• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:39
CEST 18:39
KST 01:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Who will win EWC 2025? Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Corsair Pursuit Micro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 804 users

Bnet forums to be Real Name Only - Page 97

Forum Index > Closed
3046 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 95 96 97 98 99 153 Next
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
July 07 2010 18:52 GMT
#1921
Even if gaming DIDN'T have a stigma (which it does), it would still be incredibly risky to reveal your info in a place where anybody can search it out with a simply Google query. If you're in any kind of high-ranking job, you do not want others to know that you spend hours posting on a video game forum, and since things on the internet are hard to delete, there's a good chance that an immature remark you made as a teenager can come back to bite you on the ass as an adult.

Having personal info available on the web is increasingly becoming a top concern for citizens because of how easy it is these days to track you if your info ever goes public. What makes this worse overall is that it's being revealed to the video gaming community, and yes, that's a very important fact: who you reveal info to can often be just as big as revealing the info itself. A woman who shares her real name on a womans' group probably won't suffer much, but a woman who shares her real name on a gamers' group can look forward to having her own personal army of e-stalkers. As much as I love being a gamer, there's no denying that a VERY large portion of gamers are young, male, often immature, love harassing others (see: 4chan), and generally love griefing others for the sake of "lulz". Blizzard needs to realize that even though there's a degree of overlap, there are still massive differences between Facebook communities and gamer communities. I don't know why they think that shamelessly ripping off Facebook will have the same happy result if they do it for a different crowd.

I'm certainly glad I'm male with a non-minority sounding name, because I certainly grieve for those who don't have a Y chromosome and those with non-white names. And god help those who have Muslim names.
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-07 18:58:50
July 07 2010 18:54 GMT
#1922
On July 08 2010 03:33 Orome wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:09 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:06 TheYango wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:58 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:56 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:49 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:47 Archerofaiur wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:45 See.Blue wrote:
Here at TL in our own rulebook we say that we value reputation, particularly as it is attached to a name. By requiring RealID, Blizz is just taking the same step.



Do you see how TL manages to do it without, you know, compromising privacy and security?


That ignores the larger point I was making, namely that there's been groups and organizations in the real world, time out of mind, whose members have always been able to know the real names of other members, as thats how they communicate. Groups like this still exist, so it's not a huge jump to see that having strangers learn your real name can't be as apocalyptic as a lot of the posting on here would suggest.


Except in real life, what you say isn't recorded and displayed for all eternity for anyone in the whole world to read.


But what exactly is so wrong with accountability?

"Accountability" is not that straightforward when involved with something so easily misinterpreted as written word on the internet.

It's one thing to be accountable for things you actually said. It's another story when people take quotes out of context, can't see sarcastic tone as it's not expressed well in written form, or just plain misunderstand you.


But this is no different then real life when people can twist what you say. If it acts as impetus for people to put more thought into what they're saying, then it's really hard to argue against.


In real life you have a limited audience in front of you, you know who that audience is, you know exactly what you're sharing with whom. If you don't want someone to know something, you don't talk about it in his presence.

The internet is a much more powerful medium. On the internet, your audience is potentially every single person who has access to a computer. That includes your family, all your friends, your teachers, the people at work, your future employers. It also includes criminals, thieves, crazies, etc., etc.. Even better, your message doesn't fade over time. Are you sure you want everything you write today to be associated with you 20 years from now? Do you really want just anyone in the world to be able to associate your post with a name and an address if he doesn't like what you write?

Thinking this is going to turn the battle.net forums into a great forum where nobody posts unless they've got something important to say is naive. The general quality of posting will probably go up as a result, but having all real names exposed on a forum like that is just asking for trouble.

But everything you post are potentially read by everyone in the world already! The only difference is that now people can associate those posts with the real you, aka it adds accountability.
On July 08 2010 03:33 789 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:12 Bibdy wrote:
Why does accountability require your full name?

Why can't they just use any personalized unique identifier for your forum persona?

Seriously, this is just a damn online video game forum. Why is it so important that it needs to plaster something like your full name around in order to create that accountability? You would achieve the exact same effect of accountability by forcing people to post with a single identifier on the account. Whether its real or not, its still locked to that account and you can't change it without buying another one. Exact same effect as buying another account to generate a fake full name, only this time you did it to be a troll. Not to protect your identity.

One cannot fathom why they chose real name over any kind of unique identifier. They HAVE to know its important to a lot of people. They can't be THAT stupid.

Does anyone honestly think that it makes a difference to the CONTENT of your posts if you were forced to post everywhere on the internet with your current forumID on this site, than with your full name?

I'm willing to bet the content won't change. It only becomes a decision based on the desire to post at all.


This is a very good point that this guy has made more than a few times. Why go with real names when you could get the job done with a single unique identifier for that account. It brings accountibility without the privacy concerns - if you're in the habit of being a bad poster/troll people will come to recognize your name. It will also help the moderators. They don't need to worry about IPs, cd keys, or any of that jazz. They can just simply hand out the punishment to the account tied to that name.

