|
I'm sad Oversky lost, but hyvaa is a baller too  .
GOGOGOGO ESTRO!!!
|
On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:39 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:38 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:36 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:34 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:30 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:27 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:25 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:24 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:19 Seraphim wrote:
GG from Reach. Nicely played by him. Just couldn't get his 3rd up in time... there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to he just macroed up off of 2base and hoped it'd be enough to finish it off Uh yes he did. lol with what? if he was going for lategame macro then why did he attack the zerg nat instead of protecting his nonexistent 3rd? Well, there was the part where he had a probe at 5. Which got sniped. But I guess that was just there for scouting right? I mean really, hyvaa might have proxyed a hatch there! Then there was the nexus going up at 6, which got killed my hydras. But yeah, that was just for show right? that makes no sense at all if a toss wants to macro up you think he'd stop and change the whole game plan cus 1 probe got sniped? Or if his "3rd was under attack" he wouldn't move in to defend/rebuild it? Instead he spent all his mins on units and went on the attack, and then continued to reinforce it. so let me ask you again, what 3rd are you talking about? ?? You seem to have problems with reading comprehension. This quote chain is based off of "there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to" I just said he tried to. What part of your 60 IQ brain cannot understand this? so why didnt he? cus his 1 probe got sniped? oh jesus talk about being a blind deaf mute If reach did not try to take a third. then why was there ever a nexus going up at 6? what are you talking about? I didn't see it and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended
Check the results section of the OP.
|
yea...that game was garbage
|
On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:
and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended
I don't know if you're being intentionally obtuse or what but Reach definitely had a nexus warping at 6. He got cut off from defending it by hydras and had to cancel.
|
reach tried to expo at least once, in the end it felt like he gave up, or forgot about it, coz it was too hard for him to multitask (im sure u are familiar with this feeling if ur a nub like me)
|
replay shows, that oversky coulda won that easily.. all he had to do was keep sniping drones @ hyvaa's main. he didnt even have a spire up yet.
|
On February 15 2009 14:47 Kerensky wrote:
reach tried to expo at least once, in the end it felt like he gave up, or forgot about it, coz it was too hard for him to multitask (im sure u are familiar with this feeling if ur a nub like me)
He gave it up because hydras were shooting it. He was forced back really far after the failed nat break because he had no observers to spot lurkers.
|
|
|
On February 15 2009 14:44 Fontong wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:39 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:38 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:36 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:34 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:30 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:27 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:25 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:24 .risingdragoon wrote:
[quote]
there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to
he just macroed up off of 2base and hoped it'd be enough to finish it off Uh yes he did. lol with what? if he was going for lategame macro then why did he attack the zerg nat instead of protecting his nonexistent 3rd? Well, there was the part where he had a probe at 5. Which got sniped. But I guess that was just there for scouting right? I mean really, hyvaa might have proxyed a hatch there! Then there was the nexus going up at 6, which got killed my hydras. But yeah, that was just for show right? that makes no sense at all if a toss wants to macro up you think he'd stop and change the whole game plan cus 1 probe got sniped? Or if his "3rd was under attack" he wouldn't move in to defend/rebuild it? Instead he spent all his mins on units and went on the attack, and then continued to reinforce it. so let me ask you again, what 3rd are you talking about? ?? You seem to have problems with reading comprehension. This quote chain is based off of "there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to" I just said he tried to. What part of your 60 IQ brain cannot understand this? so why didnt he? cus his 1 probe got sniped? oh jesus talk about being a blind deaf mute If reach did not try to take a third. then why was there ever a nexus going up at 6? what are you talking about? I didn't see it and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended Check the results section of the OP.
hey guess what
reach lost, oversky too
take ur ace fanboism with you to ace's grave
|
Please own everyone Anytime!
|
|
|
please hyvaa give us another boring campy game!!!
|
Baa?21244 Posts
On February 15 2009 14:49 Ido wrote:
why not Hong Jin Ho ^^
+1
Oh well, Anytime for 3-kill please, I Liquibet on Ace xD
|
On February 15 2009 14:49 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:44 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:39 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:38 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:36 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:34 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:30 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:27 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:25 Fontong wrote:
[quote]
Uh yes he did. lol with what? if he was going for lategame macro then why did he attack the zerg nat instead of protecting his nonexistent 3rd? Well, there was the part where he had a probe at 5. Which got sniped. But I guess that was just there for scouting right? I mean really, hyvaa might have proxyed a hatch there! Then there was the nexus going up at 6, which got killed my hydras. But yeah, that was just for show right? that makes no sense at all if a toss wants to macro up you think he'd stop and change the whole game plan cus 1 probe got sniped? Or if his "3rd was under attack" he wouldn't move in to defend/rebuild it? Instead he spent all his mins on units and went on the attack, and then continued to reinforce it. so let me ask you again, what 3rd are you talking about? ?? You seem to have problems with reading comprehension. This quote chain is based off of "there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to" I just said he tried to. What part of your 60 IQ brain cannot understand this? so why didnt he? cus his 1 probe got sniped? oh jesus talk about being a blind deaf mute If reach did not try to take a third. then why was there ever a nexus going up at 6? what are you talking about? I didn't see it and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended Check the results section of the OP. hey guess what reach lost
That's what it says
|
On February 15 2009 14:49 deathgod6 wrote:
Please own everyone Anytime!
