• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:26
CEST 22:26
KST 05:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1230 users

Patch 1.4 PTR Notes (updated 9/8) - Page 146

Forum Index > Closed
9040 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 144 145 146 147 148 453 Next
Since this whole topic degenerated into the usual balance flamefest where every topic ends up if unmoderated it's time for it to clean up. Locking this down for a while. Any posts made after my post [page 233] not addressing the changes in this patch directly and containting flames or general balance whine will get banned for at least a week. ~Nyovne

There is way too much flaming in this thread right now. Calm down before you post! (Page 271) ~iamke55
Jonneh
Profile Joined June 2011
United Kingdom67 Posts
August 25 2011 17:16 GMT
#2901
On August 26 2011 02:09 iHirO wrote:
Personally I cant see the rationale for the barracks build time increase. Its going to have a dramatic effect on timings (e.g. going gas first leaves you even more vulnerable to early pressure than before).

Also its a shame about the hellion nerf, the metagame was only starting to evolve and it feels like a Blizzard have thrown the toys out of the pram too soon. A research time or cost increase sounds fairer.


Something needs to be done about the range of strats terran has behind a walloff which is unscoutable. Not sure if this is an attempt at that, or just to punish greedy openings like you say.. either way I'm not so sure its a terminal nerf to either situation.

Agree a bit on the Hellion nerf, though watching TvZ die to a hellion all in, which isnt even an all in its just mass hellion into expand, boring to watch.
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
August 25 2011 17:16 GMT
#2902
People saying 5 seconds on Barracks won't affect 1-1-1....
I think you'd be surprised how much a change like that effects early game. It makes all Protoss openings safer and that means the possibility of more risks and getting ahead on econ.
After all 1-1-1 is quite a late rush (now 5 seconds later lol). With time to get the observer in on most maps you can pump 2 immortals and defend.

Lots of people missing the hidden changes too.
Is the Collosus laser trailing change a nerf to it's poking damage?
Can you now load fungaled marines into a medi-vac?

Showing resources returned is really important to observing too. No more "Did he cancel??", "Did he get the money?". Now we'll know for sure.

There's a couple more significant changes I can't remember. OP needs updating really.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
Gumbos
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada55 Posts
August 25 2011 17:17 GMT
#2903
I like the immortal range increase. Not sure why they changed the rax build timing. And I also do not like the hellion damage being cut in half... maybe take 3-4 off max.

Cant wait to see the acceleration on that mothership! loL
Zanno
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1484 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 17:17:14
August 25 2011 17:17 GMT
#2904
these changes all seem way too extreme at this stage in the game's development imo
aaaaa
Ulfsark
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States958 Posts
August 25 2011 17:17 GMT
#2905
Seems like blizzard is learning a lot from recent tournaments.

The only I wish they would add is Timestamps for chat.
gg wp
VassiliZaytsev
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada45 Posts
August 25 2011 17:17 GMT
#2906
If you are a zerg unit being chased by an HSM and you burrow, does the HSM go to where you burrowed and explode? Will it chase you if you have burrow move? Does anyone know what will happen?
Big Mac
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
August 25 2011 17:17 GMT
#2907
On August 26 2011 02:13 andrea20 wrote:
I was hoping the carrier would've gotten more love, since at this point it's virtually strictly worse than a battlecruiser. (longer build time, more minerals after 4 interceptors built, no ability, lower dps, same speed, less hp+shields, less armor, 50 less gas than a battlecruiser to make up for all that!)

I love the rest of the changes, though.

Carriers do have more range, which is pretty huge since you don't wanna lose these units once you get them.

Personally I think both BCs and carriers should get some love. Blizzard has said they are fine with them being more "fun" units instead of competitive, which kinda sucks.
Yaotzin
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa4280 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 17:19:23
August 25 2011 17:18 GMT
#2908
On August 26 2011 02:17 Zanno wrote:
these changes all seem way too extreme at this stage in the game's development imo

20 Terrans in Code S. 38% PvT winrate. Etc. And these changes aren't even extreme. They're fairly small changes that will hopefully address those issues. Also they promote more fun play, like drop play from toss.
MonsieurGrimm
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada2441 Posts
August 25 2011 17:19 GMT
#2909
On August 26 2011 02:17 VassiliZaytsev wrote:
If you are a zerg unit being chased by an HSM and you burrow, does the HSM go to where you burrowed and explode? Will it chase you if you have burrow move? Does anyone know what will happen?