It adds far less accountability, as the quote above notes people aren't afraid of what other people thinks about their ID but they are afraid of what they think about the real them.

Basically what happens is that they don't post things that they wouldn't want people to know, if the only punishment against flaming is that they are now unable to post people would still flame. If however their friends and family can potentially find out about this behavior then it is an extremely strong deterrent.
On July 08 2010 03:36 Graven wrote:
And again, if there was no danger in being harrassed then there'd be no prevention of flaming/trolling to begin with, which is what was intended.

No, the danger is not about being harassed ffs, the danger is that someone you already know and cares about in real life finds out. Also the dangers of being harassed for posting on a forum will be no more than the danger of being harassed for walking down the street irl. Sure, more reads your posts, but there are also much more posts to be read. If you argue in a topic, there will be 20 others arguing in the same topic, why would he track down just you? The only reason celebrities have a problem with things like this is because they are known by everyone, just because people can see your name on a forum doesn't mean that they know you. It is just like how people on the street can see your face which is extremely intimate information but do anyone actually care about it?

Names are not a big deal and since it doesn't even come with a picture it is even less intimate than what millions already have on facebook which is open to all. I bet that a stalker or harasser would more likely seek out people who live near them on facebook with a picture they like rather than attacking a random bnet poster which will be one in a million of faceless names.
On July 08 2010 03:52 Spawkuring wrote:
Blizzard needs to realize that even though there's a degree of overlap, there are still massive differences between Facebook communities and gamer communities.

Most facebook profiles name and picture are open to all, that is more intimate than what people got on any gaming forum and it hasn't caused much problems at all. I mean, do people like incontrol's girlfriend have armies of stalkers? No, but they are celebrities within their communities. Why do you think that random girls would get that then, unless they actively makes them to do it?
EmeraldSparks
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-07 18:57:06
July 07 2010 18:54 GMT
#1923
damn my post was completely owned by archerofaiur's

i'll go hide in a hole now
But why?
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-07 19:01:11
July 07 2010 18:55 GMT
#1924
Big thank you to Ta2 for compiling all this.



BBC News - World of Warcraft maker to end anonymous forum logins
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10543100.stm

USA Today - 'WoW' studio Blizzard to require real names on forums
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...es-on-forums/1

ABC News - Bye-Bye Trolls? Blizzard Forums to Use Real Names
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=11108240

CVG - Fans rage over Blizzard forum plans
http://www.computerandvideogames.com....php?id=254846

PCGamer (UK) - Why Blizzard’s new forum plan is an epic fail
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/07/07/wh...-an-epic-fail/

The Register - Blizzard exposes real names on WoW forums
http://www.reghardware.com/2010/07/07/wow_forums/

About.com - WoW Real ID: A Really Bad Idea
http://antivirus.about.com/b/2010/06...y-bad-idea.htm

Ars Technica - Blizzard: post about StarCraft 2? Use your real name
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2...-real-name.ars

Gamespy - Blizzard to Require Real Names on Official Forums
http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/articles/110/1104456p1.html

Kotaku - Blizzard Forums Will Soon Display Your Real Name
http://kotaku.com/5580585/blizzard-f...your-real-name
Kotaku - Blizzard's Real Name Forum Policy Has Fans In An Uproar
http://kotaku.com/5581209/blizzards-...s-in-an-uproar

Joystiq - Your real name to appear on Blizzard's official forums
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/07/06/yo...ficial-forums/

Inc Gamers - Blizzard Going Too Far With Real ID?
http://www.incgamers.com/Columns/94/...r-with-real-id

MTV Multiplayer - Blizzard Cracks Down On Anonymity In Official Forums
http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/...ficial-forums/

TechEYE.net - Blizzard forces users to show real names: Internet security they have heard of it
http://www.techeye.net/security/bliz...how-real-names

Product Reviews News - WoW Real ID System: Security Flaw Found
http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/...ty-flaw-found/

ITWorld - Blizzard to share your name with angry video game nerds
http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech...deo-game-nerds

Voodoo Extreme - Is Blizzard's Real ID Safe, Or A Playground For Sexual Deviants?
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55...exual-Deviants
Voodoo Extreme - Blizzard Forums To Require Use Of Real Name, Rage Ensues
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55...me-Rage-Ensues

Examiner National - World of Warcraft Players WoWed by Blizzard's REALID announcement
http://www.examiner.com/x-48234-Sant...D-announcement

EuroGamer - Blizzard forums to require real names
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/bl...ire-real-names

GameFocus - Blizzard To Kill Anonymity On Forums
http://www.gamefocus.ca/?nav=new&nid=10091

Strategy Informer - Battle.net removes "veil of anonymity" on forums, real names used
http://www.strategyinformer.com/news...eal-names-used

HuskyStarcraft - Blizzard Forums: First and Last Names [VIDEO]


AusGamers - Blizzard Switching Forums to Real ID System
http://www.ausgamers.com/news/read/2926798

Australian Gamer - Blizzard decide to give out subscribers' real names
http://www.australiangamer.com/news/...eal_names.html

