• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:01
CEST 02:01
KST 09:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202534Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 536 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4244

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4242 4243 4244 4245 4246 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 11 2016 19:43 GMT
#84861
On July 12 2016 04:40 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


Just because you're being peaceful doesn't mean someone else who disagrees with you can't show up and start shit.

And in general, large numbers of people are dangerous to everyone. They have police details are sporting events just because it’s a good idea. The same goes for protests, even those that are peaceful.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
July 11 2016 19:44 GMT
#84862
On July 12 2016 04:40 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


Just because you're being peaceful doesn't mean someone else who disagrees with you can't show up and start shit.

This is an often overlooked facet of public protest. There are few ways to more effectively disparage a public movement than to instigate violence at its gatherings, and it seems like most folks are just accepting that BLM is naturally a violent movement without looking too closely at precisely who it is that's starting violence.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-11 19:50:18
July 11 2016 19:44 GMT
#84863
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


yeah, in an ideal world. we have crappy roads and frequent traffic jams. sewage bubbles up sometimes when it rains. the sewer and water goes out sometimes. the city simply doesnt have money or manpower. i wholeheartedly support people's right to protests, but recognizing the reality that its causing problems for an already strapped city is important.

protests need police because you dont know if theyre going to be peaceful - doesnt matter if the vast majority of protestors are peaceful, only takes a couple (or one random guy with a sniper rifle) to ruin everything. and they dont want people blocking highways or causing additional problems.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 11 2016 19:48 GMT
#84864
On July 12 2016 04:44 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:40 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


Just because you're being peaceful doesn't mean someone else who disagrees with you can't show up and start shit.

This is an often overlooked facet of public protest. There are few ways to more effectively disparage a public movement than to instigate violence at its gatherings, and it seems like most folks are just accepting that BLM is naturally a violent movement without looking too closely at precisely who it is that's starting violence.

There is a long tradition of both political parties throughout history hiring people to cause unrest at rallies and conventions. It is not common in general elections, but was very common in state and local government.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 11 2016 19:53 GMT
#84865
In a recent interview with NBC News set to air Monday night, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush described Donald Trump's campaign as an "alternative universe" that will leave Trump's supporters feeling "betrayed."

"The tragedy of this, though, is that there isn't going to be a wall built. And Mexico's not going to pay for it. And there's not going to be a ban on Muslims," Bush told NBC News in a clip released Monday afternoon. "This is all like a alternative universe that he created."

"The reality is, that's not going to happen. And people are going to be deeply frustrated and the divides will grow in our country," he continued. "And this extraordinary country, still the greatest country on the face of the earth, will continue to stagger instead of soar. And that's the heartbreaking part of this, is I think people are really going to feel betrayed."

Bush also acknowledged that his former rival in the presidential race understands the media.

"Trump, to his credit, was very smart at exploiting these kind of opportunities. He's a master at understanding how the media works — more than anybody I've ever seen in politics," Bush told NBC News. "Kudos for him, for kind of creating the environment and then manipulating the environment to his effect."


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
July 11 2016 19:53 GMT
#84866
On July 12 2016 04:44 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


yeah, in an ideal world. we have crappy roads and frequent traffic jams. sewage bubbles up sometimes. the sewer and water goes out sometimes. the city simply doesnt have money or manpower. i wholeheartedly support people's right to protests, but recognizing the reality that its causing problems for an already strapped city is important.

protests need police because you dont know if theyre going to be peaceful - doesnt matter if the vast majority of protestors are peaceful, only takes a couple (or one random guy with a sniper rifle) to ruin everything. and they dont want people blocking highways or causing additional problems.

Are the protests drawing people in from the outlying towns? I mean, do protests require MORE police per protestor than the usual ratios of police:people? Or are there more people than usual in an area?

