• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:02
CEST 20:02
KST 03:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202550RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams5Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1023 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5003

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5001 5002 5003 5004 5005 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:11:13
September 15 2016 18:10 GMT
#100041
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:


The irony of course is that Medicaid WAS supposed to be an integral part of the ACA (basically public option for the poor, with a fairly high bar for poor), but some Republican governors decided to take a stand on some sort of nebulous principle and completely fucked over the people in their states.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 15 2016 18:11 GMT
#100042
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 15 2016 18:12 GMT
#100043
On September 16 2016 03:08 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 02:54 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:41 On_Slaught wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:28 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:05 Acrofales wrote:
On September 16 2016 01:57 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 01:52 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 16 2016 01:41 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 01:38 Acrofales wrote:
On September 16 2016 01:36 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]

Let's just presume that you're correct about all of the above. What will Joe voter hear? What you just said, or that Trump is going to pay for his kids' daycare?

Yup. Trump should promise Joe Voter the moon on a stick, because it really doesn't matter that it is completely 100% impossible.

PS: whence the disdain for Joe Voter?

My wife and I are paying in the neighborhood of $3,000-3,500 per month for childcare (2 kids in daycare, 1 in kindergarten + after-school care). Trump just told me that he's going to cover it. What could Hillary possibly offer me that trumps what Trump just put on the table?


The same thing but to feasibly pay for it?


Has she made the offer? And is the offer as good as Trump's from my economic perspective?

What Trump is doing is pure conservative heresy (hence Danglar's protests), but Trump's naked pandering to the middle class clearly is going to work.



Of course she has made the offer. It has been plastered up on her website for weeks. Here: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/early-childhood-education/

It probably doesn't sound as good, because she's not in the business of lying about what the government can afford.

And one of a couple of articles comparing Trump and Hillary's plans:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2016/09/politics-child-care


Looks like Trump's plan is more generous.

And as a bonus, while I was there (on the Economist's website), I stumbled upon this interesting blog about "post-truth politics": http://www.economist.com/node/21706525

It basically states that Trump can lie, because it really doesn't matter anymore in modern politics: the campaign is not about facts, or policy. It's about creating an us vs. them, and as long as something sounds plausible, it can be completely false, but will have the same reinforcing feeling. Especially if "they" try to debunk it by showing how it is false.


Of course the truth doesn't matter any more. Nor, by extension, do facts. Only the emotional and subconscious sells matter. Trump has figured this out and is taking these principles to their logical conclusions. And in doing so, he has so badly outmaneuvered the democrat party (he's literally occupying positions left and right of Hillary) that no one really knows what to do about it.

And for all of you who are complaining about the cost of Trump's plan and how he's going to pay for it, let me ask you this: how often does the "how are we going to pay for it" objection work when it comes to elections?


So which is it. Is he going to make your life better by lowering costs or is everything a lie to get elected? Can't have it both ways.

I don't see why the two are necessarily mutually exclusive.

Here's what I'm saying phrased slightly differently. Trump is running on the theory that "republican virtue" is dead. A majority of people aren't interested in doing what's good for the country anymore; they are interested in what's good for them. The Democrat constituency is built upon this type of pandering (and I'm not just talking about raw handouts, I'm also talking about things like liberal illegal immigration policy). Trump is merely bringing the republican party current with the times by introducing massive pandering to the Republican platform. What makes this particularly effective for Trump is that it enables him to break off voter blocks that would otherwise vote Democrat by using pandering to create wedge issues (NAFTA anyone?). The sad reality is that most voters want to vote for Santa Claus. To the extent that republican virtue still exists, you're most likely to find it among conservatives, but Trump's calculus is that most of those people are going to vote for him anyway for other reasons. Pandering is how Trump is creating his majority.

Ran against the establishment selling out the American people, just to side with the establishment trotting out liberal policy because the conservatives are stuck voting against the big time progressive radical. Yeah, it's good political calculus. It just sickens me to the stomach how bad the best case scenario is going to be. And I still don't know if he can convince enough people that he's going to give out more free goodies than the party who's been doing it for ages.

Nah, Trump is still a massive middle finger to the establishment. He's a populist, not an elitist.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 15 2016 18:12 GMT
#100044
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 15 2016 18:15 GMT
#100045
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 15 2016 18:16 GMT
#100046
On September 16 2016 03:11 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/776456358623383554

Shocking?
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:21:13
September 15 2016 18:18 GMT
#100047
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:19:05
September 15 2016 18:18 GMT
#100048
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

If we learned anything from the founding fathers, it was don’t listen to the mob on FP issues. But it appears that went out the window with separation of church and state.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:22:38
September 15 2016 18:22 GMT
#100049
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:24:57
September 15 2016 18:23 GMT
#100050
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

Funny, because from the same poll that honesty stat comes from I see 39% trust Trump on FP and 57% trust Clinton on FP

https://www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2379

xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 15 2016 18:28 GMT
#100051
On September 16 2016 03:23 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

Funny, because from the same poll that honesty stat comes from I see 39% trust Trump on FP and 57% trust Clinton on FP

https://www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2379


Just wait for the debates.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
September 15 2016 18:28 GMT
#100052
On September 16 2016 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.


Yes but at some point you just have to concur that Trump has absolutely nothing to do with conservatism any more. The whole isolationist and protectionist wall thing isn't conservative either.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:30:27
September 15 2016 18:30 GMT
#100053
On September 16 2016 03:28 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:23 Dan HH wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

Funny, because from the same poll that honesty stat comes from I see 39% trust Trump on FP and 57% trust Clinton on FP

https://www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2379


Just wait for the debates.

