• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:21
CEST 00:21
KST 07:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 729 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4097

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4095 4096 4097 4098 4099 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 19:50:08
June 20 2016 19:46 GMT
#81921
uh i was talking about raghuram rajan quitting the reserve bank of india, a situation i framed as entrenched big businesses with roots in indian socialist system trying to preserve their power by ousting a guy trying to call them out on the cronyism.

the rest of your post is just bad.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 20:58:21
June 20 2016 20:56 GMT
#81922
lmao



Trump down to 28 paid staffers?

"I regret sending out a tweet today alluding to the firing of Corey Lewandowski. In hindsight, that was too exuberant a reaction to this personnel move. I know this is a distraction from the kind of campaign you want to run, so I'm resigning my position as director of communications for caucus operations at the 2016 Republican Convention. Let's make this immediate," Caputo wrote in a letter to campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, according to a copy obtained by CNN.
Caputo also said he deeply respects Trump as well as Manafort and Gates.
"I wish you success in the months ahead. I continue to believe Donald Trump must be elected President in November. With you at the helm, I know he can. Call if I can help," he said.


Damn that shade.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11507 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 21:11:21
June 20 2016 21:09 GMT
#81923
On June 21 2016 04:29 Surth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2016 21:16 oneofthem wrote:
On June 20 2016 17:31 Surth wrote:
Would you like to have a serious discussion about drug legislation oneofthem (or anyone else)? Because I'm totally up for it. Or did you just want to take a one-line potshot at supporters of Bernie in the hopes that everybody would share your opinion?

are you seriously not seeing the political cost of having this thing on the platform? besides, the lack of nuance is incredible.

I was going to respond to this in more detail, but notice that nettles and solar are in favor of drug legalization despite the fact that i almost constantly disagree with them, whereas plansix seems to be in agreement with you despite the fact that he and i probably align a lot more closely in general. My point was merely to show that almost everything that is argued to be "totally obvious man, open your eyes, how could anyone argue against this!" in this thread is not, in fact, very obvious. Since the others have already inadvertently taken care of that, let me only add that you are decrying the "lack of nuance" of a MOTHERFUCKING TWEET, LOL.

I think there are some drugs that are absolutely terrible (mostly heroin and, funnily enough, cannabis, that drug which most people find harmless) and quite a few drugs that are relatively harmless (e.g. speed, ritalin, lsd). But "relatively harmless" barely says anything because the underlying consumptions habits are what is critical. I will only say this: I think if we finally came to terms with what Milner and Olds have told us in the 60s (and what philosophers have said for millenia), then we could maybe re-orient our society to not care so much about happiness anymore. Which is difficult, to be sure, since, as Milner and Olds have shown, we are naturally predisposed to care very much about happiness. But then, culture can do wonders.


I don't think anyone believes that drugs are harmless and not a problem.

The question is whether the war on drugs is a good idea, not if you would like to have a world where noone does any drugs. Of course it would be better if people didn't get addicted to heroin.

The war on drugs, on the other hand, is in my opinion
a) not achieving its goal of meaningfully reducing drug consumption, and
b) has a lot of negative side effects. Cartels in mexico, people being criminalized and put into prison, dangerous street drugs with random shit in them, infections due to unclean needles, difficulties for addicts to find help due to not wanting to be put in prison.

My opinion is that decriminalisation and possibly even legalisation of drugs can remove or reduce the negative side effects, without drastically increasing the amount of people doing drugs.

I do not say this because i think drugs are great and everyone should be doing them. I think that a society without a war on drugs has net benefits over a society with a war on drugs, despite the fact that drugs are bad mkay. Making drugs illegal does not make them disappear, it just means that the situation is even more shitty for everyone involved. People who want drugs will get drugs, whether they are legal or not. Go for the alcohol/tobacco route. Put some taxes onto them so they are not too cheap, use that money to finance education campaigns, and have lots of big disgusting signs on the packages, like in the case of tobacco. Prohibition does not work and leads to lots of problems.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 21:26:01
June 20 2016 21:20 GMT
#81924
On June 21 2016 04:46 oneofthem wrote:
uh i was talking about raghuram rajan quitting the reserve bank of india, a situation i framed as entrenched big businesses with roots in indian socialist system trying to preserve their power by ousting a guy trying to call them out on the cronyism.

