor57
SpeCial7
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .373
Fuzer 266
Rex 139
BRAT_OK 80
ProTech71
JimRising 68
Reynor 57
SpeCial 7
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 10242
Shuttle 2041
Nal_rA 2023
Larva 778
Bisu 462
BeSt 456
Barracks 357
Stork 276
actioN 257
EffOrt 242
[ Show more ]
TY 216
ToSsGirL 209
Soma 136
Dewaltoss 127
Snow 122
Hyun 119
ggaemo 113
ZerO 89
Soulkey 87
JulyZerg 70
sorry 62
Rush 56
Backho 53
sSak 35
Sharp 27
soO 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Icarus 8
Shinee 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe219
Counter-Strike
allub208
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor86
Other Games
gofns2333
singsing1889
Beastyqt589
B2W.Neo268
ArmadaUGS85
QueenE53
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV314
League of Legends
• Nemesis1995
• Stunt624
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 52m
CranKy Ducklings
22h 52m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 2h
CSO Cup
1d 4h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 21h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.