|
Source:Fomos
Proleague planning two huge changes on next season.
-Next proleague season, 2v2 matches will be completely cancelled. -we will see BO7 instead of BO5... (seven 1v1 matches)
KESPA, teams and other associations are still arguing about this topic, so this is not final decision!
|
think they got tired of PZ vs PZ...
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
hm, didnt think this would actually happen since kespa seemed to have the say on it and didnt seem willing to budge, but we'll see.
kinda sucks for the teams with strong 2v2 teams, sucks for 2v2 specialists, sucks for teams with relatively weak 1v1 lineups comparatively, good for teams with shitty 2v2, good for the somewhat inexpereinced 1v1 players who will have more playing time.
|
|
Sucks for those old players who cant play 1 on 1.
|
|
I'd like to see these changes happen personally. The more 1v1, the better - 2v2 just came down to PZ vs. PZ and got kind of stale imo. Also with more 1v1s, teams have more of a chance to play up and coming players and new talent, which is always fun to watch.
|
On July 15 2008 06:14 CDRdude wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 06:10 emucxg wrote:Source:Fomos Proleague planning two huge changes on next season. -Next proleague season, 2v2 matches will be completely cancelled. -we will see BO7 instead of BO5... (seven 1v1 matches) KESPA, teams and other associations are still arguing about this topic, so this is not final decision! Could you please link the source? (You said Fomos, but it'd be great to get something more specific). Do you know if this is just a wild suggestion, or a serious consideration? I hope it doesn't happen, I usually love the 2v2 set. #4
|
it would make more sense if it was still bo5 and all 1v1, but a 1v1 b07 is just going to get boring.
4v4 hunters, you heard it here first
|
Ahhhhh. So conflicted....
2v2's are awesome fun to watch. But then again, 7 1v1's would be awesome too...
|
On July 15 2008 06:16 spydernoob wrote: it would make more sense if it was still bo5 and all 1v1, but a 1v1 b07 is just going to get boring.
4v4 hunters, you heard it here first yeah, seven 1v1 games...its crazy, but maybe more fair
|
On July 15 2008 06:15 emucxg wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 06:14 CDRdude wrote:On July 15 2008 06:10 emucxg wrote:Source:Fomos Proleague planning two huge changes on next season. -Next proleague season, 2v2 matches will be completely cancelled. -we will see BO7 instead of BO5... (seven 1v1 matches) KESPA, teams and other associations are still arguing about this topic, so this is not final decision! Could you please link the source? (You said Fomos, but it'd be great to get something more specific). Do you know if this is just a wild suggestion, or a serious consideration? I hope it doesn't happen, I usually love the 2v2 set. #4 I saw it after I posted, I'm slow
|
Bo7 would blow balls, theres too many proleague matches these days as it is
|
also 6 teams will go to the playoffs instead of 4, right? and does that mean that the finals will be bo9?
|
On July 15 2008 06:23 Presony-Boy wrote: also 6 teams will go to the playoffs instead of 4, right? and does that mean that the finals will be bo9? i donno, but if Im right, every team will play five times against eachother. next season will be the longest season ever =)
|
WTF they can't do this to us!
2v2s are a great break from all the 1v1s being played all the time. I don't see what good could possibly come from removing a great aspect of the game in return for more of the same old 1v1 play that we're all so familiar with. There are more than plenty 1v1 matches as it is, not only in the proleague but also in all of the other tournament such as MSL, OSL, Intel Classic, duel Tournament and so on.
2v2s bring teamwork into the game, an aspect that is obviously missing from the 1v1 game of starcraft, and am I the only the one who thinks it would be weird to have a team league where teamwork isn't important? Let 2v2 stay!
|
Damn, the 2:2 are the only thing I watch. Mostly alot action from the start too. But yea a T or two would be nice.
|
I don't mind this change. ;D
|
2v2's brings a change to 1v1's. Granted after a few times on a map they all come down to the same pz v pz which does get boring.
|
2v2's have gotten mad boring this season, basically the same game every time.
|
eh when 2v2's start in proleague that's when I go afk.
maybe crazier maps 2v2 maps, could change it up.
go island maps.
|
Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches.
|
I would enjoy being able to see the lesser used players more
|
|
On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches.
