• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:31
CEST 01:31
KST 08:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Behind the scenes footage of ASL21 Group E ASL21 General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM [ASL21] Ro24 Group F 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1490 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3748

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3746 3747 3748 3749 3750 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
May 05 2016 18:31 GMT
#74941
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 05 2016 18:34 GMT
#74942
I want everyone to just dig into that youtube channel and see that it has 4 total videos of questionable merits. And then question where the hell people find this stuff? That guy has 5K subscribers. Who is digging up 3 month old videos that are basically reblogs of a CNN hour special on the debates?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
May 05 2016 18:36 GMT
#74943
On May 06 2016 03:34 Plansix wrote:
I want everyone to just dig into that youtube channel and see that it has 4 total videos of questionable merits. And then question where the hell people find this stuff? That guy has 5K subscribers. Who is digging up 3 month old videos that are basically reblogs of a CNN hour special on the debates?


I'd like people to wrestle with how openly dishonest Hillary is, rather than blame the messenger for pointing it out. There is no defense of what she did regarding describing her experience in Bosnia, so I suppose your way is easier.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 18:41:12
May 05 2016 18:40 GMT
#74944
No one is going to deny she did lie about that and it was stupid.

And its not like Sanders is any stranger to stretching the truth to paint a picture:

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/clintons-fossil-fuel-money-revisited/

The man is not the bastion of accuracy and gets really mad when people point that out. But don’t let that confuse you and your love for the man. Even though he is just a much of a politician as Hilary.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Rebs
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Pakistan10726 Posts
May 05 2016 18:43 GMT
#74945
On May 06 2016 03:40 Plansix wrote:
No one is going to deny she did lie about that and it was stupid.

And its not like Sanders is any stranger to stretching the truth to paint a picture:

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/clintons-fossil-fuel-money-revisited/

The man is not the bastion of accuracy and gets really mad when people point that out. But don’t let that confuse you and your love for the man. Even though he is just a much of a politician as Hilary.


Tbh honest drinking the koolaid that Bernie is and trying to feed it to everyone is just as bad. Ignorance isnt by any means a lesser sin.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
May 05 2016 18:47 GMT
#74946
On May 06 2016 03:40 Plansix wrote:
No one is going to deny she did lie about that and it was stupid.

And its not like Sanders is any stranger to stretching the truth to paint a picture:

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/clintons-fossil-fuel-money-revisited/

The man is not the bastion of accuracy and gets really mad when people point that out. But don’t let that confuse you and your love for the man. Even though he is just a much of a politician as Hilary.



Give me a break...

She blatantly lied multiple times, you could call it stretching the truth on the oil money, but they aren't even remotely comparable.

the $4.5 million total is tied to donations made to a super PAC supporting Clinton — which Clinton does not control


Riiight she doesn't control it, even though much of it's board is directly on the payroll of her campaign, including David Brock who runs a different superPAC that she does coordinate with (and some propaganda outlets as well).

It's just gross, watching people who say they want campaign finance reform defend this crap.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
May 05 2016 18:51 GMT
#74947
On May 06 2016 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?


The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.

I don't really like Clinton, and in a vacuum I prob prefer Sanders to her (too bad our politics don't work in a vacuum, though I don't mind send them to one), but just a random clip of anyone is only convincing to those who are looking to be convinced and too lazy or unwilling to actually look at the big picture.
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15742 Posts
May 05 2016 18:54 GMT
#74948
On May 06 2016 03:47 GreenHorizons wrote:
It's just gross, watching people who say they want campaign finance reform defend this crap.


I advocate for higher taxes for my tax bracket. I will not just send the government a check for the taxes I think I and everyone else with my income should be paying. I will vote for higher taxes but I will not pay the extra myself unless everyone is. How is that any different? Is it wrong of me to not pay the taxes ahead of time?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 18:57:12
May 05 2016 18:54 GMT
#74949
On May 06 2016 03:51 ragz_gt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?


The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.

I don't really like Clinton, and in a vacuum I prob prefer Sanders to her (too bad our politics don't work in a vacuum, though I don't mind send them to one), but just a random clip of anyone is only convincing to those who are looking to be convinced and too lazy or unwilling to actually look at the big picture.


So what your saying is that it didn't lack any nuance or context relating to Bosnia?

On May 06 2016 03:54 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:47 GreenHorizons wrote:
It's just gross, watching people who say they want campaign finance reform defend this crap.


I advocate for higher taxes for my tax bracket. I will not just send the government a check for the taxes I think I and everyone else with my income should be paying. I will vote for higher taxes but I will not pay the extra myself unless everyone is. How is that any different? Is it wrong of me to not pay the taxes ahead of time?


