• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:22
CEST 13:22
KST 20:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)76Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4) SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup Back to SC2 after 14 years - Protoss CTRL groups?
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released 20-year-old Valorant player starting StarCraft Bot on ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Fantasy returning?
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6924 users

PvZ Backho zealot/dark templar strategy? - Page 3

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 19 2009 09:45 GMT
#41
On October 19 2009 17:41 Vekzel wrote:Finally, I agree that we shouldn't call BackHo's build 'stupid'. I would use word 'bold' instead. However, his win is not a solution to Toss' overall weakness in recent PvZ. In fact rather supports the thesis of PvZ imbalances, because if P needs to play that crazy to win the games, then it must really be a desperate situation for Aiur.

Or, it might just be that Backho vs Calm, Backho needs to play like that to win games.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17850 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:23:04
October 19 2009 12:02 GMT
#42
Yup. P's don't need to play that crazy to win games. It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win.
And if BackHo is such a revolutionist and has found the way to beat Zergs on a consistent basis, how would you explain his next 2 games vs Calm?
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:38 GMT
#43
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
Jaedong
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5464 Posts
October 20 2009 02:48 GMT
#44
On October 20 2009 11:38 Avidkeystamper wrote:
"It was Calm's mistake that let BackHo win."
It's a harassment build. Then All of Fantasy's TvP games are his opponents fault for letting the vultures into their base?
if backho can consistently pull something off like this against other good players then this is a good strategy. fantasy's tvp games are consistently centered around his vulture harass and has proven time and again that it is a viable strategy.

i got stoved the other day by a jerk korean. does that make it a good strategy? no (though chef would argue otherwise). the stove is a harassment build with its scouts. does that make mass scouts a good harass move? no. did it win that jerk korean the game? yes. i responded incorrectly and went on tilt. same thing: calm responded incorrectly and went on tilt vs backho's mass DTs.

if backho can do this every game and pull it off successfully, then yes it becomes a good strategy. else, like the stove, it is a cool build but not viable in the long run.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
Monokeros
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States2493 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#45
I used this zealot DT build vs iSin, it was SUPER effective.
Keep the Dream Alive twitch.tv/monokerros
Avidkeystamper
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States8556 Posts
October 20 2009 02:51 GMT
#46
I'm not saying it's a good strategy. It's just misleading to say that Calm lost the game more than Backho won it because the entire point of the build is to sneak in a DT.
Jaedong
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
October 20 2009 03:11 GMT
#47
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
rredtooth
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
5464 Posts
October 20 2009 03:28 GMT
#48
On October 20 2009 12:11 JohannesH wrote:
You dont need to be able to pull it off every game for it to be a good strategy. It's enough that it works when you use it.
but that isn't the purpose of the thread. the purpose of the thread is to discuss whether or not this is a good, viable build that can be used as another alternative post-forge FE opening.

look at the op:
On October 19 2009 02:48 Whiplash wrote:
I have only played this on the D/D+ level but I believe that it could be viable on higher levels with someone that has good mechanics.
[formerly sponsored by the artist formerly known as Gene]
druj
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
137 Posts
October 20 2009 04:16 GMT
#49
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.
Once you play starcraft, everything else in life seems alot easier.
O-ops
Profile Joined February 2009
United States4236 Posts
October 20 2009 04:36 GMT
#50
On October 20 2009 13:16 druj wrote:
A rather risky strategy, if the Zerg even manages to keep the units running astray, he won't be able to get his money's worth for the lost gas spent on those DT's that could have went for ht and tech upgrades.
If the zerg is able to clump his buildings together to keep the slow moving dts from hitting hydras/sunks up a ramp or a choke, its a complete fail for him, zerg will secure a strong economic advantage from there, and freely expo with all those units saved up.

A few months ago I saw a youtube highlights clip of some game, diagonal positions, toss player went pure dts vs a zerg that apparently went 3 hatch? Wasn't an FE though, was absolutely sick timing, killed him before he could get his lair tech up, but I doubt it could be a consistent build.


Yellow vs Anytime? That game made the pimpest play list. And if it is on the Pimpest play list, it's probably not reliable after it's been done.
Fan of the Jangbanger
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44361 Posts
October 20 2009 12:29 GMT
#51
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars. In short, it doesn't work. To provide slightly more detail, these days zergs wallin worse than terrans and rush overlord speed along with a decent number of hydra. There's pretty much no way you're getting anything in unless the zerg fucks up hard, and even then they have to fuck up hard again not to notice. If a zerg does shit right (proper wallin, proper overlord spread, hydra at each base) this will not get in and because the P always has an inferior army (hydra are simply too cost effective against zealots/dt, you need storm) he won't be able to force an entry.

