• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:45
CET 02:45
KST 10:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ The top three worst maps of all time Foreign Brood War Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1627 users

Thoughts on rarely used units - Page 8

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
October 01 2025 17:06 GMT
#141
On October 02 2025 00:23 mtcn77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 00:00 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On October 01 2025 04:09 mtcn77 wrote:
Just watching Larva vs Bisu. Larva understands me. If you would only ensnare the probes, you would do as much economic damage as a psistorm.

I would like to see your math on this.

Per liquipedia, Ensnare has a size of 128x128 vs Storm's 96x96.
Ensnare halves the speed of mining while Storm kills workers.

Ensnare has a duration of 25.2 seconds while the production time of a single worker is 12.6, so the loss of mining time from both is technically equal for a single worker, but you can't say that they are equal since for Zerg, there is the additional opportunity cost of using larva to replace workers while races who can produce a single unit at a time from their production facilities have additional time with less mining.

Even if we pretend that the loss of mining time is equal, I don't see how Ensnare's greater size makes up the actual mineral cost of replacing workers.

You can see a psistorm coming from a million miles away(you play zerg and have overlords) while protoss can't(early game advantage is at zerg), corsairs are dodging scourge, or at least that is what they expect of you.
You swoop in with a queen, do a little ensnaring at 9 range and then... swoop away. If you think mutas are fast, queens come up faster. I'm not saying at a base race situation, they fill up different sections of the game which lowers chances of them meeting in the field. HTs are heavy late while queens are right after hydralisk if you dedicate yourself to it.
You can cast ensnare on multiple targets you know? Vertically you can ensnare units spread across 5 minerals(wait, I didn't assume for L shaped junctions). Given how populated the mineral patches are, you can really throw a wrench into the protoss economy with queens and that is just the surface level idea.
PS: let's say you killed 5 drones with your HT(I'm being generous). You replace the 5 drones from the same hatchery in 75.6 seconds so everything resumes to normal. Then, we have to count the mining loss, that is 433+250=683 minerals loss.
Now let us take the alternative, you go to the protoss main, or natural. You ensnare the vertical strip of minerals right at the center. You ensnare just 10 probes(again, being very generous to protoss). In 25.2s, that bunch of probes would mine 245 minerals. You can run away from a psistorm, you cannot run away from an ensnare.

245 minerals worth of economic damage in the mid game is not particularly impressive, especially since it requires the Zerg player to have complete air dominance. Those ensnares would be better off used in army fights where if you can kill 3 Zealots or 2 Dragoons, you've accomplished more.
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
October 01 2025 20:53 GMT
#142
On October 02 2025 02:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 00:23 mtcn77 wrote:
On October 02 2025 00:00 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On October 01 2025 04:09 mtcn77 wrote:
Just watching Larva vs Bisu. Larva understands me. If you would only ensnare the probes, you would do as much economic damage as a psistorm.

I would like to see your math on this.

Per liquipedia, Ensnare has a size of 128x128 vs Storm's 96x96.
Ensnare halves the speed of mining while Storm kills workers.

Ensnare has a duration of 25.2 seconds while the production time of a single worker is 12.6, so the loss of mining time from both is technically equal for a single worker, but you can't say that they are equal since for Zerg, there is the additional opportunity cost of using larva to replace workers while races who can produce a single unit at a time from their production facilities have additional time with less mining.

Even if we pretend that the loss of mining time is equal, I don't see how Ensnare's greater size makes up the actual mineral cost of replacing workers.

You can see a psistorm coming from a million miles away(you play zerg and have overlords) while protoss can't(early game advantage is at zerg), corsairs are dodging scourge, or at least that is what they expect of you.
You swoop in with a queen, do a little ensnaring at 9 range and then... swoop away. If you think mutas are fast, queens come up faster. I'm not saying at a base race situation, they fill up different sections of the game which lowers chances of them meeting in the field. HTs are heavy late while queens are right after hydralisk if you dedicate yourself to it.
You can cast ensnare on multiple targets you know? Vertically you can ensnare units spread across 5 minerals(wait, I didn't assume for L shaped junctions). Given how populated the mineral patches are, you can really throw a wrench into the protoss economy with queens and that is just the surface level idea.
PS: let's say you killed 5 drones with your HT(I'm being generous). You replace the 5 drones from the same hatchery in 75.6 seconds so everything resumes to normal. Then, we have to count the mining loss, that is 433+250=683 minerals loss.
Now let us take the alternative, you go to the protoss main, or natural. You ensnare the vertical strip of minerals right at the center. You ensnare just 10 probes(again, being very generous to protoss). In 25.2s, that bunch of probes would mine 245 minerals. You can run away from a psistorm, you cannot run away from an ensnare.

