|
On February 07 2010 05:02 quiong wrote: Or, if you really must use a seperate observer to operate the camera, have the commentators comment from THAT, instead of from running their own replay. At least the commentary would sync with the onscreen action. This.
|
both players cybercore up both scouting probes still alive, goon range going up for both players kabal's probe escapes alive white-ra's dies white ra's getting citadel
|
|
lol how can you have 'somewhat of a dt tech'
|
fast dt vs no robo, bad shit for tt1 lol
|
|
white-ra getting templar archives, kabal starts robo
|
Citadel for White-Ra! Kabal with a late robo. Templar Archives coming up
|
On February 07 2010 05:05 Zona wrote: I don't think the professional broadcasts has the commentators controlling the obs either - the commentators hold a mic, not a keyboard-mouse Yeah, I don't think the Koreans would do much better if they had to talk and try to say intelligent things while clicking around and trying to catch all the action in the game at the same time. The real problem is that it's impossible to get both commentators and a third guy to obs in the same room (well, maybe Tasteless and Artosis could since they're in Korea, but Day and Chill certainly can't). And they can't just cast based on the obs' stream or there would be a noticeable delay due to latency.
|
On February 07 2010 05:05 Zona wrote: I don't think the professional broadcasts has the commentators controlling the obs either - the commentators hold a mic, not a keyboard-mouse
Yeah, I think they comment from the VOD. The issue isn't having a seperate observer, which is fine...the korean observer rarely misses any action. Its just that the commentator should comment from THAT. At least they see the same onscreen action as the viewer does.
|
kabal's probe is running around - checking out 3 this time
observatory being built...but first dt is out!
|
Waw....DT tech vs fast expand. This is going to hurt.
|
if ra had 2 gates i think dt's would have caused way much damage imo
|
Why does TSL have this format where the camera control is not done by the commentators themselves? What i mean is, the action that the commentators are looking at is not necessarily the same as the action being shown to the viewers. It can make the commentary seem totally out of sync to the onscreen action, a major dissapointment IMO.
Or, if you really must use a seperate observer to operate the camera, have the commentators comment from THAT, instead of from running their own replay. At least the commentary would sync with the onscreen action.
I agree. They should comment based on what they see, that beeing what WE see. Now it's just confusing. Some times the comment on stuff that we don't see and it's really annoying.
|
8748 Posts
On February 07 2010 05:02 quiong wrote: Why does TSL have this format where the camera control is not done by the commentators themselves? What i mean is, the action that the commentators are looking at is not necessarily the same as the action being shown to the viewers. It can make the commentary seem totally out of sync to the onscreen action, a major dissapointment IMO.
Or, if you really must use a seperate observer to operate the camera, have the commentators comment from THAT, instead of from running their own replay. At least the commentary would sync with the onscreen action. Observer has to handle the intro videos, stats, overlay and uploading the stream. I think it's possible that the commentators could do all of that but I don't know.
Your second suggestion wouldn't work because the delay in transmitting the video to the commentators is too long to wait for their commentary on the video. I suppose it might be possible if the commentators were uploading a stream themselves. But again I don't know.
|
observer probably out in time dt kills one goon, kabal runs probes, observer is out, dt is dead
|
|
Quick response from Kabal... basically nothing done by that dt
|
|
|
|
|
|