That account was created on 2010-04-18 09:17:02 and had 353 posts.
Reason: Terrible thread
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 05:28 GMT
#18621
That account was created on 2010-04-18 09:17:02 and had 353 posts. Reason: Terrible thread | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 05:40 GMT
#18622
That account was created on 2011-09-13 22:01:29 and had 22 posts. Reason: kk Bye! When you come back please don't whine about balance! | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 05:41 GMT
#18623
That account was created on 2011-05-06 04:58:45 and had 245 posts. Reason: Stop stirring up the same old shit. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 05:44 GMT
#18624
That account was created on 2011-07-03 04:21:45 and had 249 posts. Reason: You're not working out here. Trolling BW vs SC2, insulting respected members, and in general being a nuisance on our boards. Goodbye. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:03 GMT
#18625
That account was created on 2011-09-20 12:48:22 and had 1 posts. Reason: On September 20 2011 12:57 edjay wrote: ... Sorry for my bad english, i'm a french stupid gay like you said and i **** you | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:12 GMT
#18626
That account was created on 2010-09-07 21:25:28 and had 71 posts. Reason: Arguing in SFW Funny Pics thread. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:13 GMT
#18627
That account was created on 2010-03-17 07:33:08 and had 1324 posts. Reason: Arguing in SFW Funny Pics thread. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:15 GMT
#18628
That account was created on 2010-04-26 06:36:52 and had 1510 posts. Reason: Scumbag SFW Picture thread poster: Says "Lets not argue its ban worthy" Argues anyways. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:17 GMT
#18629
That account was created on 2010-10-30 07:36:30 and had 264 posts. Reason: "Asshole" nope. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:24 GMT
#18630
That account was created on 2011-08-02 08:17:06 and had 59 posts. Reason: You're a really bad poster. On September 20 2011 11:52 f0rzaa wrote: Show nested quote + On September 20 2011 11:46 Tennet wrote: On September 20 2011 11:40 f0rzaa wrote: what's with the fucking spoilers lately? Whats with the crying about spoilers after coming into a thread that is clearly a spoiler? Is there a rule where one must watch all games? idiot Is just the icing on the cake considering you were posting in a winners' interview thread. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:29 GMT
#18631
That account was created on 2010-10-03 14:22:52 and had 822 posts. Reason: Player bashing. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:33 GMT
#18632
That account was created on 2010-12-25 00:03:53 and had 76 posts. Reason: On September 20 2011 09:59 Holophonist wrote: Show nested quote + On September 20 2011 09:49 Supamang wrote: On September 20 2011 09:43 Holophonist wrote: On September 20 2011 09:31 Supamang wrote: On September 20 2011 08:29 Holophonist wrote: On September 20 2011 08:24 Falling wrote: Well only if you invest 1 billion into one enterprize alone. What's more realistic is it's much easier to lose $10M or $100M. But that's why being wealthy makes it easier to gain more wealth, you have deeper pockets, you can survive a failed business venture, ride out a bad economy and so on and so forth. But if everything comes down to what is moral, I think the next question that would be reasonable is where does that morality come from? Is it absolute or relative and why should we follow it? Because moralness is a matter "You ought to... or ought not to..." So then given that we can choose to or not, what is our standard and what is our compulsion? Yeah and it's also more realistic that you're only gonna make like $10k instead of $1m. Seriously dude? come on, this is a waste of time. Having money doesn't necessarily raise your EV when investing, it just changes the amounts, in BOTH columns. Well, I personally believe that morality comes from God. But I don't expect other people to agree with me and I also don't expect our laws to directly come from the Bible. I'm a complete minimalist. I think the most moral thing to do is to stay out of people's lives as much as possible... from a government's standpoint. I dont think that Morality and God have any place in this discussion. I cant believe youre arguing your case against progressive tax brackets using Morality as your support base. You say its immoral to take money from someone and give it to someone else. Isnt it also immoral to leave the needy to suffer and die even when it is within your power to help them? Correct me if im wrong, but doesnt Jesus advocate giving to those who need when they ask? If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother If you argue that it should be left to the individual to give his wealth away, why isnt it up to the individuals running the government to use their power to uphold the Morality of God? By taxing the rich more than taxing the poor, the ones running this country are actually being more Moral than those withholding their wealth from the poor. Right? Basically, forget everything I said earlier and everything you have said about Morality. If you think that letting the rich improves our economy because it allows them to invest and expand businesses more rapidly or whatever other rational reason you have, go ahead and argue that. However, trying to bring in Morals to this discussion is pointless because Morality is subjective. On September 20 2011 08:25 Holophonist wrote: I'm not going to read through 40 pages of idiocy. Especially considering the fact that I've NEVER heard a good argument for it and I doubt I'm going to find it on a sc2 forum. Oh and dont be that guy...Youre here having a meaningful discussion and youre gonna suggest that people