Free Agent (Slave Auction) policy overview - Page 8
Forum Index > BW General |
NO MY LIQUIBET
United States294 Posts
| ||
icystorage
Jollibee19343 Posts
| ||
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
kespa hits new lows everytime i look at the opening post of the thread. first the ridiculous trading terms, then the forced contract signing, and finally the disallowance of player managers? jesus fucking christ | ||
Apex
United States7226 Posts
Looks more like a warped version of the NFL Rookie Draft. In both cases you are consigned to negotiating with one team, but at least NFL rookies can have an agent to discuss costs. They can threaten to sit out too. . What's the point of a FA if you're restricted to one team and one team only? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of being a FREE agent? This favors rich teams so much. I thought baseball's FA policy was bad, but this one is just ridiculous. | ||
baubo
China3370 Posts
On August 16 2009 06:29 Plexa wrote: Yea I agree. At the end of the day you would expect their coaches to at least try and bring about better rights for the players. But when you find out that the SKT Coach is the head of KeSPA you just are lost for words... (other coaches are on kespa as well) WTF? I didn't know that. So basically Kespa is made of coaches... who are paid by teams and therefore are only loyal to their teams. Anyway, the fact that the head of SKT is also the head of Kespa makes it understandable why the rules favor rich teams so much. | ||
![]()
GTR
51320 Posts
| ||
Apex
United States7226 Posts
On August 16 2009 10:53 GTR wrote: lol coaches/managers have nothing to do with kespa, it's all run by the chairmans of the companies That still doesn't make things any better. Chairmans of richer companies have a greater influence on KESPA than those with less money. | ||
Orbifold
United States1922 Posts
| ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On August 16 2009 11:00 Apex wrote: That still doesn't make things any better. Chairmans of richer companies have a greater influence on KESPA than those with less money. and none of them care about the players | ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On August 16 2009 07:35 Carnac wrote: Or he could just negotiate a decent contract with Hwaseung in the first place and eSTRO (or any other team) would never get the chance to bid on him. But yeah, it's stupid So you never thought that maybe Jaedong might deserve a better team? Of course you don't start seeking a new one if you're happy with your current one -_- If he wants to stay on Hwaseung what's the point. That was in the case he actually like, wanted to play in another team. | ||
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
| ||
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On August 16 2009 11:13 TheFoReveRwaR wrote: Oz is a good team...Jaedong is not in the same situation as someone like Flash. Of course Oz depends on Jaedong, hes their ace, but at least Oz has decent preforming players. Proleague finals day 2 is a good example. Since when does a one shot day have any meaning in starcraft at all? Oz players in Ro5 have actually been preforming nothing short of terrible... at least on KTF people like Violet started stepping up to the plate. | ||
FranzF1
Chile1710 Posts
On August 16 2009 11:24 Jayme wrote: Since when does a one shot day have any meaning in starcraft at all? Oz players in Ro5 have actually been preforming nothing short of terrible... at least on KTF people like Violet started stepping up to the plate. But then how do u explaint that KT finished 7 and Oz 2? Oz doesnt sux.. its just that Jaedong is to fucking good... like flash but even better. BackHo, Lomo and Hiya maybe arent like Bisu with fantasy and canata but they give they get the enough wins to let JD do the rest (not like KT). Just because they sucked on the last round they suck general... on the winners league Hiya was the second player and got 3 wins like 3 nights and 1 all kill. Thats just 1 example. | ||
KnightOfNi
United States1508 Posts
| ||
talismania
United States2364 Posts
2. The repayment policy is bullshit if the player's aren't already on contract. The point of free agency is that the player is free and no longer bound by contract. So... wtf | ||
vx70GTOJudgexv
United States3161 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=100349 | ||
Blueblister
Sweden321 Posts
I've just made a poll regarding this subject if anyone is interested: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=100371 | ||
Zalfor
United States1035 Posts
good thing sc2 is going to be run by blizzard. | ||
Blueblister
Sweden321 Posts
Poll: What's your oppinion on Kespa's Free Agent rules!? (Vote): Too complicated, I don't understand a thing. (Vote): Sounds resonable. (Vote): I think Kespa should add more rules. (Vote): GG! The players are being owned by Kespa! (Vote): Tragic, but thanks for the info! (Vote): It's neccesary for Kespa to keep some sort of control. (Vote): How far has those plans of that ddos attack come? (Vote): I just wanna watch another jaedong-vod :-( Tell Kespa your oppinion! | ||
General Nuke Em
United States680 Posts
| ||
| ||