Zeroday - Is Korean Law Driving Policy at Blizzard?
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday...y-at-blizzard/

TankSpot - RealID -- Unethical and Dangerous
http://www.tankspot.com/showthread.php?68744-RealID-Unethical-and-Dangerous

HellMode - Why Real ID is a Really Bad Idea
http://hellmode.com/2010/07/06/why-real-id-is-a-really-bad-idea/#more-390
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Graven
Profile Joined June 2010
United States314 Posts
July 07 2010 18:57 GMT
#1925
What was the name of that site that can track down people's names?
ta2
Profile Joined July 2010
125 Posts
July 07 2010 18:57 GMT
#1926
@Archerofaiur - You stole my post.
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
July 07 2010 18:57 GMT
#1927
On July 08 2010 03:54 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:33 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:09 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:06 TheYango wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:58 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:56 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:49 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:47 Archerofaiur wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:45 See.Blue wrote:
Here at TL in our own rulebook we say that we value reputation, particularly as it is attached to a name. By requiring RealID, Blizz is just taking the same step.



Do you see how TL manages to do it without, you know, compromising privacy and security?


That ignores the larger point I was making, namely that there's been groups and organizations in the real world, time out of mind, whose members have always been able to know the real names of other members, as thats how they communicate. Groups like this still exist, so it's not a huge jump to see that having strangers learn your real name can't be as apocalyptic as a lot of the posting on here would suggest.


Except in real life, what you say isn't recorded and displayed for all eternity for anyone in the whole world to read.


But what exactly is so wrong with accountability?

"Accountability" is not that straightforward when involved with something so easily misinterpreted as written word on the internet.

It's one thing to be accountable for things you actually said. It's another story when people take quotes out of context, can't see sarcastic tone as it's not expressed well in written form, or just plain misunderstand you.


But this is no different then real life when people can twist what you say. If it acts as impetus for people to put more thought into what they're saying, then it's really hard to argue against.


In real life you have a limited audience in front of you, you know who that audience is, you know exactly what you're sharing with whom. If you don't want someone to know something, you don't talk about it in his presence.

The internet is a much more powerful medium. On the internet, your audience is potentially every single person who has access to a computer. That includes your family, all your friends, your teachers, the people at work, your future employers. It also includes criminals, thieves, crazies, etc., etc.. Even better, your message doesn't fade over time. Are you sure you want everything you write today to be associated with you 20 years from now? Do you really want just anyone in the world to be able to associate your post with a name and an address if he doesn't like what you write?

Thinking this is going to turn the battle.net forums into a great forum where nobody posts unless they've got something important to say is naive. The general quality of posting will probably go up as a result, but having all real names exposed on a forum like that is just asking for trouble.

But everything you post are potentially read by everyone in the world already! The only difference is that now people can associate those posts with the real you, aka it adds accountability.
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:33 789 wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:12 Bibdy wrote:
Why does accountability require your full name?

Why can't they just use any personalized unique identifier for your forum persona?

Seriously, this is just a damn online video game forum. Why is it so important that it needs to plaster something like your full name around in order to create that accountability? You would achieve the exact same effect of accountability by forcing people to post with a single identifier on the account. Whether its real or not, its still locked to that account and you can't change it without buying another one. Exact same effect as buying another account to generate a fake full name, only this time you did it to be a troll. Not to protect your identity.

One cannot fathom why they chose real name over any kind of unique identifier. They HAVE to know its important to a lot of people. They can't be THAT stupid.

Does anyone honestly think that it makes a difference to the CONTENT of your posts if you were forced to post everywhere on the internet with your current forumID on this site, than with your full name?

I'm willing to bet the content won't change. It only becomes a decision based on the desire to post at all.


This is a very good point that this guy has made more than a few times. Why go with real names when you could get the job done with a single unique identifier for that account. It brings accountibility without the privacy concerns - if you're in the habit of being a bad poster/troll people will come to recognize your name. It will also help the moderators. They don't need to worry about IPs, cd keys, or any of that jazz. They can just simply hand out the punishment to the account tied to that name.

It adds far less accountability, as the quote above notes people aren't afraid of what other people thinks about their ID but they are afraid of what they think about the real them.

Basically what happens is that they don't post things that they wouldn't want people to know, if the only punishment against flaming is that they are now unable to post people would still flame. If however their friends and family can potentially find out about this behavior then it is an extremely strong deterrent.
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:36 Graven wrote:
And again, if there was no danger in being harrassed then there'd be no prevention of flaming/trolling to begin with, which is what was intended.

No, the danger is not about being harassed ffs, the danger is that someone you already know and cares about in real life finds out. Also the dangers of being harassed for posting on a forum will be no more than the danger of being harassed for walking down the street irl. Sure, more reads your posts, but there are also much more posts to be read. If you argue in a topic, there will be 20 others arguing in the same topic, why would he track down just you? The only reason celebrities have a problem with things like this is because they are known by everyone, just because people can see your name on a forum doesn't mean that they know you. It is just like how people on the street can see your face which is extremely intimate information but do anyone actually care about it?