the rest of your post is just bad.


i dunno you sound kind of like a bernieorbuster to me. you didnt really frame the situation at all. neoliberals being driven back into their lairs by socialist big business? neoliberals advocating for guaranteed wage?

like neoliberal policies after a period of enclosed nationalism have benefited entrenched interests everywhere that theyve been enacted. its weird to call rajan a neoliberal and the "cronies" he hates socialists while using "nationalist" to mean socialist post independence india but not BJP. maybe your framing would be better with consistent/meaningful use of terms
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
June 20 2016 21:39 GMT
#81925
seems more like an intra-liberal fracas to me.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
SolaR-
Profile Blog Joined February 2004
United States2685 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 22:16:50
June 20 2016 21:43 GMT
#81926
On June 21 2016 04:29 Surth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2016 21:16 oneofthem wrote:
On June 20 2016 17:31 Surth wrote:
Would you like to have a serious discussion about drug legislation oneofthem (or anyone else)? Because I'm totally up for it. Or did you just want to take a one-line potshot at supporters of Bernie in the hopes that everybody would share your opinion?

are you seriously not seeing the political cost of having this thing on the platform? besides, the lack of nuance is incredible.

I was going to respond to this in more detail, but notice that nettles and solar are in favor of drug legalization despite the fact that i almost constantly disagree with them, whereas plansix seems to be in agreement with you despite the fact that he and i probably align a lot more closely in general. My point was merely to show that almost everything that is argued to be "totally obvious man, open your eyes, how could anyone argue against this!" in this thread is not, in fact, very obvious. Since the others have already inadvertently taken care of that, let me only add that you are decrying the "lack of nuance" of a MOTHERFUCKING TWEET, LOL.

I think there are some drugs that are absolutely terrible (mostly heroin and, funnily enough, cannabis, that drug which most people find harmless) and quite a few drugs that are relatively harmless (e.g. speed, ritalin, lsd). But "relatively harmless" barely says anything because the underlying consumptions habits are what is critical. I will only say this: I think if we finally came to terms with what Milner and Olds have told us in the 60s (and what philosophers have said for millenia), then we could maybe re-orient our society to not care so much about happiness anymore. Which is difficult, to be sure, since, as Milner and Olds have shown, we are naturally predisposed to care very much about happiness. But then, culture can do wonders.


Thank you for acknowledging cannabis as a potentially harmful drug. I've seen that drug ruin so many good friends of mine, potentially more than any other drug. It is almost mind numbing that so many people think cannabis has no negative side effects, and some even believe that it is essentially magical and will improve all aspects of your life.

Heroin is something I would only touch once in a while thing if it's available from people I trust. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't approach drugs the same way, and see it as a substitution for their entire life where they constantly need to be high to feel normal. That feeling runs rampant for cannabis smokers, it's just the negative side effects to that life style are not as drastic as heroin, but the subtle side effects are definitely harmful.
Surth
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Germany456 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 21:59:08
June 20 2016 21:48 GMT
#81927
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?


Edit: and note that ending the war on drugs will probably not solve the problems of states like mexico. it was the war on drugs that created the cartels, to be sure, but they exist now, and ending the war on drugs will not simply make them vanish into thin air. How quickly the reach of the cartels would diminish would depend on 1) how much of their revenue is dependent on drugs (still to a large degree, but depends on the cartel in question, some of them have diversified quite a bit already) and 2) how quickly they could morph to find other revenue streams. As long as the cartels continue to have money, they will continue to have soldiers, and states like mexico and guatemala will continue to be on the brink of being failed states.
i believe your actions dishonour Starcraft 2 LotV cybersport!
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 20 2016 21:58 GMT
#81928
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?

did you read the tweet? are you serious
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15686 Posts
June 20 2016 21:58 GMT
#81929
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?