In the way that telling your slave that you're against slavery is different. It's morally repugnant to engage with in the first place.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 05 2016 18:56 GMT
#74950
She could not have super PACs and really risk losing the election to the RNC. I am sure all the LGBT folks in the US would be super pumped Trump and the RNC nominate another Scalia to the bench. Because at least the DNC preserved its ideological purity by making 100% sure super PACs would be around for the next 4, 8, 12, 20 years.

You bitch about voter repression, but then demand the DNC do things that pretty much assure that they lose races and would lead to the RNC passing more voter ID laws. Its almost like your sole goal in life is to fuck yourself if you can’t have exactly what you want.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
May 05 2016 18:56 GMT
#74951
On May 06 2016 03:54 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:51 ragz_gt wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?


The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.

I don't really like Clinton, and in a vacuum I prob prefer Sanders to her (too bad our politics don't work in a vacuum, though I don't mind send them to one), but just a random clip of anyone is only convincing to those who are looking to be convinced and too lazy or unwilling to actually look at the big picture.


So what your saying is that it didn't lack any nuance or context relating to Bosnia?


I'm saying you have no idea what nuance actually means.
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 19:00:07
May 05 2016 18:58 GMT
#74952
Someone started talking about Bosnia and here I thought someone actually cared about Hillary's support for the Clinton administration's involvement in Yugoslavia and Serbia.

Nope, just some random almost irrelevant comment from 8 years ago. Oh well, carry on.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 19:02:24
May 05 2016 18:59 GMT
#74953
On May 06 2016 03:58 LegalLord wrote:
Someone started talking about Bosnia and here I thought someone actually cared about Hillary's support for the Clinton administration's involvement in Yugoslavia and Serbia.

Nope, just some random almost irrelevant comment from 7 years ago. Oh well, carry on.


Not irrelevant to her honesty.

On May 06 2016 03:56 ragz_gt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:54 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:51 ragz_gt wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?


The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.

I don't really like Clinton, and in a vacuum I prob prefer Sanders to her (too bad our politics don't work in a vacuum, though I don't mind send them to one), but just a random clip of anyone is only convincing to those who are looking to be convinced and too lazy or unwilling to actually look at the big picture.


So what your saying is that it didn't lack any nuance or context relating to Bosnia?


I'm saying you have no idea what nuance actually means.


Point to any nuance that is missing, otherwise I don't believe you.

On May 06 2016 03:56 Plansix wrote:
She could not have super PACs and really risk losing the election to the RNC. I am sure all the LGBT folks in the US would be super pumped Trump and the RNC nominate another Scalia to the bench. Because at least the DNC preserved its ideological purity by making 100% sure super PACs would be around for the next 4, 8, 12, 20 years.

You bitch about voter repression, but then demand the DNC do things that pretty much assure that they lose races and would lead to the RNC passing more voter ID laws. Its almost like your sole goal in life is to fuck yourself if you can’t have exactly what you want.


This... The RNC nominated someone who is not just rhetorically against superPAC's he actually doesn't use them, he also went up against several of them during his primary, one spending well over $100 million.

This "She had to use the corrupting influence of superPAC's or else..." is a pile of hot wet garbage.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 05 2016 19:05 GMT
#74954
GH, you are incredibly naïve if you think Trump and the RNC are not going to be flooding the air waves with super PAC money. They did the last election and they will this time too. Not using them only doesn’t do much since no one will hear that the candidate doesn’t use them.

Also, Sanders would have to use them if he won the nomination. You know that right? The DNC isn’t going to not use them just because he doesn’t like it.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
CannonsNCarriers
Profile Joined April 2010
United States638 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 19:08:48
May 05 2016 19:06 GMT
#74955
Counterpoint to video: Hillary has consistently been in the mainstream of Democratic thought, but what is mainstream Democratic thinking has changed since 1992 (and has changed since 2008 too). She isn't lying or flip flopping when she keeps up with what the middle of the Democratic party wants. She is a politician, specifically a Democratic party stalwart. She, like Obama and Bill, moves to what the middle of the party wants. The video isn't proving any lies by showing that in the 90s she said what Democrats wanted then, and then showing a clip in the 2010s of Hillary saying what Democrats wanted at that time. This is not a bad thing, and it makes me like her more. Try to remember that our politicians are representatives of voters.

