• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:45
CEST 01:45
KST 08:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview2[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris34Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview BoxeR's Wings Episode 2 - Fan Translation Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update A Eulogy for the Six Pool #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below
Brood War
General
Easiest luckies way to get out of Asl groups Post ASL20 Ro24 discussion. BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion No Rain in ASL20?
Tourneys
[IPSL] CSLAN Review and CSLPRO Reimagined! [ASL20] Ro24 Group F [ASL20] Ro24 Group E [ASL20] Ro24 Group D
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mechabellum Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The year 2050
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
How Culture and Conflict Imp…
TrAiDoS
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1880 users

Increased player numbers recently - Page 2

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Korea (South)3851 Posts
February 13 2009 11:10 GMT
#21
--- Nuked ---
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 11:20:47
February 13 2009 11:17 GMT
#22
On February 13 2009 20:10 randomKo_Orean wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2009 18:13 Hot_Bid wrote:
On February 13 2009 18:09 MoRe_mInErAls wrote:
On February 13 2009 18:04 Hot_Bid wrote:
i think this phenomenon is easily explained by the concept of player inflation, the number of players naturally inflates over time, if you look at the inflation-adjusted numbers its pretty much the same as last year, so its not really signifying anything

Yes, because the rise in cost of goods and services cause people to play Starcraft.

no, it causes a rise in player numbers of people who play starcraft just like real inflation

other than that your statement is true

Are you kidding me?

Inflation defines the nominal and real value of [insert numerical unit, such as $].

can players in starcraft not be numerical units? when i go on battle.net.net. i log onto a gateway called "east" and the first thing i do after answering some of those bots or even before i join a 4v4 no clutter game, i type /users, and it gives me a numerical number of users. so i just insert that into your sentence and boom, i win the argument. obviously starcraft players can be measured numerically, just today bisu played july, that's so easy to count. bisu counts as 1, july as like 3, so 4.

GPA inflation, for example, is when the school gives out better GPA scores (by forcing them to take more AP classes) to most students so that their students might seem smarter compared to other school, while in fact, they might not be.

The number of players, however... WTF this is whole level of stupid.

if you replace "GPA" with "number of starcraft players" then its an easy analogy to make, and easily analized. in fact, the number of starcraft players playing is probably directly re-inversely proportionate to the number of schoolkids with high GPAs. so there.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
PobTheCad
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
Australia893 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 11:27:44
February 13 2009 11:27 GMT
#23
what i am saying is the recent spike has only been for the last couple of months.i'm certain that the early 2003 BW numbers would have been higher than the early 2007 BW numbers for example.

computer games usually decline in popularity with age , this is a proven fact.it is stupid to compare a computer game with chess , since after 11 years a computer game is dated whereas chess is timeless.
Once again back is the incredible!
Manifesto7
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
Osaka27149 Posts
February 13 2009 11:30 GMT
#24
On February 13 2009 20:27 PobTheCad wrote:
computer games usually decline in popularity with age , this is a proven fact.it is stupid to compare a computer game with chess , since after 11 years a computer game is dated whereas chess is timeless.


Watch what you say about my beloved StarCraft...
ModeratorGodfather
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 11:33:00
February 13 2009 11:32 GMT
#25
On February 13 2009 20:27 PobTheCad wrote:
hot_bids argument is not a total dud since the number of 'gamers' has increased exponentially in the past 10 years but what i am saying is the recent spike has only been for the last couple of months.i'm certain that the early 2003 BW numbers would have been higher than the early 2007 BW numbers for example.

exactly thank you, though your agreement is a bit of a backhanded compliment "not a total dud" but i accept it and will learn to appreciate it as if it was inflation, it gets greater value over time.

computer games usually decline in popularity with age , this is a proven fact.it is stupid to compare a computer game with chess , since after 11 years a computer game is dated whereas chess is timeless.

its not really timeless, not if you play speed chess, that is timed pretty hardcore.

also:
"Around 1200, rules of chess started to be modified in southern Europe, and around 1475, several major changes made the game essentially as it is known today."

from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess#Origins_of_the_modern_game_.281450.E2.80.931850.29

so chess is like 550 years old, but if you take into account inflation of those years, it's not nearly that old, more like 200ish years old.

who knows if brood war will be older than chess eventually? it is a question we all would like to ask to be answered, as many people call chess the "StarCraft: Brood War of board games".
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
QuickStriker
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States3694 Posts
February 13 2009 11:45 GMT
#26
hahaha, after reading the posts of this, I have to say I am amazed with using Starcraft players in battle.net of inflation. I will have to agree fully with Hot_Bid on this one along with few more factors to add with the rising # of players in SC since he does have a point and a logic rather than others who only object/deny without real details as well as no other explanation except him explaining all!

