I don't think its 1.6

I got fastest speed builds at 0.65 of the normal time. (This makes it 1.54).

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Unit_Statistics#Key

JWD

United States12607 Posts

July 07 2009 04:39 GMT

#27

I wish I had found this thread earlier, when I was trying to figure out the build time for a spire in seconds...I ended up testing it myself, for lack of reliable information

I swear I searched TL but...this thread didn't turn up! Thanks anyway OP.

NoNones

41 Posts

July 07 2009 04:55 GMT

#28

Wow that is a question that is always asked and i didn't acutlly know there was a thread for it.

Dreadwave

Netherlands254 Posts

July 07 2009 04:59 GMT

#29

On July 07 2009 13:39 JWD wrote:
I wish I had found this thread earlier, when I was trying to figure out the build time for a spire in seconds...I ended up testing it myself, for lack of reliable information

I swear I searched TL but...this thread didn't turn up! Thanks anyway OP.

The times in the OP are calculated with the wrong ratio, see my post on page 1 for the times calculated with the correct ratio.

Deletrious

United States458 Posts

July 07 2009 06:03 GMT

#30

Awesome, should this be in liquipedia?

EEEE1234

Canada55 Posts

July 08 2009 05:05 GMT

#31

When planning build outlines (not considering any adjustments) I usually do my planning in cycles (not seconds) and then when I go to think about how to adjust the build according to opponent's build then I use minutes/seconds. The reason is that cycles are exact, and usually I can measure in terms of 20 cycles or 10 cycles at a time (time it takes to make a probe, or 1/2 that time).

Interesting to know the times in seconds, though - I think it may be more useful for some people when they're working with their cycle and gameplay speed and APM and everything.

Marine50

Australia1764 Posts

July 08 2009 06:43 GMT

#32

On June 29 2009 11:02 Pokebunny wrote:

Show nested quote +

seriously ?! how can you not know that

Yeah lol

StarBrift

Sweden1761 Posts

July 08 2009 08:10 GMT

#33

Great thread. I was theorycrafting a kinda wierd valkyrie build that I wanted to try out against zerg on heartbreak ridge Gonna try to use these timings to find out if I have enough defenses out for the 1 hatch lair into 2 hatch muta build that's been popular lately.

RedTerror

New Zealand742 Posts

July 08 2009 08:12 GMT

#34

whoa hydralisk and zergling is the same, I always made zerglings in desperate defenses because I thought they build faster

Perguvious

United States1783 Posts

July 08 2009 08:24 GMT

#35

On December 26 2008 12:39 LuckyFool wrote:
upgrades are longer as they go higher? never knew that!

ever upgrade two at once when they're 1-0 or 2-1? ^_^

Railxp

Hong Kong1313 Posts

July 08 2009 08:40 GMT

#36

sorry can someone explain to a noob like me what the commas are there for? and i assume the units are in seconds? am i missing something?

wo0py

Netherlands922 Posts

July 08 2009 09:42 GMT

#37

is this on liquipedia yet? great work, must have took a lot time to complete it all. thank you very much.

XXehh

Canada122 Posts

July 08 2009 17:48 GMT

#38

On July 08 2009 17:40 Railxp wrote:
sorry can someone explain to a noob like me what the commas are there for? and i assume the units are in seconds? am i missing something?

Correct me if I'm wrong but i got the commas as decimal places.

Pylons take less time than overlords/depots, never knew that...
(Makes it easier on nooby P's in supply blocks

)

Xiphos

Canada7507 Posts

August 19 2010 02:15 GMT

#39

Hey, sorry for the bump, is this guide updated to the current version?

darnoconrad

Canada110 Posts

August 19 2010 04:13 GMT

#40

How long does it take for a mineral return?
Break it down in:
Time of mining start to finish
Time from Nexus/Hatch/CC to closest Mineral patch on Python