• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:41
CEST 06:41
KST 13:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Soulkey on ASL S20 A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch [ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1597 users

PvP is going to change in the next Patch ! - Page 29

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Sworn
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada920 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#561
Please god let them not decrease the zealot build time again proxy 1gate in TvP is already so hard to hold off
"Duty is heavy as a mountain, death is light as a feather." CJ Entus Fighting! <3 Effort
Ocedic
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1808 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#562
On April 22 2011 23:09 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 22:32 Apolo wrote:
toss will have colossus which are fairly slow.


Colossus are slow!?! for gods sake, they are the same speed as marines/marauders (units that are considered mobile) and have good mobility being able to cliff walk.


They're considered mobile because of stim, which Collosi thankfully don't have.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 17:56:22
April 22 2011 17:54 GMT
#563
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:02 GMT
#564
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:12:51
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#565
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


Yes, but by the time the 2 rax is over, you (can) have 3 warpgates out, and the production starts to come in (which causes the 2 rax to stop basically.)

Also, i think some top protoss are already figuring out timings in pvp. but hopefully this will fix the mu for good.
Sahand
Profile Joined November 2010
United Kingdom114 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#566
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


if anything you should be able to squeeze out another sentry to block your ramp a 2nd time so it would balance out anyways
I)etox
Profile Joined April 2011
1240 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#567
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....

replays:

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


That's a really good point, but the fact of matter is, nothing concrete has been said at all so we don't even know what balance changes are coming, if any at all. They only said that they were looking at it. Until we have more information though, what you're doing is what everyone should be doing: using what they have to deal with this problem.
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
April 22 2011 18:17 GMT
#568
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:
The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....



While this play is o.k, (ive seen response do this type of hold a bunch), its not ok vs blink, or robo, which are 2 very common openings/transitions. And if you do either of those builds, then you are again, made vulnerable to the 4 gate.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:18 GMT
#569
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.
watsup
Tor
Profile Joined March 2008
Canada231 Posts
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#570
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:20:55
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#571
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


lol proxy gates are defendable now but are you not thinking at all about what would happen if gateways produced units faster than WG, like the blizz mod suggested? that is why he is saying it would be very hard to stop proxy gates.
bpork
Profile Joined March 2011
United States23 Posts
April 22 2011 18:21 GMT
#572
I did not really do 1v1 when proxy 2 gating was around -- this seems risky from a zerg perspective. Either early pool to kill the pylon or put spine / wall in in the mineral line.

But like previous posters said, we do not have anything concrete.

I do give props to Blizzard to for looking into what seems to be a pretty bleh matchup from a player and spectator perspective.. hopefully what they come up with will move the game forward

On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?
"Our BM is never prioritized over our macro" - Destiny
DNA61289
Profile Joined August 2010
United States665 Posts
April 22 2011 18:24 GMT
#573
Not going to state my opinion until I see the actual changes, but from what I can gather it seems blizzard only wants to change PvP and not any other match up so they might know what they are doing.
But yeah being a Korean gamer is very imba. If you're a non-korean gamer you have to balance your game playing with earning money and your real life. If you're Korean you just sit around playing games all day eating 2 cent ramyun and becoming gosu.
RodrigoX
Profile Joined November 2009
United States645 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#574
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?


Being better than your opponent.

So is what is being said that warpgate research time will be increased, while slight changes to the buildtimes of the units, and then warpgates will take time off of those build times like it already does? Maybe have warpgates not take time off of any unit, unless Im wrong that they take 5 seconds off of the buildtimes.

Anyway glad they see 4gate pvp as a problem. Because it is already hard enough to avoid colossus wars
We were all raised on televion that made us believe we'd all be Millionairs, Movie gods, and Rockstars..... But we won't.... We are slowly learning that fact. And we are very, very pissed off.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#575
On April 23 2011 03:20 Tor wrote:
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.

I don't understand? If players choose to repeatedly do 4gate even with valid strategies to stop it, doesn't that make the matchup subjectively player defined? There is no 'right' way to play the game. Noone says you HAVE to 4 gate.

Blizzard once said that they don't want to balance around the metagame, but this is precisely what I think they are doing.
watsup
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10010 Posts
April 22 2011 18:28 GMT
#576
so cute of blizzard
1st of all 4gate is not an issue and there are several builds u can do that can easily counter 4gate

2nd of all if they really did want to fix 4gate this could have been done by simply fixing the FF bug where a zealot can spot on top of the high ground by going to the corner of an FF, which then ables the 4gater to warpin units on top of the high ground
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
sAfuRos
Profile Joined March 2009
United States743 Posts
April 22 2011 18:29 GMT
#577
I dislike this nerf. It had better be very minor. Like literally, gateways better only get like a 5 second advantage per unit TOPS
sAfuRos // twitch.tv/sAfuRos // contact for coaching
Scruff
Profile Joined May 2010
Singapore509 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#578
Oh god, its about time.
I astonish myself everyday
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#579
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?

Lol yea me too, 4 gates come before every things else finish so 4 gates just fucking kill you already
iSTime
Profile Joined November 2006
1579 Posts
April 22 2011 18:34 GMT
#580
On April 23 2011 02:54 Dommk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o


It's far too early to say. If build time is reduced by enough, pokes will be even easier to deal with, because rather than having, say, 1 zealot/1 stalker out when T gets to your ramp, you will already have the sentry as well.

My personal opinion though, is that P could hold against pokes perfectly fine even without the gateway buff. I really think a lot of to P players do not adequately time their builds to deal with T pokes, and there a wide variety of P openings building a 2nd gateway on 22 that are unexplored by most players. These openings crush early T pressure very hard.
www.infinityseven.net
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
19:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Spirit vs PercivalLIVE!
Cham vs TBD
ByuN vs Jumy
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech72
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 362
Nal_rA 61
Bale 28
Icarus 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm146
League of Legends
JimRising 630
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K487
Coldzera 298
Super Smash Bros
Westballz22
Other Games
summit1g7799
C9.Mang0383
XaKoH 108
RuFF_SC248
ViBE46
Trikslyr23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick869
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 24
• practicex 23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 14
• Diggity6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1124
• Stunt385
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
5h 19m
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
Map Test Tournament
6h 19m
The PondCast
8h 19m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
1d 22h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.