Names are not a big deal and since it doesn't even come with a picture it is even less intimate than what millions already have on facebook which is open to all. I bet that a stalker or harasser would more likely seek out people who live near them on facebook with a picture they like rather than attacking a random bnet poster which will be one in a million of faceless names.


Except it only adds accountability for people with uncommon names. John Smith can post whatever the hell he pleases because there's a million others out there.
Moderator
EmeraldSparks
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States1451 Posts
July 07 2010 18:57 GMT
#1928
archer, all your links are broken
But why?
Takkara
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2503 Posts
July 07 2010 18:57 GMT
#1929
TankSpot - RealID -- Unethical and Dangerous
http://www.tankspot.com/showthread.php?68744-RealID-Unethical-and-Dangerous

HellMode - Why Real ID is a Really Bad Idea
http://hellmode.com/2010/07/06/why-real-id-is-a-really-bad-idea/#more-390
Gee gee gee gee baby baby baby
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
July 07 2010 18:59 GMT
#1930
On July 08 2010 03:57 ta2 wrote:
@Archerofaiur - You stole my post.



Sorry i didnt mean to? Ill add you as the source.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
keV.
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States3214 Posts
July 07 2010 18:59 GMT
#1931
On July 08 2010 03:55 Archerofaiur wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
BBC News - World of Warcraft maker to end anonymous forum logins
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10543100.stm

USA Today - 'WoW' studio Blizzard to require real names on forums
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...es-on-forums/1

ABC News - Bye-Bye Trolls? Blizzard Forums to Use Real Names
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=11108240

CVG - Fans rage over Blizzard forum plans
http://www.computerandvideogames.com....php?id=254846

PCGamer (UK) - Why Blizzard’s new forum plan is an epic fail
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/07/07/wh...-an-epic-fail/

The Register - Blizzard exposes real names on WoW forums
http://www.reghardware.com/2010/07/07/wow_forums/

About.com - WoW Real ID: A Really Bad Idea
http://antivirus.about.com/b/2010/06...y-bad-idea.htm

Ars Technica - Blizzard: post about StarCraft 2? Use your real name
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2...-real-name.ars

Gamespy - Blizzard to Require Real Names on Official Forums
http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/articles/110/1104456p1.html

Kotaku - Blizzard Forums Will Soon Display Your Real Name
http://kotaku.com/5580585/blizzard-f...your-real-name
Kotaku - Blizzard's Real Name Forum Policy Has Fans In An Uproar
http://kotaku.com/5581209/blizzards-...s-in-an-uproar

Joystiq - Your real name to appear on Blizzard's official forums
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/07/06/yo...ficial-forums/

Inc Gamers - Blizzard Going Too Far With Real ID?
http://www.incgamers.com/Columns/94/...r-with-real-id

MTV Multiplayer - Blizzard Cracks Down On Anonymity In Official Forums
http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/...ficial-forums/

TechEYE.net - Blizzard forces users to show real names: Internet security they have heard of it
http://www.techeye.net/security/bliz...how-real-names

Product Reviews News - WoW Real ID System: Security Flaw Found
http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/...ty-flaw-found/

ITWorld - Blizzard to share your name with angry video game nerds
http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech...deo-game-nerds

Voodoo Extreme - Is Blizzard's Real ID Safe, Or A Playground For Sexual Deviants?
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55...exual-Deviants
Voodoo Extreme - Blizzard Forums To Require Use Of Real Name, Rage Ensues
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55...me-Rage-Ensues

Examiner National - World of Warcraft Players WoWed by Blizzard's REALID announcement
http://www.examiner.com/x-48234-Sant...D-announcement

EuroGamer - Blizzard forums to require real names
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/bl...ire-real-names

GameFocus - Blizzard To Kill Anonymity On Forums
http://www.gamefocus.ca/?nav=new&nid=10091

Strategy Informer - Battle.net removes "veil of anonymity" on forums, real names used
http://www.strategyinformer.com/news...eal-names-used

HuskyStarcraft - Blizzard Forums: First and Last Names [VIDEO]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBwTpHNZDpQ

AusGamers - Blizzard Switching Forums to Real ID System
http://www.ausgamers.com/news/read/2926798

Australian Gamer - Blizzard decide to give out subscribers' real names
http://www.australiangamer.com/news/...eal_names.html

Zeroday - Is Korean Law Driving Policy at Blizzard?
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday...y-at-blizzard/


Should really give ta2 credit :p and make sure the links actually work...
"brevity is the soul of wit" - William Shakesman
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
July 07 2010 18:59 GMT
#1932
On July 08 2010 03:57 Myles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:54 Klockan3 wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:33 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:09 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:06 TheYango wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:58 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:56 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:49 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:47 Archerofaiur wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:45 See.Blue wrote:
Here at TL in our own rulebook we say that we value reputation, particularly as it is attached to a name. By requiring RealID, Blizz is just taking the same step.



Do you see how TL manages to do it without, you know, compromising privacy and security?