And I can see that inflation can be used besides money values, number values and etc. It can basically be used for everything and # of SC player is indeed a # value...
www.twitch.tv/KoreanUsher
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
February 13 2009 11:50 GMT
#27
Hot_Bid.

You are awesome.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
February 13 2009 11:52 GMT
#28
On February 13 2009 20:45 QuickStriker wrote:
hahaha, after reading the posts of this, I have to say I am amazed with using Starcraft players in battle.net of inflation. I will have to agree fully with Hot_Bid on this one along with few more factors to add with the rising # of players in SC since he does have a point and a logic rather than others who only object/deny without real details as well as no other explanation except him explaining all!

And I can see that inflation can be used besides money values, number values and etc. It can basically be used for everything and # of SC player is indeed a # value...

we must be careful of using inflation as an explanation though, as its usefulness and truth may eventually also become inflated, and thus create a dangerous vortex of exponentially increasing inflation, to the point where a single starcraft player is essentially worthless.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
inReacH
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Sweden1612 Posts
February 13 2009 11:57 GMT
#29
On February 13 2009 20:08 Hot_Bid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2009 19:50 inReacH wrote:
On February 13 2009 19:19 Hot_Bid wrote:
On February 13 2009 18:25 MuR)Ernu wrote:
...
and i don't understand that inflation thingy...
More players are more players... I don't know how you can say that it is the "same" if there are more players :o

the concept is quite simple, players nowadays are not worth as much as players several years ago. there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft and before there were less, that's how inflation works.

Holy fuck this is like a new level of dumb, how has noone called you out on this yet.

probably because they realize i am truly relying on lowly legal inferences, now go into dictionary, it oughtta teachya

Show nested quote +
So according to your logic, more people on earth = more people doing any given thing?

obviously more people on earth = more people doing any given thing. let me give you an example, if there are 10 people on earth breathing, and instead there are 15 people, that's 5 more people breathing. another example would be if there are 15 people, and then there are 20 people, that's another 5 more people breathing, or 10 more than 10 people breathing.

Show nested quote +
Do you actually think this subject is so cut and dry?

So why aren't there more people playing ps1 games than there were when ps1 was the current generation console?

because there's a PS2 and PS3?

Show nested quote +
Could it possibly be because as games age, people look for newer sources of entertainment and move on from games that are say.. 10 years old?

I can think of a few examples, there are more people playing Chess now than the 1800s. And there are more people in the 1800s playing chess than in the 400s. And more people playing in the 400s than in 65million BC, because there were no people back then, only dinosaurs.

Show nested quote +
Inflation, that's your answer. I literally am right now discovering that I don't want to click post until I have fully expressed my awe that someone could be so absurd. But also I am discovering that I can't, with all the words in the dictionary(inflation being one of them), there isn't one for the way I feel about your posts.

Your posts seem to have inflation too, every one of them is worth less as you continue on this site.

Show nested quote +
And the condescending way you linked me to that wikepedia page that is about economic inflation as confident as could be...

Let's just look at this quote by itself for a moment:
"there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft"

Wow.

So to break it down, more people = more people playing starcraft

And this can be explained by 'inflation', which is a generic term that I'm gathering you think means, as the worlds population grows, everything grows.

I think you need to re-read the wikipedia definition of inflation.

Show nested quote +
Not only is this not what inflation means, it's not even true.

There are more people on battle.net for a ton of reasons, most prominent of course is starcraft2's imminent release.

If blizzard had announced they were never making a sequel every year would be a record low SCbnet users.