So you are not describing what is happening but predicting what will happen based on wishful thinking
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 15 2016 18:30 GMT
#100054
On September 16 2016 03:28 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.


Yes but at some point you just have to concur that Trump has absolutely nothing to do with conservatism any more. The whole isolationist and protectionist wall thing isn't conservative either.

When have I ever said that he's a conservative?
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
September 15 2016 18:31 GMT
#100055
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

There are a lot of things where the government could do well to listen more to the people. Foreign policy is one of the things I'd rather politicians decide behind closed doors.

Hell, if governments listened to their people on foreign policy we'd already be at war with China, given some rising popular sentiments in China toward war with the US. Fortunately, their government isn't *that* stupid.
Moderator
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 15 2016 18:32 GMT
#100056
Hillary's FP popularity comes from people buying into her assertion that she is highly experienced.

Most of her experience is seen in the sheer quantity of FP blunders that she has helped to create.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-15 18:36:12
September 15 2016 18:34 GMT
#100057
On September 16 2016 03:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:28 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.


Yes but at some point you just have to concur that Trump has absolutely nothing to do with conservatism any more. The whole isolationist and protectionist wall thing isn't conservative either.

When have I ever said that he's a conservative?


well you just said a page ago that he's "going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall)." I don't think conservatives actually want that.

I'm not sure where you stand anyway. Are you identifying as a conservative, are you supporting Trump? I truly never know, you are the Trump of this thread
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 15 2016 18:35 GMT
#100058
On September 16 2016 03:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:28 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.


Yes but at some point you just have to concur that Trump has absolutely nothing to do with conservatism any more. The whole isolationist and protectionist wall thing isn't conservative either.

When have I ever said that he's a conservative?

It is really hard to tell since your stance and level of commitment to Trump’s policies are so mercurial. As far as I can tell your argument is that Hilary losing is good for conservatism and Trump can only do so much damage in 4 years. It won’t forward the small government goals that are the center of your political views, but you are willing to risk Trump because it won’t set them back to far.

Unless we have another 9/11 level disaster on our hands. At that point, all bets are off.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 15 2016 18:38 GMT
#100059
On September 16 2016 03:34 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:30 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:28 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:18 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:12 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:08 xDaunt wrote:
On September 16 2016 03:06 LegalLord wrote:
On September 16 2016 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/StealthBlue/status/776477949537218560

Watching Trump spout positions antithetical to Republican mainstream positions and watching both his supporters and party officials is a very amusing pastime.

Trump's heresies against conservatism are largely excusable given that he's going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall).

Rumor from the grapevine is that Trump's FP is one of his most severe conflicts with "the establishment." At the very least he really struck a nerve with his anti-NATO rhetoric, and that's not hard to see if you look at how desperate a lot of the military/intelligence officials are for Hillary to win.

Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.



Take a look back at Athenian democracy if you want to know why that isn't a particularly good idea. That's like arguing for the " nuclear physics of the people"

One redeeming feature of conservatives is their natural scepticism when it comes to the intellectual capacity of the electorate. Apparently that's been thrown out of the window as well

Again, I'm not expressing any value judgments as to whether any of this is good. I'm just describing what's happening.


Yes but at some point you just have to concur that Trump has absolutely nothing to do with conservatism any more. The whole isolationist and protectionist wall thing isn't conservative either.

When have I ever said that he's a conservative?


well you just said a page ago that he's "going to give conservatives the big ticket items that they want (ie the Wall)." I don't think conservatives actually want that.

I'm not sure where you stand anyway. Are you identifying as a conservative, are you supporting Trump? I truly never know, you are the Trump of this thread

I don't think an actual conservative would wnat the wall; because they know it's a waste of cash big gov't spending program.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
September 15 2016 18:39 GMT
#100060
On September 16 2016 03:31 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2016 03:15 xDaunt wrote:
Absolutely. However, what I think the know-it-alls are about to learn is that Trump has figured out and is pursuing the foreign policy that the people want.

There are a lot of things where the government could do well to listen more to the people. Foreign policy is one of the things I'd rather politicians decide behind closed doors.

Hell, if governments listened to their people on foreign policy we'd already be at war with China, given some rising popular sentiments in China toward war with the US. Fortunately, their government isn't *that* stupid.

While FP involves a great deal of non-common expertise which should be cross-administration and influenced strongly by experts, it should still reflect the general will of the people. Otherwise we get the olden days when kings started war for petty land grabs while the people had to pay for it, a pattern that is not so unlike certain less well-liked FP adventures in recent years.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Prev 1 5001 5002 5003 5004 5005 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 16h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11232
JimRising 471
Hui .368
Reynor 115
ProTech66
MindelVK 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1161
BeSt 766
Mini 725
TY 687
Mind 108
sorry 42
JYJ22
yabsab 10
IntoTheRainbow 10
ivOry 3
Dota 2
420jenkins482
Counter-Strike
fl0m4846
sgares391
edward29
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu1
Other Games
Gorgc3816
FrodaN3144
Beastyqt1277
qojqva1166
Dendi1013
B2W.Neo567
oskar157
KnowMe146
QueenE79
Trikslyr75
ArmadaUGS67
Organizations
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings117
Other Games
BasetradeTV29
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 154
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 36
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3387
• masondota21874
• WagamamaTV179
League of Legends
• Jankos1568
Other Games
• imaqtpie1213
• Shiphtur322
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
16h 58m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
19h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
CSO Cup
1d 21h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 23h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.