That account was created on 2011-01-04 04:48:54 and had 3000 posts.
Reason: By Request.
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 15:32 GMT
#29961
That account was created on 2011-01-04 04:48:54 and had 3000 posts. Reason: By Request. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 15:42 GMT
#29962
That account was created on 2011-01-12 02:16:39 and had 35 posts. Reason: No. LMAO@GRUBBY GOING DOWN 0-5, THAT'S HILARIOUS RIGHT THERE. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 16:01 GMT
#29963
That account was created on 2012-12-07 08:47:13 and had 421 posts. Reason: Your posting is so bad. Please improve, last chance. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 17:57 GMT
#29964
That account was created on 2012-09-18 06:04:27 and had 505 posts. Reason: On January 12 2013 20:49 Inzan1ty wrote: wow, didnt see that one coming sAviOr must be proud Not funny at all. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:01 GMT
#29965
That account was created on 2012-12-19 18:37:10 and had 51 posts. Reason: pbu | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:02 GMT
#29966
That account was created on 2012-02-23 23:51:35 and had 686 posts. Reason: On January 12 2013 23:37 Rhaegar_tar wrote: Show nested quote + On January 12 2013 23:36 Rescawen wrote: I think after all the shitstorm it would nice to know briefly what MVP thinks of the gowser. Patch-zerg? You're still not learning | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:02 GMT
#29967
That account was created on 2013-01-09 01:20:37 and had 31 posts. Reason: You have 4 warnings in barely over 4 days and are still making useless posts. Improve, quickly. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:06 GMT
#29968
That account was created on 2013-01-12 02:48:17 and had 23 posts. Reason: On January 13 2013 03:56 2muchSWAG wrote: Show nested quote + On January 13 2013 03:53 entropius wrote: On January 13 2013 03:52 2muchSWAG wrote: On January 13 2013 03:47 Maesy wrote: On January 13 2013 03:42 ref4 wrote: On January 13 2013 03:40 Boucot wrote: On January 13 2013 03:38 2muchSWAG wrote: how can anyone call scarlett the best canadian when she isn't even in code s? huk > scarlett because he is a good code s proven player who won important tournaments with koreans in it aka dreamhack, homestory and mlg And got 10th place in WCS Canada. but got into Code S, which Scarlett isn't in. /burncenter.jpg Yeah. His SPL match night was incredibly impressive... We'll see how he does in Code S. didn't even see scarlett in proleague so..... awkward.... when acer starts caring about esports and register for proleague or gstl then maybe scarlett will be a legitimately good player. for now, all she beats are koreans online cross server. She's beaten Koreans in LAN's, too. 1. SC2 does not support LAN so your argument is automatically invalid because of that. 2. she only beat either scrub koreans or good koreans who worse match ups are vZ and inconsistent players like bomber and hero considering she is a patch zerg You were warned barely over 24 hours ago for balance whine. This is more player bashing, but throwing in the word patch zerg is close enough. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:56 GMT
#29969
That account was created on 2012-10-09 09:38:31 and had 122 posts. Reason: Failure to heed mod note. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 19:56 GMT
#29970
That account was created on 2010-12-28 11:18:46 and had 392 posts. Reason: Failure to heed mod note. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 20:10 GMT
#29971
That account was created on 2012-12-01 16:23:18 and had 134 posts. Reason: Failure to heed mod note | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 21:23 GMT
#29972
That account was created on 2012-11-13 16:54:42 and had 283 posts. Reason: On January 13 2013 05:07 Slackzftw wrote: Zerg is balanced... right? You've been through this before. They'll only get longer. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 23:38 GMT
#29973
That account was created on 2011-09-29 08:05:18 and had 32 posts. Reason: Failure to heed mod note. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 23:39 GMT
#29974
That account was created on 2013-01-13 07:57:38 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 12 2013 23:40 GMT
#29975
That account was created on 2011-04-27 01:17:19 and had 227 posts. Reason: On January 13 2013 06:36 SharkStarcraft wrote: Dat balance You have enough warnings and shorter bans. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 13 2013 03:17 GMT
#29976
That account was created on 2011-12-10 04:53:47 and had 72 posts. Reason: Failure to heed mod note + martyr | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 13 2013 06:00 GMT
#29977
