• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 21:08
CET 03:08
KST 11:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT7Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book16Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0224LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)45Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker15
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game?
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Team League Season 10 PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea Ladder maps - how we can make blizz update them? TvZ is the most complete match up Brood War inspired Terran vs Zerg cinematic – feed Which units you wish saw more use in the game?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread ZeroSpace Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Corso Formazione Insegnanti Yoga What Game makes you happy and stress free?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013 2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Search For Meaning in Vi…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2171 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1863

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 14:08 GMT
#37241
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?
Freeeeeeedom
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
April 20 2015 14:13 GMT
#37242
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 14:32:52
April 20 2015 14:32 GMT
#37243
So Hillary Clinton is running for US presidency in 2016. I'm wondering what are your opinions on this. If I was American, I would vote for Rand Paul.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 15:22:19
April 20 2015 14:58 GMT
#37244
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 15:02 GMT
#37245
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 15:51 GMT
#37246
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.
Freeeeeeedom
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28739 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 16:10:38
April 20 2015 16:04 GMT
#37247
the OECD chart doesn't look at top 0.1%, it looks at top 10%. Like I mentioned earlier I was genuinely surprised to find that top 10% was that high, but the top 10% doesn't relate to the billionaires or the 'obscenely rich', the ones I myself find politically and societally problematic. Even for a pretty far left leaning social democrat like myself, I don't see problems with some degree of economic inequality (like highly motivated, hard working and skilled people earning $80k a year - which puts them in the top 10%). Top 0.1% is $1.5 mill, even then you're still far away from the ones with the wealth that I find unpalatable. (well, that's in the ballpark actually. ;p )
Moderator
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 16:12:33
April 20 2015 16:08 GMT
#37248
On April 21 2015 00:51 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.


notice i connected my definition of 'rich' with substantial wealth ownership. this means looking at the group of people whose income is mainly investment/real estate.

effective tax burden should be examined based on the individual's wealth/income, because the 'fair' amount of tax burden depends on the structure of income/wealth distributino in a particular society. looking merely at revenue sourcing is not very informative.

the rest of your post is insubstantial.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 20 2015 16:42 GMT
#37249
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 17:27:19
April 20 2015 16:47 GMT
#37250
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
April 20 2015 17:18 GMT
#37251
Also, lest we forget the relative % of "disposable income" that taxes make up for each group
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 17:45 GMT
#37252
On April 21 2015 01:08 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 00:51 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.


notice i connected my definition of 'rich' with substantial wealth ownership. this means looking at the group of people whose income is mainly investment/real estate.


effective tax burden should be examined based on the individual's wealth/income, because the 'fair' amount of tax burden depends on the structure of income/wealth distributino in a particular society. looking merely at revenue sourcing is not very informative.

the rest of your post is insubstantial.


Then freaking bring your own chart. You don't just get to say "well, I don't like your evidence, I have my own perceptions of the world".

On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.




Basically, your argument is that the Payroll tax, which funds Social Security and Medicare, is a bad thing. I don't disagree that those are bad programs that are funded strangely. The reason they are is because they are crafted to be politically untouchable expansions of the Federal government. If there was no "set aside" there would be no "entitlements" and they would have been repealed years ago. Milton Friedman has a rant about Social Security which basically states that Social Security is two parts that are indefensible on their own: 1. A wage tax plus + 2. A subsidy that increases based on your previous income.

I don't know what to say, you are essentially attacking the modern welfare state, I'm not going to disagree with that.
Freeeeeeedom
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 18:18:50
April 20 2015 17:52 GMT
#37253
citations about effective 0.1% tax rate.

Taxpayers at the very top of the income distribution, the top 0.1 percent, which includes taxpayers with incomes over $2.2 million, actually paid a slightly lower income tax rate than the top 1 percent (21.7 percent versus 22.8 percent). This is due to the fact that very high income taxpayers are more likely to report a greater share of their income as taxable capital gains income. This leads to a slightly lower effective tax rate because capital gains and dividends income faces a lower top income tax rate

http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-0

also stuff buffett and geithner said.