Feel free to use it at D rank because D ranks won't have all the basic shit down and won't lolblock it. But if you're playing at D rank then you'll probably forget the archives anyway so whatever. This isn't new or revolutionary though. It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

When you do a build you're investing your time in getting good at that build. Your mechanics and multitasking improve but at the same time your familiarity with the build you're using will improve. You should invest your time in builds that do not have skill ceilings because otherwise you reach a point where your skills are decent but you're being let down by using weak builds or unfamiliarity with the builds that work at any level.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 12:38 GMT
#52
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:
This is a build I have a great deal of experience with because it featured in my ongoing research into finding out every single way to beat a superior player using dark templars.

You are now officially my least favourite player ever. :D
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
micropede
Profile Joined October 2009
United States47 Posts
October 20 2009 12:54 GMT
#53
try the build and see how it goes
long live the new flesh
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
October 20 2009 13:07 GMT
#54
On October 19 2009 16:00 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 15:00 baubo wrote:
People like us aren't amateurs because we lack intelligence. But rather it's not feasible for us to sleep/eat SC 24/7 and raise our APM to 300+ to compete with the best.


this widespread misconception is hilarious yet annoying.

Foreigners are bad not because they lack mechanics. Quite the contrary, a fair number of foreigners (especially the Chinese) have excellent mechanics. But at the same time they have no idea what they are doing, that is their weakness. Korean amateurs have great decision making and solid builds, and most pros *cough Rock cough* can be trusted to consistently make strong or great decisions.


foreigners are bad both because of mechanics and because of decision making, and most korean amateurs are robots. they do have solid builds but its not a result of their decision making or intelligence.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
538
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Hungary3932 Posts
October 20 2009 13:16 GMT
#55
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...
BW fighting!
kulik-
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Czech Republic305 Posts
October 20 2009 13:18 GMT
#56
i was trying this on C+ and it quite work...
Terrible OP. Improve your posting or next one is a perma-ban.
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
October 20 2009 13:23 GMT
#57
On October 20 2009 22:16 538 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 20 2009 21:29 Kwark wrote:It's a dead end build, as skill levels increase the effectiveness decreases, a D will beat a D with this, a B will beat a C with this, a B won't beat a B with this and an A might lose to a B with this.

Using everyday logic, regardless of my starcraft knowledge: Why is it then that an A++ player opted for this build against an other A++ player?
And what did he scout in Calm's build that made him stick with it?

I cannot believe that it only worked because its so bad, he shouldnt have been using it in the first place:-p
There must be something to this build that we're missing...

I think you are severly overrating Backho. As I mentioned earlier, this is the guy who suicided reaver filled shuttles despite scouting that Canata had gone for wraith. That's what he does; stupid shit. Sometimes it works, other times it doesn't. Against Calm, his stupid shit worked.
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Stimpacked
Profile Joined June 2008
Philippines368 Posts
October 20 2009 13:59 GMT
#58
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..
live and let live...
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#59
An OGN commentator that was watching this game (the game wasn't broadcasted on OGN) thought Backho was being retarded when he kept massing dts. He was really surprised when it worked. Calm later said that he lost because he really wasn't expecting Backho to continue dt use after his initial harassment completely failed.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
October 20 2009 14:30 GMT
#60
On October 20 2009 22:59 Stimpacked wrote:
i like this build.. i think the timing is right that the hydras are still not that many and the zealot/dt army can still fight off the amount of hydras which makes the probability of sneaking a dt bigger..

Except the timing isn't really like that.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
20:00
Kung Fu Cup Weekly #26
IntoTheiNu 569
RotterdaM150
Rex72
SteadfastSC69
TKL 59
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko336
RotterdaM 150
Rex 72
SteadfastSC 69
ByuN 67
TKL 59
Codebar 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16126
Shuttle 1499
Soulkey 762
Bisu 759
Jaedong 548
Horang2 419
Mong 397
BeSt 371
actioN 281
firebathero 215
[ Show more ]
Soma 210
Stork 206
Mini 158
Larva 139
Rush 126
Zeus 123
Last 117
Hyun 92
Pusan 83
PianO 81
910 67
Snow 67
sorry 66
Free 64
ZerO 64
Mind 64
Shine 56
hero 43
EffOrt 41
Shinee 37
Sharp 33
Sexy 30
Bale 24
sSak 23
ToSsGirL 21
HiyA 20
ZergMaN 19
JYJ 16
Hm[arnc] 10
scan(afreeca) 10
Aegong 9
Sacsri 9
yabsab 8
Noble 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe283
canceldota14
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1526
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King184
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes244
Other Games
gofns35576
singsing1957
B2W.Neo240
DeMusliM200
Pyrionflax180
KnowMe152
Livibee143
Trikslyr26
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV163
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream33
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV325
League of Legends
• Jankos1267
Other Games
• Shiphtur775
Upcoming Events
Patches Events
4h 38m
The PondCast
22h 38m
INu's Battles
23h 38m
Percival vs SHIN
Zoun vs herO
OSC
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
OSC
2 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Patches Events
4 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
HCC Season 3
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.