In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!
NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
On June 16 2016 06:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So this just happened:
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
On June 16 2016 01:47 ticklishmusic wrote: White supremacists have been losing sway, yes. But bigotry of all sorts is alive and well.
Here's my point: racism is so dead in the US that the left has had to go out of its ways to create new, overly-expansive definitions of racism to bitch about lest they lose all purpose in life.
To be clear, are you actually saying that racism isn't an issue in the United States anymore? Or am I misinterpreting your comment?
Basically, yes. To the extent that racism is still an issue, it is completely undeserving of the level of attention that it currently gets.
Okay then. I'd like to ask you a few questions based off that, if you don't mind:
1. What would be an "appropriate" level of attention for acknowledging and trying to change racist attitudes in the United States? I'm not really sure how to quantify or qualify it, but I'm interested in where you think the level is, and where you think the level should be lowered to.
It is tough to quantify what the "appropriate level of attention" is. All I know is that we're well beyond it. We live in a society that has organizations like BLM exist and that force feeds us crap like the school to prison pipeline. Again, what I object to is ascribing these types of problems to "racism." Doing so poisons the conversation and obfuscates the real problems.
2. Do you think "white privilege" exists in the United States on a daily basis?
Nope, and I think that we have done black people a great disservice in creating that concept.
What about the multitude of statistics showing disproportionate stops and searches, arrests, convictions, longer sentences for identical crimes, passing over "black" job applications for otherwise-identical "white" ones, and countless other inconsistencies between being a black person in America and a white person? Here's a huge compilation of data: "The data are organized into 12 categories: Police, the War on Drugs, Prison (Mass Incarceration), Criminal Justice/Courts, Education, Employment, Wealth, Workplace, Voting, Media, and Housing." http://www.jbwtucker.com/ultimate-white-privilege-statistics/
3a. Do you think that black people in our country consistently feel less at ease and worry about things escalating inappropriately, or being treated worse overall, due to the color of their skin?
4. Do you think your attitude or perspective towards racism in the United States would be different if you were black? (If I remember correctly, I don't think you are?)
I'm not black. If I was black, poor, and uneducated, I can certainly see how my perspective would be different. But given my upbringing and experience, simply changing my race wouldn't really affect my opinions.
If any white person wants to know what real racism feels like, they should go travel around China. I have spent some time over there, and it was quite illuminating.
Can you elaborate on your experiences with racism in China? I've never been there.
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
Eh, that's a stretch.
I agree*, hence why I'd like to see a longer video clip
*Although, for what it's worth, I could absolutely see Trump making such a gaff... it'd be his millionth by now.
If anything, that clip is a pretty good example of just how far Trump is out of his depth at this point. He never expected to have this sort of podium and it very clearly shows.
On June 16 2016 07:54 SK.Testie wrote: I don't think it matters whether what they have is substantial. So long as they can keep up the bombardment on low information voters they'll crush the election regardless. It's why I think Hillary simply has it in the bag. Every late night host, every news outlet, every celebrity, all guns are on Trump with very little support. Sound bites and snippets will always be played against him. His issues and policies will not matter.
I'm definitely not implying that high information voters don't have plenty of great arguments to vote against him. I'm well aware they have a literal truckload of reasons. But among high information voters you'll have a more equal split overall. Because a lot of those voters aren't necessarily voting for Trump or his immigration policies, they are voting on what they think governments role should be.
Whereas in Canada for instance, a tonne of women voted for Trudeau because he was cute. Regardless of how good a politician he may or may not be, I think most of us can agree this is a borderline retarded way to vote for your country.
Julian Assange from Wikileaks said he'd be releasing a lot of fun info on Clinton. And he genuinely dislikes and fears the woman for obvious reasons. Discussion on Hillary and not BRexit starts at around 4:10. + Show Spoiler +
that is technically correct except the information will be full of shit with youtube links backed up by sources. Thanks man, you do offer so much to talk to people and laugh about.
Way to insult women without evidence btw. People didnt just vote for him because he was cute. People also voted for him because Harper was a shitbag and his politics are not what Canadians endorse anymore.
No it's technically correct because a large # of people will vote Trump based on their beliefs of what government should and shouldn't be involved in. The point was that a man voting for what he believes the role of government should be & biting the bullet for supreme court justices is a slightly more nuanced view than what they saw on Stephen Colbert or Jon Oliver.
Darkplasmaball, The school to prison pipeline statistics are unnerving, but you assume that there is a systemic discrimination causing the discrepancies vs blacks and whites. I think a far better explanation is that 75% of black kids are raised by a single parent, vs 25% in the rest of the population.
