EPTSamsung's new 75 inch screen costs $17,424 - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
| ||
|
Newbistic
China2912 Posts
Or just buy a good projector and an expendable white projector screen? | ||
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
On July 06 2012 18:18 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Fixed. Also, when you can get a ~60 inch for like $2K, I don't know if this is really worth it... The difference is that this TV does local dimming (according to cnet anyway, if this TV doesn't do local dimming then well...). The real question is: are the thin bezels worth paying $10,000 over the Sharp Elite 70" TV? Probably not but if you're in this market, you probably don't care how much money you spend as long you get the best. To a poster above, it'll match plasmas when it comes to black depth. If you want to game, you still probably want a plasma TV for the low input lag, though. | ||
|
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
For HDTVs what I'd buy depends on the size of the room and the viewing distance. 42-55 would be perfectly fine for most rooms. | ||
|
Aterons_toss
Romania1275 Posts
| ||
|
Cinim
Denmark866 Posts
| ||
|
EnE
417 Posts
| ||
|
Mysticesper
United States1183 Posts
On July 06 2012 18:39 yeint wrote: I wouldn't buy anything that big if it's only 1080p. Wait 5-10 years until 4320p is the norm. For HDTVs what I'd buy depends on the size of the room and the viewing distance. 42-55 would be perfectly fine for most rooms. I would hope it's that fast, because we sure have a lot of slow adopters with our dinosaur media. DVDs look like crap, and we still haven't phased those out, and I honestly don't see them going anywhere, sadly. We still have premiums on "HD" content, etc, and even then, it's primarily 720p source material. 5-10 years is still a long way, but honestly, we haven't really changed much since 2002, much less 2007. Processing power? Definitely. Displays? hardly. I could see 2160p being standard in that timeframe, hopefully. Then I would at least see myself getting a 40" display with that resolution. Anything below 100 pixels per inch is unacceptable in my mind. | ||
|
Passion
Netherlands1486 Posts
On July 06 2012 19:16 Cinim wrote: if I were rich, I would get B&O TV. Amen. | ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
| ||
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
Alas. | ||
|
iXphobos
Germany1465 Posts
On July 06 2012 19:16 Cinim wrote: if I were rich, I would get B&O TV or Löewe any day over samsung. This. | ||
|
Euronyme
Sweden3804 Posts
On July 06 2012 17:32 Superouman wrote: Hah i read 17$ and 424 cents, i was like wait what? Yeah the difference between Europe and US ^^ I honestly still wouldn't buy it, even if it came with the girl :/ Edit. It's kind of amusing with people going "nah I'd wait 5-10 years and get one that's much better"... You'll keep saying that all your life. There will always be a better TV in development. | ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
| ||
|
Corvi
Germany1406 Posts
| ||
|
Silentness
United States2821 Posts
| ||
|
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 06 2012 20:14 Silentness wrote: Nah I'm good with my 42" TV. 75" imo is just straight up a waste unless you plan on hosting movie parties and shit with the whole neighborhood. or you'll need a giant screen to plot your evil schemes and destroy this world. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Before anyone says that it's too expensive for a TV, this is not an OLED TV. OH WELL I CAN'T SAY A BAD WORD ABOUT IT NOW! Lol, ridiculous expense for a person. I can imagine corporations being able to afford such a TV but otherwise, lolol k i'd rather pay for half of my college bills than buy a soon to be obsolete television. | ||
|
drumsetjunky
United States136 Posts
| ||
|
Mayd
Finland251 Posts
EDIT: And more seriously you who say the tv is too expensive - it's not obviously designed for you =) | ||
| ||
