• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:16
CEST 14:16
KST 21:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 298Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 6 - 12): Protoss strike back2BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion7BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion7Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon44
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (July 6 - 12): Protoss strike back Is the larve respawn broken? Serral wins HomeStory Cup 29 Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format
Tourneys
GSL CK #5 Race War WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event HomeStory Cup 29 Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family
Brood War
General
screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool Pros Debate: Zerg Unfairly Nerfed? (ASL S22 map) ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool ASL22 General Discussion BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Wildcard Qualifier IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming!
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5510 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2213

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:17 GMT
#44241
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18366 Posts
August 19 2015 18:17 GMT
#44242
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.


Immigration law doesn't discriminate on race, nor would excluding newborns. It would discriminate on nationality (in this case the parents' nationality), which in the case of national law makes sense.

To me it makes sense that Jus Sole should only apply to legal immigrants, though. It doesn't make sense for me that Jus Sole applies for people who are on holiday, or crossed the border without the proper papers.

That said, such a change should be part of a wholescale reform of the immigration law, and not cherrypicked out of Trump's program. Seen in the whole context of Trump's program it is insane and will never work. It won't achieve what he (claims to) want, and will only lead to even worse situations. Just look at Europe and stay far away from the stuff tried there. Trump is actually looking to apply quite a few of the restrictions that were tried and failed miserably elsewhere.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24136 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:34:57
August 19 2015 18:19 GMT
#44243
it was all new for them, so they started calling it the new world, end of story.


That doesn't make it painfully obvious?

I'm not talking about white supremacy as in robes and pillowcases, I'm talking about the (inadvertent) white supremacy displayed in the quote.

It was new to white people, they called it new, end of story (who cares if people had been living there building communities for thousands of years, I mean they were non-white).

It comes from the same Euro-white-centric view of the world that claims Columbus "discovered" America. No! There were people with distinct cultures and histories predating European countries by thousands of years already there.

But because white Europeans saw themselves as superior they cast aside that "savage" culture and claimed the land "New" and theirs.

Why the rest of the US still has a "Columbus day" and why it's still commonly known as "The New World" is a longer story and takes more unpacking.

But if I came over to your house and claimed I discovered this new house and it was mine now it would probably help one understand why it's so ridiculous.


I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.


Take down the Statue of Liberty first, then we can talk about refusing refugees and people escaping crippling governments.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11582 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:24:51
August 19 2015 18:23 GMT
#44244
On August 19 2015 22:58 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2015 16:40 Falling wrote:
Hey Wegandi, please keep the TL boards clear of the labelling SJW nonsense. I have rarely seen it used but as an insulting epithet to those the labeller holds in contempt. As such, it has no place in our political discourse or any where else on TL.


SJW isn't an insulting epithet. It's an accurate term, which SJWs like Plansix wear proudly.

A pejorative usually seems an accurate term when you hold an opposing side in contempt. One could equally argue 'Paulbot' 'libtard' is simply an accurate term, but in all three cases it is an insult given to another, and rarely worn voluntarily, except to be ironic. There is no room for that on TL.
Moderator5000 of our finest Taliban warriors have been released! Rise up my brothers. Mashalla! al-Donald ibn-Frederick al-Masih allows it.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 19 2015 18:27 GMT
#44245
Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee delivered a confused and garbled press conference in Jerusalem during a brief campaign stop, which included a controversial fundraising visit to a settlement in the occupied Palestinian territories.

At times taking positions to the right of Israel’s government, the former governor of Arkansas at one stage described Russia as the “Soviet Union” – when referring to its plans to supply Iran with S-300 anti-aircraft missiles – before correcting himself.

He also seemed to suggest that the West Bank bordered one of Israel’s enemies, as opposed to Jordan, which has long enjoyed a peace treaty with Israel.

As Huckabee left the press conference, he also said he was unsure if he would be the first US president to abandon a commitment to a two-state solution, despite having no policy he could articulate on the future of Palestinians.

The press conference followed meetings with senior Israeli figures, including prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, and followed his visit to the settlement of Shilo on the occupied West Bank where he held a private fundraiser with wealthy American settlers.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22462 Posts
August 19 2015 18:29 GMT
#44246
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:34 GMT
#44247
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24136 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:37:28
August 19 2015 18:36 GMT
#44248
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment (or the 1st for that matter) is sacrosanct...
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Deathstar
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
9150 Posts
August 19 2015 18:37 GMT
#44249
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.
rip passion
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24136 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:44:54
August 19 2015 18:39 GMT
#44250
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.


