EPT[TLS] Qualifier #2 - Page 6
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Vaftrudner
Sweden1185 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
 | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24604 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28899 Posts
On January 14 2013 06:53 Vaftrudner wrote: Gotta give a big thank you to Sayle! I started with SC2 and only recently started watching and playing BW. His comments on how the matchups work and flow are incredibly helpful to a noob like me, for example his comments just now on the TvZ tech race and how the lategame should and does work. I'm sure it's obvious to BW veterans but having looked around for vods, it's rare to find English commentary that explains the flow of the game so well and it's a big help! yea it's really awesome. I'm about as much of a bw veteran as you can possibly get, but well, we never enjoyed regular english commentary back in the day. it's funny how sc2 basically first kills the game, but then proceeds to provide the infrastructure and viewership numbers to revitalize it.  | ||
|
skzlime
Hungary462 Posts
On January 14 2013 06:50 LRM)TechnicS wrote: it's the rael one since there are many fakers xD LOL everyone wants a piece of that 100% zvp | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
Hylirion
Netherlands968 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On January 14 2013 07:12 Hylirion wrote: Why does the terran not make tanks? I don't understand how science vessel are better? It's a style that used to be really popular, called SK Terran. You focus on highly aggressive play with very mobile MnM armies, and spend all your gas on getting a huge vessel cloud which is used to take down the zergs gas heavy units (ultras, defilers, lurkers) with irradiates. | ||
|
drooL
United Kingdom2108 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28899 Posts
On January 14 2013 07:12 Hylirion wrote: Why does the terran not make tanks? I don't understand how science vessel are better? they're different styles with different strenghts and weaknesses. mainly, it's a tradeoff between mobility and firepower - pure mm vessel can move around freely, while if you're adding tanks, you basically need to move slowlier and force zerg to engage your army. which style is stronger is largely map dependant; if you are playing a map where you (as terran) can hold off some significant pathways and where expansions are bunched together, including tanks into your army is great. if, however, the map is more open and expansions are more spread out, tanks become less efficient in a fight, easier to avoid for the zerg army, and the decreased mobility can end up killing you. if you lose a battle with mm&vessel, you normally manage to retreat with half your army still intact. losing a battle with tanks, means your entire army dies. | ||
|
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
| ||
|
rescape
28 Posts
| ||
|
soujiro_
Uruguay5195 Posts
| ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
*casting bakuryu vs terror* *seeing bakuryu vs julia ro16 replay* Sayle: even though some might think terror is the favourite, I would not count bakuryu out Elegent: yes, bakuryu definitely has a rational chance in this bo3 | ||
|
REDBLUEGREEN
Germany1904 Posts
On January 14 2013 07:22 soujiro_ wrote: terror please next time use some mech He got balls to go SK Terran with transatlantic ping :D | ||
|
rescape
28 Posts
| ||
|
MidnightGladius
China1214 Posts
| ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
| ||
|
iNfeRnaL
Germany1908 Posts
On January 14 2013 06:44 Liquid`Drone wrote: man these games are just awesome. the funny thing is that bw is just so ridiculously good that games like the infernal vs trutacz are commonplace. and baku vs terror is awesome too, i think baku has it tho. play with me so I can show some better performances pretty pretty please Eri?!?!?? I added you on Iccup too!111 <3 | ||
| ||