245 minerals worth of economic damage in the mid game is not particularly impressive, especially since it requires the Zerg player to have complete air dominance. Those ensnares would be better off used in army fights where if you can kill 3 Zealots or 2 Dragoons, you've accomplished more.

That is the genius of it. You don't have to have air control. Defending from air with hydralisks, but not using them in a 9734 situation which doesn't win any more, is better.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
October 02 2025 00:20 GMT
#143
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.

Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-10-02 00:45:34
October 02 2025 00:38 GMT
#144
On October 02 2025 09:20 puppykiller wrote:
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.


You know, you could be mistaking it for another match. Larva kept the 4 main ones on the coastline for most of the game. Having the islands would have made zero difference which is ironically the fundamental point in a recent shine vs light game. You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands. It does not work that way. Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period.
PS: TvT battlereports were very precious. There were one inwhich for the longest part of the game the mech player seemed ahead, but the player who did the leta rush before it got calles that won in the end. I really wish I could comb through battlereports again in their epic form with graphics.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
October 02 2025 01:06 GMT
#145
On October 02 2025 09:38 mtcn77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 09:20 puppykiller wrote:
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.


You know, you could be mistaking it for another match. Larva kept the 4 main ones on the coastline for most of the game. Having the islands would have made zero difference which is ironically the fundamental point in a recent shine vs light game. You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands. It does not work that way. Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period.
PS: TvT battlereports were very precious. There were one inwhich for the longest part of the game the mech player seemed ahead, but the player who did the leta rush before it got calles that won in the end. I really wish I could comb through battlereports again in their epic form with graphics.



+ Show Spoiler +

Are you talking about the recent Larva vs Bisu game from the ASL? If so Bisu and Larva had even bases on the land sections of the map. By the early late game, Bisu (as the protoss player) was in a position to win a long game of attrition as long as he didn't let Larva get the islands. He screwed up and let Larva get the islands. However, I think that despite this mistake, dweb and air upgrades would have given him an opportunity to make much better attacks that could either secure him islands of his own or kill Larva's island expansions, thus making it an even base game again and putting him in a winning position.

Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
October 02 2025 01:16 GMT
#146
On October 02 2025 10:06 puppykiller wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 09:38 mtcn77 wrote:
On October 02 2025 09:20 puppykiller wrote:
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.


You know, you could be mistaking it for another match. Larva kept the 4 main ones on the coastline for most of the game. Having the islands would have made zero difference which is ironically the fundamental point in a recent shine vs light game. You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands. It does not work that way. Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period.
PS: TvT battlereports were very precious. There were one inwhich for the longest part of the game the mech player seemed ahead, but the player who did the leta rush before it got calles that won in the end. I really wish I could comb through battlereports again in their epic form with graphics.



+ Show Spoiler +

Are you talking about the recent Larva vs Bisu game from the ASL? If so Bisu and Larva had even bases on the land sections of the map. By the early late game, Bisu (as the protoss player) was in a position to win a long game of attrition as long as he didn't let Larva get the islands. He screwed up and let Larva get the islands. However, I think that despite this mistake, dweb and air upgrades would have given him an opportunity to make much better attacks that could either secure him islands of his own or kill Larva's island expansions, thus making it an even base game again and putting him in a winning position.


I kind of answered that in my reply with shine vs light commentary.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
October 02 2025 06:07 GMT
#147
On October 02 2025 10:16 mtcn77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 10:06 puppykiller wrote:
On October 02 2025 09:38 mtcn77 wrote:
On October 02 2025 09:20 puppykiller wrote:
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.


You know, you could be mistaking it for another match. Larva kept the 4 main ones on the coastline for most of the game. Having the islands would have made zero difference which is ironically the fundamental point in a recent shine vs light game. You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands. It does not work that way. Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period.
PS: TvT battlereports were very precious. There were one inwhich for the longest part of the game the mech player seemed ahead, but the player who did the leta rush before it got calles that won in the end. I really wish I could comb through battlereports again in their epic form with graphics.