(double taxation through corporate tax does add substantially to this but problem is, effective corporate tax rate is not 35% and this is priced into the stock price)


point with payroll and local level taxation is that only focusing on the federal income tax would misrepresent the actual tax burden. not taking into account the very substantial loopholes and tax avoidance/evasion/deferments at the higher levels of sophistication also would distort one's perception of 'fair' tax burden.

the size of the u.s. welfare state is not that large especially considering the non-redistributive nature of much of local and state level system. (e.g. a school district funded by local property tax reinforces rather than breaks existing class differences) the federal level transfers are pretty insubstantial and can be counterproductive.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 20 2015 18:21 GMT
#37254
On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.


Marginal tax rates aren't your effective tax rates though, that's your effective rate on the next dollar you earn. Actual effective tax rates are much lower.

To address your other post, effective tax rates as described by the IRS are going to be different from the CBO because of definitional differences. The CBO tries to get closer to reality, while the IRS goes strictly by tax law. This is important when you get into the top 0.1% and higher, since income will be split between multiple IRS taxpayers (C-corp and individual).
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 18:34 GMT
#37255
On April 21 2015 03:21 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount oou get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.


Marginal tax rates aren't your effective tax rates though, that's your effective rate on the next dollar you earn. Actual effective tax rates are much lower.

To address your other post, effective tax rates as described by the IRS are going to be different from the CBO because of definitional differences. The CBO tries to get closer to reality, while the IRS goes strictly by tax law. This is important when you get into the top 0.1% and higher, since income will be split between multiple IRS taxpayers (C-corp and individual).


the federal effective tax rate on upper middle class professionals is already 25-30%(http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42043.pdf), adding the state stuff and 40% is a fair estimate. the reason why some CBO estimate for effective tax rate is low is due to the counting rule of various deductibles, many of which are targeted at families.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 20 2015 18:40 GMT
#37256
WASHINGTON -- Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) on Monday extended a short-term needle exchange program in order to respond to an exploding HIV crisis in southeastern Indiana.

"While we’ve made progress in identifying and treating those affected by this heartbreaking epidemic, the public health emergency continues and so must our efforts to fight it," Pence said in a statement.

As of April 17, the Indiana State Department of Health had confirmed 128 cases and at least six preliminary cases of HIV in Scott County, the governor's office reported. The week before, the county was looking at 106 cases. Typically, Scott County would see fewer than five new HIV cases a year.

Indiana's HIV crisis is linked to intravenous drug use of a prescription painkiller called Opana. Like many other conservatives, Pence opposes needle exchange programs as part of drug control efforts. The exchanges allow drug users to obtain sterile needles and have been shown to reduce the transmission of diseases like HIV, but critics say the programs facilitate drug abuse. Research has refuted that claim.

The exchanges are technically illegal in Indiana. But last month, Pence made an exception and signed an executive order authorizing a temporary needle exchange program that was set to expire this week. Pence has now extended that order for another 30 days. According to The New York Times, since the temporary exchange was approved, 5,322 clean syringes have been distributed to 86 people.

"The goal of that program is a clean needle for each person for each injection," Amber Kent, a spokeswoman for Indiana's Joint Information Center, told The Huffington Post. The center is working on behalf of the state's Department of Health.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 18:59:25
April 20 2015 18:43 GMT
#37257
this is cheerful
The FBI has admitted "errors" in evidence provided by its forensics laboratory to US courts to help secure convictions, including in death penalty cases, over more than 20 years.

A report by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) noted "irregularities" in the hair analysis unit.

More detail on the cases affected is expected later from campaign groups.
Flawed forensics were used in at least 60 capital punishment cases, the OIG report found.

Fourteen defendants were either executed or died in prison, says the Washington Post, which first reported the story at the weekend.