That ignores the larger point I was making, namely that there's been groups and organizations in the real world, time out of mind, whose members have always been able to know the real names of other members, as thats how they communicate. Groups like this still exist, so it's not a huge jump to see that having strangers learn your real name can't be as apocalyptic as a lot of the posting on here would suggest.


Except in real life, what you say isn't recorded and displayed for all eternity for anyone in the whole world to read.


But what exactly is so wrong with accountability?

"Accountability" is not that straightforward when involved with something so easily misinterpreted as written word on the internet.

It's one thing to be accountable for things you actually said. It's another story when people take quotes out of context, can't see sarcastic tone as it's not expressed well in written form, or just plain misunderstand you.


But this is no different then real life when people can twist what you say. If it acts as impetus for people to put more thought into what they're saying, then it's really hard to argue against.


In real life you have a limited audience in front of you, you know who that audience is, you know exactly what you're sharing with whom. If you don't want someone to know something, you don't talk about it in his presence.

The internet is a much more powerful medium. On the internet, your audience is potentially every single person who has access to a computer. That includes your family, all your friends, your teachers, the people at work, your future employers. It also includes criminals, thieves, crazies, etc., etc.. Even better, your message doesn't fade over time. Are you sure you want everything you write today to be associated with you 20 years from now? Do you really want just anyone in the world to be able to associate your post with a name and an address if he doesn't like what you write?

Thinking this is going to turn the battle.net forums into a great forum where nobody posts unless they've got something important to say is naive. The general quality of posting will probably go up as a result, but having all real names exposed on a forum like that is just asking for trouble.

But everything you post are potentially read by everyone in the world already! The only difference is that now people can associate those posts with the real you, aka it adds accountability.
On July 08 2010 03:33 789 wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:12 Bibdy wrote:
Why does accountability require your full name?

Why can't they just use any personalized unique identifier for your forum persona?

Seriously, this is just a damn online video game forum. Why is it so important that it needs to plaster something like your full name around in order to create that accountability? You would achieve the exact same effect of accountability by forcing people to post with a single identifier on the account. Whether its real or not, its still locked to that account and you can't change it without buying another one. Exact same effect as buying another account to generate a fake full name, only this time you did it to be a troll. Not to protect your identity.

One cannot fathom why they chose real name over any kind of unique identifier. They HAVE to know its important to a lot of people. They can't be THAT stupid.

Does anyone honestly think that it makes a difference to the CONTENT of your posts if you were forced to post everywhere on the internet with your current forumID on this site, than with your full name?

I'm willing to bet the content won't change. It only becomes a decision based on the desire to post at all.


This is a very good point that this guy has made more than a few times. Why go with real names when you could get the job done with a single unique identifier for that account. It brings accountibility without the privacy concerns - if you're in the habit of being a bad poster/troll people will come to recognize your name. It will also help the moderators. They don't need to worry about IPs, cd keys, or any of that jazz. They can just simply hand out the punishment to the account tied to that name.

It adds far less accountability, as the quote above notes people aren't afraid of what other people thinks about their ID but they are afraid of what they think about the real them.

Basically what happens is that they don't post things that they wouldn't want people to know, if the only punishment against flaming is that they are now unable to post people would still flame. If however their friends and family can potentially find out about this behavior then it is an extremely strong deterrent.
On July 08 2010 03:36 Graven wrote:
And again, if there was no danger in being harrassed then there'd be no prevention of flaming/trolling to begin with, which is what was intended.

No, the danger is not about being harassed ffs, the danger is that someone you already know and cares about in real life finds out. Also the dangers of being harassed for posting on a forum will be no more than the danger of being harassed for walking down the street irl. Sure, more reads your posts, but there are also much more posts to be read. If you argue in a topic, there will be 20 others arguing in the same topic, why would he track down just you? The only reason celebrities have a problem with things like this is because they are known by everyone, just because people can see your name on a forum doesn't mean that they know you. It is just like how people on the street can see your face which is extremely intimate information but do anyone actually care about it?

Names are not a big deal and since it doesn't even come with a picture it is even less intimate than what millions already have on facebook which is open to all. I bet that a stalker or harasser would more likely seek out people who live near them on facebook with a picture they like rather than attacking a random bnet poster which will be one in a million of faceless names.


Except it only adds accountability for people with uncommon names. John Smith can post whatever the hell he pleases because there's a million others out there.

It isn't perfect but it is the strongest accountability you can have.
ta2
Profile Joined July 2010
125 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-07 19:02:07
July 07 2010 18:59 GMT
#1933
On July 08 2010 03:57 EmeraldSparks wrote:
archer, all your links are broken


Here's the unbroken version.

I'm trying to compile a list of media responses to the proposed RealID changes. From what I have read so far, the response (where it is given, many sites are descriptive only) is universally negative. Can anyone help by finding more links like these?

