• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:49
CEST 10:49
KST 17:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 591 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3067

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3065 3066 3067 3068 3069 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
February 29 2016 08:47 GMT
#61321
On February 29 2016 16:23 ErectedZenith wrote:
Yeah most people wants to work and be productive member of society instead of having a welfare state.


what happens to people who fail under your system?
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
February 29 2016 08:51 GMT
#61322
On February 29 2016 17:47 puerk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 29 2016 16:23 ErectedZenith wrote:
Yeah most people wants to work and be productive member of society instead of having a welfare state.


what happens to people who fail under your system?


Social Darwinism.
Never Knows Best.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
February 29 2016 08:59 GMT
#61323
I do not typically like the editorializing of The Young Turks as they tend to remind me of Olbermann NBC, but by contrast this is just asking a lot of questions and just letting 'em speak. (Granted, it's still cut back and forth.)



How representative this is/ what did TYT do to find them, I don't know. But interesting perspective for sure.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
{ToT}ColmA
Profile Joined November 2007
Japan3260 Posts
February 29 2016 09:03 GMT
#61324
i was hoping for sanders. as an outsider who just watches on the sidelines he came off as the better option for the u.s
The only virgins in kpop left are the fans
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
February 29 2016 09:14 GMT
#61325
On February 29 2016 17:25 JW_DTLA wrote:
Oh man, it is happening. Conservatives are coming around the Trump. The spin is gonna be good.

All that talk of Trump not being conservative enough falls through when someone like Sessions gives him an endorsement. If the GOP had used half the amount of venom and pettiness they are throwing at Trump against Obama 4 years ago Romney would be running for re-election.
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10687 Posts
February 29 2016 09:19 GMT
#61326
Clearly the not born in the US Muslim that wants to destroy america was reeleceted because he wasn't attacked hard enough...
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-29 09:29:58
February 29 2016 09:28 GMT
#61327
well former ron paul aide (eric rittberg) said it best when obama was reelected:
November 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Eric Dondero wrote:

Seccession of leave. I say we've got two to three years left before they start rounding up dissenters and sending us off to Nazi-style concentration camps. I've got a little more time, cause I live in Texas.

Arizona is a good place to be for now. But New York, Iowa, Michigan, Massachusetts, PA beware. You're vastly on the road to complete authoritarianism and statism. Grab your guns, protect what few things you have left. You're living in Nazi Germany circa 1933-34.
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
February 29 2016 09:42 GMT
#61328
On February 29 2016 18:19 Velr wrote:
Clearly the not born in the US Muslim that wants to destroy america was reeleceted because he wasn't attacked hard enough...

Actually they didn't attack him hard enough and to be fair robot Romney buried the rest. It's unbelievable how anyone could lose that election against Obama but Romeny pulled it off.

To all the people saying Hillary would stand a chance against Trump in debates.. maybe she would do better than Sanders who has anger issues when challenged, but Trump will deconstruct her on live television. There is just too much dirt on her out there, and as Trump always says 'I haven't even started on her yet'. At least high ratings will ensure everyone will see her collapse.
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
strongwind
Profile Joined July 2007
United States862 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-29 10:45:57
February 29 2016 10:45 GMT
#61329
On February 29 2016 17:59 Falling wrote:
I do not typically like the editorializing of The Young Turks as they tend to remind me of Olbermann NBC, but by contrast this is just asking a lot of questions and just letting 'em speak. (Granted, it's still cut back and forth.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjPmzw1SbBk

How representative this is/ what did TYT do to find them, I don't know. But interesting perspective for sure.


I think it's easy to criticize the people in the video, believing we would never be like them. It's harder to realize two things:

1. We are all easily manipulated. Our worldview is heavily shaped by our surroundings and the information we choose to inform us.
2. We all have some deep-seated beliefs about the world that would be hard for us to change even with overwhelming evidence against them.

