go lose again july, savior, fbh!
[Fantasy] PL R4 Daily Blog - Page 9
Forum Index > BW General |
Heimatloser
Germany1494 Posts
go lose again july, savior, fbh! | ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On April 14 2009 16:13 Crunchums wrote: Is it possible to trade your main team's team (ie KTF, MBC)? Yep, works just like any other trade. | ||
Crunchums
United States11143 Posts
Under the trade tab there are no teams listed? edit: + Show Spoiler + also, having two players sent out 4th and then both matches ending 3-0 is rage inducing, more so when on of those players is Jaedong. At least Leta beat Jangbi though ^_^ | ||
Velr
Switzerland10597 Posts
On April 14 2009 06:10 3 Lions wrote: prepare to die tonight, most of my team is in action ![]() Hm... Someone was a little wrong I guess? ![]() | ||
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
On April 14 2009 19:00 Heimatloser wrote: my anti team ownz, this sucks. go lose again july, savior, fbh! o.O Three best-player-on-their-team, all on top teams, for your anti-team? I think you were asking for everything you got. | ||
3 Lions
![]()
United States3705 Posts
![]() fml. Trading away Luxury for Savior if he doesn't win tomorrow, maybe trading away FBH. | ||
Manit0u
Poland17187 Posts
On April 14 2009 22:13 Musoeun wrote: o.O Three best-player-on-their-team, all on top teams, for your anti-team? I think you were asking for everything you got. Actually, FBH is serving me very well in my anti-team. | ||
Velr
Switzerland10597 Posts
July? On a good day probably. But Kal/Hwasin also look awesome on good days, by.hero and notice look strong recently and Calm has atleast shown that he can be very strong in a past PL-Season. Also I haven't seen July play many Ace matches. FBH? He's slumping like papa slump. Actually he turns out the be a pretty smart choice. Savior? He is not truly slumping anymore but he is in no way the undisputed aceplayer for CJ (and Skyhigh seems to rapidly destroy saviors effort to become it again ![]() The problem I see with these choices is more: STX = Strong team (in PL-Format). Kahn = Strong team (today was a weird day anyway so...). CJ = Looked very good in WL (not so much in PL iirc). The danger with at least July and Savior is... If theyre chosen for Ace, which is very possible for these 2 when you take into account the *new ZvZ playground* you could possibly lose absurd amounts of points.. (+1 lineup, +1 win, +2 ace, +2 Acewin, +1 Teamwin + evtl. streak / break streak or something like that?). Well... I took Jangbi, who am I to judge ^^ (well, not a bad choice until now but this could turn fast.... very fast ![]() | ||
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
July has the best record in terms of win-loss on his team, though he doesn't play as much as Kal or Calm. sAviOr is maybe behind sKyHigh right now, and maaaaaybe Iris. But the way CJ plays it's hard to tell. firebathero is slumping now, sure. But overall although he's behind Jangbi, he is doing a touch better than Stork. So not unarguably-better-than-anybody-else-all-the-time (hi Jaedong and Leta), but clearly among the best players on their teams. We'll wait and see whether it was a justified risk. But the team win points alone would start to pose a problem. | ||
Velr
Switzerland10597 Posts
Your approach: Take 3 decent/good players. My approach: Take 1 Monster, Jangbi or Bisu are the best players for this because they don't play 100% of the acematches for their teams and have even some *inner*-team competition for their spots (Stork and Best and fill up with 2 "scrubs". Doing this with Jaedong, Flash or Leta would be suicide because they play EVERY damn match. | ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On April 15 2009 00:35 Velr wrote: I feel there are anyway just to way's people have done their antiteam. Your approach: Take 3 decent/good players. My approach: Take 1 Monster, Jangbi or Bisu are the best players for this because they don't play 100% of the acematches for their teams and have even some *inner*-team competition for their spots (Stork and Best and fill up with 2 "scrubs". Doing this with Jaedong, Flash or Leta would be suicide because they play EVERY damn match. You have a couple options: 5/4/4 - the 13 points forcing a pick at 5 points really hurts since all the 5 point players are hard choices for anti team 6/4/3 - I think this is the best choice, the 4 & 3 pt players shouldn't hurt you much and your main risk is the 6 point but they aren't the worst picks (especially with the week 1 lineups) 8/3/2 (or any of the 7+ cost players and 2 cheap ones) - Your two cheap players should be easy picks and incur almost no point loss but you're risking a lot on the one expensive player, and if that player does good (especially at the beginning) you're going to be hard pressed to find a good trade for him. 6/6/1 - Your 1 pt player should almost be guaranteed 0 points, its risky taking two of the 6 point players though (or a 7/5). | ||
Yiruru
Canada690 Posts
I picked Iris and Effort because SkyHigh and Savior have been overshadowing them lately, so hopefully they won't get TOO much playtime. As much as FBH seems to be slumping right now, I think he'll still get playtime for a few more weeks since Khan's T lineup isn't particularly amazing. | ||
Jaksiel
United States4130 Posts
Is FBH doing better than anyone lately? | ||
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
On April 15 2009 01:02 Abydos1 wrote: You have a couple options: 5/4/4 - the 13 points forcing a pick at 5 points really hurts since all the 5 point players are hard choices for anti team 6/4/3 - I think this is the best choice, the 4 & 3 pt players shouldn't hurt you much and your main risk is the 6 point but they aren't the worst picks (especially with the week 1 lineups) 8/3/2 (or any of the 7+ cost players and 2 cheap ones) - Your two cheap players should be easy picks and incur almost no point loss but you're risking a lot on the one expensive player, and if that player does good (especially at the beginning) you're going to be hard pressed to find a good trade for him. 6/6/1 - Your 1 pt player should almost be guaranteed 0 points, its risky taking two of the 6 point players though (or a 7/5). Your 1 point player doesn't guaranteed 0 points unless he plays ACE. Teams do win and even if he didn't play or he did lose his games, you will get that 1 point. So best option is to have 1 or 2 ACE players and fill one player with good points to get near 13 points (like hyvaa). Thats why some people has had some questions why they get points even if their team lost 0-3 but they were 4th player. | ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On April 15 2009 03:20 Too_MuchZerg wrote: Your 1 point player doesn't guaranteed 0 points unless he plays ACE. Teams do win and even if he didn't play or he did lose his games, you will get that 1 point. So best option is to have 1 or 2 ACE players and fill one player with good points to get near 13 points (like hyvaa). Thats why some people has had some questions why they get points even if their team lost 0-3 but they were 4th player. For all intents the one point cost player should get as close to 0 points as is possible | ||
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
![]() 6/4/3 - I think this is the best choice, the 4 & 3 pt players shouldn't hurt you much and your main risk is the 6 point but they aren't the worst picks (especially with the week 1 lineups) My ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
hasuprotoss
United States4611 Posts
Yeah, that's me. I'm only being overshadowed by the stupid Hite Sparkyz coach. All 3 Hite players that I had were successful. Hopefully Lux and ForGG get some damn points for me tonight and I can continue my ascension at this rate (and hit a rank in the negatives :O!). | ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
| ||
Teejing
Germany1360 Posts
So next time plz make do not count the anti team, since i am 100% zerg. PS: Awesome job on all the statistics ! Makes fantasy league even better than last season! | ||
![]()
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
| ||