| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
KwarK
United States44403 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:03 DickMcFanny wrote: I'm not an expert in American history, but I think there is plenty of precedent of single-gender tickets. My only regret is that I have but no upvotes to give for this post. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:11 Velr wrote: Yes, but compromising ideologues are actually the people that can push a country towards a certain direction. Maybe Clinton just totally sucks at selling her ideology, being "pragmatic" is a nice attribute, but its not a description of what you actually would want to do and should not be your main selling point. I doubt anyone is questioning that she is pragmatic. But she runs basically on "being pragmatic and like Obama but even more/better"... Well luckily for her neither the Dems nor Reps could push a truely good candidate, so it should be enough... quite true certainly. As a general trend of course, ideologues are less prone to compromising than pragmatists. Certainly compromising ideologues would be best. Clinton is definitely not as good as many at selling her ideology. Her policy command is excellent, but as "cheerleader-in-chief" which is one of the president's functions, she's quite poor. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:29 KwarK wrote: My only regret is that I have but no upvotes to give for this post. Agreed. But I show my support through this post. Also folks, can we use “women” when appropriate over “females”? I really don’t like thinking of you all as Ferengi. Just read your post out loud and if you sound like you would have the lobes for business, use woman instead. | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:41 Plansix wrote: Also folks, can we use “women” when appropriate over “females”? omg so much this! + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://media0.giphy.com/media/GCLlQnV7wzKLu/giphy.gif) This series of comments brought to you by Jezebel | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:41 Plansix wrote: Also folks, can we use “women” when appropriate over “females”? I really don’t like thinking of you all as Ferengi. Just read your post out loud and if you sound like you would have the lobes for business, use woman instead. Never even thought of that lol. Makes sense though, thanks. However, I am compelled to remind you of the 94th rule of acquisition. | ||
|
DickMcFanny
Ireland1076 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8216 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:03 Velr wrote: Well, by that logic, Angela Merkel is the best cancellor/president ever... Merkel is a complete ideologue. Her treatment of Greece is and has always been completely irrational. She expects the Greek to get out of the crisis by tightening their budget and then pay to the last euro their debt, which every economist says is not only stupid, but also completely unfeasible. I don't think we have one more dogmatic leader in Europe. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:41 Plansix wrote: Agreed. But I show my support through this post. Also folks, can we use “women” when appropriate over “females”? I really don’t like thinking of you all as Ferengi. Just read your post out loud and if you sound like you would have the lobes for business, use woman instead. We've got whole binders full of females. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States44403 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46637 Posts
| ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On June 10 2016 23:58 DickMcFanny wrote: I was snapped at once because I said "of either gender". I thought I was being liberal, but apparently I was implying that genders are binary, which made me transphobic. So yeah, difficult to judge what lingo to use these days. LMAO. I thought the whole point is that they want to be considered 100% female o.0 | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46637 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/OxlsZ1X.png) | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
On June 11 2016 00:26 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Top comment (2nd one is roughly the same) ![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/pnMCi/fd596e4d4c.png) | ||
|
KwarK
United States44403 Posts
On June 11 2016 00:23 Mohdoo wrote: LMAO. I thought the whole point is that they want to be considered 100% female o.0 Trans women do, transgenders fit in the binary, they just don't fit in the one they were born in. But then you get into queer and genderfluid and all that stuff and it becomes far more complicated. Transgender are the tip of the iceberg. But for trans people, there are two genders. The person was too interested in checking privilege to check facts. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
On June 11 2016 00:30 Plansix wrote: If Bill Maher decided to become a hermit and never use any form of communication ever again, I’m pretty sure it would be a net gain for humanity. I dont like how you take the moral highground in every zopic here. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On June 11 2016 00:30 Plansix wrote: If Bill Maher decided to become a hermit and never use any form of communication ever again, I’m pretty sure it would be a net gain for humanity. Isn't his point that we are insanely diverse and that's awesome? | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Yamato Cup
IPSL
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
WardiTV Weekly
Ultimate Battle
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