EDIT:
This is at the top of the article you linked me:
"This article is about a general rise in the level of prices."

Yeah that has a lot to do with the number of people playing on battle.net I'm sure.

Let me spell it out for you. If you replace "prices" with "people playing on bnet" then what does it read? "This article is about a general rise in the people playing on bnet." Case closed.


You're trolling right?
I would be 100% sure you are trolling but some people are actually agreeing with you which means that in fact people can be that dumb. I'm going to just assume they are not actually reading closely enough to what you are saying to have an opinion and just read like 1 random sentence that isn't completely retarded(of which there are few) and basing their opinion on that.
inReacH
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Sweden1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 12:02:23
February 13 2009 12:00 GMT
#30
Lol ok I just read your posts on the second page and it got hilarious, but seriously what is this?

On February 13 2009 20:45 QuickStriker wrote:
I will have to agree fully with Hot_Bid on this one


Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
February 13 2009 12:01 GMT
#31
its easy to yell "troll" at someone whose argument you have no refutation or answer for. it's akin to saying "my allies sucked" when you die in a 4v4 BGH, oftentimes its hard to find enough players for such a game, because while there seems to be a lot of players, in reality there isn't that many due to inflation. if there were so many players all those 4v4s would fill up instantaneously right? wrong.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
Manifesto7
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
Osaka27149 Posts
February 13 2009 12:02 GMT
#32
Why would he be trolling? Doesn't it make sense that as more people exist there is more of a chance they will play SC?

I mean, what about technological inflation. More people have computers and internet, thus more people have a chance to play the game.

Final, language inflation. English continues to spread around the world, and it is the default language of battle net. As more people are comfortable with that, then they will obviously play more.

I think it is a pretty simple reason tbh, I don't know why you take such umbridge to it.
ModeratorGodfather
inReacH
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Sweden1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 12:04:23
February 13 2009 12:03 GMT
#33
This made me laugh so so much

can players in starcraft not be numerical units? when i go on battle.net.net. i log onto a gateway called "east" and the first thing i do after answering some of those bots or even before i join a 4v4 no clutter game, i type /users, and it gives me a numerical number of users. so i just insert that into your sentence and boom, i win the argument. obviously starcraft players can be measured numerically, just today bisu played july, that's so easy to count. bisu counts as 1, july as like 3, so 4.
inReacH
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Sweden1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 12:07:34
February 13 2009 12:04 GMT
#34
On February 13 2009 21:02 Manifesto7 wrote:
Why would he be trolling? Doesn't it make sense that as more people exist there is more of a chance they will play SC?

I mean, what about technological inflation. More people have computers and internet, thus more people have a chance to play the game.

Final, language inflation. English continues to spread around the world, and it is the default language of battle net. As more people are comfortable with that, then they will obviously play more.

I think it is a pretty simple reason tbh, I don't know why you take such umbridge to it.


I ws 90% sure he was trolling on page 1.. but just read his posts on page 2..

Numerical numbers??

4v4 no clutter...

LOL hilarious.

I don't get how mani missed that he was trolling, go read his posts slowly and report back please.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
February 13 2009 12:06 GMT
#35
On February 13 2009 21:04 inReacH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2009 21:02 Manifesto7 wrote:
Why would he be trolling? Doesn't it make sense that as more people exist there is more of a chance they will play SC?

I mean, what about technological inflation. More people have computers and internet, thus more people have a chance to play the game.

Final, language inflation. English continues to spread around the world, and it is the default language of battle net. As more people are comfortable with that, then they will obviously play more.

I think it is a pretty simple reason tbh, I don't know why you take such umbridge to it.


I ws 90% sure he was trolling on page 1.. but just read his posts on page 2..

Numerical numbers??

4v4 no clutter...

