• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:15
CEST 20:15
KST 03:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon100Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 Yamato Cup Series StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Has online-only competition during the pandemic changed your enjoyment of pro SC2?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall KSL Week #92
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Syncronization issues and can't find games Remastered crash fix suggestions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues The Casual Games of the Week Thread Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8409 users

PvP is going to change in the next Patch ! - Page 29

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Sworn
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada920 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#561
Please god let them not decrease the zealot build time again proxy 1gate in TvP is already so hard to hold off
"Duty is heavy as a mountain, death is light as a feather." CJ Entus Fighting! <3 Effort
Ocedic
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1808 Posts
April 22 2011 17:53 GMT
#562
On April 22 2011 23:09 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 22:32 Apolo wrote:
toss will have colossus which are fairly slow.


Colossus are slow!?! for gods sake, they are the same speed as marines/marauders (units that are considered mobile) and have good mobility being able to cliff walk.


They're considered mobile because of stim, which Collosi thankfully don't have.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 17:56:22
April 22 2011 17:54 GMT
#563
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:02 GMT
#564
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:12:51
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#565
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


Yes, but by the time the 2 rax is over, you (can) have 3 warpgates out, and the production starts to come in (which causes the 2 rax to stop basically.)

Also, i think some top protoss are already figuring out timings in pvp. but hopefully this will fix the mu for good.
Sahand
Profile Joined November 2010
United Kingdom114 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#566
On April 23 2011 03:02 hitman133 wrote:
I hope it won't affect PvT in early game, 2 raxes marauders pressure is very difficult now already


if anything you should be able to squeeze out another sentry to block your ramp a 2nd time so it would balance out anyways
I)etox
Profile Joined April 2011
1240 Posts
April 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#567
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....

replays:

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


That's a really good point, but the fact of matter is, nothing concrete has been said at all so we don't even know what balance changes are coming, if any at all. They only said that they were looking at it. Until we have more information though, what you're doing is what everyone should be doing: using what they have to deal with this problem.
hellsan631
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States695 Posts
April 22 2011 18:17 GMT
#568
On April 23 2011 02:44 N3rV[Green] wrote:
The thing that I have a problem with is, I HAVE A SOLUTION that does nothing to the game and simply changes the mindset of early protoss in the early game. At first it was a more cutesy build with two cannons if they 4-gate and going for phoenix harass. This had some holes in that that I found playing with masters level players, but the idea of an early forge for safety and upgrades are amazing no matter what was solid IMO.


Then I saw Naniwa play PvP, and use his gateway wall in. I adapted the two gates, and replaced the pylon with a cannon. I'm now invincible vs a 4 gate push with proper control (1 zealot outside the wall to keep other zeals off the cannon, sentries produced as needed but prioritizing stalkers off 3 gates)

With good scouting you can figure out what he's doing expanding wise, and you are in a position where you have 1/1 nearing completion, blink either done or getting started, and the option of taking an expand or punishing an expand.

I feel that it's a very solid way of playing, and things like this are what we need to fix PvP, not fucking balance changes....



While this play is o.k, (ive seen response do this type of hold a bunch), its not ok vs blink, or robo, which are 2 very common openings/transitions. And if you do either of those builds, then you are again, made vulnerable to the 4 gate.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:18 GMT
#569
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.
watsup
Tor
Profile Joined March 2008
Canada231 Posts
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#570
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 18:20:55
April 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#571
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


lol proxy gates are defendable now but are you not thinking at all about what would happen if gateways produced units faster than WG, like the blizz mod suggested? that is why he is saying it would be very hard to stop proxy gates.
bpork
Profile Joined March 2011
United States23 Posts
April 22 2011 18:21 GMT
#572
I did not really do 1v1 when proxy 2 gating was around -- this seems risky from a zerg perspective. Either early pool to kill the pylon or put spine / wall in in the mineral line.

But like previous posters said, we do not have anything concrete.

I do give props to Blizzard to for looking into what seems to be a pretty bleh matchup from a player and spectator perspective.. hopefully what they come up with will move the game forward

On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?
"Our BM is never prioritized over our macro" - Destiny
DNA61289
Profile Joined August 2010
United States665 Posts
April 22 2011 18:24 GMT
#573
Not going to state my opinion until I see the actual changes, but from what I can gather it seems blizzard only wants to change PvP and not any other match up so they might know what they are doing.
But yeah being a Korean gamer is very imba. If you're a non-korean gamer you have to balance your game playing with earning money and your real life. If you're Korean you just sit around playing games all day eating 2 cent ramyun and becoming gosu.
RodrigoX
Profile Joined November 2009
United States645 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#574
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 03:18 ShotoElite wrote:
so....why are they trying to change it? PvP is not broken and doesn't need any fixing whatsoever. There are plenty of counters to 4gate, there is nothing to fix if you are just lazy or unwilling to practice these counters.


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?


Being better than your opponent.

So is what is being said that warpgate research time will be increased, while slight changes to the buildtimes of the units, and then warpgates will take time off of those build times like it already does? Maybe have warpgates not take time off of any unit, unless Im wrong that they take 5 seconds off of the buildtimes.

