• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:43
CET 22:43
KST 06:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump0Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win
Tourneys
StarCraft2.fi 15th Anniversary Cup Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Foreign Brood War Data analysis on 70 million replays MBCGame Torrents
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1579 users

PvZ Backho zealot/dark templar strategy? - Page 3

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 19 2009 09:45 GMT
#41
On October 19 2009 17:41 Vekzel wrote:Finally, I agree that we shouldn't call BackHo's build 'stupid'. I would use word 'bold' instead. However, his win is not a solution to Toss' overall weakness in recent PvZ. In fact rather supports the thesis of PvZ imbalances, because if P needs to play that crazy to win the games, then it must really be a desperate situation for Aiur.

Or, it might just be that Backho vs Calm, Backho needs to play like that to win games.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17510 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:23:04
October 19 2009 12:02 GMT
#42
Yup. P's don't need to play that crazy to win games. It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win.
And if BackHo is such a revolutionist and has found the way to beat Zergs on a consistent basis, how would you explain his next 2 games vs Calm?
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:38 GMT
#43
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
Jaedong
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5461 Posts
October 20 2009 02:48 GMT
#44
On October 20 2009 11:38 Avidkeystamper wrote:
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
if backho can consistently pull something off like this against other good players then this is a good strategy. fantasy's tvp games are consistently centered around his vulture harass and has proven time and again that it is a viable strategy.

i got stoved the other day by a jerk korean. does that make it a good strategy? no (though chef would argue otherwise). the stove is a harassment build with its scouts. does that make mass scouts a good harass move? no. did it win that jerk korean the game? yes. i responded incorrectly and went on tilt. same thing: calm responded incorrectly and went on tilt vs backho's mass DTs.

if backho can do this every game and pull it off successfully, then yes it becomes a good strategy. else, like the stove, it is a cool build but not viable in the long run.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
Monokeros
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States2493 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#45
I used this zealot DT build vs iSin, it was SUPER effective.
Keep the Dream Alive twitch.tv/monokerros
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#46
I'm not saying it's a good strategy. It's just misleading to say that Calm lost the game more than Backho won it because the entire point of the build is to sneak in a DT.
Jaedong
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 20 2009 03:11 GMT
#47
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5461 Posts
October 20 2009 03:28 GMT
#48
On October 20 2009 12:11 JohannesH wrote:
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
but that isn't the purpose of the thread. the purpose of the thread is to discuss whether or not this is a good, viable build that can be used as another alternative post-forge FE opening.

look at the op:
On October 19 2009 02:48 Whiplash wrote:
I have only played this on the D/D+ level but I believe that it could be viable on higher levels with someone that has good mechanics.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
druj
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
137 Posts
October 20 2009 04:16 GMT
#49
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.
Once you play starcraft, everything else in life seems alot easier.
O-ops
Profile Joined February 2009
United States4236 Posts
October 20 2009 04:36 GMT
#50
On October 20 2009 13:16 druj wrote:
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.


Yellow vs Anytime? That game made the pimpest play list. And if it is on the Pimpest play list, it's probably not reliable after it's been done.
Fan of the Jangbanger
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43323 Posts
October 20 2009 12:29 GMT
#51
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars. In short, it doesn't work. To provide slightly more detail, these days zergs wallin worse than terrans and rush overlord speed along with a decent number of hydra. There's pretty much no way you're getting anything in unless the zerg fucks up hard, and even then they have to fuck up hard again not to notice. If a zerg does shit right (proper wallin, proper overlord spread, hydra at each base) this will not get in and because the P always has an inferior army (hydra are simply too cost effective against zealots/dt, you need storm) he won't be able to force an entry.

Feel free to use it at D rank because D ranks won't have all the basic shit down and won't lolblock it. But if you're playing at D rank then you'll probably forget the archives anyway so whatever. This isn't new or revolutionary though. It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

When you do a build you're investing your time in getting good at that build. Your mechanics and multitasking improve but at the same time your familiarity with the build you're using will improve. You should invest your time in builds that do not have skill ceilings because otherwise you reach a point where your skills are decent but you're being let down by using weak builds or unfamiliarity with the builds that work at any level.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 12:38 GMT
#52
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars.

You are now officially my least favourite player ever. :D
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
micropede
Profile Joined October 2009
United States47 Posts
October 20 2009 12:54 GMT
#53
try the build and see how it goes
long live the new flesh
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
October 20 2009 13:07 GMT
#54
On October 19 2009 16:00 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 15:00 baubo wrote:
People like us aren't amateurs because we lack intelligence. But rather it's not feasible for us to sleep/eat SC 24/7 and raise our APM to 300+ to compete with the best.


this widespread misconception is hilarious yet annoying.

Foreigners are bad not because they lack mechanics. Quite the contrary, a fair number of foreigners (especially the Chinese) have excellent mechanics. But at the same time they have no idea what they are doing, that is their weakness. Korean amateurs have great decision making and solid builds, and most pros *cough Rock cough* can be trusted to consistently make strong or great decisions.


foreigners are bad both because of mechanics and because of decision making, and most korean amateurs are robots. they do have solid builds but its not a result of their decision making or intelligence.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
538
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Hungary3932 Posts
October 20 2009 13:16 GMT
#55
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...
BW fighting!
kulik-
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Czech Republic305 Posts
October 20 2009 13:18 GMT
#56
i was trying this on C+ and it quite work...
Terrible OP. Improve your posting or next one is a perma-ban.
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 13:23 GMT
#57
On October 20 2009 22:16 538 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...

I think you are severly overrating Backho. As I mentioned earlier, this is the guy who suicided reaver filled shuttles despite scouting that Canata had gone for wraith. That's what he does; stupid shit. Sometimes it works, other times it doesn't. Against Calm, his stupid shit worked.
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Stimpacked
Profile Joined June 2008
Philippines368 Posts
October 20 2009 13:59 GMT
#58
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..
live and let live...
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#59
An OGN commentator that was watching this game (the game wasn't broadcasted on OGN) thought Backho was being retarded when he kept massing dts. He was really surprised when it worked. Calm later said that he lost because he really wasn't expecting Backho to continue dt use after his initial harassment completely failed.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#60
On October 20 2009 22:59 Stimpacked wrote:
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..

Except the timing isn't really like that.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
17:00
#33
MaxPax vs ClemLIVE!
SteadfastSC679
TKL 615
IndyStarCraft 267
BRAT_OK 127
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Clem_sc2 1184
SteadfastSC 679
TKL 615
IndyStarCraft 282
ProTech129
BRAT_OK 127
Liquid`TLO 79
JuggernautJason58
PiGStarcraft45
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 1746
Shuttle 600
Dota 2
syndereN412
Counter-Strike
allub203
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4461
Liquid`Hasu535
Other Games
B2W.Neo526
ArmadaUGS209
KnowMe171
QueenE118
XaKoH 94
Trikslyr61
ZombieGrub51
NarutO 37
Livibee37
Chillindude15
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV188
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 195
• Hupsaiya 14
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki37
• FirePhoenix20
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler78
League of Legends
• TFBlade1373
Other Games
• imaqtpie1977
• Shiphtur163
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
14h 17m
StarCraft2.fi
18h 17m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 3h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 19h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV 2025
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
WardiTV 2025
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
IPSL
4 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Tarson vs DragOn
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Revival: Season 3
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.