That is a very legitimate concern. It can be hard to keep the quality and focus of the matches with so many games playing. Add the expanded regular season, and I expect even further decreases in quality. It will be hard to watch sub-par matches all year just to wait for the grand finals. Perhaps they should add something in the middle of the season to "flare things up".
|
I just hope there is less mirror matchups...
|
On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches. this year i have been seen almost 50 games by Flash =__________=
|
2v2 were the best part at proleagues for me. They should chance it that every1 is random, if they want new team combos... Would be fun when the luck factor kicks in .
|
right now, getting through a regular pro-league match [note, regular implies not popular team, not great players, etc.] is hard enough. Add to this another two games...more mirrors... >.<
we need something creative to happen with the maps
|
Wouldn't be surprised 2v2 lately have been pvz barely get into muta tech and its gg no expos are anything not really what sponsors want to see the hunters bought some interesting shit but not enough that i would watch 2v2 alot.
|
On July 15 2008 07:02 emucxg wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches. this year i have been seen almost 50 games by Flash =__________=
KTF coach had the choice to use Flash in each match, he could easily replace Flash from the lineups and replace him with say... hery. But next season the coaches would be left with no choice but to use all of its "decent" players if it wants to win. So yes, I believe we'll be seeing hery in every single game KTF plays next season.
|
As of now the ONLY time i watch 2v2's is when i'm watching the match live, otherwise i just skip cause i don't really care.
Also, i too am tired of seeing the same players all the time, in 1v1's i think this would bring greater variety, all we need is some new better maps and for the coaches to stop sending mirror matchups all the time...
|
I don't think 7 1on1 would be good. That could make the matches extremely long. If we have still pvz on andromeda or something like that, a bo7 will take ages.
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On July 15 2008 07:07 dinmsab wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 07:02 emucxg wrote:On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches. this year i have been seen almost 50 games by Flash =__________= KTF coach had the choice to use Flash in each match, he could easily replace Flash from the lineups and replace him with say... hery. But next season the coaches would be left with no choice but to use all of its "decent" players if it wants to win. So yes, I believe we'll be seeing hery in every single game KTF plays next season.
7 pple...
Flash 815 Haran Lucifer Tempest Violet....
ya we're seeing hery a lot again
|
The only solution is to bring back DMZ!
Seriously though, more players being able to play on the big stage is a good thing, and it makes teams more into 'teams', though I could see there being some time issues involved with BO7s as often as PL games are!
|
On July 15 2008 07:25 thedeadhaji wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 07:07 dinmsab wrote:On July 15 2008 07:02 emucxg wrote:On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches. this year i have been seen almost 50 games by Flash =__________= KTF coach had the choice to use Flash in each match, he could easily replace Flash from the lineups and replace him with say... hery. But next season the coaches would be left with no choice but to use all of its "decent" players if it wants to win. So yes, I believe we'll be seeing hery in every single game KTF plays next season. 7 pple... Flash 815 Haran Lucifer Tempest Violet.... ya we're seeing hery a lot again 
Kang Min!
|
Calgary25980 Posts
I was just starting to get into the 2v2s. The maps made them really special. This sucks
|
DAMNIT, I agree with Haji they just need to make good maps like Iron Curtains and Hwansangul again (Hannibal had cool games this season too, it had potential, except its not so good for Terran for some reason...)
|
bring back fragbet style matches!
|
On July 15 2008 07:25 thedeadhaji wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 07:07 dinmsab wrote:On July 15 2008 07:02 emucxg wrote:On July 15 2008 06:54 dinmsab wrote: Imagine waking up next season, looking forward to Haran, hery, sair, stats + the usual KTF lineup vs say... Fox's pepe, hoony, firefist, control+regular fox's lineup. The lineups would give me a hard time trying to stay up throughout the matches. this year i have been seen almost 50 games by Flash =__________= KTF coach had the choice to use Flash in each match, he could easily replace Flash from the lineups and replace him with say... hery. But next season the coaches would be left with no choice but to use all of its "decent" players if it wants to win. So yes, I believe we'll be seeing hery in every single game KTF plays next season. 7 pple... Flash 815 Haran Lucifer Tempest Violet.... ya we're seeing hery a lot again 
Because tempest is actually better than hery? come on... 
|
On July 15 2008 06:53 Tinithor wrote: 2v2's have gotten mad boring this season, basically the same game every time.