We've been steadily moving away from the notion of "I know that I do not know". Admitting this is perceived as weakness. I think a healthy dose of Socratic wisdom is needed to counter the rampant exceptionalism that abounds on all sides.
Taek Bang Fighting!
RenSC2
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States1057 Posts
February 29 2016 11:24 GMT
#61330
On February 29 2016 16:10 xDaunt wrote:
Sanders was always going to be a longshot. He's not within the democrat mainstream, much less the American mainstream. Thought it may be too much to say that it was a foregone conclusion, the expectation always was that Bernie was going to struggle in the South and in conservative states during the primary. Though the DNC certainly worked to stack the deck in her favor, I haven't seen anything to suggest that Hillary's seemingly impending victory is largely a function of underhanded tactics. As exciting as Bernie may be to very liberal democrats, he simply isn't getting enough of them out to vote for him.

And this is what should be concerning to democrats overall: their low turnouts in the primaries so far. The hearts and minds of democrat and liberal voters aren't being moved like they were in 2008 and 2012. The Obama thrill is gone. Republicans, however, are very excited (for Donald Trump) and are turning out in record numbers. Presuming that Trump wins the nomination and is able to unite most of the Republican Party behind him (he's going to have very careful with his VP pick), Trump will be very well-positioned going into the general, without factoring in 1) his ability to appeal to many traditional democrat voters by moving to the left of Hillary on free trade and foreign policy, 2) any downturn in the US economy which will undoubtedly work to his advantage, and 3) any other catastrophe that may occur on Obama's watch, which will work against Democrats as a whole.

I'm not saying that any of this is going to happen, but the recipe for an electoral disaster for Hillary is right there for everyone to see. And simply dismissing Trump as a buffoon who will be exposed once he is beyond the relative safety of the Republican primary requires turning a blind eye to what has happened since Trump announced his candidacy. His demise has repeatedly been predicted -- and even announced -- by many over the past nine months.

It may be that a majority of American voters ultimately reject Trump and that his loss is already baked into the cake due to the undesirability of his person and platform. But presuming that this is not the case, I do promise you this: Hillary will not be the instrument of Trump's destruction, and any faith in her to be as such is greatly misplaced. She simply is not a skilled enough politician, and she certainly is not qualitatively better than those whom Trump has dispatched thus far.

I agree with a lot of what you say, but I do think you're missing a few key points.

1) Trump is going to bring out the votes For and Against. He is so bombastic that he will energize his opposition and I would suspect the voter turnout in a Trump vs Anyone general election will be enormous. The primaries are just the first example.

2) Clinton has only lost one race in her entire life, right? That was to Obama in 08, who was a juggernaut that made McCain and Romney look pathetic. She may not be a great leader, but she's been a very good campaigner. She knows exactly what she needs to do to win an election and she's done it before. Recently, Sanders popped up as a challenger, so she consolidated the black vote in the south and smacked him back down. If she can smack him down once more on Tuesday, it's over. She knows how to campaign and has a real strategy that goes beyond the first two states. For the general, she'll know exactly which states she needs to target and she'll hit them exactly as hard as necessary to win. She could definitely lose the popular vote, but win the electoral college this election.

3) She can also handle herself quite well in a hostile debate. She has played nice with Sanders in the debates because he has been nice to her... but that's not really her element. She's already been able to smack down the witch-hunt that was Benghazi. She's quite good at venom when needed and her base and independents won't mind if she uses a little venom on Trump. She will get under his skin and make him look like an out of control maniac while she remains sociopathically cool. Then the mainstream media will consistently play select clips to reinforce the narrative that Trump is a maniac while Clinton is presidential.

I'm not predicting Trump's demise in the general quite yet. He has done significantly better than almost anyone predicted in the primary and his opponents have already taken the gloves off. However, I think you completely underestimate Clinton and the anti-Trump movement that is happening inside and outside the Republican party. Clinton may not be energizing, but picking her over Trump will be.
Playing better than standard requires deviation. This divergence usually results in sub-standard play.
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
February 29 2016 11:36 GMT
#61331
On February 29 2016 17:51 Slaughter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 29 2016 17:47 puerk wrote:
On February 29 2016 16:23 ErectedZenith wrote:
Yeah most people wants to work and be productive member of society instead of having a welfare state.


what happens to people who fail under your system?