He's talking about the treatment of certain groups in other countries. I want to also add when I first saw StealthBlue's preface, I honestly expected to be the clip to be something retarded like when he talks about doing worse things than waterboarding, but then I watched it and was totally let down - really nothing to see here.
On June 16 2016 08:49 biology]major wrote: Darkplasmaball, The school to prison pipeline statistics are unnerving, but you assume that there is a systemic discrimination causing the discrepancies vs blacks and whites. I think a far better explanation is that 75% of black kids are raised by a single parent, vs 25% in the rest of the population.
There is not a good reason to consider single parent rates the most prominent factor. Clearly, the disparate inequalities faced by minorities are due to a large number of interrelated elements.
On June 16 2016 06:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So this just happened:
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
I mean, it's obvious "people" is just referring to people that are not gay.
And single parent house holds are common among poor white families as well. The big difference is that nearly 40% of black families are below the poverty line.
Fresh off being grilled on live TV by CNN host Anderson Cooper over her anti-gay positions, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi declared Wednesday morning that it was his interview with her that encouraged "anger and hate."
Cooper's interview with Bondi Tuesday made for dramatic TV when he repeatedly pressed Bondi on whether it was "hypocritical" of her to suggest she was an ally to the LGBT community. Bondi was involved in defending the state's same-sex marriage ban.
Bondi said Wednesday she agreed to Cooper's interview to help victims' families, not to create "more anger and havoc and hatred yesterday. Yesterday was about unity."
“There’s a time and place for everything, but yesterday wasn’t the time nor the place in front of a hospital when we could have been helping victims,” Bondi said in a radio interview on WOR.
She went on to say that she was disappointed in the interview.
"All it did was encourage anger and hate," Bondi said.
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
On June 16 2016 08:49 biology]major wrote: Darkplasmaball, The school to prison pipeline statistics are unnerving, but you assume that there is a systemic discrimination causing the discrepancies vs blacks and whites. I think a far better explanation is that 75% of black kids are raised by a single parent, vs 25% in the rest of the population.
I'd say that there are a multitude of factors that are all related to each other. Two of the most predominant ones are systemic discrimination and the correlation between race and socioeconomic status (which is related to family life, affluence, availability and number of parents in the household, etc.). While the latter umbrella factor can account for some things (e.g., part of the vicious cycle of poverty -> low education/ opportunity -> poverty), it doesn't account for criminal justice discrimination and other issues listed.
Let me clarify. While I don't agree with the criminalization of schools (to put it mildly), I do not like how the school school to prison pipeline is used as a chronic excuse in the same way that white privilege is.
What about the multitude of statistics showing disproportionate stops and searches, arrests, convictions, longer sentences for identical crimes, passing over "black" job applications for otherwise-identical "white" ones, and countless other inconsistencies between being a black person in America and a white person? Here's a huge compilation of data: "The data are organized into 12 categories: Police, the War on Drugs, Prison (Mass Incarceration), Criminal Justice/Courts, Education, Employment, Wealth, Workplace, Voting, Media, and Housing." http://www.jbwtucker.com/ultimate-white-privilege-statistics/
Most of these issues fall into the disparate impact category that I discussed earlier as opposed racism. The two exceptions are sentencing differences and equal opportunity employment/housing. Laws already exist to take care of the latter. The former is a bigger problem that should be addressed.
Can you elaborate on your experiences with racism in China? I've never been there.
I don't have time right now. Remind me to do it later.
On June 16 2016 06:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So this just happened:
Some of you aren't really sure what to make of this short clip. What I'm taking out of this is that Trump is making a distinction between gays and people. He says "Ask the gays, and ask the people" (this then that). As in, gays aren't a subset of people, but are instead a group of beings who are mutually exclusive.
That being said, this could just be a quote mine, so more context is definitely good.
I mean, it's obvious "people" is just referring to people that are not gay.
Wouldn't it be obvious if he said "other people"? Gays vs. Other people makes it clear that gays are people. Gays vs. People means they're mutually exclusive, right?
On June 16 2016 08:49 biology]major wrote: Darkplasmaball, The school to prison pipeline statistics are unnerving, but you assume that there is a systemic discrimination causing the discrepancies vs blacks and whites. I think a far better explanation is that 75% of black kids are raised by a single parent, vs 25% in the rest of the population.
No. There is a distinct and clear racial component to the prison pipeline and pettifogging/trying to explain it away is complicity in my view.
When was Gary Johnson added to the thread title photo? Though I feel the chopped look suits him, because in the end he really won't end up with that many votes. Unless Trump continues off the rails.
So then again I'm not so confident. I just don't know who he appeals to. Even with two really unpopular candidates, people vote strategically. Plus they aren't serious as a party. I just don't see it...