EPTZoom in to fill the screen vertically and give it a few goes, report your best score and rank/race
Score: 455000
Rank/race: A rank Zerg last season
I've had people who are not StarCraft players try and they got around 100K-150K
StarCraft player reflex TE scores
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
Zoom in to fill the screen vertically and give it a few goes, report your best score and rank/race Score: 455000 Rank/race: A rank Zerg last season I've had people who are not StarCraft players try and they got around 100K-150K | ||
|
RJBTVYOUTUBE
Netherlands1093 Posts
On August 07 2025 17:05 iopq wrote: https://mission-red.com/reflexte/ Zoom in to fill the screen vertically and give it a few goes, report your best score and rank/race Score: 455000 Rank/race: A rank Zerg last season I've had people who are not StarCraft players try and they got around 100K-150K there is a harder version of this calles cursor invisible. It only counts succesful click streak. | ||
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
On August 07 2025 18:05 RJBTVYOUTUBE wrote: there is a harder version of this calles cursor invisible. It only counts succesful click streak. it's not that hard, I could go for a few hundred but it would take too long I got 330 and it just takes forever | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6805 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/Co5CtoK.png) | ||
|
KenZy
France93 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/Z3U2fpM.png) | ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1665 Posts
On August 07 2025 18:25 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: what is your score in this ? https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime NOOB! But mine is more of an intuitive click than reflex click. ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/ZzVNMrGC/Screenshot-from-2025-08-07-12-00-17.png) | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6805 Posts
| ||
|
Bonyth
Poland593 Posts
around 170 avg Allthough as it says there, your score may depend on your ping, monitor refresh rate etc, so comparing may not have too much sense. | ||
|
cebanicanam
3 Posts
| ||
|
Kraekkling
604 Posts
On August 07 2025 19:57 Bonyth wrote: 142 ms personal best so far around 170 avg Allthough as it says there, your score may depend on your ping, monitor refresh rate etc, so comparing may not have too much sense. yep. maybe ping matters less since the time is probably measured client side, but PC specs in general do, maybe even the browser when my monitor refresh rate is at 60Hz my average is ~220ms when at 165Hz it's ~185ms | ||
|
RJBTVYOUTUBE
Netherlands1093 Posts
On August 07 2025 18:25 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: what is your score in this ? https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime does not rlly work on mobile  | ||
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
On August 07 2025 18:25 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: what is your score in this ? https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime My average is ~200 ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/qF77pH2W/Screenshot-20250808-151529.png) why isn't anyone doing the game I posted? you'll die in two minutes, don't worry about it | ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1665 Posts
On August 08 2025 16:17 iopq wrote: why isn't anyone doing the game I posted? you'll die in two minutes, don't worry about it I reached 150K at first try and I won't go any further coze this shit makes my old brain spin so bad. | ||
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/xSWcRkGL/Screenshot-20250808-164253.png) I've improved through practice | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6805 Posts
On August 08 2025 19:42 iopq wrote: I've improved through practice Do you have a 144 hz monitor ? | ||
|
LUCKY_NOOB
Bulgaria1514 Posts
Barely C rank Zerg I also downloaded a reaction time test to avoid connection issues and my best so far is 37ms improvement. https://sourceforge.net/projects/reaction-time-test/ ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/zhJZ64bH/2nd-try.jpg) ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/xqnDmxFY/lower.jpg) ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/xqcfGRGm/faster.jpg) I also made ppl in CPL compete in this: https://mouseaccuracy.com/ | ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1665 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/x88Bkp2x/Screenshot-from-2025-08-08-13-13-53.png) When you use the Force, it works better. ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/3y0mR7BQ/Screenshot-from-2025-08-08-13-14-56.png) The thing is the green screen appears at a rate that is way too regular, hence, predictable. Bad test. | ||
|
LUCKY_NOOB
Bulgaria1514 Posts
On August 08 2025 20:14 iFU.pauline wrote: Just to make sure it was not luck. + Show Spoiler + When you use the Force, it works better. The thing is the green screen appears at a rate that is way too regular, hence, predictable. Bad test. I tried spamming for a minute... I just assumed they wouldn't be as silly as that... Usually it takes about 8 seconds for Green to appear... | ||
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
I do, but I think the switch on the mouse is a bit slow but also even if it was a tiny bit faster I wouldn't get good scores anyway, my reaction time was never that fast | ||
|
zelevin
United States311 Posts
Chimp test: "the chimps consistently outperformed humans, and some chimps were able to remember 9 digits over 90% of the time" but you score 9 digits, you are at less than 50% of humans. So, that's clearly tainted by cheating. Number memory: "The average person can only remember 7 digit numbers reliably" I scored a 9 which put me at 35.8%. 7 is average, 9 is below average -- got it. Stuff that you can't really cheat on -- or it would be very tedious to cheat on -- seems to be a bit more in line. My 102wpm is 97.2%, sounds right. My reaction time of 171ms is 92.3% which seems generous. Verbal memory is 83pts, at 87.6%, which I guess sounds right, though it is possible to cheat this one. | ||
|
XenOsky
Chile2307 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/5xKPM7NT/score.png) first try did it windowed tho | ||
|
iopq
United States1045 Posts
On February 04 2026 02:03 evilfatsh1t wrote: the amount of times pros complain that they fumbled keyboard inputs, made misclicks or failed to react quick enough to something is off the charts. its not even a debate that their apm is less efficient and that their mechanics are worse. youre confusing better decision making with improved physical ability, which is just false. the reality is if the pros could go back to their late teens we would have been blessed with another level of starcraft that we will never ever see now so the claim is that pros used to be to be better at clicking are people better at me at starcraft because they are faster? Nobody so far posted better scores than me | ||
|
WGT-Baal
France3436 Posts
On February 06 2026 23:30 iopq wrote: https://tl.net/forum/brood-war/643348-can-someone-share-very-abbreviated-bw-cliffnotes?page=2 so the claim is that pros used to be to be better at clicking are people better at me at starcraft because they are faster? Nobody so far posted better scores than me Faster and more accurate are different for keyboard input. And reaction time includes situation analysis too. I don't think pros ever claimed being purely faster was that important. But also I heard FBH I think mention that in team houses they d do the same build a million times in a row and so they wouldn't fumble as much just due to the nature of the practice regimen. Of course there is also age. But if you play a build intensively you also less likely to have to think too much about it live after a while and you d misclick less. Supposedly | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8798 Posts
On February 06 2026 23:30 iopq wrote: https://tl.net/forum/brood-war/643348-can-someone-share-very-abbreviated-bw-cliffnotes?page=2 so the claim is that pros used to be to be better at clicking are people better at me at starcraft because they are faster? Nobody so far posted better scores than me what exactly are you suggesting? and what exactly do you think i was saying in that post? because i definitely wasnt saying that the pros are better than you because they could click faster than you and how is your score in the test you chose in any way relevant or transferrable to mechanical skill in a game like starcraft? | ||
| ||
