|
On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this.
LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On April 27 2010 00:19 YouMake wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this. LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo
SC2 sure brings out the best people on the interwebz
|
On April 27 2010 00:19 YouMake wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this. LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo
hope you enjoyed your stay....
Anywho, I have a feeling if N.Korea was the culprit behind this, they'd come out and say it because they have the elitist "I don't give a fuck I'll do whatever I want" sort of outlook on the world.
|
Man I thought this was over already... I remember KBS making a story about it (a few weeks ago)and how it was probably an accident. Again I might have got it wrong since I barely know any korean...
Also... they might have the elitist attitude mentioned above; however... they're not a terrorist organization that could hide anywhere... I'm sure that even if they did it they wouldn't just outright admit it since that would put them in a very difficult position with all other big countries:
Basically:
NK: Yeah we're shooting down SK's ships for fun
SK: WTF?
Rest of the world: Nothing ain't going down yet..
SK: more WTF? tension rises...
(eventually something stupid happens involving the military)
NK -attacks--> SK
we lose Samsung
rest of the word takes revenge and wipes out NK
Maybe not exactly like that... But NK has very good reasons to deny the attack on that ship. At least for now...
|
On April 27 2010 00:19 YouMake wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this. LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo
You're not welcome here.
|
United States43818 Posts
On April 25 2010 18:55 omninmo wrote:Gulf of Tonkin was very likely a false flag charade staged to justify an aggressive invasion of N..Vietnam. Do not jump to conclusions or blame. "What experience and history teach is this: that people and governments never have learned anything from history, or acted on principles deduced from it." GWF Hegel It is surely possible that this was an American S.Korean planted defensive mine. One, convenient way to explain the friendly fire would be to blame N.Korea.
And then use the incident to stage an embarrassing backdown in which war is very notably not declared while secretly leaking the fact that North Korea was able to attack you without any military response. Genius.
|
On April 27 2010 00:19 YouMake wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this. LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo
You're quite the American there.
|
On April 25 2010 18:15 BlueRoyaL wrote:
so other than the possibility that it was NK, what else could be the cause of the explosion?
Christ guys, hasn't anyone seen Tomorrow Never Dies?
Elliot Carver, obviously
|
On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this.
LOL @ Netizens.
North Korea acquired nuclear technologies while Bush was in office supposedly trying to keep Saddam Hussein from getting nuclear technologies. What was Bush's response to North Korea? Nothing.
|
man this conflict is starting to worry me. =\
i mean NK is that big bully that we cant do anything about because they have nukes, and we have to be really careful in situations involving them...
|
On April 27 2010 07:27 TwilightStar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2010 00:19 YouMake wrote:On April 25 2010 18:12 Cain0 wrote:
If bush was still in power, he would have plunged everyone into world war 3 over this. LOL You live in England go drink your tea kid. You lost to us in the Rev. War. And 80% of are soliders didnt even own a gun. You guys dont know how to hit n run. like a good marine. YOUR COUNTRY FAILLLLLLSSSS. lol you got a ash cloud over your country gtfo You're quite the American there.
I can't tell if he was joking or if some people are actually that stupid/annoying/argh...
To the first comment though: No Bush wouldn't, as there is no profit in invading NK.. 
I really hope SK are the grownups in this issue, which luckily seems like their position of choice.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
I think the situation is quite scary. Even if North Korea shot a torpedo from one of it's submarines. No one wants to do anything about it. The three countries concerned about it, China, South Korea, USA all don't want war. China is wishing that North Korea would stay stable so they don't have to send troops into North Korea to maintain stability and deal with the consequences after that. They also don't want the North Korean regime to fall down because they want a buffer zone against American troops. South Korea doesn't want anything to change either. War with North Korea means that Seoul will get blown up from artillery fire. Then they have to deal with building infrastructure in a 3rd world country + having to educate millions of people who have no experience with the western world.