Lying is what Trump does. Every line he rattles off is riddled with falsehoods. His big ones are his Iraq position, his tax plans, his claimed business success, his university scams, his conspiracy theories, his claims of holding actual beliefs, pretty much every other sentence is a lie.
Dun tuch my cheezbrgr
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 19:10:37
May 05 2016 19:08 GMT
#74956
On May 06 2016 02:27 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 02:20 LegalLord wrote:
On May 06 2016 02:17 Plansix wrote:
Oh man, this is going to be one of those "what is socialism" style debates that is really tedious and everyone talks past each other.

Indeed. I'm hoping we can nip this argument in the bud before it leads to 5 pages of unreadable tedium.

My master plan is to mock it as having little to do with immediate state of US politics and is mostly an argument based around semantics. Then the snotty response about being unwilling to debate the issue will hopefully derail the discussion. Or Trump will do something amazingly stupid, like blame the Flint water issue on Muslims.


I don't intend to argue the point but you guys realize that whitedoge's post was not primarily a semantic one right? It was a substantive one about Marx's arguments for an internationalism centered around home-based economic units. Your cringe-worthy responses are exactly the reason that we end up with well-meaning but unsophisticated candidates like Bernie instead of incisive European-style lefists like they had in Syriza. You can't speak the language and seemingly don't have the patience for anything beyond a seventh grade reading level. Trump at least knows his audience.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-05 19:11:52
May 05 2016 19:10 GMT
#74957
On May 06 2016 03:59 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 03:56 ragz_gt wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:54 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:51 ragz_gt wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 06 2016 03:30 ragz_gt wrote:
It also devoid of any context or nuance, which is how we end up in this place in the first place.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance


What context or nuance is it missing on Bosnia?


The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.

I don't really like Clinton, and in a vacuum I prob prefer Sanders to her (too bad our politics don't work in a vacuum, though I don't mind send them to one), but just a random clip of anyone is only convincing to those who are looking to be convinced and too lazy or unwilling to actually look at the big picture.


So what your saying is that it didn't lack any nuance or context relating to Bosnia?


I'm saying you have no idea what nuance actually means.


Point to any nuance that is missing, otherwise I don't believe you.


On May 06 2016 03:51 ragz_gt wrote:
The nuance is that highlight reel is a worthless cheap distortion of reality often resorted by people who has no legitimate argument. that If you make a highlight reel of Jordan's missed shots he'd look like unfit to be on a NCAA team.

The nuance is that any politicians have issues like that, and you can make a similar highlight reel out of anybody, and Hillary has pretty good accuracy comparatively (so does Sanders) if you actually look into her claims and that Hillary's "trustworthiness" is mostly a meme that's perpetuated by highlight reel like this.


I guess the whole idea just flies right over your head.

You are like the irl meme in http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/9/5/1127885/-Jon-Stewart-warns-Dems-Americans-don-t-do-nuance
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
May 05 2016 19:17 GMT
#74958
On May 06 2016 02:53 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 02:49 Barrin wrote:
Donald Trump suggested Wednesday that he would be open to lifting the minimum wage, switching his previous primary campaign stance that the U.S. could not afford to hike the current federal rate of $7.25 per hour.

Asked specifically if he was "open to raising the minimum wage" during an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Trump responded: "I am open to doing something with it, because I don't like that."

"But," he added, "what I really do like is bring our jobs back so they're making much more than the 15 dollars."

The billionaire's statement comes just a day after his last opponent, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, bowed out of the Republican primary race, leaving Trump to court general election voters as the likely GOP nominee. Trump's possible opponents in November have both pledged to raise the minimum wage by varying degrees: Hillary Clinton is open to a $12 minimum wage, while Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has called for a $15 wage increase.

During the primary campaign season, Trump, like his other Republican rivals, rejected any proposals for minimum wage raises.

At a GOP debate in November, the New York business mogul said of the federal wage rate: "We have to leave it the way it is."

"People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum," he said. "But we cannot do this if we are going to compete with the rest of the world. We just can't do it."

Trump, in another interview with CNN in 2013, suggested the possibility of two minimum wage rates: one for teenagers and another elevated rate for adults.

"You don't want to do anything that's going to keep the incentive away for whether it's McDonald's expanding in this country," Trump told CNN over two years ago. "At the same time you have to let people live."

Barring Rick Santorum's populist policies, no other GOP White House contenders had supported a jump in the minimum wage, and the issue remains an unpopular one among Republicans.

In Wednesday's CNN interview, Trump said he was "actually looking at" lifting the minimum wage.

"Because I'm very different from most Republicans," he said. "I mean, you have to have something that you can live on."

