|
On September 14 2009 20:57 immacolate wrote: yeah, perhaps zergs should also stop fast expanding, i am sure there were some great 1 base builds back in 2000. 12 hatch is good versus 1-base tech if you know it's coming.
|
Fantastic translations Dice, keep it up
|
10387 Posts
Yea Dice does a lot better translation than me haha.. ;;
|
On September 14 2009 21:00 ArvickHero wrote: Yea Dice does a lot better translation than me haha.. ;; Well, you did good yourself. I edited my post cause I missed something that you did not. Thanks bro!
|
10387 Posts
On September 14 2009 20:54 motbob wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2009 20:50 ArvickHero wrote: Commentator: What do you think about this map? Best: This map is not good. I have played all maps, but (something I don't really understand, it has to do w/ Protoss not being able to sim-city well. Said something about Bisu too lol)
Also said something about Bisu getting frustrated about this map PvZ. Best doesn't like this map because you can't really double nexus well. This quote has made me realize that Protoss needs a new revolutionist. I mean, FEs don't cut it against Zerg anymore at the very top level. Terrans are defending really really well against reavers and DTs nowadays. Protosses need a hero... someone creative but with mechanics to back it up... protosses need... Horang2! + Show Spoiler +lol jk. But protosses need to change the builds that worked for them 6 months ago. I wouldn't mind if it was Tazza, he's got the looks to garner a lot of star power haha..
|
Any idea on what Boxer's apm was during his prime?
350+?
|
On September 14 2009 20:57 SilverSkyLark wrote: As long as toss cannot FE, it's a map imbalance...
or maybe they're just lazy to work on 1 gate builds again. Guess we should do some maps without gas nats. Or maybe without nats at all.
|
On September 14 2009 21:03 nayumi wrote: Any idea on what Boxer's apm was during his prime?
350+? + Show Spoiler + Over 9000....it had to be done.
|
On September 14 2009 21:03 nayumi wrote: Any idea on what Boxer's apm was during his prime?
350+? Mid 100?
|
Tazza at 9 Boxer at 12
I'm excited!
|
lol all new maps are like zt>>>>>>p
|
On September 14 2009 20:57 Dice84 wrote: Commentator: So Best how do you feel about this map?
Best: Still not good. I tried all the map, but it's 2 opening. If it's 1 opening, it's easy to defend with cannons, but with 2 opening, it's easy for Zerg to break it. I think this map needs to change by blocking one of the entrance or something. I might have played well but it is still a huge disadvantage. Even Bisu is having a hard time!
Commentator: Is it hard to play double nexus?
Best: Even in practice when Bisu played and defended with 2 cannons, Zerg players still bypassed the defense easily. Then what are we suppose to do?
Commentator: What about you Yellow? How do you feel?
Yellow: It's a good map for Protoss. *crowd laughs*
Commentator: It was 1 gate base from Protoss. How do you feel about your loss? Was it pure management skill or..?
Yellow: Protoss did good with management. Practice went well for me as a Zerg. But on televised match.. mm.. I still think it's okay for Zergs.
Commentator: The map is called Moongrabe (Moongrave lol)
Yellow: It's okay for Zerg still.
edit: Thanks Arvickhero. I missed the part about Bisu and the 2 cannon. Edited the post.
thanks a lot  to arvickhero too
|
On September 14 2009 21:04 Hittegods wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2009 21:03 nayumi wrote: Any idea on what Boxer's apm was during his prime?
350+? Mid 100?
i'm pretty sure it wasn't even 100.
|
10387 Posts
On September 14 2009 21:02 Dice84 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2009 21:00 ArvickHero wrote: Yea Dice does a lot better translation than me haha.. ;; Well, you did good yourself. I edited my post cause I missed something that you did not. Thanks bro!  no problem, ^^ glad that I can help in any way
|
On September 14 2009 21:03 Hittegods wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2009 20:57 SilverSkyLark wrote: As long as toss cannot FE, it's a map imbalance...
or maybe they're just lazy to work on 1 gate builds again. Guess we should do some maps without gas nats. Or maybe without nats at all.
zvp more toss complained the last time that was done, cause they did not have the gas to duel tech. while zerg would still get 3 expand and have 2 gas.
|
On September 14 2009 21:04 SkelA wrote: lol all new maps are like zt>>>>>>p
Are they? I mean, all of them?
|
On September 14 2009 21:05 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2009 21:03 Hittegods wrote:On September 14 2009 20:57 SilverSkyLark wrote: As long as toss cannot FE, it's a map imbalance...
or maybe they're just lazy to work on 1 gate builds again. Guess we should do some maps without gas nats. Or maybe without nats at all. zvp more toss complained the last time that was done, cause they did not have the gas to duel tech. while zerg would still get 3 expand and have 2 gas. Yeah, I was thinking more of ZvTing without two gas and such. Would be equally ridiculous to say that maybe zerg should work on their low gas builds.
|
On September 14 2009 21:04 SkelA wrote: lol all new maps are like zt>>>>>>p Tosses crying map imbalance because they know they can't pull the race imbalance card anymore? Maybe it has something to do with the players?
|
Woow, this is the most original wall-in ever.
|
On September 14 2009 21:06 Mortician wrote:Are they? I mean, all of them? Almost as far as map balance go. But it can always change.
|
|
|
|