EPTOn July 10 2010 20:37 DrMosh wrote:
I'm able to log in now too, but it's pretty slow
I'm able to log in now too, but it's pretty slow
same here
Battle.Net Status, US: UP EU: UP - Page 247
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
hypan
Sweden12 Posts
same here | ||
|
SpurvL
Sweden345 Posts
 | ||
|
veganwa
Norway116 Posts
| ||
|
Gish
Denmark22 Posts
| ||
|
Suikakuju
Germany238 Posts
| ||
|
Infernium
Sweden74 Posts
| ||
|
littl0r
Germany15 Posts
| ||
|
Mannerheim
766 Posts
| ||
|
intervila
Spain10 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:39 veganwa wrote: I have to say, I'm beginning to get a bit worried about the fact that they still have such serious issues this close to the actual release date. I assume the main goal of this phase of the beta was to ensure that the service would be stable even with a relatively large number of users, but apparently it's hard enough even to get things up and running at all. Even assuming that the bnet servers becomes somewhat more stable over the course of today, and that phase 2 is extended right up to the launch date, is 16 days really enough time to ensure that things are working properly? NO GAME FOR 27..... | ||
|
Sorkoas
549 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:18 reflexs wrote: I can confirm that it is still possible to play games on b.net aslong as you dont log out of it. I logged out because it was stuck searching for a game for more than 15 mins... and now I of course can't log back on. :-) | ||
|
aXa
France748 Posts
| ||
|
Arb4lest
Italy1 Post
| ||
|
DrMosh
United Kingdom26 Posts
| ||
|
ta2
125 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:39 veganwa wrote: I have to say, I'm beginning to get a bit worried about the fact that they still have such serious issues this close to the actual release date. I assume the main goal of this phase of the beta was to ensure that the service would be stable even with a relatively large number of users, but apparently it's hard enough even to get things up and running at all. Even assuming that the bnet servers becomes somewhat more stable over the course of today, and that phase 2 is extended right up to the launch date, is 16 days really enough time to ensure that things are working properly? Yeah I agree, I think they're pretty much screwed for release date. Can't seem them delaying it though, so we'll just have to put up with terrible service for a week or two. I believe Phase 1 was for balancing and bug fixing, whereas Phase 2 is for stress testing and tweaking. That would fit with a typical product launch, at least. | ||
|
PaterSin
Germany301 Posts
Was exactly what I was thinking "Work Battle.net! Work!" :D | ||
|
scBane
Netherlands35 Posts
| ||
|
Gulzt
Netherlands275 Posts
| ||
|
aXa
France748 Posts
| ||
|
laggikoN
Sweden213 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:38 Encode wrote: Yeah okay, so what happens when you randomly generate the same number again? You'd have to do a full database search every single time (a few weeks after release, that could be a million rows) to check if the number is taken.[/QUOTE]SQL database usually generate unique id for any entry, no duplicates and it works at a glance. And when you start to fill entries it adds them in order, starting from 1. [/QUOTE] You would do a search for the username picked and then check those rows for the randomized character code... He was arguing that it would take to much server power to do that for every character created, i don't see how the uniqe id fits into that... sure the database is fine but you could still have two users with the same name and code. | ||
|
EnvoYofAiuR
Netherlands71 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:39 veganwa wrote: I have to say, I'm beginning to get a bit worried about the fact that they still have such serious issues this close to the actual release date. I assume the main goal of this phase of the beta was to ensure that the service would be stable even with a relatively large number of users, but apparently it's hard enough even to get things up and running at all. Even assuming that the bnet servers becomes somewhat more stable over the course of today, and that phase 2 is extended right up to the launch date, is 16 days really enough time to ensure that things are working properly? true, and wtf we live in 2010, we could expect overloads 10 years ago,but now they have like money enough to add more and bigger servers and stability wtf, | ||
| ||