That account was created on 2011-06-01 11:56:58 and had 142 posts. Reason: Ok, we've had enough of you. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 13 2013 16:50 GMT
#29978
That account was created on 2013-01-06 22:09:40 and had 17 posts. Reason: Please keep it to one account. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 13 2013 16:51 GMT
#29979
That account was created on 2010-05-05 23:02:26 and had 2710 posts. Reason: On January 13 2013 21:51 Hider wrote: Show nested quote + On January 13 2013 21:49 Rider517 wrote: On January 13 2013 21:30 LgNKami wrote: On January 13 2013 21:19 Rider517 wrote: On January 13 2013 20:51 Excludos wrote: On January 13 2013 20:34 Henk wrote: On January 13 2013 06:41 Excludos wrote: On January 13 2013 06:01 Rider517 wrote: mech requires about 14 apm to be played, i don't see why they want to implement it and let be the game a camper fest till 200/200 anyway, imo it looks like they know what they are doing but they don't know witch is the correct direction to take, just look back from patch #1 to #10, i don't think this is the correct approach to balance the game cause it seems they are trying to reach the goal randomly changing stuff until it works : What in the world makes you think mech is easy to play? Just because the main army is stationary? In a proper mech game, you have harass your enemy to death on all angles at all times, or else he just takes the entire map for free. Try dropping 4 places at once, while hellion harass a fifth, while keeping your macro perfect at all times, and control the rallied units, and siege your tanks in a proper place. Of course, not all games are like this. But that is the essence of mech. (I play toss btw. So this isn't any kind of terran whine) Except mech doesn't use drops. There is no rule that says you can't drop hellions while going mech. Or make a banshee for that matter. I know it doesn't work like that in the current HoTS, but multitasking is still core in mech. Saying it requires 14 apm is ignorance at its best. nope, mech is the most low skill required strategy of the game, is boring and is not viable, no matter what they say, they are just shuffling the deck and trying to tell you that now you have more cards than before just look @ what they do to reaper and tank, they are leading to one base play while the real problem with terran is the 3 base play, the late tech, not the early stage as long as there is this reaper and tank im not going to play terran because it is simply annoying from the start to the end of any tvt and tvp You sir, are an idiot. I thought mech was terrible and easy until I actually started playing it. When your opponent has a brain, you don't just sit, make units, make factories, and attack move to win. That NEVER happens. Bio is fun to watch, but it is boring to see the same stuff over and over again. People want mech to work because it brings diversity. I get sick of seeing bio get demolished in every matchup, but not having any other options besides bio. and you are a gentleman i agree to the diversity but really, open your eyes, they are doing nothing to make mech viable, they are simply doing random stuff to make you believe that they are making mech viable mines make mech viable? i mean really viable? no, they are not free siege tech is really the changement to make mech viable? NO. they don't want to make mech viable, they are just trying to make us think so Your not as stupid as you sound. What was your last ban for? | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net124 Posts
January 13 2013 17:05 GMT
#29980
That account was created on 2012-12-12 00:57:39 and had 33 posts. Reason: Patchzerg comment. Don't bash players please. suppy is a patch zerg for real, even pros like Naniwai/MC have said it on their streams not to long ago. Goswer on the other hand has been working hard, He is a nice guy, I been supporting him from the start, I talk with him on NA often, he is a nice guy to random people like myself, he will answer questions to random people who whisper him, He is a good guy in general. I'm very happy to see him rise above the average battle.net ladder gm players and start to win major things, GL to him hope he does well. People like suppy will be no more soon, EG picks up rich people in college for marketing, Suppy is not a very good player in general and bet you won't hear form him in HOTS and above. It just happens rich folk who are in college that do well once in a while get support from rich companies like EG, it's just how the USA works. | ||
| ||
StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH197 StarCraft: Brood War• HeavenSC 107 • musti20045 45 • Adnapsc2 25 • RyuSc2 12 • Migwel • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Monday
OlimoLeague
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|