on an SC2 forum cant possibly have the intelligence and/or knowledge to argue with you properly just because youre mad that people disagree with you? Ugh I'l answer your last point first: STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH HYPERBOLE. I didn't say we can't possibly have the intelligence to figure this stuff out. What I actually said was I doubt I'd find it on a SC2 forum. I'd say 80% of what I've written here over the past couple hours is stuff like this. I have to explain myself when I really shouldn't. The terrible inconsistency in your suggestion that the people in power are using their "power" to do what's right is that they're using other people's faculties/resources, not their own. total. waste. of. time. You completely ignored the core of my post LOL. I was saying that its a double standard for you to argue using morals as a base when the people you are defending are being immoral by not giving out their wealth. Basically, Im saying its useless to argue using morals as your support because there are so many standards for morality (even within God) that youre bound to look like a hypocrite its not a "total.waste.of.time", but youre obviously only saying that because youre angry at not having a good argument against me. So you target my afterthought and argue against that for the majority of your post instead of the actual meat of my original argument. You also say that this thread is "40 pages of idiocy" and say that you wont find a good argument on an SC2 forum. How is that NOT suggesting that those on TL.net lack the intelligence to argue against you? Lol, Im not the one slinging around inconsistency, you are. I left it out because you answered it yourself. The quote you used said nothing about the government making your charitable contributions for you. Your quote... your whole post... is what doesn't have a place in this thread. And the rich... particularly the rich in the US are among the most charitable people in the history of the planet. And I said I "doubt" I'll find the answer on a sc2 forum. Because obviously the main reason people are here at all is because of sc2, not because they like to argue economics. It's possible, of course, but I have no reason to think so. again, you're an idiot and you're wasting my time. I have enough smart people to respond to, I'm not gonna waste any more effort on you, or people like you. fuck off. Next time you get the urge to post stuff like this, don't, or it will mean a perm ban. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:36 GMT
#18633
That account was created on 2011-08-08 09:36:55 and had 230 posts. Reason: On September 20 2011 09:32 hypnoxide wrote: Show nested quote + On September 20 2011 09:04 Slider954 wrote: On September 20 2011 09:02 hypnoxide wrote: On September 20 2011 08:58 Angelbelow wrote: On September 20 2011 08:56 hypnoxide wrote: On September 20 2011 08:49 French fries wrote: On September 20 2011 08:47 AIOL! wrote: On September 20 2011 08:46 French fries wrote: France 1-0 USA Ban plz -_- Pas cool mec T__T Si on peux plus faire d'humour France getting raped in every modern war: Everyone: 1 France: -9001 This post is equal if not worse than his. Poor taste in your response. He's clearly trolling and so am I. Don't be so sensitive. 2 wrongs don't make a right, and calling attention to the fact that you are trolling isn't very smart. Suggest you take a few minutes and read the 10 commandments. 0 fucks. Cya. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 06:41 GMT
#18634
That account was created on 2010-10-20 10:55:02 and had 1236 posts. Reason: Balance whining/flaming in the patch notes thread. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 07:25 GMT
#18635
That account was created on 2010-08-06 04:12:54 and had 1754 posts. Reason: Talking about trash. Time to take it out, cya in a month for your last chance. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 08:08 GMT
#18636
That account was created on 2010-12-12 08:16:11 and had 411 posts. Reason: By request. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 09:17 GMT
#18637
That account was created on 2011-09-20 17:59:28 and had 0 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 09:23 GMT
#18638
That account was created on 2011-09-20 17:19:59 and had 1 posts. Reason: Registering to make a generalising insulting comment? Unacceptable. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 12:10 GMT
#18639
That account was created on 2010-07-14 20:38:17 and had 67 posts. Reason: Balance whining in tournament topic. Seriously... | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
September 20 2011 12:12 GMT
#18640
That account was created on 2010-10-19 13:13:01 and had 951 posts. Reason: Misery loves company it seems. Have fun in the balance whine corner. | ||
| ||
Kaelaris Steadfast Rott…
KSR #11 Cup PTR Tournament
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM 838 StarCraft: Brood WarHarstem 796 SteadfastSC 252 IndyStarCraft 236 BRAT_OK 112 KnowMe 78 JuggernautJason65 Rex 39 Calm 4696 Dota 2Sea 3562 Rain 2441 Horang2 799 Mini 493 actioN 208 sSak 136 firebathero 80 ggaemo 43 Sexy 38 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games XBOCT989 hiko907 Beastyqt749 sgares669 ceh9604 Lowko352 Livibee285 Hui .260 Liquid`VortiX161 Mew2King107 Trikslyr85 QueenE60 Dewaltoss57 nookyyy 27 EmSc Tv 14 OptimusSC21 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK 28 StarCraft: Brood War• Reevou 2 • Kozan • Laughngamez YouTube • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel • intothetv • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP Dota 2 League of Legends |
BSL: ProLeague
Cross vs LancerX
StRyKeR vs JDConan
PiGosaur Monday
OlimoLeague
The PondCast
OSC
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
OlimoLeague
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
Online Event
Wardi Open
|
|