This is why i don't even watch the 2v2 games anymore, also i think Bo7 would be cool as hell.
|
|
what no
now reach/yellow are useless
|
omg reach ;; Brush up on 1v1!!!
|
they should play shared bases 2v2
|
they should play team melee
|
i think team melee would be a sweet idea
|
I'm glad they did it. 2v2 in bw is way unbalanced, gets boring and repetitive really fast. 1v1 is the way to go, they just need to keep refreshing the maps to keep it interesting. Hope 2v2 is more balanced and fun in sc2 so we're not stuck with 1v1 for competitive games..
|
Instead, 2v2 should be replaced so the players have to be random. How awesome would that be?
|
On July 15 2008 08:48 edzwoo wrote: Instead, 2v2 should be replaced so the players have to be random. How awesome would that be? Not awesome at all.
|
51449 Posts
bo7
zzzzz
no more ace match then?
|
THEY SHUD PLAY 2V2 BUT ALL RANDOM ^_^;
|
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
Bah! 2v2 always provides the best ceremonies and BO7 makes for a really, really long proleague event each time.
|
On July 15 2008 08:57 GTR-2-Go wrote: bo7
zzzzz
no more ace match then?
there will still be ace match if it ties up 3 3
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On July 15 2008 08:21 VIB wrote: I'm glad they did it. 2v2 in bw is way unbalanced, gets boring and repetitive really fast. 1v1 is the way to go, they just need to keep refreshing the maps to keep it interesting.
new maps every PL season and we'd still have the boringness problem. After 3 weeks the matches went stale overall 
|
Ok, maybe 2v2 has gone to boring. I myself stopped watching 2v2 unless it involves players I like a lot, and sometimes not even then. However I think that 7 1v1's is a terrible idea.
Here is the thing. People are thinking that with 7 1v1's we are going to see TvZ like Hwasin vs Jaedong, TvP Flash vs Best, PvZ Bisu vs July... Well, guess what? No. We will have around 4 mirror matches every time, and being game 2 and 3 where coaches will let their worst players play, you'll get two terribly boring turtling terran noobs playin 1 hour TvT, and some noobish mu that you'll regret ever watching.
If they are going to remove 2v2, at least they should come with something that it's NOT 1v1, and that can replace 2v2 with the same weight in the final outcome. Team melee anyone? And if they are too lazy to use their creativity, well, then just leave it at 5 1v1's.
|
that would suck I enjoy 2v2.... u watch ur 1v1 then get one 2v2 spices things up....
the only problem with 2v2 is the maps... just gotta make the maps a little intresting like Iron curtain...
I dont think it would be a good idea... B0 7 would be boring in my opinion... same 1v1's, more no name players vs no name players... less chance of Ace Match, less chance of a 2 big names facing each other...
|
Bo7 will take FOREVER. Imagine if you get Stork v GGplay happening once or twice a match. It'd take like 4-6 hours easy. Bo7 will probably equate to more cheesing to try and get quick wins.
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
On July 15 2008 11:30 RamenStyle wrote: Ok, maybe 2v2 has gone to boring. I myself stopped watching 2v2 unless it involves players I like a lot, and sometimes not even then. However I think that 7 1v1's is a terrible idea.
Here is the thing. People are thinking that with 7 1v1's we are going to see TvZ like Hwasin vs Jaedong, TvP Flash vs Best, PvZ Bisu vs July... Well, guess what? No. We will have around 4 mirror matches every time, and being game 2 and 3 where coaches will let their worst players play, you'll get two terribly boring turtling terran noobs playin 1 hour TvT, and some noobish mu that you'll regret ever watching.
If they are going to remove 2v2, at least they should come with something that it's NOT 1v1, and that can replace 2v2 with the same weight in the final outcome. Team melee anyone? And if they are too lazy to use their creativity, well, then just leave it at 5 1v1's.
let me just point out that its not a 'lack of creativity', rather that the other game modes are fucking stupid
|
Maybe they could have the fans select which players go into the 2v2, that would make it much more interesting for spectators.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
this has generated quite a discussion on fomos o.O
btw
if current proleague is boring go back to how it was before; - unannounced lineups - team league!!!!
|
after seeing so amny PZ v PZ in hunters etc,it gets kinda boring.I was hoping if they will switch 2v2 ---> 3v3 or 4v4 in maps like hunters to make it interesting.Or even better for Bo7
1v1 1v1 2v2 1v1 1v1 3v3 1v1 ACE [coach battle?]
|
what if they did a team melee instead of a 2v2?
