• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:16
CEST 18:16
KST 01:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Why Protoss Struggles on ASL (Ft. Shuttle, Tulbo) ASL22 General Discussion Syncronization issues and can't find games Remastered crash fix suggestions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch! Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6653 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1863

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 14:08 GMT
#37241
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?
Freeeeeeedom
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
April 20 2015 14:13 GMT
#37242
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 14:32:52
April 20 2015 14:32 GMT
#37243
So Hillary Clinton is running for US presidency in 2016. I'm wondering what are your opinions on this. If I was American, I would vote for Rand Paul.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 15:22:19
April 20 2015 14:58 GMT
#37244
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 15:02 GMT
#37245
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 15:51 GMT
#37246
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.
Freeeeeeedom
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28894 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 16:10:38
April 20 2015 16:04 GMT
#37247
the OECD chart doesn't look at top 0.1%, it looks at top 10%. Like I mentioned earlier I was genuinely surprised to find that top 10% was that high, but the top 10% doesn't relate to the billionaires or the 'obscenely rich', the ones I myself find politically and societally problematic. Even for a pretty far left leaning social democrat like myself, I don't see problems with some degree of economic inequality (like highly motivated, hard working and skilled people earning $80k a year - which puts them in the top 10%). Top 0.1% is $1.5 mill, even then you're still far away from the ones with the wealth that I find unpalatable. (well, that's in the ballpark actually. ;p )
Moderator
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 16:12:33
April 20 2015 16:08 GMT
#37248
On April 21 2015 00:51 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.


notice i connected my definition of 'rich' with substantial wealth ownership. this means looking at the group of people whose income is mainly investment/real estate.

effective tax burden should be examined based on the individual's wealth/income, because the 'fair' amount of tax burden depends on the structure of income/wealth distributino in a particular society. looking merely at revenue sourcing is not very informative.

the rest of your post is insubstantial.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 20 2015 16:42 GMT
#37249
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 17:27:19
April 20 2015 16:47 GMT
#37250
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
April 20 2015 17:18 GMT
#37251
Also, lest we forget the relative % of "disposable income" that taxes make up for each group
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
April 20 2015 17:45 GMT
#37252
On April 21 2015 01:08 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 00:51 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:58 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:08 cLutZ wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital


Do you not read the chart?

the chart is misleading. effective tax rate on reported income for the top 0.1% is around 20-25% by most estimates and this is not taking into account active evasion and avoidance schemes that gets more effective as the source of income is more diverse and international. and let's not get into real estate taxation

if your idea of measuring tax burden is simply looking at the federal top bracket rate for wage income then i wonder if you've ever filed a tax return in your lief


The chart may be misleading you, because you are reading it incorrectly. It takes % of total revenues paid to the government, and divides it by total % of income earned. America has the highest such ratio of OECD countries which means, that the top % of Americans bears a larger burden of the taxes than in any other country. In other words, if you say "the rich are paying too little" you are just being intellectually dishonest. Really, what you want is more taxes on everyone. That's the only feasible way to generate more tax revenue.


notice i connected my definition of 'rich' with substantial wealth ownership. this means looking at the group of people whose income is mainly investment/real estate.


effective tax burden should be examined based on the individual's wealth/income, because the 'fair' amount of tax burden depends on the structure of income/wealth distributino in a particular society. looking merely at revenue sourcing is not very informative.

the rest of your post is insubstantial.


Then freaking bring your own chart. You don't just get to say "well, I don't like your evidence, I have my own perceptions of the world".

On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.




Basically, your argument is that the Payroll tax, which funds Social Security and Medicare, is a bad thing. I don't disagree that those are bad programs that are funded strangely. The reason they are is because they are crafted to be politically untouchable expansions of the Federal government. If there was no "set aside" there would be no "entitlements" and they would have been repealed years ago. Milton Friedman has a rant about Social Security which basically states that Social Security is two parts that are indefensible on their own: 1. A wage tax plus + 2. A subsidy that increases based on your previous income.

I don't know what to say, you are essentially attacking the modern welfare state, I'm not going to disagree with that.
Freeeeeeedom
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 18:18:50
April 20 2015 17:52 GMT
#37253
citations about effective 0.1% tax rate.

Taxpayers at the very top of the income distribution, the top 0.1 percent, which includes taxpayers with incomes over $2.2 million, actually paid a slightly lower income tax rate than the top 1 percent (21.7 percent versus 22.8 percent). This is due to the fact that very high income taxpayers are more likely to report a greater share of their income as taxable capital gains income. This leads to a slightly lower effective tax rate because capital gains and dividends income faces a lower top income tax rate

http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-0

also stuff buffett and geithner said.