|
On February 15 2009 14:47 inertinept wrote:
replay shows, that oversky coulda won that easily.. all he had to do was keep sniping drones @ hyvaa's main. he didnt even have a spire up yet.
i guess its not that easy with spores there and only like 5 muta .. he just moves away the drones a bit and spore gets free hit... then if mutas die he cant even defend from lings anymore... so dont think it was that simple -_-
|
51505 Posts
On February 15 2009 14:49 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:44 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:39 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:38 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:36 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:34 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:30 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:27 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:25 Fontong wrote:
[quote]
Uh yes he did. lol with what? if he was going for lategame macro then why did he attack the zerg nat instead of protecting his nonexistent 3rd? Well, there was the part where he had a probe at 5. Which got sniped. But I guess that was just there for scouting right? I mean really, hyvaa might have proxyed a hatch there! Then there was the nexus going up at 6, which got killed my hydras. But yeah, that was just for show right? that makes no sense at all if a toss wants to macro up you think he'd stop and change the whole game plan cus 1 probe got sniped? Or if his "3rd was under attack" he wouldn't move in to defend/rebuild it? Instead he spent all his mins on units and went on the attack, and then continued to reinforce it. so let me ask you again, what 3rd are you talking about? ?? You seem to have problems with reading comprehension. This quote chain is based off of "there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to" I just said he tried to. What part of your 60 IQ brain cannot understand this? so why didnt he? cus his 1 probe got sniped? oh jesus talk about being a blind deaf mute If reach did not try to take a third. then why was there ever a nexus going up at 6? what are you talking about? I didn't see it and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended Check the results section of the OP. hey guess what reach lost
you truly are obtuse
|
On February 15 2009 14:48 Fontong wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:47 Kerensky wrote:
reach tried to expo at least once, in the end it felt like he gave up, or forgot about it, coz it was too hard for him to multitask (im sure u are familiar with this feeling if ur a nub like me) He gave it up because hydras were shooting it. He was forced back really far after the failed nat break because he had no observers to spot lurkers.
yeah he had to give it up that one time, but i meant that he completely gave up trying to expand altogether (he had at least 2 solid oppertunities to do so after he had to cancel, but didn't take them (when he should have))
|
On February 15 2009 14:50 Kaolla wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:47 inertinept wrote:
replay shows, that oversky coulda won that easily.. all he had to do was keep sniping drones @ hyvaa's main. he didnt even have a spire up yet. i guess its not that easy with spores there and only like 5 muta .. he just moves away the drones a bit and spore gets free hit... then if mutas die he cant even defend from lings anymore... so dont think it was that simple -_-
yea well he shoulda sniped more or just defended home, he did neither and got raped as a result. oh well =[ GO ANYTIME!
|
On February 15 2009 14:50 GTR-2-Go wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2009 14:49 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:44 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:43 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:39 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:38 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:36 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:34 .risingdragoon wrote:On February 15 2009 14:30 Fontong wrote:On February 15 2009 14:27 .risingdragoon wrote:
[quote]
lol with what?
if he was going for lategame macro then why did he attack the zerg nat instead of protecting his nonexistent 3rd? Well, there was the part where he had a probe at 5. Which got sniped. But I guess that was just there for scouting right? I mean really, hyvaa might have proxyed a hatch there! Then there was the nexus going up at 6, which got killed my hydras. But yeah, that was just for show right? that makes no sense at all if a toss wants to macro up you think he'd stop and change the whole game plan cus 1 probe got sniped? Or if his "3rd was under attack" he wouldn't move in to defend/rebuild it? Instead he spent all his mins on units and went on the attack, and then continued to reinforce it. so let me ask you again, what 3rd are you talking about? ?? You seem to have problems with reading comprehension. This quote chain is based off of "there was no "getting a 3rd in time" cus he never tried to" I just said he tried to. What part of your 60 IQ brain cannot understand this? so why didnt he? cus his 1 probe got sniped? oh jesus talk about being a blind deaf mute If reach did not try to take a third. then why was there ever a nexus going up at 6? what are you talking about? I didn't see it and why would he put his 3rd at that spot? Any pro would know that the corner expo's the spot where it can be defended Check the results section of the OP. hey guess what reach lost you truly are obtuse
and he changed his team logo to samsung khan from estro for god knows what reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