I think China, USA, and South Korea needs be prepared if the North Korean regime gets unstable. They should plan an surprise attack and bomb the shit out of the North Korean military so they can't attack Seoul. Can't get them kill starcraft and kpop.
|
|
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On April 27 2010 08:19 randomKo_Orean wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2010 07:55 T.O.P. wrote:
I think the situation is quite scary. Even if North Korea shot a torpedo from one of it's submarines. No one wants to do anything about it. The three countries concerned about it, China, South Korea, USA all don't want war. China is wishing that North Korea would stay stable so they don't have to send troops into North Korea to maintain stability and deal with the consequences after that. They also don't want the North Korean regime to fall down because they want a buffer zone against American troops. South Korea doesn't want anything to change either. War with North Korea means that Seoul will get blown up from artillery fire. Then they have to deal with building infrastructure in a 3rd world country + having to educate millions of people who have no experience with the western world.
I think China, USA, and South Korea needs be prepared if the North Korean regime gets unstable. They should plan an surprise attack and bomb the shit out of the North Korean military so they can't attack Seoul. Can't get them kill starcraft and kpop. What the hell William? I don't care anyone here says, NK and SK has the same fucking blood. The fucking SK politicians talk about unification without really meaning it -- but before the day I die, I must see Koreas be reunited. I don't care how hard it's gonna get with Koreans suffering for 10 years like Germany, it'll be worth it in the end.
How would you unify Korea? Someone has to start a war for that to happen. A lot of people are gonna die.
|
United States43818 Posts
Plus NK simply isn't worth having. It's in a far worse state than East Germany was. The cost of bringing the population of NK up to a respectable living standard would be vast, plus re-educating them so they can function within SK society and get jobs. It's important to realise that NK is basically agrarian whereas East Germany was a functioning country within the Soviet bloc. The problems of NK run way deeper than the problems of East Germany.
|
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
i am not informed enough to make any sort of opinion on this general situation, but i must say the stories and studies of north korea after reunification (i don't know if this is a naive + stupid expectation?) are going to be fascinating, absolutely fascinating for academics
|
I was a kid when germany got unified, but i clearly know that without the desire of the people for a change it wouldnt have happened. So i dont really know how the situation between NK and SK people is, but i really hope for this country and wish them only the best.
|
On April 27 2010 09:09 intrigue wrote:
i am not informed enough to make any sort of opinion on this general situation, but i must say the stories and studies of north korea after reunification (i don't know if this is a naive + stupid expectation?) are going to be fascinating, absolutely fascinating for academics
Oh no, I totally agree, as an anthropologist I find the idea fascinating, and I don't think its naive at all. As long as the earth isn't made inhospitable, it will be very interesting.
|
On April 27 2010 08:19 randomKo_Orean wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2010 07:55 T.O.P. wrote:
I think the situation is quite scary. Even if North Korea shot a torpedo from one of it's submarines. No one wants to do anything about it. The three countries concerned about it, China, South Korea, USA all don't want war. China is wishing that North Korea would stay stable so they don't have to send troops into North Korea to maintain stability and deal with the consequences after that. They also don't want the North Korean regime to fall down because they want a buffer zone against American troops. South Korea doesn't want anything to change either. War with North Korea means that Seoul will get blown up from artillery fire. Then they have to deal with building infrastructure in a 3rd world country + having to educate millions of people who have no experience with the western world.
I think China, USA, and South Korea needs be prepared if the North Korean regime gets unstable. They should plan an surprise attack and bomb the shit out of the North Korean military so they can't attack Seoul. Can't get them kill starcraft and kpop. What the hell William? I don't care anyone here says, NK and SK has the same fucking blood. The fucking SK politicians talk about unification without really meaning it -- but before the day I die, I must see Koreas be reunited. I don't care how hard it's gonna get with Koreans suffering for 10 years like Germany, it'll be worth it in the end.
but this situation with how they separated was so much more different that that of germany =p
itll be reaaaaaaaallllllllllllly long until the koreans come together
|
On April 27 2010 09:09 intrigue wrote:
i am not informed enough to make any sort of opinion on this general situation, but i must say the stories and studies of north korea after reunification (i don't know if this is a naive + stupid expectation?) are going to be fascinating, absolutely fascinating for academics
The situation as it is now is already fascinating for economists.
on topic: Are there any definite answers now? Last thing I heard was that the minister of defence said it was a torpedo, while the rest of the government quickly reacted to deny that claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