The review of cases was prompted by the Post's 2012 story that three men were wrongly placed at the scene of violent crimes by the unit's hair analysts, raising the possibility of hundreds of unsafe convictions.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32380051
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 20 2015 18:55 GMT
#37258
As the first black female mayor of Parma, Mo., took office last week, five of the town's six police officers resigned, Missouri television station KFVS reported.

The new mayor, Tyrus Byrd (pictured above on the right), was sworn in on Tuesday evening. Former Mayor Randall Ramsey told KFVS that in addition to the five police officers, the city's attorney, clerk and water treatment plant supervisor resigned due to "safety concerns."

Byrd was not aware why the five police officers resigned, according to KFVS. When she took office, Byrd said she could not find the resignation letters and that the city computers had been cleared. She told KFVS that she needs more information before addressing the resignations publicly.

Byrd was born and raised in Parma, and formerly served as the city clerk. Ramsey lost the mayoral election to Byrd by 37 votes after serving as the mayor for 37 years, according to KFVS.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 20 2015 19:04 GMT
#37259
On April 21 2015 03:40 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON -- Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) on Monday extended a short-term needle exchange program in order to respond to an exploding HIV crisis in southeastern Indiana.

"While we’ve made progress in identifying and treating those affected by this heartbreaking epidemic, the public health emergency continues and so must our efforts to fight it," Pence said in a statement.

As of April 17, the Indiana State Department of Health had confirmed 128 cases and at least six preliminary cases of HIV in Scott County, the governor's office reported. The week before, the county was looking at 106 cases. Typically, Scott County would see fewer than five new HIV cases a year.

Indiana's HIV crisis is linked to intravenous drug use of a prescription painkiller called Opana. Like many other conservatives, Pence opposes needle exchange programs as part of drug control efforts. The exchanges allow drug users to obtain sterile needles and have been shown to reduce the transmission of diseases like HIV, but critics say the programs facilitate drug abuse. Research has refuted that claim.

The exchanges are technically illegal in Indiana. But last month, Pence made an exception and signed an executive order authorizing a temporary needle exchange program that was set to expire this week. Pence has now extended that order for another 30 days. According to The New York Times, since the temporary exchange was approved, 5,322 clean syringes have been distributed to 86 people.

"The goal of that program is a clean needle for each person for each injection," Amber Kent, a spokeswoman for Indiana's Joint Information Center, told The Huffington Post. The center is working on behalf of the state's Department of Health.


Source

Can someone tell me how handing out clean needles is not facilitating drug use? Sure seems like it does to me. Maybe instead of handing out needles, they should offer free rehab. Offer real help instead of just stringing people along.
Who called in the fleet?
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 19:08 GMT
#37260
addicts would not refrain from using for lack of clean needles, so assuming addiction already exists this doesn't change matters much except prevent hiv spread.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Prev 1 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
01:00
#69
PiGStarcraft418
CranKy Ducklings82
davetesta35
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft418
RuFF_SC2 191
SpeCial 132
Nathanias 49
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 843
Purpose 34
NaDa 21
Dota 2
monkeys_forever876
League of Legends
Reynor69
Counter-Strike
tarik_tv6332
fl0m1520
taco 1277
Foxcn446
m0e_tv355
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox758
Other Games
summit1g14007
Day[9].tv1134
C9.Mang0646
Maynarde216
Trikslyr84
Chillindude71
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1592
BasetradeTV133
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 92
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• IndyKCrew
• intothetv
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21140
League of Legends
• Scarra2376
• TFBlade1206
• Stunt168
Other Games
• imaqtpie1342
• Day9tv1134
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 52m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
9h 52m
Replay Cast
21h 52m
PiG Sty Festival
1d 6h
Maru vs Bunny
Classic vs SHIN
The PondCast
1d 7h
KCM Race Survival
1d 7h
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d 9h
OSC
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
PiG Sty Festival
2 days
Clem vs Percival
Zoun vs Solar
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
herO vs NightMare
Reynor vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
PiG Sty Festival
4 days
Serral vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

C-League Week 31
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: King of Kings
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round Qualifier
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026: China & Korea Invitational
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.