BBC News - World of Warcraft maker to end anonymous forum logins
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10543100.stm

USA Today - 'WoW' studio Blizzard to require real names on forums
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gamehunters/post/2010/07/wow-studio-blizzard-to-require-real-names-on-forums/1

ABC News - Bye-Bye Trolls? Blizzard Forums to Use Real Names
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=11108240

CVG - Fans rage over Blizzard forum plans
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=254846

PCGamer (UK) - Why Blizzard’s new forum plan is an epic fail
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/07/07/why-blizzard’s-new-forum-plan-is-an-epic-fail/

The Register - Blizzard exposes real names on WoW forums
http://www.reghardware.com/2010/07/07/wow_forums/

About.com - WoW Real ID: A Really Bad Idea
http://antivirus.about.com/b/2010/06/22/wow-real-id-a-really-bad-idea.htm

Ars Technica - Blizzard: post about StarCraft 2? Use your real name
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/07/blizzard-post-about-starcraft-2-use-your-real-name.ars

Gamespy - Blizzard to Require Real Names on Official Forums
http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/articles/110/1104456p1.html

Kotaku - Blizzard Forums Will Soon Display Your Real Name
http://kotaku.com/5580585/blizzard-forums-will-soon-display-your-real-name
Kotaku - Blizzard's Real Name Forum Policy Has Fans In An Uproar
http://kotaku.com/5581209/blizzards-real-name-forum-policy-has-fans-in-an-uproar

Joystiq - Your real name to appear on Blizzard's official forums
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/07/06/your-real-name-to-appear-on-blizzards-official-forums/

Inc Gamers - Blizzard Going Too Far With Real ID?
http://www.incgamers.com/Columns/94/blizzard-going-too-far-with-real-id

MTV Multiplayer - Blizzard Cracks Down On Anonymity In Official Forums
http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/07/07/blizzard-cracks-down-on-anonymity-in-official-forums/

TechEYE.net - Blizzard forces users to show real names: Internet security they have heard of it
http://www.techeye.net/security/blizzard-forces-users-to-show-real-names

Product Reviews News - WoW Real ID System: Security Flaw Found
http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/07/wow-real-id-system-security-flaw-found/

ITWorld - Blizzard to share your name with angry video game nerds
http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/113202/blizzard-share-your-name-angry-video-game-nerds

Voodoo Extreme - Is Blizzard's Real ID Safe, Or A Playground For Sexual Deviants?
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55728/Is-Blizzards-Real-ID-Safe-Or-A-Playground-For-Sexual-Deviants
Voodoo Extreme - Blizzard Forums To Require Use Of Real Name, Rage Ensues
http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/55910/Blizzard-Forums-To-Require-Use-Of-Real-Name-Rage-Ensues

Examiner National - World of Warcraft Players WoWed by Blizzard's REALID announcement
http://www.examiner.com/x-48234-Santa-Ana-Internet-Examiner~y2010m7d7-World-of-Warcraft-Players-WoWed-by-Blizzards-REALID-announcement

EuroGamer - Blizzard forums to require real names
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/blizzard-forums-to-require-real-names

GameFocus - Blizzard To Kill Anonymity On Forums
http://www.gamefocus.ca/?nav=new&nid=10091

Strategy Informer - Battle.net removes "veil of anonymity" on forums, real names used
http://www.strategyinformer.com/news/8551/battlenet-removes-veil-of-anonymity-on-forums-real-names-used

HuskyStarcraft - Blizzard Forums: First and Last Names [VIDEO]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBwTpHNZDpQ

AusGamers - Blizzard Switching Forums to Real ID System
http://www.ausgamers.com/news/read/2926798

Australian Gamer - Blizzard decide to give out subscribers' real names
http://www.australiangamer.com/news/3239_blizzard_decide_to_give_out_subscribers_real_names.html

Zeroday - Is Korean Law Driving Policy at Blizzard?
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2010/07/07/is-korean-law-driving-policy-at-blizzard/


Santriell
Profile Joined June 2010
Belgium151 Posts
July 07 2010 19:00 GMT
#1934
On July 08 2010 03:54 Klockan3 wrote:
Names are not a big deal and since it doesn't even come with a picture it is even less intimate than what millions already have on facebook which is open to all. I bet that a stalker or harasser would more likely seek out people who live near them on facebook with a picture they like rather than attacking a random bnet poster which will be one in a million of faceless names.


WHICH IS PRECISELY THE REASON.

With a username, all people can flame is a username. As a teenager I know I want to great lenghts at that time (quake 1&2 :p) to flame certain people I didn't like and usually stopped after sending them a raging e-mail which was never read anyway because nobody cared about emails...

Nowadays ? Oh great I have their name... And with facebook/myspace now I have their photo... And hobbies... And home address/phone number with little to no effort... Oh and I even have the contacts of their friends/ex girlfriends who will gladly help me reach "a lost friend"... WONDERFUL !

You're awfully blind if you don't see how it can degenerate into an absolute nightmare...

By the clack smack cracking of my thumbs, something wicked this may comes.
gospelwut
Profile Joined April 2010
United States52 Posts
July 07 2010 19:00 GMT
#1935
What baffles me about Blizzard is their heavy hand. I'm all for accountability, but there are other ways they could accomplish this. For example, they could generate a random number (or let you generate a "forum tag") that would go under every character/account you post on. Of course, this is more of a WoW issue. The thing that puzzles me about BNet2 Forums and SC2 is there won't be a plethora of alt accounts. If I run around and be an asshole on my 1 account -- ban me.

