• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:03
CEST 06:03
KST 13:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202547RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 678 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1685

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 12:03:24
March 02 2015 11:59 GMT
#33681
On March 02 2015 20:47 coverpunch wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II#Production_overview:_service.2C_power_and_type

America's main contribution to World War II wasn't loss of life, it was production of war materiel. The US produced about as much by itself as the entire Axis combined.

Without this contribution, the grim logic of attrition turns highly against the Allied powers. That's not to say the Allies would necessarily lose without the US, since Germany overextended itself horribly in Russia and lacked the punch to actually finish Britain off. Japan faced a similar problem in China where they believed they had checkmated the enemy but couldn't complete a total conquest. But the war would have lasted longer and been much uglier if the Axis were going to lose anyways. In that sense, America helped win the war in a way that reduced the total human cost and is thus good.

I totally agree with that. But nothing in that analysis ever suggests anything close to "If america acted like France we would all be speaking German right now", which is pretty close to what was 4 posts above mine:
On March 02 2015 10:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
In fariness the whole "If we were like the French we would all be speaking German" line comes out pretty regularly in similar context.

From less than a week ago

Show nested quote +
REP. DARRELL ISSA, R-CALIF.: You know, many of us are proud of who we are as a nation, what we've done, what we stand for. We recognize that there are things we can do better. But there's a huge difference between being proud of our country and being only proud if our country changes. I'm proud of our country and I want to work for change in a positive direction.

Rudy Giuliani used some words that he regrets, and he really has, but he does have these constant messages coming from the president that he doesn't seem to be proud of the country we now live in, only the one we could become if we became more like Europe.

If we were like France, we would all be speaking German. The fact is America has stood up to tyranny time and time again. This president's challenge is to stand up to the tyranny of Islamic terrorists. And if we don't, then in fact we'll go the way of so many nations who have failed to meet that last challenge.


Source

Personally I think comparing ISIS to Nazi Germany gives them vastly more credit then they are due.



To expand on that: current American public opinion from the Republicans, seems to be that supplying fighting factions in the region with weapons and logistical support is not enough, only boots on the ground matter. And in that vein they draw parallels to WWII as if their fighting on the ground in Europe had even slightly the same impact as the eastern front, which is only possible in totally missunderstanding the war.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 13:20:18
March 02 2015 12:26 GMT
#33682
On March 02 2015 20:59 puerk wrote:
To expand on that: current American public opinion from the Republicans, seems to be that supplying fighting factions in the region with weapons and logistical support is not enough, only boots on the ground matter. And in that vein they draw parallels to WWII as if their fighting on the ground in Europe had even slightly the same impact as the eastern front, which is only possible in totally missunderstanding the war.

There's a difference between saying that the Eastern front had a bigger impact on the German armed forces than the Western front, and saying that the U.S. "came for a victory lap", which is what you initially wrote and which is completely off the mark.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
March 02 2015 12:27 GMT
#33683
On March 02 2015 20:59 puerk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2015 20:47 coverpunch wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II#Production_overview:_service.2C_power_and_type

America's main contribution to World War II wasn't loss of life, it was production of war materiel. The US produced about as much by itself as the entire Axis combined.

Without this contribution, the grim logic of attrition turns highly against the Allied powers. That's not to say the Allies would necessarily lose without the US, since Germany overextended itself horribly in Russia and lacked the punch to actually finish Britain off. Japan faced a similar problem in China where they believed they had checkmated the enemy but couldn't complete a total conquest. But the war would have lasted longer and been much uglier if the Axis were going to lose anyways. In that sense, America helped win the war in a way that reduced the total human cost and is thus good.

I totally agree with that. But nothing in that analysis ever suggests anything close to "If america acted like France we would all be speaking German right now", which is pretty close to what was 4 posts above mine:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2015 10:08 GreenHorizons wrote:
In fariness the whole "If we were like the French we would all be speaking German" line comes out pretty regularly in similar context.

From less than a week ago

REP. DARRELL ISSA, R-CALIF.: You know, many of us are proud of who we are as a nation, what we've done, what we stand for. We recognize that there are things we can do better. But there's a huge difference between being proud of our country and being only proud if our country changes. I'm proud of our country and I want to work for change in a positive direction.