2v2 or 3v3 team melee at a progamer level would be pretty cool imo
|
United States20661 Posts
Just return to the 2006 style - that is, current format with unannounced lineups. That shit was my favorite.
Also that's probably the best possible format for ACE but shhhhhh
|
Osaka27149 Posts
I want to see this:
On July 15 2008 12:05 Last Romantic wrote: Just return to the 2006 style - that is, current format with unannounced lineups. That shit was my favorite.
Also that's probably the best possible format for ACE but shhhhhh
And also the old MBC Team League style.
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On July 15 2008 12:11 Manifesto7 wrote:
And also the old MBC Team League style.
god that shit was so good :<
|
I'm going to miss the awesome 2v2ers.
Change is good, but I really don't know about this.
The Pro League is going to lose one dimension, but 7 1v1s will make each series longer, harder and more draining.
It's a touchy subject.
7 x 1v1 will get tiring after one season.
|
I for one think they should bring back Seongangil in the 2v2 map rotation to add variety.
|
Hong Kong20321 Posts
WHAT THE HELL THEY BETTER KEEP THE 2v2s they're so fun to watch i can't believe they even thoguht about removing them wtf?!?!?!
and bo7?? omg whats the finals going to be? Bo9? lol.
|
CA10828 Posts
i think Bo5 all 1v1 without announcing lineups is the best.
|
On July 15 2008 11:43 Plexa wrote: this has generated quite a discussion on fomos o.O
btw
if current proleague is boring go back to how it was before; - unannounced lineups - team league!!!!
unannouced lineups will be good.
Or maybe give them your 7 players, then the matchups are drawn out randomly.
but getting rid of 2v2 is a good thing.
|
Yeah, it'll really screw around with our LBs lol
GOOD TIMES!
ALLIN in the dark.
I think the old MBC format would be best.
7x1v1s does sound intriguing and God, we'll be up all night.
|
I like the 2v2's. Its a team league, and u have to play as a team! Get it? Not much of a team league if it is just 1v1.
If its best of 7, It should be 1v1, 1v1, 2v2, 1v1, 1v1, 2v2, 1v1 (ACE). 7 might be too long, 5 is good, not short, not long.
If u wanna have the 2v2 effect still being a 1v1, have 1 progamer play and a 2nd progamer/coach help/assist w/o playing.
|
On July 15 2008 11:46 justiceknight wrote: after seeing so amny PZ v PZ in hunters etc,it gets kinda boring.I was hoping if they will switch 2v2 ---> 3v3 or 4v4 in maps like hunters to make it interesting.Or even better for Bo7
1v1 1v1 2v2 1v1 1v1 3v3 1v1 ACE [coach battle?]
Coach battle? you can't be serious, then Oov and Kingdom will just own the rest of the coachs everytime the matches become 3-3
-_-;;
|
Maybe they should play on random proleague maps. That way we won't have so many boring mirror matches.
|
|
There would need to be a way bigger map pool if they had 7 1v1s. Just to spice it up. Maybe bring back some classics like bitfrost and peaks and such. And perhaps randomized which maps were used each series so the series wouldn't always be the same.
|
On July 15 2008 13:12 Victor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 11:46 justiceknight wrote: after seeing so amny PZ v PZ in hunters etc,it gets kinda boring.I was hoping if they will switch 2v2 ---> 3v3 or 4v4 in maps like hunters to make it interesting.Or even better for Bo7
1v1 1v1 2v2 1v1 1v1 3v3 1v1 ACE [coach battle?] Coach battle? you can't be serious, then Oov and Kingdom will just own the rest of the coachs everytime the matches become 3-3 -_-;;
dont forget [oops]january. The samsung lady plays zerg. =P
|
they should start 3v3's...
|
I like 2v2's because they present something different compared to the onslaught of 1v1's
|
Suddenly I'm imagining 3v3 Team Micro Melee games in proleague. It will never happen, but goddamn what a nice dream.
|
is awesome32274 Posts
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On July 15 2008 11:46 justiceknight wrote: after seeing so amny PZ v PZ in hunters etc,it gets kinda boring.I was hoping if they will switch 2v2 ---> 3v3 or 4v4 in maps like hunters to make it interesting.Or even better for Bo7
1v1 1v1 2v2 1v1 1v1 3v3 1v1 ACE [coach battle?]