The fact of the matter is, even if I did my best to remove my presence on Google/facebook/etc, friends and employers wont' understand me arguing about 9rax reapers or how many gas geysers to get at my expansion. In practically, this doesn't effect the SC2 community that much since they have reliable alt-sources like TL to discuss matters. It's a much bigger issue for a MMO, i.e. WoW. In principle it's still infuriating.

On July 08 2010 03:33 See.Blue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:29 GMarshal wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:24 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:16 Santriell wrote:
Accountability is a matter of law, not half-baked moderators trying to be just that by forcing you to hand over your personal information.

And come on; Nobody dig that up already ? First facebook, then the real name.... And then what ? This is a pure vivendi-style operation to compile consumer information and re-sell the lists to advertisers.

Add to that the future UN & DMCA laws that are bound to be coming in 3-5 years about how "people must be tracked online" and you have a pretty good idea of who's going to be the guinea pig collaborator...


This is getting downright tinfoil-cap like. If the ramifications for posting are so dire, then ideally, that will mean that people will only post things they're willing to be associated with. If that means less people threatening to torch Blizz HQ because 'mech is too strong against zerg' then great. In real life your name is required daily for interactions with a whole host of people which we don't think twice about. Other than the fact that we have to now be responsible for our actions off and online, there really isn't that much to argue against, once you step beyond the rampant paranoia.


Really, I guess what happened to Bashiok proves nothing then, because all the man did was post his name which is what is going to happen whenever you post on the forums now. Also those who are looking for jobs and get googled by potential employers are sure to enjoy not getting a job because of their private hobby which blizzard made public. Bottom line there are other ways to make people responsible for their actions that dont involve plastering their names all over the internet


I object to the idea that being identified as a gamer somehow victimizes you. There is no reason for hiring firms to select against WoW or SC or players of any other video game simply as a matter of principle, simply because they don't track with anything. People lose jobs because of video games when they act like an idiot by skipping work for a raid or to play more. If this now means you can't post from work about how much you enjoy cutting off for raids or calling in sick to play in a local LAN without facing the repercussions, so what. There's an incredible sense of victimhood amongst the gamer community- that the corporate world just doesn't like them, which is patently false. If you're highly qualified and aren't planning to slack off to game more, then there is absolutely no reason a firm would not hire you or you would lose out on any other perk as a result of your hobby.
http://kotaku.com/5111403/job-recruiters-instructed-to-avoid-wow-players

I think it's pretty applicable to most games outside of the Wii. MLG has stated a few times how difficult it is to get investors when using the wrong words like "cyber athlete" or even explaining what they do.
keV.
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States3214 Posts
July 07 2010 19:00 GMT
#1936
On July 08 2010 03:59 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:57 Myles wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:54 Klockan3 wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:33 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:09 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:06 TheYango wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:58 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:56 Orome wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:49 See.Blue wrote:
On July 08 2010 02:47 Archerofaiur wrote:
[quote]


Do you see how TL manages to do it without, you know, compromising privacy and security?


That ignores the larger point I was making, namely that there's been groups and organizations in the real world, time out of mind, whose members have always been able to know the real names of other members, as thats how they communicate. Groups like this still exist, so it's not a huge jump to see that having strangers learn your real name can't be as apocalyptic as a lot of the posting on here would suggest.


Except in real life, what you say isn't recorded and displayed for all eternity for anyone in the whole world to read.


But what exactly is so wrong with accountability?

"Accountability" is not that straightforward when involved with something so easily misinterpreted as written word on the internet.

It's one thing to be accountable for things you actually said. It's another story when people take quotes out of context, can't see sarcastic tone as it's not expressed well in written form, or just plain misunderstand you.


But this is no different then real life when people can twist what you say. If it acts as impetus for people to put more thought into what they're saying, then it's really hard to argue against.


In real life you have a limited audience in front of you, you know who that audience is, you know exactly what you're sharing with whom. If you don't want someone to know something, you don't talk about it in his presence.

The internet is a much more powerful medium. On the internet, your audience is potentially every single person who has access to a computer. That includes your family, all your friends, your teachers, the people at work, your future employers. It also includes criminals, thieves, crazies, etc., etc.. Even better, your message doesn't fade over time. Are you sure you want everything you write today to be associated with you 20 years from now? Do you really want just anyone in the world to be able to associate your post with a name and an address if he doesn't like what you write?

Thinking this is going to turn the battle.net forums into a great forum where nobody posts unless they've got something important to say is naive. The general quality of posting will probably go up as a result, but having all real names exposed on a forum like that is just asking for trouble.

But everything you post are potentially read by everyone in the world already! The only difference is that now people can associate those posts with the real you, aka it adds accountability.
On July 08 2010 03:33 789 wrote:
On July 08 2010 03:12 Bibdy wrote:
Why does accountability require your full name?