When something is specified as "all", does that not remove the need for nuance? they said all. So don't they mean all?
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
June 20 2016 21:58 GMT
#81930
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?


Oh this should be good. Please clarify what you think turns people into addicts?

Besides, what do you even mean by "legalizing drugs"? All drugs? Some drugs? Narcotics?
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 20 2016 22:01 GMT
#81931
On June 21 2016 06:20 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 04:46 oneofthem wrote:
uh i was talking about raghuram rajan quitting the reserve bank of india, a situation i framed as entrenched big businesses with roots in indian socialist system trying to preserve their power by ousting a guy trying to call them out on the cronyism.

the rest of your post is just bad.


i dunno you sound kind of like a bernieorbuster to me. you didnt really frame the situation at all. neoliberals being driven back into their lairs by socialist big business? neoliberals advocating for guaranteed wage?

like neoliberal policies after a period of enclosed nationalism have benefited entrenched interests everywhere that theyve been enacted. its weird to call rajan a neoliberal and the "cronies" he hates socialists while using "nationalist" to mean socialist post independence india but not BJP. maybe your framing would be better with consistent/meaningful use of terms
it's more like, not all 'neoliberals' are bad and leftist hamsters using the term are ignorant and confused about what is actually going on
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 20 2016 22:01 GMT
#81932
On June 21 2016 06:58 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?

did you read the tweet? are you serious

I am with him on this. Twitter is not the place for any sort of complex discourse and complaining about a tweet being a big over-simplistic is pretty silly. If you then provided a more detailed break down of their beliefs on teh subject, then we would have something to talk about. But its just a tweet. And by their nature, they are all sort of shit.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Surth
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Germany456 Posts
June 20 2016 22:03 GMT
#81933
On June 21 2016 06:58 Ghostcom wrote:
Oh this should be good. Please clarify what you think turns people into addicts?

Besides, what do you even mean by "legalizing drugs"? All drugs? Some drugs? Narcotics?

I'm going to bed honey, but you tell me what you think turns people into addicts and what should be done, and I'll tell you tomorrow why you are wrong

User was warned for this post
i believe your actions dishonour Starcraft 2 LotV cybersport!
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 20 2016 22:03 GMT
#81934
On June 21 2016 07:01 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 06:58 oneofthem wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?

did you read the tweet? are you serious

I am with him on this. Twitter is not the place for any sort of complex discourse and complaining about a tweet being a big over-simplistic is pretty silly. If you then provided a more detailed break down of their beliefs on teh subject, then we would have something to talk about. But its just a tweet. And by their nature, they are all sort of shit.

did you read the tweet? are you serious?
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 22:04:53
June 20 2016 22:04 GMT
#81935
On June 21 2016 07:03 Surth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 06:58 Ghostcom wrote:
Oh this should be good. Please clarify what you think turns people into addicts?

Besides, what do you even mean by "legalizing drugs"? All drugs? Some drugs? Narcotics?

I'm going to bed honey, but you tell me what you think turns people into addicts and what should be done, and I'll tell you tomorrow why you are wrong


Pfft, figures you are just another hack without any substance and no actual idea of what you are talking about.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 20 2016 22:05 GMT
#81936
On June 21 2016 07:03 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 07:01 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:58 oneofthem wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?

did you read the tweet? are you serious

I am with him on this. Twitter is not the place for any sort of complex discourse and complaining about a tweet being a big over-simplistic is pretty silly. If you then provided a more detailed break down of their beliefs on teh subject, then we would have something to talk about. But its just a tweet. And by their nature, they are all sort of shit.

did you read the tweet? are you serious?

Yeah, I read the tweet. Its dumb, but so is all of twitter in general. Do you have anything else beyond "This tweet by the Bernie supporters is so stupid"? That isn't really a great discussion to be had.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-20 22:09:16
June 20 2016 22:06 GMT
#81937
On June 21 2016 07:05 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 07:03 oneofthem wrote:
On June 21 2016 07:01 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:58 oneofthem wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:
Simberto:
Yes? It sounds like you're agreeing with me? I am in favor of legalizing drugs, and i am definitely and strongly in favor of ending the war on drugs. My point is merely that the underlying problem is never drugs but what turns people into addicts, and that society at large still has no fucking clue of why people become addicted. Read up on Milner/Olds and then on stoicism and you'll see what i mean not that i'm a stoicist, they were kinda dumb.