Imba Idea. T1 would rape literally all coach battles. Send Oov for insta-win and occasionally Kingdom when Oov's bored.
Anyways, back on topic. 2v2's were fun to watch (Pain in the ass to live report but fun to watch). Certainly quite a changeup from all the 1v1's we see in Indiv. Leagues, and other games in Proleague.
If 2v2's were to be abolished, BO5 1v1's with spontaneous lineups would be great to watch. BO7s in the regular season would simply be too taxing.
|
On July 15 2008 12:42 Highways wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2008 11:43 Plexa wrote: this has generated quite a discussion on fomos o.O
btw
if current proleague is boring go back to how it was before; - unannounced lineups - team league!!!! unannouced lineups will be good. Or maybe give them your 7 players, then the matchups are drawn out randomly. but getting rid of 2v2 is a good thing. 100% supported! The less mirrors we get, the better ^^
|
Zergbong will have to play 1v1?!?!!!?!? This is terrible. KTF need to get more solid 1v1, esp no Reach or Yellow.
"Are we boned?"
|
United States20661 Posts
Get your hero to join up with ACE
then we can cheer for the Knights of the Sky.
The Lord of Dreams belongs in the air.
|
I prefer 1v1 over 2v2, but 2v2 were great distraction. 7 games worth of 1v1... ZzzzzZZzzzz. 3-4 match of mirror match with a big chunk being TvT.
If 2v2 were to be removed, I think I'd watch even less Proleague. It's fun to see something different from time to time. It's a good thing for TV when Yellow/Reach/July get to play.
I wonder if this has anything to do with OGN and MBC getting their ass handed to them in 2v2
|
I usually switch streams during 2v2s in hopes of seeing a 1v1 on a different team. Therefore, I would be happy with this change.
I think the reason that they would increase the number of games is so that losing the 2v2s would not decrease the number of players that each team has to use for each match. In fact, with 7 1v1s even more players will get their chance to play on the big stage which I think of as a good thing(Greg Fields GOGO!)
|
I enjoy more 2v2 on Hannibal than the average 1v1. Small mains / few mins / 2 gaz = fast tech = fun.
I think they should just make more good 2v2 maps. Most of 2v2 on Hunters are mass zeal/ling vs mass zeal/ling .
|
that doesnt bode well for us
really all they need to do is reinstate the rule that teams cant use the same race on a given map twice in a row. its all the mirror mu's that are making proleague stale.
|
On July 15 2008 17:14 IdrA wrote: that doesnt bode well for us
really all they need to do is reinstate the rule that teams cant use the same race on a given map twice in a row. its all the mirror mu's that are making proleague stale.
What if the first match is a terran mirror and because of this rule 2 tosses gent sent out. doesnt this make even mroe mirrors?
|
-_- worst case scenario you have the same number of mirrors, half tvt and half pvp which is still better than all tvt.
|
This seems more like a political move rather than what's good for the viewers and players. 2v2 has evolve to where there is so much action from start to finish. Matches are rarely decided by the 2v2 since that would mean winning 3-0. The sudden change feels like teams with great 1v1, but crappy 2v2 complaining. IIRC OGN & MBC teams been sucking lately in 2v2. Ogn & MBC are also on the Kespa board.
|
OGN has not sucked in 2v2. Zeus has been doing great with the fake-yellow zerg twin.
|
Sounds good. Now the only thing left would be forcing the teams to have a maximum of 50% mirror matches, i.e. guarantee that at least half of the games are non-mirrors.
|
I really hope they don't do it. 2v2 is the only real hook proleague has for me and watching no-names isn't fun
|
this feels like their ratings minute by minute drops when 2v2 comes. I don't think that more 1v1 is the solution though. Though hard to implement, a 2v2 team style (UMS maps where you always have your partner by your side of the map) would make better games and thus, more entertaining. I also support the idea that one channel stays with current format and another one has the "winner stays" (so you can always choose which format to watch).
|
Winner stays should be a good way to avoid 2 many no name games. If not, Flash vs JD, Nada vs Best etc would have less chance of happening. Sometimes this would lead to JD/Flash/Best vs other team with ocasional newcomer creatively stealing a win.