The law we are talking about is contained in the same document. He made a stupid statement, I'm just pointing out one reason as to why it's stupid (as far as birthright). If we're just talking about immigration laws now then fine, advocate for tearing down the statue of liberty and then once it's down that discussion makes sense.

But so long as we have the equivalent of a giant neon sign asking for people Xdaunt is fine with excluding from our nation, it just sounds stupid.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 19 2015 18:40 GMT
#44251
Fire managers overwhelmed by huge wildfires blazing across the west are looking for help wherever they can find it and have called in 200 active-duty military troops to fight the flames.

It’s the first time since 2006 that the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise has mobilized soldiers for fire-suppression.

National guard troops set controlled burns outside Chelan to use up fuel as helicopters dropped water. More than 1,000 people worked to protect homes from the lightning-sparked blazes that began there last week, have burned more than 170 square miles and have destroyed an estimated 75 buildings.

“Nationally, the system is pretty tapped,” said Rob Allen, the deputy incident commander for the fires around the Cascade Mountain resort town of Chelan. “Everything is being used right now, so competition for resources is fierce.”

The active-duty troops are all coming from the 17th field artillery brigade at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma and will be sent to a fire north of Republic, a town in central Washington, about 30 miles south of the Canadian border.

Fire managers at the center are able to enlist military help when there are not enough civilian firefighting teams, thanks to a 1975 agreement between the Defense, Interior and Agriculture departments.

The help can be crucial in particularly active years like this one. In the last two weeks alone, more than 1,500 square miles have burned in the Lower 48 states, center spokesman Ken Frederick said.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 18:42 GMT
#44252
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.

You must be new around here. GreenHorizons slams straw man arguments like junkies slam heroin.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24136 Posts
August 19 2015 18:44 GMT
#44253
On August 20 2015 03:42 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]
What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.

You must be new around here. GreenHorizons slams straw man arguments like junkies slam heroin.


Xdaunt and others just like to label everything that exposes the shallowness of their posts as "Strawmen"
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States5001 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-19 18:49:28
August 19 2015 18:47 GMT
#44254
On August 20 2015 03:19 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
it was all new for them, so they started calling it the new world, end of story.


That doesn't make it painfully obvious?

I'm not talking about white supremacy as in robes and pillowcases, I'm talking about the (inadvertent) white supremacy displayed in the quote.

It was new to white people, they called it new, end of story (who cares if people had been living there building communities for thousands of years, I mean they were non-white).

It comes from the same Euro-white-centric view of the world that claims Columbus "discovered" America. No! There were people with distinct cultures and histories predating European countries by thousands of years already there.

But because white Europeans saw themselves as superior they cast aside that "savage" culture and claimed the land "New" and theirs.

Why the rest of the US still has a "Columbus day" and why it's still commonly known as "The New World" is a longer story and takes more unpacking.

But if I came over to your house and claimed I discovered this new house and it was mine now it would probably help one understand why it's so ridiculous.


Show nested quote +
I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.


Take down the Statue of Liberty first, then we can talk about refusing refugees and people escaping crippling governments.


Actually I was just tired and made a silly mistake. I intended to quote from the article, but then again "New World" isn't the type of phrase that needs explaining. It has nothing to do with any of the BS you are going on about.

And the purpose of immigration is ultimately about what is good for the citizens, which is why preferring certian groups (like English speakers) makes sense. Immigration after the 1960s means we have to reevaluate some things.

Moreover, most citizens are to the right of politicians on this issue, not that it matters.

That's my piece. No white supremacy undertones anywhere in "new world".
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
always_winter
Profile Joined February 2015
United States195 Posts
August 19 2015 18:54 GMT
#44255
Guys everyone knows the Statue of Liberty is a giant welcome sign to every disenfranchised citizen of planet Earth. Personally I like to think of the Statue of Liberty as a giant Oprah. "You get citizenship, and you get citizenship and you get citizenship!" And so on and so forth. It's beautiful, really.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44190 Posts
August 19 2015 18:56 GMT
#44256
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.

Which is remarkably convenient for the people advocating that the ladder that brought them to the top be removed less other people follow them.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
August 19 2015 19:02 GMT
#44257
On August 20 2015 03:39 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:37 Deathstar wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]
What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.


