• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:38
CEST 03:38
KST 10:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway122v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature3Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18Serral wins EWC 202549
Community News
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris7Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!10Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread What mix of new and old maps do you want in the next 1v1 ladder pool? (SC2) : I made a 5.0.12/5.0.13 replay fix Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull
Brood War
General
Victoria gamers Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL New season has just come in ladder BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
The Biochemical Cost of Gami…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1802 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2213

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:17 GMT
#44241
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18010 Posts
August 19 2015 18:17 GMT
#44242
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.


Immigration law doesn't discriminate on race, nor would excluding newborns. It would discriminate on nationality (in this case the parents' nationality), which in the case of national law makes sense.

To me it makes sense that Jus Sole should only apply to legal immigrants, though. It doesn't make sense for me that Jus Sole applies for people who are on holiday, or crossed the border without the proper papers.

That said, such a change should be part of a wholescale reform of the immigration law, and not cherrypicked out of Trump's program. Seen in the whole context of Trump's program it is insane and will never work. It won't achieve what he (claims to) want, and will only lead to even worse situations. Just look at Europe and stay far away from the stuff tried there. Trump is actually looking to apply quite a few of the restrictions that were tried and failed miserably elsewhere.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23250 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:34:57
August 19 2015 18:19 GMT
#44243
it was all new for them, so they started calling it the new world, end of story.


That doesn't make it painfully obvious?

I'm not talking about white supremacy as in robes and pillowcases, I'm talking about the (inadvertent) white supremacy displayed in the quote.

It was new to white people, they called it new, end of story (who cares if people had been living there building communities for thousands of years, I mean they were non-white).

It comes from the same Euro-white-centric view of the world that claims Columbus "discovered" America. No! There were people with distinct cultures and histories predating European countries by thousands of years already there.

But because white Europeans saw themselves as superior they cast aside that "savage" culture and claimed the land "New" and theirs.

Why the rest of the US still has a "Columbus day" and why it's still commonly known as "The New World" is a longer story and takes more unpacking.

But if I came over to your house and claimed I discovered this new house and it was mine now it would probably help one understand why it's so ridiculous.


I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.


Take down the Statue of Liberty first, then we can talk about refusing refugees and people escaping crippling governments.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11355 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:24:51
August 19 2015 18:23 GMT
#44244
On August 19 2015 22:58 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2015 16:40 Falling wrote:
Hey Wegandi, please keep the TL boards clear of the labelling SJW nonsense. I have rarely seen it used but as an insulting epithet to those the labeller holds in contempt. As such, it has no place in our political discourse or any where else on TL.


SJW isn't an insulting epithet. It's an accurate term, which SJWs like Plansix wear proudly.

A pejorative usually seems an accurate term when you hold an opposing side in contempt. One could equally argue 'Paulbot' 'libtard' is simply an accurate term, but in all three cases it is an insult given to another, and rarely worn voluntarily, except to be ironic. There is no room for that on TL.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 19 2015 18:27 GMT
#44245
Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee delivered a confused and garbled press conference in Jerusalem during a brief campaign stop, which included a controversial fundraising visit to a settlement in the occupied Palestinian territories.

At times taking positions to the right of Israel’s government, the former governor of Arkansas at one stage described Russia as the “Soviet Union” – when referring to its plans to supply Iran with S-300 anti-aircraft missiles – before correcting himself.

He also seemed to suggest that the West Bank bordered one of Israel’s enemies, as opposed to Jordan, which has long enjoyed a peace treaty with Israel.

As Huckabee left the press conference, he also said he was unsure if he would be the first US president to abandon a commitment to a two-state solution, despite having no policy he could articulate on the future of Palestinians.

The press conference followed meetings with senior Israeli figures, including prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, and followed his visit to the settlement of Shilo on the occupied West Bank where he held a private fundraiser with wealthy American settlers.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21712 Posts
August 19 2015 18:29 GMT
#44246
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:34 GMT
#44247
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23250 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:37:28
August 19 2015 18:36 GMT
#44248
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment (or the 1st for that matter) is sacrosanct...
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Deathstar
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
9150 Posts
August 19 2015 18:37 GMT
#44249
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.
rip passion
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23250 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:44:54
August 19 2015 18:39 GMT
#44250
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.


The law we are talking about is contained in the same document. He made a stupid statement, I'm just pointing out one reason as to why it's stupid (as far as birthright). If we're just talking about immigration laws now then fine, advocate for tearing down the statue of liberty and then once it's down that discussion makes sense.

But so long as we have the equivalent of a giant neon sign asking for people Xdaunt is fine with excluding from our nation, it just sounds stupid.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 19 2015 18:40 GMT
#44251
Fire managers overwhelmed by huge wildfires blazing across the west are looking for help wherever they can find it and have called in 200 active-duty military troops to fight the flames.

It’s the first time since 2006 that the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise has mobilized soldiers for fire-suppression.

National guard troops set controlled burns outside Chelan to use up fuel as helicopters dropped water. More than 1,000 people worked to protect homes from the lightning-sparked blazes that began there last week, have burned more than 170 square miles and have destroyed an estimated 75 buildings.

“Nationally, the system is pretty tapped,” said Rob Allen, the deputy incident commander for the fires around the Cascade Mountain resort town of Chelan. “Everything is being used right now, so competition for resources is fierce.”