Question to Idra: what do you guys in Estro and other progamers think of this? My guess is that most people are positive about it - more chance for a decent, although not top player to at least gain televised game experience. Another consequence of it - competent offline partners being more important, since we would have 6-7 players preparing for their proleague games, which requires over 12-14 people participating for each match. Of course this doesn't mean more money for players, unfortunately. Just experience and extended practice ground for individual leagues. Lack of 2v2 should be good for pros, since 1v1 is what brought them to their team and 2v2 is niche, kills 1v1 skill. Is 2v2 treated as a disliked service for the team or rather one other way of contributing for weaker players?
|
On July 15 2008 06:53 genwar wrote: eh when 2v2's start in proleague that's when I go afk.
maybe crazier maps 2v2 maps, could change it up.
go island maps.
I agree! I would love to see island maps. Although I'm not terribly disappointed that 2v2 would be cut, it would be nice if they drastically changed how 2v2's are done. Island maps or even RRvsRRs would be great.
|
On July 15 2008 08:10 stanley_ wrote: they should play team melee
On July 15 2008 08:09 pockyD wrote: they should play shared bases 2v2
These are both awesome ideas too!
|
Its good that 2v2 is taken down, makes those non 1v1 zergs practice more to get their spot for it and that means more non mirror games I hope.
As for BO7, I would spice it up little bit like:
Game1 Game2 Game3 Game4 (semi-Ace only if score is 3-0 for losing team to change player) Game5 Game6 Game7 (Obvious Ace)
OR
Give wildcards like:
Break Mirror: Gives team that is losing at the moment chance to swap player from proleague roster(can be used once per team)
Evil Map: Forces map switch if losing team uses wildcard, suddenly Wuthering Heights is gone and here comes Blue Storm 1.2 etc (can be used once per team)
Swap Game: Only if score is tied at the moment (can't be used first set) team can make one move that can move anything from set to set (of course already played cant be switched). Can be used after Set2, Set4 after that no switches cant be done.
Only 1 card per team per set.
And so one.
|
On July 15 2008 06:18 Woyn wrote: Bo7 would blow balls, theres too many proleague matches these days as it is Here's a crazy idea. Don't watch them all? Oh good now there's still the same amount!
|
please dont take away 2v2.
every team should have a quota on how many times you can use a race per match imo.
|
I very rarely watch 2v2's and I think that best of 7's would be 2 long. Maybe if they decided to have about ten maps, the teams choose the lineups and the maps are random. So that way there would be no planned mirror matches
|
Belgium9947 Posts
Ugh, this is what they get for reincluding hunters as a 2v2 map. 2v2 on hunters is so boring. Atleast DMZ was exciting.
|
I usually just skip the 2v2's when i'm watching proleague because they are usually boring. So if this happened i wouldn't be sad at all. The BO7 idea is a little to much though, BO5 is fine.
|
It really could depend on the map pool. If some low econ maps get made we'll be seeing a lot of shorter matches, which could make Bo7 more feasible and would also make the big macro games more epic (since it would be seen relative so the shorter games). Plus, with the crazy macro style that is ever so popular these days some micro maps could be really fun and force players to work on a more well rounded playing style *cough* BeSt*cough* .
While I never really got into the 2v2s I think they add some diversity to the proleague matches and a nice break that seems a little more...Light? So to speak. Always feels less intense to me since I really don't understand what is going on like I do in 1v1s (with even my limited knowledge).
|
On July 17 2008 01:19 RaGe wrote: Ugh, this is what they get for reincluding hunters as a 2v2 map. 2v2 on hunters is so boring. Atleast DMZ was exciting.
That was probably a desperate attempt to make the crowd more interested in 2v2 (because Hunters is played on BattleNet all the time).
|
2 vs 2 blows balls, and i like the idea of more 1 on 1 games. there are soo many players now, some need a chance to prove themselves. More games might bring up some new talents.
|
is awesome32274 Posts
On July 17 2008 01:19 RaGe wrote: Ugh, this is what they get for reincluding hunters as a 2v2 map. 2v2 on hunters is so boring. Atleast DMZ was exciting.
Actually there have been good games on hunters.
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
Oh im not sure if this has been mentioned in this thread yet but at wwi the koreans were saying they might be switching to korean clan war style (ie you can all kill a team)....ill read the thread now lol
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
They also talked about doing rotating seasons - so for example next season teamleague style, the season after they include 2v2s
|
I'd prefer BO5 over BO7 for regular season games and especially if all games are 1v1.
|
|
|
|
|