Anyway glad they see 4gate pvp as a problem. Because it is already hard enough to avoid colossus wars
We were all raised on televion that made us believe we'd all be Millionairs, Movie gods, and Rockstars..... But we won't.... We are slowly learning that fact. And we are very, very pissed off.
ShotoElite
Profile Joined March 2011
United States79 Posts
April 22 2011 18:26 GMT
#575
On April 23 2011 03:20 Tor wrote:
Because 4gate defines the match-up, which isn't good for the game.

I don't understand? If players choose to repeatedly do 4gate even with valid strategies to stop it, doesn't that make the matchup subjectively player defined? There is no 'right' way to play the game. Noone says you HAVE to 4 gate.

Blizzard once said that they don't want to balance around the metagame, but this is precisely what I think they are doing.
watsup
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10067 Posts
April 22 2011 18:28 GMT
#576
so cute of blizzard
1st of all 4gate is not an issue and there are several builds u can do that can easily counter 4gate

2nd of all if they really did want to fix 4gate this could have been done by simply fixing the FF bug where a zealot can spot on top of the high ground by going to the corner of an FF, which then ables the 4gater to warpin units on top of the high ground
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
sAfuRos
Profile Joined March 2009
United States743 Posts
April 22 2011 18:29 GMT
#577
I dislike this nerf. It had better be very minor. Like literally, gateways better only get like a 5 second advantage per unit TOPS
sAfuRos // twitch.tv/sAfuRos // contact for coaching
Scruff
Profile Joined May 2010
Singapore509 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#578
Oh god, its about time.
I astonish myself everyday
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
April 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#579
On April 23 2011 03:21 bpork wrote:


I'm curious - what are the many counters to 4 gate?

Lol yea me too, 4 gates come before every things else finish so 4 gates just fucking kill you already
iSTime
Profile Joined November 2006
1579 Posts
April 22 2011 18:34 GMT
#580
On April 23 2011 02:54 Dommk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2011 02:26 gnutz wrote:
On April 23 2011 02:11 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
So proxy gates will become undefendable again, and terrans will win games by random poking at Ps ramp, again.

Sounds like fun.

I hope it works out better than it does in my mind lol

The Warpgates never were a solution to random poking of Terrans.

Indeed, the random poking did occur most of the time before warpgates were finished. They were a problem because the sentry was not out, the sentry you needed to build in a gateway.

I think so. DQ is a good example.

But that still has nothing to do with warpgates. It had to do with the bad maps.

And even this change would make it better for Protoss on small maps, because their sentry and stalker would get out faster.


Or what do you mean by random poking?


And when were proxy gates undefendable? oO
But what many suggested, if you don't change the buildtimes of Zealots (/change the buildtimes not completely) but only of stalkers and sentry, i don't think it will work out bad.

I don't know why i'm defending Blizzard,lol. But i think it is a good idea. But obviously requires lots of testing.


Hmm the timings for the more aggressive pokings 15-20 seconds before Warpgate is done for majority of builds, which gives toss enough time to delay with their one forcefield and get 2-3 Gateways transforming. The builds like the one Select/Fenix/QXC do will most likely be much much harder to defend, that instant warpin bypassing a production cycle is sometimes crucial when trying to survive, especially if you go double sentry to try and be "safe", you might just die going double sentry.


Most likely he means if the terran happens to get up the ramp now, it can screw over the Protoss pretty badly since units will be streaming out of gateways longer and will be much easier to catch units, especially with more aggressive builds that will get up your ramp even if you get 2 sentries, I think Fenix did something like that--the protoss narrowly skirted death when his warpgates finished and was able to bypass a production cycle and warp-in sentry instantly to throw another FF whilst his last one was running out. The version Select does that is almost impossible to scout because he leads with an SCV+Marine to clear out Xel'Naga towers might be brutal :o


It's far too early to say. If build time is reduced by enough, pokes will be even easier to deal with, because rather than having, say, 1 zealot/1 stalker out when T gets to your ramp, you will already have the sentry as well.

My personal opinion though, is that P could hold against pokes perfectly fine even without the gateway buff. I really think a lot of to P players do not adequately time their builds to deal with T pokes, and there a wide variety of P openings building a 2nd gateway on 22 that are unexplored by most players. These openings crush early T pressure very hard.
www.infinityseven.net
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:15
Rotti's PatchesSC Open #4
RotterdaM745
IndyStarCraft 198
TKL 186
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 745
ByuN 625
IndyStarCraft 198
TKL 186
EmSc Tv 9
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21265
Shuttle 1233
Dewaltoss 142
firebathero 86
Barracks 57
Sexy 39
soO 27
Mong 26
scan(afreeca) 24
Shine 20
[ Show more ]
Trap 12
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma498
Fuzer 187
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK17
Other Games
FrodaN1775
Beastyqt537
Dendi304
B2W.Neo225
Liquid`LucifroN146
KnowMe137
ArmadaUGS122
C9.Mang091
QueenE74
Livibee49
Trikslyr33
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1404
StarCraft 2
TaKeTV 170
EmSc Tv 9
EmSc2Tv 9
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 17
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3710
League of Legends
• Jankos1608
Other Games
• imaqtpie588
• Shiphtur126
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 45m
GSL
16h 45m
AI Arena Tournament
22h 45m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
GSL
1d 16h
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
1d 20h
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.