As to your unspecified cities' money/manpower issues; then they need better/smarter planning. I guess I'm willing to take over and fix it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
July 11 2016 19:58 GMT
#84867
On July 12 2016 04:53 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:44 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


yeah, in an ideal world. we have crappy roads and frequent traffic jams. sewage bubbles up sometimes. the sewer and water goes out sometimes. the city simply doesnt have money or manpower. i wholeheartedly support people's right to protests, but recognizing the reality that its causing problems for an already strapped city is important.

protests need police because you dont know if theyre going to be peaceful - doesnt matter if the vast majority of protestors are peaceful, only takes a couple (or one random guy with a sniper rifle) to ruin everything. and they dont want people blocking highways or causing additional problems.

Are the protests drawing people in from the outlying towns? I mean, do protests require MORE police per protestor than the usual ratios of police:people? Or are there more people than usual in an area?

As to your unspecified cities' money/manpower issues; then they need better/smarter planning. I guess I'm willing to take over and fix it.


you're a little naive to assume you can run one of the top 10 metro areas in the US. if our problems were that easy to fix, they would already be fixed.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
The Bottle
Profile Joined July 2010
242 Posts
July 11 2016 20:06 GMT
#84868
On July 12 2016 03:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Why does it say there is no racial differences in the use of lethal force in the same article it acknowledges whites are 22% more likely to be shot than blacks?

All the statistics on non-lethal force have less than 21% differential for blacks being more likely to be subjected to non-lethal use of force and that constitutes a racial bias, but 22% more likely to be subject to lethal force as white isn't racial bias?

Is it purely going off the larger differential present in the data revolving around the civilian's takes on the encounters?

Because the result was not statistically significant. I.e. they did a logistic regression to learn the coefficients to the "black" dummy variable for probability of lethal force and did, what I'm guessing (the paper didn't specify) was a likelihood ratio test or Wald test to determine whether said dummy variable causes a significant difference in the chi-squared p value of that test.

Again, the paper didn't specify why the results were statistically insignificant (they really don't go into much detail on their statistical analysis) but I'm guessing that their sample of black subjects was just too small. (The overall sample was roughly 4 thousand, all from Houston, but I didn't see them specify anywhere what proportion of that sample was black.)
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 11 2016 20:13 GMT
#84869
CLEVELAND — A panel crafting the Republican Party’s platform on trade has removed all references to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, citing Donald Trump’s rejection of the deal and the difficult politics that Republican incumbents are navigating.

“I think we should take out TPP completely,” said Tracey Monroe-Winburn, an Ohio delegate. “We know that our presumptive nominee isn’t in favor of it, one … and we have some senators who are running across the country that were in support of it at one time.”

The new language must still be vetted by the GOP’s full Platform Committee Monday afternoon.

Andy Puzder, one of the co-chairs of the GOP platform economic subcommittee, suggested that TPP has become too thorny of an issue to take a specific stand on. Trump has found flaws in the current version, he said. Rather than wade into the specific agreement, he suggested embracing a broad trade platform that discourages “massive trade deficits,” negotiating better trade deals and enforcing existing deals.

“Who can argue with we shouldn’t have such big deficits?” he wondered.

The language Puzder described would dovetail more completely with Trump’s language on trade.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-11 20:21:17
July 11 2016 20:17 GMT
#84870
On July 12 2016 04:58 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:44 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


yeah, in an ideal world. we have crappy roads and frequent traffic jams. sewage bubbles up sometimes. the sewer and water goes out sometimes. the city simply doesnt have money or manpower. i wholeheartedly support people's right to protests, but recognizing the reality that its causing problems for an already strapped city is important.

protests need police because you dont know if theyre going to be peaceful - doesnt matter if the vast majority of protestors are peaceful, only takes a couple (or one random guy with a sniper rifle) to ruin everything. and they dont want people blocking highways or causing additional problems.

Are the protests drawing people in from the outlying towns? I mean, do protests require MORE police per protestor than the usual ratios of police:people? Or are there more people than usual in an area?

As to your unspecified cities' money/manpower issues; then they need better/smarter planning. I guess I'm willing to take over and fix it.


you're a little naive to assume you can run one of the top 10 metro areas in the US. if our problems were that easy to fix, they would already be fixed.