it chases you

I like the patch changes but if we're trying to make things more viable, Blizzard, could you please take a look at the Hydralisk and a better look at the Ultralisk?
"60% of the time, it works - every time" - Brian Fantana on Double Reactors All The Way // "Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people." - Eleanor Roosevelt
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
August 25 2011 17:19 GMT
#2910
On August 26 2011 01:22 moregamethanSEGA wrote:
As a terran player this patch makes my blood boil, and here are my reasons why:

1 - + Show Spoiler +
nobody can get a raven close enough to an enemy unit use the seeker missle so who care how fast it moves? hey blizzard, here an idea, how bout you increase the range (to 7) of the spell OR the speed of the raven (to 2.75). I mean, something in the terran air armada needs be able to retreat). So dont piss in my pocket and tell me its raining - the raven still sucks and is unusable. Instead of the medivac upgrade WHICH NO ONE USES, give the raven a speed/invisibility upgrade for pete's sake.


2- + Show Spoiler +
barracks nerf literally makes no sense. let me repeat: this actually doesn't make sense to nerf the building time - thus slowing down all tech for terran (factory, starport). i didnt realize the 11/11 rax vs zerg was this imba that now I have to worry about getting 6 pooled every game now outside of 1v1s. someone needs to explain why this change was made. workers harrass me while i build the barracks every game anyhow so I'm already losing minerals cause I have to send another worker off the line as is - why must you make it so painful for terrans to just make their first non-worker unit?


3 - + Show Spoiler +
the blue flame nerf is excessive without a doubt (50% nerf). now it can't two shot marines or scvs. now i have to reseach +1 for that? really blizzard? when a unit becomes popular you make it worthless? why would i even research that upgrade now for +5 damage (ONLY vs light). i didnt realize hellions were that good (oh wait they are not). it called make stalkers and roaches (which is the standard anyhow for those races)... and now lings with speed can easily own hellons (which was the whole point of the fracking unit/upgrade). Oh and if you didnt know, now banelings REALLY own hellons.


4 - + Show Spoiler +
Ultralisk build time buff is unbelievable. 55 secs for tier 3 units... enough said. ultra now fastest tier 3 unit to make (not to mention you can make multiple at a time as zerg. ultra make faster than bc, thor, banshee, raven. - really? REALLY? I dont care how long it takes to get hive this messes up multiplayer in big way.


5 - + Show Spoiler +
overseer cost reduced is acceptable BUT given the relativity of each races detector, the raven costs too much in comparision. yeah, its abilites are nice, but you have to upgrade the crap out of it (im sorry but turret ability is worthless 99% of time. so basically i have to pay almost 4 times as much in gas (and even more in minerals) as any other race for the same thing, effectively - plus i have to tech to starport with a techlab? this just doesn't make sense to me in any way, shape, or form. the raven is also the slowest of all detectors and is most fragile given it is both slow and not invisible - therefore its not even useful AT ALL for scouting.


Thank you blizzard for removing all fun from sc2 for terrans. I bet next patch with nerf the ghosts. I truly hope blizzard has plans to add new units cause it getting a little out of hand with all these nerfs for terran. As for the rest of the changes, I dont see anything wrong with them. Blink is too good and too cheap imho. i should take longer to get blink than blue flame for sure. mothership buff is hilariously pointless. immortal range SHOULD have been increased long ago casue its so slow and bulky anyways. warp prism buff makes sense as that unit was, in fact, too fragile (even though it only cost minerals...), but regardless that unit costs half as much as medivac and you can argue its a more versitile unit when used correctly. lastly, why even bother nerfing an ability like contaminate no one uses? Isn't there something else more useful/impactful that can be tweaked?

Just when I was starting to enjoy mech now they throw this s**t in my face... hope the rest of you terrans feel the same way I do. maybe that way blizzard will listen.



I actually was going to suggest that blizzard nerf the ghosts and that that's the only the only thing really missing from this amazing patch. Sorry buddy.
Also notice how the only variety they removed was cheesy blue flame hellion builds. They made Raven's more viable and bio more viable (thanks to infestor nerf). In the end, I think terran is going to be stronger in the mid/late game against zerg because of the infestor nerf. 5 Seconds on the barracks is probably related to the larger map sizes that we have now. In the early beta, maps were super tiny so to defend a 6 pool you needed that super fast rax. Now the maps are a lot bigger. That's the reasoning i can see for the change.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
Yaotzin
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa4280 Posts
August 25 2011 17:20 GMT
#2911
I think the far better WP will help a lot against ghosts. Templar shuttles will definitely be standard now.
Phant
Profile Joined August 2010
United States737 Posts
August 25 2011 17:20 GMT
#2912
So....just add 1 more hellion into the mix? Makes it more of a risk but there is still a huge payoff.
andrea20
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada441 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 17:22:54
August 25 2011 17:21 GMT
#2913
On August 26 2011 02:17 Bagi wrote:
Carriers do have more range, which is pretty huge since you don't wanna lose these units once you get them.