Social Darwinism.

That reasoning is imo very wrong - in addition to being very badly named - if you take as a core principle the fact that meritocracy should be the driving force of a country ; that a given individual's rank in society should be determined solely by their success and efforts (which can be grossly summarized as their "work") and not by their wealth, name, race, religion, etc.

Pretty obviously, having a functional meritocracy means that you have to have equal opportunities for everyone. With that system, it looks like the lack of welfare state makes perfect sense : if everyone has the same opportunities to climb the social ladder, then those who work and are productive members of society get what they deserve, and those who are lazy fuckers get what they deserve too.

But here's the catch : what should be is not what is. Even in the most egalitarian society you can think of, equal opportunities would not be a reality. That's why not having a welfare state is detrimental to meritocracy : I think it's not hard to understand that becoming a doctor, when your parents are doctors making $15K/month and you grow up with no material problems nor violent neighbourhood, is way easier than becoming a doctor, when your parents have low-pay, insecure jobs and you grow up in poverty and violence (and why not add an alcoholic father who beats his wife to the mix).

That's the idea : people who fail do not necessarily fail because they deserved to fail. Most of the time, they fail because they didn't have an equal footing with people who didn't fail.

Thus you have to penalize richer people and help poorer people - that's what Welfare State is. It can be done by reducing the richer people's advantages, or by reducing the poorer people's disadvantage, or both. But either way, the idea of a Welfare State is not that you give money to people who don't deserve it, as many in America seem to think ; it's that you give money to people who didn't even get the chance to climb the social ladder, even though they put effort into it. Yes, in the process you'll also give money to lazy fuckers, that's a reality. But these are a minority among the people who benefit from a Welfare State - and even more so if you consider that everyone, as a member a society, benefits from a healthier society, and that a Welfare State makes a healthier society.
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
February 29 2016 11:59 GMT
#61332
the problem with aid is that it does disrupt the situation and make people and even enire communities dependent. this is a clear lesson from international aid and development.

there are some adverse effects to simply giving people aid, the remedy is not no aid, but aid that does not distort incentives to work (as a high effective marginal tax at hte lower range for example).
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
February 29 2016 12:07 GMT
#61333
I am not sure i can accept your defense of a welfare state when you seem to think that "lazy fucks" aren't really fellow humans who deserve a dignified life, they are just lucky they get one by accident in a welfare state....
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
February 29 2016 12:11 GMT
#61334
that is an incredibly dumb way of looking at it
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
February 29 2016 12:19 GMT
#61335
not every welfare state is based upon the principle of meritocracy others are based on human dignity... i just wanted to remind him of that, as i find meritocratic ideas flawed in the sense that they can never adjust for human variabilitiy... no amount of "adjustment" will create opportunities for people, that are considered disabled in some way or an other (accident, genetic, birth defect, illness, a lot of stuff happens to humans) in a truly meritocratic system... they would be just useless trash.. even if they would want to work, their apptitude would not match up to people in luckier parts of the distribution
a dignity based approach captures all those cases and more easily and justifies helping them...
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 29 2016 12:24 GMT
#61336
In a more practical argument, it is more efficient to provide someone with assistance so they are not desperate than to police them when because they cannot survive or make ends meet. I would rather pay for subsidized housing than have people be homeless and risk breaking into my house because they are desperate.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
February 29 2016 12:29 GMT
#61337
that is an argument to sell a wellfare system to people against one.... but it is at its core fundamentally selfish "lets make society better because if we don't their suffering might impact me"
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 29 2016 12:30 GMT
#61338
Also:



John Oliver on Trump. The section about Trump not knowing what the truth is or just not caring is the most terrifying part IMO. I don't want a guy who true believes whatever headcannon he creates being president.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
February 29 2016 12:54 GMT
#61339
On February 29 2016 21:07 puerk wrote:
I am not sure i can accept your defense of a welfare state when you seem to think that "lazy fucks" aren't really fellow humans who deserve a dignified life, they are just lucky they get one by accident in a welfare state....