(double taxation through corporate tax does add substantially to this but problem is, effective corporate tax rate is not 35% and this is priced into the stock price)


point with payroll and local level taxation is that only focusing on the federal income tax would misrepresent the actual tax burden. not taking into account the very substantial loopholes and tax avoidance/evasion/deferments at the higher levels of sophistication also would distort one's perception of 'fair' tax burden.

the size of the u.s. welfare state is not that large especially considering the non-redistributive nature of much of local and state level system. (e.g. a school district funded by local property tax reinforces rather than breaks existing class differences) the federal level transfers are pretty insubstantial and can be counterproductive.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 20 2015 18:21 GMT
#37254
On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount of tax you get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.


Marginal tax rates aren't your effective tax rates though, that's your effective rate on the next dollar you earn. Actual effective tax rates are much lower.

To address your other post, effective tax rates as described by the IRS are going to be different from the CBO because of definitional differences. The CBO tries to get closer to reality, while the IRS goes strictly by tax law. This is important when you get into the top 0.1% and higher, since income will be split between multiple IRS taxpayers (C-corp and individual).
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 18:34 GMT
#37255
On April 21 2015 03:21 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2015 01:47 oneofthem wrote:
On April 21 2015 01:42 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 21 2015 00:02 oneofthem wrote:
On April 20 2015 23:13 Aveng3r wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:58 oneofthem wrote:
progressivity without distributive motive is just a formula for burden sharing. right now we are not even at that. amount of tax avoidance and evasive action is high enough to place tax burden on the most stressed rather than on those with major wealth.

redistributive tax rates havent been seen for half a century and wont evr work given globalization of capital

I don't get why so many posts in this thread contend that "the most financially stressed taxpayers pay more in taxes than the rich". on what grounds is this true?

the claim was never 'pay more taxes' in absolute amount but in the form of higher rates and also higher burden in terms of impacting life.

just based on reported income alone the top 0.1% pays under 25% effective rate, while a working professional would pay around 40%.

The top marginal rate is ~40%. How are you getting that a working professional will be paying 40%? Have you ever filed taxes?

effective tax rate jonny, including state taxes, payroll and ss.

the largest disparity in effective tax burden basically comes down to the composition of income. those who have fairly high income, top 10% even, but have that income in the form of wages will face high tax rate.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

http://www.economics-finance.org/jefe/econ/Allenpaper2.pdf

trash journal i know but the calculations are fairly simple. most state taxes such as property/excise are regressive, and payroll+fica are largely employee burdens. this chart is about 'marginal rate' which means, among other things, counting the loss of transfers in the lower ranges. so no poor people are not taxed at 40% they just face steep marginal effective tax given transfers. these rates should not be very different for present day given the presence of the AMT.

but i was talking about working professionals earning 100k-200k in a major city. the amount oou get hit with at this range is pretty brutal.


Marginal tax rates aren't your effective tax rates though, that's your effective rate on the next dollar you earn. Actual effective tax rates are much lower.

To address your other post, effective tax rates as described by the IRS are going to be different from the CBO because of definitional differences. The CBO tries to get closer to reality, while the IRS goes strictly by tax law. This is important when you get into the top 0.1% and higher, since income will be split between multiple IRS taxpayers (C-corp and individual).


the federal effective tax rate on upper middle class professionals is already 25-30%(http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42043.pdf), adding the state stuff and 40% is a fair estimate. the reason why some CBO estimate for effective tax rate is low is due to the counting rule of various deductibles, many of which are targeted at families.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 20 2015 18:40 GMT
#37256
WASHINGTON -- Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) on Monday extended a short-term needle exchange program in order to respond to an exploding HIV crisis in southeastern Indiana.

"While we’ve made progress in identifying and treating those affected by this heartbreaking epidemic, the public health emergency continues and so must our efforts to fight it," Pence said in a statement.

As of April 17, the Indiana State Department of Health had confirmed 128 cases and at least six preliminary cases of HIV in Scott County, the governor's office reported. The week before, the county was looking at 106 cases. Typically, Scott County would see fewer than five new HIV cases a year.

Indiana's HIV crisis is linked to intravenous drug use of a prescription painkiller called Opana. Like many other conservatives, Pence opposes needle exchange programs as part of drug control efforts. The exchanges allow drug users to obtain sterile needles and have been shown to reduce the transmission of diseases like HIV, but critics say the programs facilitate drug abuse. Research has refuted that claim.

The exchanges are technically illegal in Indiana. But last month, Pence made an exception and signed an executive order authorizing a temporary needle exchange program that was set to expire this week. Pence has now extended that order for another 30 days. According to The New York Times, since the temporary exchange was approved, 5,322 clean syringes have been distributed to 86 people.