Rudy Giuliani used some words that he regrets, and he really has, but he does have these constant messages coming from the president that he doesn't seem to be proud of the country we now live in, only the one we could become if we became more like Europe.

If we were like France, we would all be speaking German. The fact is America has stood up to tyranny time and time again. This president's challenge is to stand up to the tyranny of Islamic terrorists. And if we don't, then in fact we'll go the way of so many nations who have failed to meet that last challenge.


Source

Personally I think comparing ISIS to Nazi Germany gives them vastly more credit then they are due.



To expand on that: current American public opinion from the Republicans, seems to be that supplying fighting factions in the region with weapons and logistical support is not enough, only boots on the ground matter. And in that vein they draw parallels to WWII as if their fighting on the ground in Europe had even slightly the same impact as the eastern front, which is only possible in totally missunderstanding the war.

Ah, I see it, thanks.

Issa made a childish statement that is actually commonly said, but usually meant more as an insult to France than an analysis about the war. To be fair, it is also meant to hype America's role in WWII. And I still find your analysis about as incorrect as his, since you also ignored the fact that America only entered the war because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

I would also point out something really interesting about the AUMF against ISIS debate, which is that Obama is already engaging in military hostilities against ISIS since the US has been bombing targets for months now and there are more than 1000 American soldiers. The Republicans want him to be more aggressive and do more, while the Democrats want nothing to do with escalating the conflict. Anyone talking like there's a simple or easy answer to this is being terribly naive, especially considering the costs of the war in Afghanistan and the last occupation of Iraq, with the relevant questions of the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs of whether the United States has accomplished its mission of taking out the Taliban/Al Qaeda or ended whatever threats Iraq posed to American interests (with the answer surely being "no" to both, since Obama is relying on both to justify the current operations against ISIS). The real question is whether the US can best defeat ISIS with a quick and overwhelming show of force or with a medium-term commitment to regional stability, and whether it even wants to do both if that's the necessary answer (which everyone seems to think it is but nobody wants to admit).
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 02 2015 14:22 GMT
#33684
you guys can't' be seriously arguing that europe is more responsible/contributes more to nato security than the u.s.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 15:28:15
March 02 2015 15:24 GMT
#33685
On March 02 2015 23:22 oneofthem wrote:
you guys can't' be seriously arguing that europe is more responsible/contributes more to nato security than the u.s.

wrong thread?
i have not seen that claim in this thread for ages... and would't think any of the regular posters would think it to be true
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 02 2015 15:52 GMT
#33686
On March 02 2015 05:41 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Feels like the US is the last country that should be criticizing others for not assisting them during a war.

Especially when talking about Europe.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Paljas
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6926 Posts
March 02 2015 16:05 GMT
#33687
he was talking about ww2, lol
TL+ Member
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 02 2015 16:22 GMT
#33688
yea after like a thousand years of europeans killling half of their population every century i can't possibly imagine why americans were reluctant to intervene in an european war.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
always_winter
Profile Joined February 2015
United States195 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-04 17:23:27
March 02 2015 16:54 GMT
#33689
To suggest American intervention in WWII was dwarfed by combat on the Eastern front, to explicitly degrade American involvement as a "victory lap," is so universally-insulting that even as a liberally and progressively-minded individual with an inherently international approach to world affairs, I take extreme offense to such language and it is quite apparent that you, rather than those you are so strangely trying to incite, are the one grossly misguided by history.

Perhaps you missed the lesson on the Battle of Dunkirk, in which the surrounding of over 300,000 British and French troops brought conditional surrender to the table of the British war room. Perhaps you missed the transformation of American domestic industry into an unparalleled war-machine which funded and armed the European theatre on both fronts. Perhaps you missed the entire Pacific theatre, in which the United States engaged Asia's foremost power almost single-handedly while simultaneously fighting an even mightier foe on foreign soil.