...
Donald Trump hints at changing stance on minimum wage

He is hunting for the Sanders supporters.

Nah. Trump is just stating that he's willing to put raising the minimum wage on the table, but raising it will not be a central part of his overall policy for helping lower income Americans. This is simply classic Trump dealmaking.
CannonsNCarriers
Profile Joined April 2010
United States638 Posts
May 05 2016 19:19 GMT
#74959
On May 06 2016 04:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2016 02:53 WhiteDog wrote:
On May 06 2016 02:49 Barrin wrote:
Donald Trump suggested Wednesday that he would be open to lifting the minimum wage, switching his previous primary campaign stance that the U.S. could not afford to hike the current federal rate of $7.25 per hour.

Asked specifically if he was "open to raising the minimum wage" during an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Trump responded: "I am open to doing something with it, because I don't like that."

"But," he added, "what I really do like is bring our jobs back so they're making much more than the 15 dollars."

The billionaire's statement comes just a day after his last opponent, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, bowed out of the Republican primary race, leaving Trump to court general election voters as the likely GOP nominee. Trump's possible opponents in November have both pledged to raise the minimum wage by varying degrees: Hillary Clinton is open to a $12 minimum wage, while Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has called for a $15 wage increase.

During the primary campaign season, Trump, like his other Republican rivals, rejected any proposals for minimum wage raises.

At a GOP debate in November, the New York business mogul said of the federal wage rate: "We have to leave it the way it is."

"People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum," he said. "But we cannot do this if we are going to compete with the rest of the world. We just can't do it."

Trump, in another interview with CNN in 2013, suggested the possibility of two minimum wage rates: one for teenagers and another elevated rate for adults.

"You don't want to do anything that's going to keep the incentive away for whether it's McDonald's expanding in this country," Trump told CNN over two years ago. "At the same time you have to let people live."

Barring Rick Santorum's populist policies, no other GOP White House contenders had supported a jump in the minimum wage, and the issue remains an unpopular one among Republicans.

In Wednesday's CNN interview, Trump said he was "actually looking at" lifting the minimum wage.

"Because I'm very different from most Republicans," he said. "I mean, you have to have something that you can live on."

...
Donald Trump hints at changing stance on minimum wage

He is hunting for the Sanders supporters.

Nah. Trump is just stating that he's willing to put raising the minimum wage on the table, but raising it will not be a central part of his overall policy for helping lower income Americans. This is simply classic Trump dealmaking.


Do you see how Trump is killing intellectual Conservatism? He is systematically throwing cherished Conservative policy positions overboard. Free trade, unions, minimum wage, abortion, supply side tax cuts, you name it, Trump is willing to toss it for votes.
Dun tuch my cheezbrgr
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23797 Posts
May 05 2016 19:20 GMT
#74960
On May 06 2016 04:06 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Counterpoint to video: Hillary has consistently been in the mainstream of Democratic thought, but what is mainstream Democratic thinking has changed since 1992 (and has changed since 2008 too). She isn't lying or flip flopping when she keeps up with what the middle of the Democratic party wants. She is a politician, specifically a Democratic party stalwart. She, like Obama and Bill, moves to what the middle of the party wants. The video isn't proving any lies by showing that in the 90s she said what Democrats wanted then, and then showing a clip in the 2010s of Hillary saying what Democrats wanted at that time. This is not a bad thing, and it makes me like her more. Try to remember that our politicians are representatives of voters.

Lying is what Trump does. Every line he rattles off is riddled with falsehoods. His big ones are his Iraq position, his tax plans, his claimed business success, his university scams, his conspiracy theories, his claims of holding actual beliefs, pretty much every other sentence is a lie.


So the reason I timemarked the video is because I wasn't referencing the whole video, just the part about Bosnia, at least Plan came out and just ate the fact that she was just blatantly lying multiple times about it. Everyone else just intentionally pettifogged.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 3746 3747 3748 3749 3750 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft259
ViBE145
SpeCial 85
CosmosSc2 44
JuggernautJason34
PattyMac 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 632
NaDa 13
LancerX 5
Dota 2
syndereN440
canceldota192
capcasts110
Super Smash Bros
PPMD40
Other Games
summit1g6714
tarik_tv5308
C9.Mang0297
shahzam77
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick812
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 95
• RyuSc2 83
• musti20045 33
• Response 9
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 13
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21640
Other Games
• imaqtpie800
Upcoming Events
OSC
29m
RSL Revival
10h 29m
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Big Brain Bouts
16h 29m
Replay Cast
1d
RSL Revival
1d 10h
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-31
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.