Why can't they just use any personalized unique identifier for your forum persona?

Seriously, this is just a damn online video game forum. Why is it so important that it needs to plaster something like your full name around in order to create that accountability? You would achieve the exact same effect of accountability by forcing people to post with a single identifier on the account. Whether its real or not, its still locked to that account and you can't change it without buying another one. Exact same effect as buying another account to generate a fake full name, only this time you did it to be a troll. Not to protect your identity.

One cannot fathom why they chose real name over any kind of unique identifier. They HAVE to know its important to a lot of people. They can't be THAT stupid.

Does anyone honestly think that it makes a difference to the CONTENT of your posts if you were forced to post everywhere on the internet with your current forumID on this site, than with your full name?

I'm willing to bet the content won't change. It only becomes a decision based on the desire to post at all.


This is a very good point that this guy has made more than a few times. Why go with real names when you could get the job done with a single unique identifier for that account. It brings accountibility without the privacy concerns - if you're in the habit of being a bad poster/troll people will come to recognize your name. It will also help the moderators. They don't need to worry about IPs, cd keys, or any of that jazz. They can just simply hand out the punishment to the account tied to that name.

It adds far less accountability, as the quote above notes people aren't afraid of what other people thinks about their ID but they are afraid of what they think about the real them.

Basically what happens is that they don't post things that they wouldn't want people to know, if the only punishment against flaming is that they are now unable to post people would still flame. If however their friends and family can potentially find out about this behavior then it is an extremely strong deterrent.
On July 08 2010 03:36 Graven wrote:
And again, if there was no danger in being harrassed then there'd be no prevention of flaming/trolling to begin with, which is what was intended.

No, the danger is not about being harassed ffs, the danger is that someone you already know and cares about in real life finds out. Also the dangers of being harassed for posting on a forum will be no more than the danger of being harassed for walking down the street irl. Sure, more reads your posts, but there are also much more posts to be read. If you argue in a topic, there will be 20 others arguing in the same topic, why would he track down just you? The only reason celebrities have a problem with things like this is because they are known by everyone, just because people can see your name on a forum doesn't mean that they know you. It is just like how people on the street can see your face which is extremely intimate information but do anyone actually care about it?

Names are not a big deal and since it doesn't even come with a picture it is even less intimate than what millions already have on facebook which is open to all. I bet that a stalker or harasser would more likely seek out people who live near them on facebook with a picture they like rather than attacking a random bnet poster which will be one in a million of faceless names.


Except it only adds accountability for people with uncommon names. John Smith can post whatever the hell he pleases because there's a million others out there.

It isn't perfect but it is the strongest accountability you can have.


God forbid we compromise for a gaming forum...
"brevity is the soul of wit" - William Shakesman
Pandonetho
Profile Joined October 2009
Canada321 Posts
July 07 2010 19:01 GMT
#1937
I can't wait to see how this all turns out.

I just find it absolutely hilarious that all of TL a couple of days ago was jumping into the "TL got me a job!" thread and saying how absolutely awesome it is, TL being known as one of the biggest SC gaming and competitive gaming site on the internet.

Now everyone is scared shitless that an employer is going to search them up and associate their name with a game.

Yeah, I really needed the laugh.
ta2
Profile Joined July 2010
125 Posts
July 07 2010 19:01 GMT
#1938
On July 08 2010 03:59 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2010 03:57 ta2 wrote:
@Archerofaiur - You stole my post.



Sorry i didnt mean to? Ill add you as the source.

No problem. Would be nice if someone bumped it or it's gonna drop off the bottom.

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25626050587&sid=3000
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
July 07 2010 19:01 GMT
#1939
my problem with it is that while it may reduce trolling on the forums, they type of trolling it would illicit is far worse. just take a browse through 4chan /b/ etc. and see what happens when personal information gets leaked. I'd rather someone troll my thread if they are upset with me than my life, facebook, email, phone, etc. etc..

sorry if something like this has been posted already.
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
July 07 2010 19:01 GMT
#1940
Fixed link and added those two other links.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Prev 1 95 96 97 98 99 153 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 17h 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 290
BRAT_OK 94
UpATreeSC 79
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 3500
Flash 3074
Barracks 2246
Mini 1064
EffOrt 934
BeSt 719
Soma 574
Stork 462
firebathero 382
Snow 320
[ Show more ]
Larva 280
Zeus 224
Free 153
Hyun 106
Rush 105
Mind 98
Sharp 51
TY 50
soO 42
zelot 35
Shinee 27
Movie 27
sorry 25
Shine 25
scan(afreeca) 21
Terrorterran 20
Yoon 14
SilentControl 9
ivOry 7
Dota 2
canceldota88
League of Legends
Dendi1356
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1880
flusha235
allub168
Other Games
FrodaN1684
Beastyqt599
ceh9364
KnowMe121
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 48
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki31
• FirePhoenix2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3134
• WagamamaTV660
League of Legends
• Nemesis5376
• TFBlade726
Other Games
• Shiphtur312
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
17h 21m
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
1d 17h
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.