LOL hilarious.

whats wrong with 4v4 no clutter? its just a different type of game than low low money, it focuses more on macro than micro. its a different skill.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
inReacH
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Sweden1612 Posts
February 13 2009 12:08 GMT
#36
I feel like upon clicking this thread I've entered an alternate dimension.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
February 13 2009 12:09 GMT
#37
On February 13 2009 21:08 inReacH wrote:
I feel like upon clicking this thread I've entered an alternate dimension.

the feeling is mutual when i see your name in the sc2 forum
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-13 12:14:38
February 13 2009 12:10 GMT
#38
On February 13 2009 20:08 Hot_Bid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2009 19:50 inReacH wrote:
On February 13 2009 19:19 Hot_Bid wrote:
On February 13 2009 18:25 MuR)Ernu wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

...
and i don't understand that inflation thingy...
More players are more players... I don't know how you can say that it is the "same" if there are more players :o

the concept is quite simple, players nowadays are not worth as much as players several years ago. there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft and before there were less, that's how inflation works.

Holy fuck this is like a new level of dumb, how has noone called you out on this yet.

probably because they realize i am truly relying on lowly legal inferences, now go into dictionary, it oughtta teachya

Show nested quote +
So according to your logic, more people on earth = more people doing any given thing?

obviously more people on earth = more people doing any given thing. let me give you an example, if there are 10 people on earth breathing, and instead there are 15 people, that's 5 more people breathing. another example would be if there are 15 people, and then there are 20 people, that's another 5 more people breathing, or 10 more than 10 people breathing.

Show nested quote +
Do you actually think this subject is so cut and dry?

So why aren't there more people playing ps1 games than there were when ps1 was the current generation console?

because there's a PS2 and PS3?

Show nested quote +
Could it possibly be because as games age, people look for newer sources of entertainment and move on from games that are say.. 10 years old?

I can think of a few examples, there are more people playing Chess now than the 1800s. And there are more people in the 1800s playing chess than in the 400s. And more people playing in the 400s than in 65million BC, because there were no people back then, only dinosaurs.

Show nested quote +
Inflation, that's your answer. I literally am right now discovering that I don't want to click post until I have fully expressed my awe that someone could be so absurd. But also I am discovering that I can't, with all the words in the dictionary(inflation being one of them), there isn't one for the way I feel about your posts.

Your posts seem to have inflation too, every one of them is worth less as you continue on this site.

Show nested quote +
And the condescending way you linked me to that wikepedia page that is about economic inflation as confident as could be...

Let's just look at this quote by itself for a moment:
"there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft"

Wow.

So to break it down, more people = more people playing starcraft

And this can be explained by 'inflation', which is a generic term that I'm gathering you think means, as the worlds population grows, everything grows.

I think you need to re-read the wikipedia definition of inflation.

Show nested quote +
Not only is this not what inflation means, it's not even true.

There are more people on battle.net for a ton of reasons, most prominent of course is starcraft2's imminent release.

If blizzard had announced they were never making a sequel every year would be a record low SCbnet users.

EDIT:
This is at the top of the article you linked me:
"This article is about a general rise in the level of prices."

Yeah that has a lot to do with the number of people playing on battle.net I'm sure.

Let me spell it out for you. If you replace "prices" with "people playing on bnet" then what does it read? "This article is about a general rise in the people playing on bnet." Case closed.


I guess what Hot_Bid wants to point out is the fact that the player number increases even though the percentage of players playing decreases.

Let me put it like that:

500 people live on earth and 250 are playing Starcraft in 2008. (50% playing)
1000 people live on earth and 300 are playing Starcraft in 2009. (30% playing)

You have more players playing Starcraft, but still you have a lesser percentage of people playing in total.
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Manifesto7
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
Osaka27149 Posts
February 13 2009 12:12 GMT
#39
THANK YOU.

Was that so difficult to understand?
ModeratorGodfather
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36375 Posts
February 13 2009 12:16 GMT
#40
On February 13 2009 21:10 G.s)NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2009 20:08 Hot_Bid wrote:
On February 13 2009 19:50 inReacH wrote:
On February 13 2009 19:19 Hot_Bid wrote:
On February 13 2009 18:25 MuR)Ernu wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

...
and i don't understand that inflation thingy...
More players are more players... I don't know how you can say that it is the "same" if there are more players :o

the concept is quite simple, players nowadays are not worth as much as players several years ago. there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft and before there were less, that's how inflation works.

