• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:08
CET 05:08
KST 13:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational1SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
Starcraft 2 will not be in the Esports World Cup SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational When will we find out if there are more tournament PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
$70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Gypsy to Korea BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1642 users

PvP is going to change in the next Patch ! - Page 29

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Sworn
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada920 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#561
Please god let them not decrease the zealot build time again proxy 1gate in TvP is already so hard to hold off
"Duty is heavy as a mountain, death is light as a feather." CJ Entus Fighting! <3 Effort
Ocedic
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1808 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#562
On April 22 2011 23:09 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 22:32 Apolo wrote:
toss will have colossus which are fairly slow.


Colossus are slow!?! for gods sake, they are the same speed as marines/marauders (units that are considered mobile) and have good mobility being able to cliff walk.


They're considered mobile because of stim, which Collosi thankfully don't have.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 17:56:22
April 22 2011 17:54 GMT
#563
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:02 GMT
#564
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:12:51
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#565
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


Yes, but by the time the 2 rax is over, you (can) have 3 warpgates out, and the production starts to come in (which causes the 2 rax to stop basically.)

Also, i think some top protoss are already figuring out timings in pvp. but hopefully this will fix the mu for good.
Sahand
Profile Joined November 2010
United Kingdom114 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#566
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


if anything you should be able to squeeze out another sentry to block your ramp a 2nd time so it would balance out anyways
I)etox
Profile Joined April 2011
1240 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#567
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....

replays:

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


That's a really good point, but the fact of matter is, nothing concrete has been said at all so we don't even know what balance changes are coming, if any at all. They only said that they were looking at it. Until we have more information though, what you're doing is what everyone should be doing: using what they have to deal with this problem.
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
April 22 2011 18:17 GMT
#568
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:
The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....



While this play is o.k, (ive seen response do this type of hold a bunch), its not ok vs blink, or robo, which are 2 very common openings/transitions. And if you do either of those builds, then you are again, made vulnerable to the 4 gate.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:18 GMT
#569
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.
watsup
Tor
Profile Joined March 2008
Canada231 Posts
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#570
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:20:55
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#571
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


lol proxy gates are defendable now but are you not thinking at all about what would happen if gateways produced units faster than WG, like the blizz mod suggested? that is why he is saying it would be very hard to stop proxy gates.
bpork
Profile Joined March 2011
United States23 Posts
April 22 2011 18:21 GMT
#572
I did not really do 1v1 when proxy 2 gating was around -- this seems risky from a zerg perspective. Either early pool to kill the pylon or put spine / wall in in the mineral line.

But like previous posters said, we do not have anything concrete.

I do give props to Blizzard to for looking into what seems to be a pretty bleh matchup from a player and spectator perspective.. hopefully what they come up with will move the game forward

On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?
"Our BM is never prioritized over our macro" - Destiny
DNA61289
Profile Joined August 2010
United States665 Posts
April 22 2011 18:24 GMT
#573
Not going to state my opinion until I see the actual changes, but from what I can gather it seems blizzard only wants to change PvP and not any other match up so they might know what they are doing.
But yeah being a Korean gamer is very imba. If you're a non-korean gamer you have to balance your game playing with earning money and your real life. If you're Korean you just sit around playing games all day eating 2 cent ramyun and becoming gosu.
RodrigoX
Profile Joined November 2009
United States645 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#574
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?


Being better than your opponent.

So is what is being said that warpgate research time will be increased, while slight changes to the buildtimes of the units, and then warpgates will take time off of those build times like it already does? Maybe have warpgates not take time off of any unit, unless Im wrong that they take 5 seconds off of the buildtimes.

Anyway glad they see 4gate pvp as a problem. Because it is already hard enough to avoid colossus wars
We were all raised on televion that made us believe we'd all be Millionairs, Movie gods, and Rockstars..... But we won't.... We are slowly learning that fact. And we are very, very pissed off.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#575
On April 23 2011 03:20 Tor wrote:
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.

I don't understand? If players choose to repeatedly do 4gate even with valid strategies to stop it, doesn't that make the matchup subjectively player defined? There is no 'right' way to play the game. Noone says you HAVE to 4 gate.

Blizzard once said that they don't want to balance around the metagame, but this is precisely what I think they are doing.
watsup
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10012 Posts
April 22 2011 18:28 GMT
#576
so cute of blizzard
1st of all 4gate is not an issue and there are several builds u can do that can easily counter 4gate

2nd of all if they really did want to fix 4gate this could have been done by simply fixing the FF bug where a zealot can spot on top of the high ground by going to the corner of an FF, which then ables the 4gater to warpin units on top of the high ground
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
sAfuRos
Profile Joined March 2009
United States743 Posts
April 22 2011 18:29 GMT
#577
I dislike this nerf. It had better be very minor. Like literally, gateways better only get like a 5 second advantage per unit TOPS
sAfuRos // twitch.tv/sAfuRos // contact for coaching
Scruff
Profile Joined May 2010
Singapore509 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#578
Oh god, its about time.
I astonish myself everyday
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#579
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?

Lol yea me too, 4 gates come before every things else finish so 4 gates just fucking kill you already
iSTime
Profile Joined November 2006
1579 Posts
April 22 2011 18:34 GMT
#580
On April 23 2011 02:54 Dommk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o


It's far too early to say. If build time is reduced by enough, pokes will be even easier to deal with, because rather than having, say, 1 zealot/1 stalker out when T gets to your ramp, you will already have the sentry as well.

My personal opinion though, is that P could hold against pokes perfectly fine even without the gateway buff. I really think a lot of to P players do not adequately time their builds to deal with T pokes, and there a wide variety of P openings building a 2nd gateway on 22 that are unexplored by most players. These openings crush early T pressure very hard.
www.infinityseven.net
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
01:00
#65
PiGStarcraft626
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft679
RuFF_SC2 173
Nathanias 56
Ketroc 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 132
Shinee 92
Noble 28
Bale 26
ZergMaN 22
Icarus 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever368
League of Legends
JimRising 749
C9.Mang0424
Counter-Strike
Foxcn316
minikerr33
Other Games
summit1g7820
WinterStarcraft278
ViBE175
XaKoH 128
Maynarde113
Mew2King56
febbydoto14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1301
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 42
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 66
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1696
• Lourlo648
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h 53m
OSC
6h 53m
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs Solar
MaxPax vs TBD
Krystianer vs TBD
ShoWTimE vs TBD
Big Brain Bouts
2 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
3 days
BSL 21
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-20
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.