I'm not naive; I'm silly (sometimes)
Also, the hard part isn't having a sound budget and such, the hard part is doing it in a way that gets you reelected.
Are your local politicians good, average, poor, or terrible?
Usually power in a city is also diffuse enough, with enough parochial interests, that it's hard to push anything through, sound or not.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13930 Posts
July 11 2016 20:24 GMT
#84871
There arn't enough police to even serve warrants and solve crimes as it is. let alone throw in protests that disrupt basic government services.

If there wasn't a police presence then people wouldn't be able to have peaceful protests without the fear of violent non peaceful protests.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
July 11 2016 20:28 GMT
#84872
Well, to what extent is it feasible to not have the police there all the time, and simply call them in when there's an issue? I mean, police spend a lot of time simply being on call, rather than being present. I'm interested in more data on the effect of presence levels on response time and overall system results.

And they need more police clearly (and more reserves)
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 11 2016 20:28 GMT
#84873
On July 12 2016 05:13 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
CLEVELAND — A panel crafting the Republican Party’s platform on trade has removed all references to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, citing Donald Trump’s rejection of the deal and the difficult politics that Republican incumbents are navigating.

“I think we should take out TPP completely,” said Tracey Monroe-Winburn, an Ohio delegate. “We know that our presumptive nominee isn’t in favor of it, one … and we have some senators who are running across the country that were in support of it at one time.”

The new language must still be vetted by the GOP’s full Platform Committee Monday afternoon.

Andy Puzder, one of the co-chairs of the GOP platform economic subcommittee, suggested that TPP has become too thorny of an issue to take a specific stand on. Trump has found flaws in the current version, he said. Rather than wade into the specific agreement, he suggested embracing a broad trade platform that discourages “massive trade deficits,” negotiating better trade deals and enforcing existing deals.

“Who can argue with we shouldn’t have such big deficits?” he wondered.

The language Puzder described would dovetail more completely with Trump’s language on trade.


Source

There are already reports of the first draft having anti-gay marriage and anti-abortion front and center. I am glad they have hit all the social conservative high notes that assure government will be small enough to fit in the bedroom and doctors office.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 11 2016 20:31 GMT
#84874
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 11 2016 20:40 GMT
#84875
I still like that they have dusted off “America First,” and trotted out one out front and center under some delusion that no one will go “wasn’t that the slogan that Nazi sympathizer that wanted to keep the US out of WW2, even after pearl harbor?”

It’s like they are just going through the history books and picking the slogans of the worst people they can find. Maybe Trump will stay that the Wall will need to be built to provide “Living space” for the American people next?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
July 11 2016 21:26 GMT
#84876
On July 12 2016 05:40 Plansix wrote:
I still like that they have dusted off “America First,” and trotted out one out front and center under some delusion that no one will go “wasn’t that the slogan that Nazi sympathizer that wanted to keep the US out of WW2, even after pearl harbor?”

It’s like they are just going through the history books and picking the slogans of the worst people they can find. Maybe Trump will stay that the Wall will need to be built to provide “Living space” for the American people next?

Im starting to get the feeling that you dont like Trump.
sorry for dem one liners
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 11 2016 21:34 GMT
#84877
He has dredged up the old slogan of Charles Lindbergh and told a member of congress he is all about protecting the Article XII of the constitution. I am just impressed that at other member of the GOP for not running for the hills.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 11 2016 21:54 GMT
#84878
In the primary campaign, Donald Trump boasted he was too rich to be bought – but he is about to travel to two of California’s richest enclaves with an urgent plea for cash.

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee hopes to persuade fellow billionaires and even mere millionaires to stump up to $449,400 each to fill gaping holes in his campaign for the White House.

He is due to attend fundraisers at private homes in Rancho Santa Fe and Bel Air next week, on the eve of the Republican national convention in Cleveland, to try to narrow Hillary Clinton’s wide financial advantage.