On February 29 2016 21:19 puerk wrote:
not every welfare state is based upon the principle of meritocracy others are based on human dignity... i just wanted to remind him of that, as i find meritocratic ideas flawed in the sense that they can never adjust for human variabilitiy... no amount of "adjustment" will create opportunities for people, that are considered disabled in some way or an other (accident, genetic, birth defect, illness, a lot of stuff happens to humans) in a truly meritocratic system... they would be just useless trash.. even if they would want to work, their apptitude would not match up to people in luckier parts of the distribution
a dignity based approach captures all those cases and more easily and justifies helping them...

Let me clarify here : what I mean by "lazy fucks" are not people who cannot (be it because of social, medical, or whatever, factors) make enough efforts to atteign decent wealth, it is people who can do it, but do not want to work and be, as ErectedZenith originally put it, "productive members of society". Thus yes, I'd argue that people who do not have sufficient wealth not to work yet who chose to do nothing with their lives and who have the luck of benefiting from (almost-)free healthcare, financial aids, etc etc, are lucky to live in a welfare state during our era, because that wouldn't be possible if they lived anywhere else in the world or during any other era. I'm not saying that this is particularly good or bad, however I am saying that they are genuinely lucky, and I think that's a fact. I'll repeat, too, that contrarily to what some populist parties in Europe try to make people believe, these "lazy fuckers" are not a horde of people exploiting the system, they're a very small minority among all the people getting aid not because they wanted to, but because they couldn't do better.

As for meritocracy, raw/fake meritocracy, the idea that your success is only proportional with the efforts you put in, is indeed very flawed. Real meritocracy, the meritocracy that accounts for human variability, does not consider disabled people as trash, because real meritocracy takes the amount of efforts made as its main criteria, not your success (which most often doesn't come from the efforts you put in). And I do not see how promoting meritocracy is selfish at its core ; the selfish thing to do is NOT to promote meritocracy, as increased meritocracy means an increased chance of you getting lower on the social ladder because people with more merit, who previously were put down by the system, can now express their potential...

And human dignity... yeah, human dignity is indeed a principle that justifies the fact that no human should be treated like a beast, exploited, used an experimental material, forced to do things against their own will, etc - which makes human dignity one of the most disrespected principle on earth. However it does not justify the fact that someone refuses to partake in what is the fundamental core of even the smallest human society, work.
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-29 13:08:03
February 29 2016 13:06 GMT
#61340
The issue is: who is the one deciding who can and who cannot, who wants and who wants not, who shows effort and who does not...

Meritocracies are measuring with monetary and/or societal (praise) success, they are entirely outcome based and not as you claim effort based.

And success is not in any objective way normalizable with some sort of apptitude level to extract their "effort". I am not sure why you think otherwise but there is no "meritocracy" in what you call a "real meritocracy".

I am not saying dignity justifies refusal to work, i say dignity informs us how to interact with people you consider lazy fucks.
Prev 1 3065 3066 3067 3068 3069 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 542
trigger 44
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1080
TY 331
Stork 312
actioN 295
Larva 240
Zeus 210
ToSsGirL 119
PianO 102
Soma 83
Nal_rA 62
[ Show more ]
Yoon 46
sSak 41
JulyZerg 40
Noble 38
Sharp 33
Sacsri 24
sorry 18
Barracks 13
IntoTheRainbow 8
ivOry 0
Dota 2
XaKoH 545
XcaliburYe453
Fuzer 240
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1161
Other Games
tarik_tv3225
shahzam1066
ceh9441
Happy319
monkeys_forever206
crisheroes181
Pyrionflax64
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick33798
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH422
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2192
League of Legends
• Stunt691
• HappyZerGling95
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 11m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
7h 11m
WardiTV European League
7h 11m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
15h 11m
RSL Revival
1d 1h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 15h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.