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?

did you read the tweet? are you serious

I am with him on this. Twitter is not the place for any sort of complex discourse and complaining about a tweet being a big over-simplistic is pretty silly. If you then provided a more detailed break down of their beliefs on teh subject, then we would have something to talk about. But its just a tweet. And by their nature, they are all sort of shit.

did you read the tweet? are you serious?

Yeah, I read the tweet. Its dumb, but so is all of twitter in general. Do you have anything else beyond "This tweet by the Bernie supporters is so stupid"? That isn't really a great discussion to be had.

can you tell me what the tweet says? then i can bold the part you need to read.

let me help you out, it's something like "It's now in the Iowa Democrat platform"
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
June 20 2016 22:07 GMT
#81938
On June 21 2016 06:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 06:48 Surth wrote:

Oneofthem: I took your "lack of nuance" to refer to the tweet. Did you refer to something else or are you just being purposefully thick right now? You were criticizing a post on twitter, a platform that limits you to 140 characters, for not being nuanced, correct?


When something is specified as "all", does that not remove the need for nuance? they said all. So don't they mean all?


If Trump said it then several people in this topic could explain how all doesn't actually mean all.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
June 20 2016 22:10 GMT
#81939
Nailed it

FBI now backpedals and releases COMPLETE transcripts of Orlando shooter Omar Mateen's 911 call in which he says 'Peace be upon the prophet... I did the shootings' - hours after redacting references to Islam and 9/11


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3650799/Peace-prophet-did-shootings-FBI-releases-complete-transcripts-Orlando-shooter-Omar-Mateen-s-911-calls-scrubs-references-Islam-9-11.html
Surth
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Germany456 Posts
June 20 2016 22:12 GMT
#81940
On June 21 2016 07:04 Ghostcom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2016 07:03 Surth wrote:
On June 21 2016 06:58 Ghostcom wrote:
Oh this should be good. Please clarify what you think turns people into addicts?

Besides, what do you even mean by "legalizing drugs"? All drugs? Some drugs? Narcotics?

I'm going to bed honey, but you tell me what you think turns people into addicts and what should be done, and I'll tell you tomorrow why you are wrong


Pfft, figures you are just another hack without any substance and no actual idea of what you are talking about.

No, I'm serious (tip for oneofthem, btw: Yes, i am serious, always, especially when I make jokes. Seriously.). You should sympathize with my timezone problems, person from denmark! I have about 700 pages of texts from various journals and books in regards to drugs and the war on drugs scattered in my room, and roughly an equal amount on gang suppression in north and latin america, and I have consumed moderate amounts of drugs myself! I don't even care about this topic that much (I happen to loathe hippies who will do nothing but talk about legalizing drugs all day, its almost as bad as people like testie who do nothing but google the terrible things that some assholes do in the name of islam all day), Im studying a bunch of completely unrelated topics right now. But I know what I'm talking about, luv. Seriously, you give me something to attack (I don't even know your position on this), I'll demolish you tomorrow or the day after

See, this is the problem with forums, everybody's in a hurry. Everyone wants to discuss tweets, as if that had anything to do with politics ever. BUT GUYS LETS TALK ABOUT TRUMPS LATEST TWEET FOR 10 PAGES
i believe your actions dishonour Starcraft 2 LotV cybersport!
Prev 1 4095 4096 4097 4098 4099 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 207
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever824
League of Legends
Dendi971
syndereN151
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1585
Stewie2K1044
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken41
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu528
Other Games
summit1g7540
FrodaN3245
tarik_tv2119
C9.Mang0198
PPMD41
ViBE21
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 58
• davetesta53
• musti20045 34
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 52
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade426
Other Games
• imaqtpie1616
• Shiphtur445
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 39m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
15h 39m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
CSO Cup
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.