"The goal of that program is a clean needle for each person for each injection," Amber Kent, a spokeswoman for Indiana's Joint Information Center, told The Huffington Post. The center is working on behalf of the state's Department of Health.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 18:59:25
April 20 2015 18:43 GMT
#37257
this is cheerful
The FBI has admitted "errors" in evidence provided by its forensics laboratory to US courts to help secure convictions, including in death penalty cases, over more than 20 years.

A report by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) noted "irregularities" in the hair analysis unit.

More detail on the cases affected is expected later from campaign groups.
Flawed forensics were used in at least 60 capital punishment cases, the OIG report found.

Fourteen defendants were either executed or died in prison, says the Washington Post, which first reported the story at the weekend.

The review of cases was prompted by the Post's 2012 story that three men were wrongly placed at the scene of violent crimes by the unit's hair analysts, raising the possibility of hundreds of unsafe convictions.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32380051
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 20 2015 18:55 GMT
#37258
As the first black female mayor of Parma, Mo., took office last week, five of the town's six police officers resigned, Missouri television station KFVS reported.

The new mayor, Tyrus Byrd (pictured above on the right), was sworn in on Tuesday evening. Former Mayor Randall Ramsey told KFVS that in addition to the five police officers, the city's attorney, clerk and water treatment plant supervisor resigned due to "safety concerns."

Byrd was not aware why the five police officers resigned, according to KFVS. When she took office, Byrd said she could not find the resignation letters and that the city computers had been cleared. She told KFVS that she needs more information before addressing the resignations publicly.

Byrd was born and raised in Parma, and formerly served as the city clerk. Ramsey lost the mayoral election to Byrd by 37 votes after serving as the mayor for 37 years, according to KFVS.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 20 2015 19:04 GMT
#37259
On April 21 2015 03:40 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON -- Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) on Monday extended a short-term needle exchange program in order to respond to an exploding HIV crisis in southeastern Indiana.

"While we’ve made progress in identifying and treating those affected by this heartbreaking epidemic, the public health emergency continues and so must our efforts to fight it," Pence said in a statement.

As of April 17, the Indiana State Department of Health had confirmed 128 cases and at least six preliminary cases of HIV in Scott County, the governor's office reported. The week before, the county was looking at 106 cases. Typically, Scott County would see fewer than five new HIV cases a year.

Indiana's HIV crisis is linked to intravenous drug use of a prescription painkiller called Opana. Like many other conservatives, Pence opposes needle exchange programs as part of drug control efforts. The exchanges allow drug users to obtain sterile needles and have been shown to reduce the transmission of diseases like HIV, but critics say the programs facilitate drug abuse. Research has refuted that claim.

The exchanges are technically illegal in Indiana. But last month, Pence made an exception and signed an executive order authorizing a temporary needle exchange program that was set to expire this week. Pence has now extended that order for another 30 days. According to The New York Times, since the temporary exchange was approved, 5,322 clean syringes have been distributed to 86 people.

"The goal of that program is a clean needle for each person for each injection," Amber Kent, a spokeswoman for Indiana's Joint Information Center, told The Huffington Post. The center is working on behalf of the state's Department of Health.


Source

Can someone tell me how handing out clean needles is not facilitating drug use? Sure seems like it does to me. Maybe instead of handing out needles, they should offer free rehab. Offer real help instead of just stringing people along.
Who called in the fleet?
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
April 20 2015 19:08 GMT
#37260
addicts would not refrain from using for lack of clean needles, so assuming addiction already exists this doesn't change matters much except prevent hiv spread.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Prev 1 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech127
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2929
Horang2 1037
Snow 630
Soma 556
Light 375
Stork 349
Soulkey 328
Larva 296
Rush 238
ZerO 195
[ Show more ]
hero 125
Dewaltoss 96
910 75
Sexy 36
Hm[arnc] 27
Shine 26
Sharp 18
Terrorterran 17
sorry 12
scan(afreeca) 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Britney 0
Dota 2
qojqva3501
Dendi1466
Counter-Strike
fl0m854
x6flipin505
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King56
Other Games
singsing2269
B2W.Neo1021
hiko816
FrodaN515
ceh9428
Beastyqt358
Hui .248
DeMusliM217
ArmadaUGS110
SteadfastSC93
QueenE71
KnowMe64
ZerO(Twitch)17
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1048
StarCraft 2
WardiTV839
TaKeTV 153
Other Games
BasetradeTV34
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 52
• mYiSmile126
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2399
• WagamamaTV508
League of Legends
• Nemesis2616
• TFBlade1087
Other Games
• Shiphtur175
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 44m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
18h 44m
Cure vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Percival vs Classic
ByuN vs Rogue
OSC
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 7h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL
3 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
3 days
Spirit vs Mixu
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.