Holy fuck this is like a new level of dumb, how has noone called you out on this yet.

probably because they realize i am truly relying on lowly legal inferences, now go into dictionary, it oughtta teachya

So according to your logic, more people on earth = more people doing any given thing?

obviously more people on earth = more people doing any given thing. let me give you an example, if there are 10 people on earth breathing, and instead there are 15 people, that's 5 more people breathing. another example would be if there are 15 people, and then there are 20 people, that's another 5 more people breathing, or 10 more than 10 people breathing.

Do you actually think this subject is so cut and dry?

So why aren't there more people playing ps1 games than there were when ps1 was the current generation console?

because there's a PS2 and PS3?

Could it possibly be because as games age, people look for newer sources of entertainment and move on from games that are say.. 10 years old?

I can think of a few examples, there are more people playing Chess now than the 1800s. And there are more people in the 1800s playing chess than in the 400s. And more people playing in the 400s than in 65million BC, because there were no people back then, only dinosaurs.

Inflation, that's your answer. I literally am right now discovering that I don't want to click post until I have fully expressed my awe that someone could be so absurd. But also I am discovering that I can't, with all the words in the dictionary(inflation being one of them), there isn't one for the way I feel about your posts.

Your posts seem to have inflation too, every one of them is worth less as you continue on this site.

And the condescending way you linked me to that wikepedia page that is about economic inflation as confident as could be...

Let's just look at this quote by itself for a moment:
"there are more people on the earth so more computer gamers and thus more people playing starcraft"

Wow.

So to break it down, more people = more people playing starcraft

And this can be explained by 'inflation', which is a generic term that I'm gathering you think means, as the worlds population grows, everything grows.

I think you need to re-read the wikipedia definition of inflation.

Not only is this not what inflation means, it's not even true.

There are more people on battle.net for a ton of reasons, most prominent of course is starcraft2's imminent release.

If blizzard had announced they were never making a sequel every year would be a record low SCbnet users.

EDIT:
This is at the top of the article you linked me:
"This article is about a general rise in the level of prices."

Yeah that has a lot to do with the number of people playing on battle.net I'm sure.

Let me spell it out for you. If you replace "prices" with "people playing on bnet" then what does it read? "This article is about a general rise in the people playing on bnet." Case closed.


I guess what Hot_Bid wants to point out is the fact that the player number increases even though the percentage of players playing decreases.

Let me put it like that:

500 people live on earth and 250 are playing Starcraft in 2008. (50% playing)
1000 people live on earth and 300 are playing Starcraft in 2009. (30% playing)

You have more players playing Starcraft, but still you have a lesser percentage of people playing in total.

this man understands simple inflationary mathematics.

seriously was that so hard inreach? i even linked you to wikipedia.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Code For Giants Cup
22:30
#25
CosmosSc2 63
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft267
Nathanias 110
CosmosSc2 63
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 586
ZZZero.O 44
NaDa 22
Dota 2
syndereN606
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K523
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox387
C9.Mang0333
Chillindude37
Other Games
tarik_tv21452
gofns17594
summit1g5723
FrodaN1766
Grubby1610
KnowMe209
WinterStarcraft198
RotterdaM185
ViBE60
PPMD23
JuggernautJason8
ProTech6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1397
BasetradeTV32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH50
• RyuSc2 49
• davetesta46
• poizon28 15
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21817
League of Legends
• Doublelift4270
Other Games
• imaqtpie772
Upcoming Events
SC Evo League
12h 15m
TaeJa vs Cure
Rogue vs threepoint
ByuN vs Creator
MaNa vs Classic
Maestros of the Game
16h 15m
ShoWTimE vs Cham
GuMiho vs Ryung
Zoun vs Spirit
Rogue vs MaNa
[BSL 2025] Weekly
18h 15m
SC Evo League
1d 12h
Maestros of the Game
1d 16h
SHIN vs Creator
Astrea vs Lambo
Bunny vs SKillous
HeRoMaRinE vs TriGGeR
BSL Team Wars
1d 19h
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
BSL Team Wars
1d 19h
Team Dewalt vs Team Sziky
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Monday
4 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Maru vs SHIN
MaNa vs MaxPax
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Astrea
Classic vs sOs
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Summer 2025
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
Acropolis #4 - TS1
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
Skyesports Masters 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.