You speak of dishonoring fallen Soviets defending their homeland? You deliberately dishonor hundreds of thousands of American soldiers who abandoned their safe, comfortable American lives to combat genocide a world apart, a war in which they personally had very little at stake, yet a struggle in which all of humanity was entwined. My grandfather left home at age seventeen, without his parents' consent, and enlisted in the United States Navy under a false name and false birthdate not because his life or his family's life was in danger, but because he was drawn by a greater purpose.

You cast judgment from the relative safety of your twenty-first century home, apart of your twenty-first century Western civilization, with absolute disregard for the sacrifice which made it possible. The blanket of freedom you sleep beneath was sewn with the blood of men far greater than yourself. Show some goddamn respect.

Rant aside, there are far more pressing issues than one sheep's opinion of history. There are a myriad of American and, more importantly, human issues which are presently before us and not sixty years behind us. I believe this thread would be far better served if we simply ignore inflammatory behavior.
Yoav
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1874 Posts
March 02 2015 16:56 GMT
#33690
Are we seriously debating WWII here? Does anyone really disagree that:
1. US delayed too much before entering war. Didn't help that last war seemed not to do anything, but they should have entered earlier.
2. US could not land troops at first, due to having insufficient men/materiel in the UK and having not yet done the massive transportation bombing campaign.
3. Most of the actual fighting of the war was done on the Eastern front between the Germans and Soviets.
4. Without US supplies, Soviet forces would have had a notably weaker force.
5. Hitler made terrible mistakes in Russia that resulted in the tide being turned.
6. The Allies would have probably, but not certainly, won in the end without US involvement.
7. Losing, while relatively unlikely, would have meant the completion of the final solution and the deaths of many millions.
8. "Winning" would have looked like Soviet domination over a broken Europe. Stalin would have run Europe as a personal fief until 1953. Purges would have taken place. Europe would be looted by the Soviets and would never have received anything on the order of the Marshall plan. America would have been forced inward and the Soviets would have had the world as their playground.
9. It's a really good thing the US intervened, and that they focused on Europe, not the Pacific.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
March 02 2015 17:14 GMT
#33691
I think pretty much anybody on this continent here is glad the the US intervened, but this doesn't change the fact that the actual war happened on the Eastern front, the death toll alone was just on another level. Given the fact that Russia lost about a fifth of their population and that the war is pretty much a constitutive event for the country, one could see why they get a little pissed from time to time given the fact that so much focus is always being put on the Western side of the conflict.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:29:08
March 02 2015 17:20 GMT
#33692
uh just because the eastern front was especially brutal does not mean the u.s. didn't do their part in the conflict. given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.

if you think the soviets won the war why don't you want to live in soviet russia now?


if a bunch of babies are killing each other and shitting up the place without wearing diapers, and an adult comes in, puts diapers on them and settles them without suffering as much casualty as the babies because the adult is stronger, you wouldn't say the adult deserved less credit because he got less injuries from the conflict.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Yoav
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1874 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:21:53
March 02 2015 17:21 GMT
#33693
On March 03 2015 02:14 Nyxisto wrote:
I think pretty much anybody on this continent here is glad the the US intervened, but this doesn't change the fact that the actual war happened on the Eastern front, the death toll alone was just on another level. Given the fact that Russia lost about a fifth of their population and that the war is pretty much a constitutive event for the country, one could see why they get a little pissed from time to time given the fact that so much focus is always being put on the Western side of the conflict.


Sure, but my point is that we kinda all know and accept that. Any American with any understanding of history is aware that the Soviet part of the fighting (and dying) was a lot more than ours.

The arguments here are both saying things everybody agrees with. We've achieved synthesis. Hurrah! Now let's move on.
MoltkeWarding
Profile Joined November 2003
5195 Posts
March 02 2015 17:30 GMT
#33694
The arguments here are both saying things everybody agrees with. We've achieved synthesis


The only point here I can generally agree with is 3. There is something missing from everything else.

given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.