Well, sure, but does that matter after a fleet of BCs greet the enemy army with a yamato gun salute?
Akash1223
Profile Joined March 2011
United States91 Posts
August 25 2011 17:21 GMT
#2914
While reducing ultra build time is nice, imo it's not enough. They simply don't do enough damage to non-armored units to be worth their cost.

The raven change is interesting; wondering which units can no longer out run seeker missiles now.
Jonneh
Profile Joined June 2011
United Kingdom67 Posts
August 25 2011 17:21 GMT
#2915
On August 26 2011 02:15 Yaotzin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 02:12 Jonneh wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:59 Heavenly wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:55 Jonneh wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:52 darkness wrote:
What I want to see as well is carrier buff. You don't see any of those units anymore.
Thoughts?



you would if gateway units weren't so effective. Why waste gas on stargates when blink stalkers are the counter to everything? :D


You're right, so imba versus marauders.


So you use the even cheaper unit against those right? ;D

Kinda thinking the original point is pretty valid.

Yeah no. They're a useful support unit in PvT but they lose to basically everything Terran can build in a straight up fight.


On August 26 2011 02:15 Loodah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 02:12 Jonneh wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:59 Heavenly wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:55 Jonneh wrote:
On August 26 2011 01:52 darkness wrote:
What I want to see as well is carrier buff. You don't see any of those units anymore.
Thoughts?



you would if gateway units weren't so effective. Why waste gas on stargates when blink stalkers are the counter to everything? :D


You're right, so imba versus marauders.


So you use the even cheaper unit against those right? ;D

Kinda thinking the original point is pretty valid.


Actually marauders own zealots AND stallkers. Marines own zealots and stalkers, too as long as you micro.


Actually I don't really agree, assuming you get EMPd then yeah, perhaps. But then it depends a lot on what tech you have... guardian shield, charge, blink, templar+storm? How many medivacs, and so on. The flat numbers don't support your assertions. A zealot takes how many marine hits to die? Isn't it something stupidly high?
Silky
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States260 Posts
August 25 2011 17:21 GMT
#2916
I think that the contaminate changes are effective so zerg players don't mass overlords due to the price reduction. Therefore, they would just goo all of the opponents building. I think that this is fair.
Have a good life
Yaotzin
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa4280 Posts
August 25 2011 17:22 GMT
#2917
Not sure what you're disagreeing about. Stalkers lose to most units in the game in a straight up fight. They're really shit at straight up fights, as designed. They get utterly demolished by marauders, and marines beat them just as cost effectively, if not more (no gas required!).
Enhancer_
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada320 Posts
August 25 2011 17:23 GMT
#2918
Hopefully all the people complaining about the patch notes actually go onto the PTR and play 1.4 so that Blizzard can get some decent data/feedback that isn't based entirely on theory. Previous PTRs have been extremely dead =/.
PhiliBiRD
Profile Joined November 2009
United States2643 Posts
August 25 2011 17:24 GMT
#2919
dont understand most of these changes, which we could hear blizzards side on this.
LetoAtreides82
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1188 Posts
August 25 2011 17:24 GMT
#2920
This might just be the most epic patch ever. These changes actually make a lot of sense. Faster mothership, warp prism is harder to kill, hellions might not grant total control of the map anymore, Raven seeker missiles aren't so slow anymore, and ultras build quicker. Awesome.
The spice must flow
Prev 1 144 145 146 147 148 453 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
19:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Gerald vs ArTLIVE!
Solar vs goblin
Nicoract vs TBD
Spirit vs Percival
Cham vs TBD
ByuN vs Jumy
SteadfastSC1129
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 1129
UpATreeSC 138
ZombieGrub94
JuggernautJason70
Lillekanin 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20199
Calm 1930
Rain 1537
Shuttle 499
Dewaltoss 89
ggaemo 32
Hm[arnc] 6
Dota 2
Dendi1423
Pyrionflax226
NeuroSwarm97
Counter-Strike
apEX2367
fl0m1140
Stewie2K431
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu527
Other Games
Grubby3761
FrodaN1674
Beastyqt511
summit1g368
ToD190
Hui .186
C9.Mang0131
ArmadaUGS114
Trikslyr54
Kaelaris6
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 48
• davetesta9
• Reevou 3
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix16
• Pr0nogo 8
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21884
Other Games
• Scarra798
• imaqtpie798
• WagamamaTV270
• Shiphtur176
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 35m
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
Map Test Tournament
14h 35m
The PondCast
16h 35m
RSL Revival
1d 13h
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.