Yeah we never hear that about the Constitution right? Only fools argue the 2nd amendment is sacrosanct...


What's the matter with you? You have trouble focusing on an issue? We're talking about immigration here. The laws are malleable.


The law we are talking about is contained in the same document. He made a stupid statement, I'm just pointing out one reason as to why it's stupid (as far as birthright). If we're just talking about immigration laws now then fine, advocate for tearing down the statue of liberty and then once it's down that discussion makes sense.

But so long as we have the equivalent of a giant neon sign asking for people Xdaunt is fine with excluding from our nation, it just sounds stupid.


So, your argument is we should base our national policy around a national monument? Should France also be Eiffel Tower focused in its policy considerations? Does Egypt base its policy around the riddles of the Sphinx? Why not pick Mount Rushmore as our policy monument?
Freeeeeeedom
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 19 2015 19:04 GMT
#44258
On August 20 2015 03:56 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2015 03:34 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:29 Gorsameth wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:17 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 03:02 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:56 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:53 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:48 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2015 02:44 KwarK wrote:
A birth within the United States is a birth within the United States. The newborns of current citizens have achieved nothing more worthy in their few seconds of existence than the newborns of non citizens and the idea of discriminating between newborns based upon the race of their parents is an anathema to me.

Also, as one of the few people in this topic who has legally immigrated into the United States, the process is literally Hitler. It already discriminates very strongly in favour of people with money, fluency in English, education and experience.

What sane immigration system wouldn't very strongly favor these people?

One that held it to be self evident that all men are created equal?

....which is why Americans are a bunch of communists. Oh, wait....

I'm basically allowed into America because I have rich parents and come from England. Oh, and I'm young enough and smart enough to find and understand the lengthy guides to how to navigate the paperwork without an immigration lawyer. The vast majority of Americans descend from people who would not be able to immigrate today. A lot of them wouldn't be able to immigrate today had they not been born here. I see a problem with that.

I have no problem with generally taking only the best, brightest, and wealthiest. The USA doesn't exist to be a charity.

Which is funny and sad considering your country is basically founded on the exact opposite.

America is a very different place than it was 200 -- or even 100 -- years ago. Only a fool would argue that the same policy considerations apply.

Which is remarkably convenient for the people advocating that the ladder that brought them to the top be removed less other people follow them.

Call it "remarkably convenient" all you want, but it doesn't make it any less true. The time when the US needed to rapidly expand its population to populate its vast territory is long over.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
August 19 2015 19:05 GMT
#44259
Also it has nothing to do with that. It has to do with math and government finances.
Freeeeeeedom
Soap
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Brazil1546 Posts
August 19 2015 19:06 GMT
#44260
Why can't they build their own ladder?
Prev 1 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
11:00
WardiTV Mondays #95
IntoTheiNu 1090
WardiTV698
TKL 260
Rex131
CranKy Ducklings35
CranKy Ducklings SOOP7
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko460
TKL 275
Ryung 243
SHIN 142
herO (SOOP) 133
Rex 127
DenverSC2 28
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 6924
Sea 2122
Bisu 1646
Shuttle 1158
Jaedong 644
Hyuk 459
Mini 416
firebathero 400
BeSt 280
EffOrt 228
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 200
Light 197
Stork 174
Snow 164
Larva 151
Soma 135
ggaemo 135
sorry 126
ZerO 82
Mong 81
Sea.KH 63
Sharp 59
Pusan 58
ToSsGirL 57
Free 55
PianO 51
[sc1f]eonzerg 44
910 44
Rush 41
JYJ 40
soO 33
hero 30
scan(afreeca) 28
yabsab 22
Sexy 22
Bale 22
Killer 21
Icarus 20
Hm[arnc] 20
Aegong 19
Shine 18
IntoTheRainbow 17
sSak 16
Movie 14
Noble 11
Yoon 8
Barracks 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5801
Dendi455
syndereN121
League of Legends
JimRising 359
Counter-Strike
x6flipin234
markeloff87
Other Games
singsing807
B2W.Neo674
crisheroes272
hiko39
RuFF_SC214
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2635
BasetradeTV307
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade762
• HappyZerGling108
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
21h 44m
Replay Cast
1d 20h
CrankTV Team League
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
IPSL
4 days
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
5 days
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S3
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W3
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 1
Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.