I prefer Bismarck's European Order to NATO, but even ignoring my own notions about how an independent, Eurocentric order should look, this is merely retrospective bias projected against historical events. The US never meant to lead a "western world order" until well after the lapse of the war, and when they came to embrace that role under Eisenhower/Dulles, they were actively conspiring against the interests of their nominal allies.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:39:08
March 02 2015 17:31 GMT
#33695
On March 03 2015 02:30 MoltkeWarding wrote:
Show nested quote +
The arguments here are both saying things everybody agrees with. We've achieved synthesis


The only point here I can generally agree with is 3. There is something missing from everything else.

Show nested quote +
given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.


I prefer Bismarck's European Order to NATO, but even ignoring my own notions about how an independent, Eurocentric order should look, this is merely retrospective bias projected against historical events. The US never meant to lead a "western world order" until well after the lapse of the war, and when they came to embrace that role under Eisenhower/Dulles, they were actively conspiring against the interests of their nominal allies.

beats either soviets or nazis. the u.s. were not going into europe like a state building project, but since great blood and treasure were expended, might as well get a functional europe out of it.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:37:58
March 02 2015 17:32 GMT
#33696
What does it mean "If we were like the french" ? lol

And Russia will never attack France. Never.

given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.

That is absolutly true.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
MoltkeWarding
Profile Joined November 2003
5195 Posts
March 02 2015 17:38 GMT
#33697
Castlereagh and Metternich were also preferable to Alexander and Napoleon. And yet the 19th century went by without a large Anglo-German army permanently based in Paris.
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:41:11
March 02 2015 17:40 GMT
#33698
On March 03 2015 02:38 MoltkeWarding wrote:
Castlereagh and Metternich were also preferable to Alexander and Napoleon. And yet the 19th century went by without a large Anglo-German army permanently based in Paris.

Yeah that's an entirely sound comparaison, if you put aside what happened during the XXth century.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-02 17:43:13
March 02 2015 17:42 GMT
#33699
On March 03 2015 02:20 oneofthem wrote:
uh just because the eastern front was especially brutal does not mean the u.s. didn't do their part in the conflict. given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.

if you think the soviets won the war why don't you want to live in soviet russia now?


if a bunch of babies are killing each other and shitting up the place without wearing diapers, and an adult comes in, puts diapers on them and settles them without suffering as much casualty as the babies because the adult is stronger, you wouldn't say the adult deserved less credit because he got less injuries from the conflict.


From the rest of my posts here I thought it's pretty clear that I'm not very Soviet nostalgic, but still it's not okay to praise the US as the glorious "parent" that kept the "kids apart". The Soviet Union lost 20 million people while the US lost less people than during the civil war. If you think this war was decided by the US and look at history as such then that's definitely not true.
Yoav
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1874 Posts
March 02 2015 17:44 GMT
#33700
On March 03 2015 02:30 MoltkeWarding wrote:
Show nested quote +
The arguments here are both saying things everybody agrees with. We've achieved synthesis


The only point here I can generally agree with is 3. There is something missing from everything else.

Show nested quote +
given the success of the american led western world order after the war europeans should be very thankful that the u.s. did as much as it did.


I prefer Bismarck's European Order to NATO, but even ignoring my own notions about how an independent, Eurocentric order should look, this is merely retrospective bias projected against historical events. The US never meant to lead a "western world order" until well after the lapse of the war, and when they came to embrace that role under Eisenhower/Dulles, they were actively conspiring against the interests of their nominal allies.


I was a little curious about how you disagreed with anything else I said (unless by "missing" you refer to the fact that I only said the bare minimum agreed on by pretty much every historian).

But then if you're coming from a position of thinking that pre-WWI thinking in Europe is the right way to go (and sincerely hoping you don't share his ideas of Africa or Imperialism, which was a part of that system), I'm not sure there's much discussion that can be usefully had.

Prev 1 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 57m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft464
Livibee 131
Ketroc 56
StarCraft: Brood War
Light 3436
Leta 476
ggaemo 203
Noble 86
NaDa 77
Sharp 65
Icarus 5
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1120
League of Legends
JimRising 775
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K953
Other Games
summit1g12273
hungrybox413
ViBE211
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1748
BasetradeTV37
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 60
• practicex 46
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki15
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1733
• Stunt97
Other Games
• Shiphtur325
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
5h 57m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 6h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.