A bargain-basement ticket, which gets a donor in the door but no picture or dinner, costs $2,700.

Even for that relative trifle, The Art of the Deal author may need to draw on all his charm, charisma and negotiating skills because California’s conservative donors are leery about his campaign, according to analysts.

“Much of the mainstream contributing community is very, very concerned about his candidacy,” said Jack Pitney, a political analyst and professor at Claremont McKenna College. “They worry about two things: that he’ll lose, or that he’ll win. Losing could drag down other Republicans. Winning could be bad for the country.”

Organisers of Wednesday’s event in Rancho Santa Fe, outside San Diego, include Doug Manchester, a developer; Jenny Craig, a diet guru; Madeleine Pickens, the ex-wife of the Texas billionaire T Boone Pickens; and Doug Kimmelman, an energy investor, according to a leaked invitation.

Organisers of Thursday’s event in Bel Air, LA’s swankiest neighbourhood, include Tom Barrack, a real estate investor who hosted a Trump fundraiser in May, Jamie McCourt, the former owner of the LA Dodgers, and Andy Puzder, a fast-food tycoon, according to the Los Angeles Times, which also reported the almost half-a-million dollar price tag for the most expensive tickets.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
July 11 2016 22:21 GMT
#84879
On July 12 2016 04:44 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2016 04:40 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:34 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 04:04 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:53 zlefin wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:51 ticklishmusic wrote:
On July 12 2016 03:48 zlefin wrote:
From the research I've seen, 12 hour shifts should really be avoided; it'd be better ot have a larger reserve pool to call upon than to have 12 hour shifts.


130 sq miles, 2,000 officers. 5m ppl in the metro area, 500k in the city proper. pulling a good fraction of the police force to a few sites throws off the entire system.

I'm not sure what that's meant to say in response to my point.
it'd also help if you could specify a city; the prior post from it only had some text, not the link that text came from, so I can't get more context.


Those are the general stats of my city. There's only so much police capacity, and there's not much slack already. You start pulling officers for events like these and you have to compromise on patrols and coverage in other places.

then you need more slack; that's the point of having reserves, which was about half of my point. Having reserves is good.
Also that doing 12 hour shifts is bad, especially considering the situations that lead to this.

Also, if the protests are peaceful, what do you need police presence for?


Just because you're being peaceful doesn't mean someone else who disagrees with you can't show up and start shit.

This is an often overlooked facet of public protest. There are few ways to more effectively disparage a public movement than to instigate violence at its gatherings, and it seems like most folks are just accepting that BLM is naturally a violent movement without looking too closely at precisely who it is that's starting violence.

You aren't actually arguing that right-wing/anti-BLM plants are responsible for BLM's bad acts, are you?
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
July 11 2016 22:25 GMT
#84880

A majority of Senate Republicans will be attending the party’s national convention in Cleveland this month, despite the reservations that many of them have about Donald Trump.

A survey by The Hill found that 32 Senate Republicans plan to attend the convention in Cleveland later this month, while 15 will skip it. Five Republican senators said they had not yet decided, and two did not respond.

Ben Sasse (Neb.) — Spokesman: “Sen. Sasse will not be attending the convention and will instead take his kids to watch some dumpster fires across the state, all of which enjoy more popularity than the current front-runners.”


Source

Heh.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Prev 1 4242 4243 4244 4245 4246 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 59m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 283
RuFF_SC2 7
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 425
Aegong 83
firebathero 55
Sexy 49
NaDa 34
Dota 2
monkeys_forever702
League of Legends
JimRising 561
febbydoto3
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox694
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor194
Other Games
tarik_tv22897
summit1g13257
gofns11473
Grubby3721
shahzam461
ViBE85
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1019
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH199
• RyuSc2 83
• tFFMrPink 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21690
Other Games
• imaqtpie1168
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
9h 59m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
13h 59m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
15h 59m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
1d 10h
OSC
1d 23h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
HCC Europe
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.