The active-duty troops are all coming from the 17th field artillery brigade at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma and will be sent to a fire north of Republic, a town in central Washington, about 30 miles south of the Canadian border.

Fire managers at the center are able to enlist military help when there are not enough civilian firefighting teams, thanks to a 1975 agreement between the Defense, Interior and Agriculture departments.

The help can be crucial in particularly active years like this one. In the last two weeks alone, more than 1,500 square miles have burned in the Lower 48 states, center spokesman Ken Frederick said.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:42 GMT
#44252
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.

You must be new around here. GreenHorizons slams straw man arguments like junkies slam heroin.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23250 Posts
August 19 2015 18:44 GMT
#44253
On August 20 2015 03:42 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]
What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.

You must be new around here. GreenHorizons slams straw man arguments like junkies slam heroin.


Xdaunt and others just like to label everything that exposes the shallowness of their posts as "Strawmen"
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4773 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:49:28
August 19 2015 18:47 GMT
#44254
On August 20 2015 03:19 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
it was all new for them, so they started calling it the new world, end of story.


That doesn't make it painfully obvious?

I'm not talking about white supremacy as in robes and pillowcases, I'm talking about the (inadvertent) white supremacy displayed in the quote.

It was new to white people, they called it new, end of story (who cares if people had been living there building communities for thousands of years, I mean they were non-white).

It comes from the same Euro-white-centric view of the world that claims Columbus "discovered" America. No! There were people with distinct cultures and histories predating European countries by thousands of years already there.

But because white Europeans saw themselves as superior they cast aside that "savage" culture and claimed the land "New" and theirs.

Why the rest of the US still has a "Columbus day" and why it's still commonly known as "The New World" is a longer story and takes more unpacking.

But if I came over to your house and claimed I discovered this new house and it was mine now it would probably help one understand why it's so ridiculous.


Show nested quote +
I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.


Take down the Statue of Liberty first, then we can talk about refusing refugees and people escaping crippling governments.


Actually I was just tired and made a silly mistake. I intended to quote from the article, but then again "New World" isn't the type of phrase that needs explaining. It has nothing to do with any of the BS you are going on about.

And the purpose of immigration is ultimately about what is good for the citizens, which is why preferring certian groups (like English speakers) makes sense. Immigration after the 1960s means we have to reevaluate some things.

Moreover, most citizens are to the right of politicians on this issue, not that it matters.

That's my piece. No white supremacy undertones anywhere in "new world".
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
always_winter
Profile Joined February 2015
United States195 Posts
August 19 2015 18:54 GMT
#44255
Guys everyone knows the Statue of Liberty is a giant welcome sign to every disenfranchised citizen of planet Earth. Personally I like to think of the Statue of Liberty as a giant Oprah. "You get citizenship, and you get citizenship and you get citizenship!" And so on and so forth. It's beautiful, really.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42794 Posts
August 19 2015 18:56 GMT
#44256
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.

Which is remarkably convenient for the people advocating that the ladder that brought them to the top be removed less other people follow them.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
August 19 2015 19:02 GMT
#44257
On August 20 2015 03:39 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]
What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.


The law we are talking about is contained in the same document. He made a stupid statement, I'm just pointing out one reason as to why it's stupid (as far as birthright). If we're just talking about immigration laws now then fine, advocate for tearing down the statue of liberty and then once it's down that discussion makes sense.

But so long as we have the equivalent of a giant neon sign asking for people Xdaunt is fine with excluding from our nation, it just sounds stupid.


So, your argument is we should base our national policy around a national monument? Should France also be Eiffel Tower focused in its policy considerations? Does Egypt base its policy around the riddles of the Sphinx? Why not pick Mount Rushmore as our policy monument?
Freeeeeeedom
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 19:04 GMT
#44258
On August 20 2015 03:56 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.

Which is remarkably convenient for the people advocating that the ladder that brought them to the top be removed less other people follow them.

Call it "remarkably convenient" all you want, but it doesn't make it any less true. The time when the US needed to rapidly expand its population to populate its vast territory is long over.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
August 19 2015 19:05 GMT
#44259
Also it has nothing to do with that. It has to do with math and government finances.
Freeeeeeedom
Soap
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Brazil1546 Posts
August 19 2015 19:06 GMT
#44260
Why can't they build their own ladder?
Prev 1 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
00:00
The 5.4k Patch Clash #2
CranKy Ducklings113
davetesta30
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 143
NeuroSwarm 130
RuFF_SC2 100
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 61
Dota 2
monkeys_forever674
Counter-Strike
fl0m1365
Stewie2K69
Other Games
tarik_tv11280
summit1g9189
shahzam590
C9.Mang0559
JimRising 352
ViBE224
Maynarde119
Trikslyr79
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1112
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH172
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4638
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur342
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
8h 22m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
9h 22m
Zoun vs Bunny
herO vs Solar
Replay Cast
22h 22m
LiuLi Cup
1d 9h
BSL Team Wars
1d 17h
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
[BSL 2025] Weekly
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs TBD
Jaedong vs Mong
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
herO vs TBD
Royal vs Barracks
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Jiahua Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSLAN 3
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.