eh, why do people care about the kespa sanctioned? a check doesn't need to be kespa sanctioned, and iirc the gom prize was a big fat one

edit: by this i mean why would some teams not participate

i guess ogn and mbc make sense because of competing networks, but why not skt1?

Warrior Madness

Canada3791 Posts

April 02 2009 06:24 GMT

#24

darkemperor

Turkey725 Posts

April 02 2009 06:24 GMT

#25

why do you even care about KESPA's rules ? GOM was a very big event. Even prize says itself. It is completely unreasonable. It should be changed to old system.

Raithed

China7078 Posts

April 02 2009 06:29 GMT

#26

w/e bisu will still weeeen!

betaben

681 Posts

April 02 2009 06:36 GMT

#27

well, if kespa wanting a monopoly means that we discredit the best players in history, then that's ok with me!

konadora

Singapore66364 Posts

April 02 2009 06:44 GMT

#28

Wow Flash.. wow.

Lachrymose

Australia1928 Posts

April 02 2009 06:46 GMT

#29

to say that because gom was not kespa sanctioned it will not count for tlpd despite what it was is a joke.

to call gom s2 "an invitational" is a worse joke.

Magic84

Russian Federation1381 Posts

April 02 2009 06:52 GMT

#30

This is a correct thing to do, either count all 3 seasons, or remove everything, because it doesn't make sense.

Mikilatov

United States3897 Posts

April 02 2009 07:01 GMT

#31

Fine with me, for I really don't care so much about ELO and such, however, it bothers me that Kespa isn't sanctioning GOM, and teams aren't participating... Why is this, anyway? I would assume more events and more money is a GOOD THING for Starcraft... Why would Kespa (And some teams) continually facepalm GOM?

p4NDemik

United States13896 Posts

April 02 2009 07:09 GMT

#32

can we get Gom S1 put in the database but not counted towards ELO? seems strange to have S2 in but now S1 now. Plus Jaedong's accomplishments would look nicer going into his OSL championship bid.

Hot_Bid

Braavos36401 Posts

April 02 2009 07:12 GMT

#33

On April 02 2009 16:09 p4NDemik wrote:
can we get Gom S1 put in the database but not counted towards ELO? seems strange to have S2 in but now S1 now. Plus Jaedong's accomplishments would look nicer going into his OSL championship bid.

We asked GOM for full brackets for GOM1 but they haven't gotten back to us despite many attempts to get this information.

p4NDemik

United States13896 Posts

April 02 2009 07:17 GMT

#34

Season 2 has incomplete information too, and it was still included. You've got everything for the Ro32 and up, why not at least add just those games, and you can add the earlier rounds whenever all the information comes to light?

Solinren

United States2653 Posts

April 02 2009 07:18 GMT

#35

On April 02 2009 15:04 Carnac wrote:
anyone else tired of that elo peak shit anyway?

Crazy fanboys.

rredtooth

5464 Posts

April 02 2009 07:20 GMT

#36

bisu is bumped off the top.
really, his bonjwa status just wasn't meant to be.

Monsen

Germany2548 Posts

April 02 2009 07:34 GMT

#37

The Top four are actually five :D

29 fps

United States5725 Posts

April 02 2009 08:01 GMT

#38

this totally sucks for tossgirl. now she has all Ls (again)

SK.Testie

Canada11084 Posts

April 02 2009 08:03 GMT

#39

INDIAN GIVERS!!!!!

Kentor

United States5784 Posts

April 02 2009 08:40 GMT

#40

Following Kespa is so arbitrary. An all-star game I can understand since it's more of a fun thing and people don't really try like in the race battles. But counting ELO in a whole tournament with big money and top players and great finals like bisu vs jangbi and jaedong vs flash helps show the current state/power of the players.

However, I do agree that it's either count all seasons or count none for consistency.