• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:22
CEST 21:22
KST 04:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course3Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !7Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results12026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ? Why there arent any 256x256 pro maps? RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May [ASL21] Ro8 Day 3 [ASL21] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Daigo vs Menard Best of 10
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1592 users

PvZ Backho zealot/dark templar strategy? - Page 3

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 19 2009 09:45 GMT
#41
On October 19 2009 17:41 Vekzel wrote:Finally, I agree that we shouldn't call BackHo's build 'stupid'. I would use word 'bold' instead. However, his win is not a solution to Toss' overall weakness in recent PvZ. In fact rather supports the thesis of PvZ imbalances, because if P needs to play that crazy to win the games, then it must really be a desperate situation for Aiur.

Or, it might just be that Backho vs Calm, Backho needs to play like that to win games.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17743 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:23:04
October 19 2009 12:02 GMT
#42
Yup. P's don't need to play that crazy to win games. It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win.
And if BackHo is such a revolutionist and has found the way to beat Zergs on a consistent basis, how would you explain his next 2 games vs Calm?
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:38 GMT
#43
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
Jaedong
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5464 Posts
October 20 2009 02:48 GMT
#44
On October 20 2009 11:38 Avidkeystamper wrote:
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
if backho can consistently pull something off like this against other good players then this is a good strategy. fantasy's tvp games are consistently centered around his vulture harass and has proven time and again that it is a viable strategy.

i got stoved the other day by a jerk korean. does that make it a good strategy? no (though chef would argue otherwise). the stove is a harassment build with its scouts. does that make mass scouts a good harass move? no. did it win that jerk korean the game? yes. i responded incorrectly and went on tilt. same thing: calm responded incorrectly and went on tilt vs backho's mass DTs.

if backho can do this every game and pull it off successfully, then yes it becomes a good strategy. else, like the stove, it is a cool build but not viable in the long run.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
Monokeros
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States2493 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#45
I used this zealot DT build vs iSin, it was SUPER effective.
Keep the Dream Alive twitch.tv/monokerros
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#46
I'm not saying it's a good strategy. It's just misleading to say that Calm lost the game more than Backho won it because the entire point of the build is to sneak in a DT.
Jaedong
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 20 2009 03:11 GMT
#47
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5464 Posts
October 20 2009 03:28 GMT
#48
On October 20 2009 12:11 JohannesH wrote:
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
but that isn't the purpose of the thread. the purpose of the thread is to discuss whether or not this is a good, viable build that can be used as another alternative post-forge FE opening.

look at the op:
On October 19 2009 02:48 Whiplash wrote:
I have only played this on the D/D+ level but I believe that it could be viable on higher levels with someone that has good mechanics.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
druj
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
137 Posts
October 20 2009 04:16 GMT
#49
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.
Once you play starcraft, everything else in life seems alot easier.
O-ops
Profile Joined February 2009
United States4236 Posts
October 20 2009 04:36 GMT
#50
On October 20 2009 13:16 druj wrote:
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.


Yellow vs Anytime? That game made the pimpest play list. And if it is on the Pimpest play list, it's probably not reliable after it's been done.
Fan of the Jangbanger
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43979 Posts
October 20 2009 12:29 GMT
#51
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars. In short, it doesn't work. To provide slightly more detail, these days zergs wallin worse than terrans and rush overlord speed along with a decent number of hydra. There's pretty much no way you're getting anything in unless the zerg fucks up hard, and even then they have to fuck up hard again not to notice. If a zerg does shit right (proper wallin, proper overlord spread, hydra at each base) this will not get in and because the P always has an inferior army (hydra are simply too cost effective against zealots/dt, you need storm) he won't be able to force an entry.

Feel free to use it at D rank because D ranks won't have all the basic shit down and won't lolblock it. But if you're playing at D rank then you'll probably forget the archives anyway so whatever. This isn't new or revolutionary though. It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

When you do a build you're investing your time in getting good at that build. Your mechanics and multitasking improve but at the same time your familiarity with the build you're using will improve. You should invest your time in builds that do not have skill ceilings because otherwise you reach a point where your skills are decent but you're being let down by using weak builds or unfamiliarity with the builds that work at any level.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 12:38 GMT
#52
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars.

You are now officially my least favourite player ever. :D
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
micropede
Profile Joined October 2009
United States47 Posts
October 20 2009 12:54 GMT
#53
try the build and see how it goes
long live the new flesh
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
October 20 2009 13:07 GMT
#54
On October 19 2009 16:00 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 15:00 baubo wrote:
People like us aren't amateurs because we lack intelligence. But rather it's not feasible for us to sleep/eat SC 24/7 and raise our APM to 300+ to compete with the best.


this widespread misconception is hilarious yet annoying.

Foreigners are bad not because they lack mechanics. Quite the contrary, a fair number of foreigners (especially the Chinese) have excellent mechanics. But at the same time they have no idea what they are doing, that is their weakness. Korean amateurs have great decision making and solid builds, and most pros *cough Rock cough* can be trusted to consistently make strong or great decisions.


foreigners are bad both because of mechanics and because of decision making, and most korean amateurs are robots. they do have solid builds but its not a result of their decision making or intelligence.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
538
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Hungary3932 Posts
October 20 2009 13:16 GMT
#55
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...
BW fighting!
kulik-
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Czech Republic305 Posts
October 20 2009 13:18 GMT
#56
i was trying this on C+ and it quite work...
Terrible OP. Improve your posting or next one is a perma-ban.
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 13:23 GMT
#57
On October 20 2009 22:16 538 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...

I think you are severly overrating Backho. As I mentioned earlier, this is the guy who suicided reaver filled shuttles despite scouting that Canata had gone for wraith. That's what he does; stupid shit. Sometimes it works, other times it doesn't. Against Calm, his stupid shit worked.
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Stimpacked
Profile Joined June 2008
Philippines368 Posts
October 20 2009 13:59 GMT
#58
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..
live and let live...
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#59
An OGN commentator that was watching this game (the game wasn't broadcasted on OGN) thought Backho was being retarded when he kept massing dts. He was really surprised when it worked. Calm later said that he lost because he really wasn't expecting Backho to continue dt use after his initial harassment completely failed.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#60
On October 20 2009 22:59 Stimpacked wrote:
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..

Except the timing isn't really like that.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
19:00
RO16 Group D
Dewalt vs DragOn
Aether vs Jimin
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 98
MindelVK 23
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 219
Dota 2
Gorgc8109
XaKoH 643
Counter-Strike
Fnx 97
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor477
Liquid`Hasu379
Other Games
Grubby4345
FrodaN2723
singsing1950
Liquid`RaSZi1815
fl0m1433
B2W.Neo716
Beastyqt610
monkeys_forever257
mouzStarbuck228
420jenkins207
Pyrionflax181
Hui .179
syndereN154
ArmadaUGS132
BananaSlamJamma60
ODPixel43
ForJumy 1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3665
StarCraft 2
angryscii 41
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 14
• Airneanach12
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV598
League of Legends
• Jankos2525
• imaqtpie2037
Other Games
• Shiphtur226
Upcoming Events
GSL
12h 39m
Afreeca Starleague
14h 39m
Soma vs Leta
Wardi Open
16h 39m
Monday Night Weeklies
20h 39m
OSC
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 14h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 14h
Light vs Flash
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL
5 days
GSL
6 days
Cure vs TBD
TBD vs Maru
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W6
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W7
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.