+ Show Spoiler +

Are you talking about the recent Larva vs Bisu game from the ASL? If so Bisu and Larva had even bases on the land sections of the map. By the early late game, Bisu (as the protoss player) was in a position to win a long game of attrition as long as he didn't let Larva get the islands. He screwed up and let Larva get the islands. However, I think that despite this mistake, dweb and air upgrades would have given him an opportunity to make much better attacks that could either secure him islands of his own or kill Larva's island expansions, thus making it an even base game again and putting him in a winning position.


I kind of answered that in my reply with shine vs light commentary.


Well...

Correct me if I'm missing something.

Claim1:
"You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands."
"Having the islands would have made zero difference"

Justification:
"It does not work that way"




Claim2:
"Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did"

Justification: (refering to an argument I am not making about how this strategy isnt good in the early game)
which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period


If you want to address my argument I think the best way would be to reference pro games in which Dweb is actually used (especially if you can find one played on a map that is similar to the match in question). Also I really think it's a bad idea to reference a TvZ match as part of your explanation of why Bisu lost. TvZ has a very different dynamics in the late game than PvZ because terrans and protoss interact with hive tech zerg very differently.
Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
October 02 2025 06:28 GMT
#148
On October 02 2025 15:07 puppykiller wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 10:16 mtcn77 wrote:
On October 02 2025 10:06 puppykiller wrote:
On October 02 2025 09:38 mtcn77 wrote:
On October 02 2025 09:20 puppykiller wrote:
Since we are on the topic of Larva versus Bisu, I think Bisu could really have had a much higher chance of winning his match had he just built a fleetbeacon to upgrade his corsairs. The zerg air carpace upgrades made the sairs pretty bad at killing scourge and overlords and dweb would have allowed him to blanket the enemy units on the small islands to support his drops.


It wouldn't have guaranteed a win but I think it would have opened up a lot of tactical options for him late game like:

Drop 4 reavers, dweb the area zerg can target the reavers from, snipe the hatchery, run away.

Or: Dweb the island with your control group of corsairs, kill/ chase away the overlords. Drop 8 DT and kill the hatchery, nydus and/or drones.


You know, you could be mistaking it for another match. Larva kept the 4 main ones on the coastline for most of the game. Having the islands would have made zero difference which is ironically the fundamental point in a recent shine vs light game. You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands. It does not work that way. Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period.
PS: TvT battlereports were very precious. There were one inwhich for the longest part of the game the mech player seemed ahead, but the player who did the leta rush before it got calles that won in the end. I really wish I could comb through battlereports again in their epic form with graphics.



+ Show Spoiler +

Are you talking about the recent Larva vs Bisu game from the ASL? If so Bisu and Larva had even bases on the land sections of the map. By the early late game, Bisu (as the protoss player) was in a position to win a long game of attrition as long as he didn't let Larva get the islands. He screwed up and let Larva get the islands. However, I think that despite this mistake, dweb and air upgrades would have given him an opportunity to make much better attacks that could either secure him islands of his own or kill Larva's island expansions, thus making it an even base game again and putting him in a winning position.


I kind of answered that in my reply with shine vs light commentary.


Well...

Correct me if I'm missing something.

Claim1:
"You cannot rut out the zerg by taking the islands."
"Having the islands would have made zero difference"

Justification:
"It does not work that way"




Claim2:
"Either you play a leta rush, bisu fundamentally did the most of it for a protoss, or fail which bisu did"

Justification: (refering to an argument I am not making about how this strategy isnt good in the early game)
which bisu did since corsairs can't attack the ground like wraiths in the same rush period


If you want to address my argument I think the best way would be to reference pro games in which Dweb is actually used (especially if you can find one played on a map that is similar to the match in question). Also I really think it's a bad idea to reference a TvZ match as part of your explanation of why Bisu lost. TvZ has a very different dynamics in the late game than PvZ because terrans and protoss interact with hive tech zerg very differently.

You are trying to solve the problem from protoss perspective, however I'm answering from zerg perspective. You cannot just black and white distinguish between the two comments. However, I can say you aren't very accurate.
I didn't say taking islands justification is it does not work that way. I said, look at shine vs light game, it does not work that way.
The best way to answer your comment isn't finding a Dweb game, that is what you are aiming, it is to bring to your attention some other game which I'm doing triple, one shine vs light game 1 on artosiscasts, one leta rush jyj did in asl 15 vs hero on 76 and one tvt on battlereports I lost track of.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
October 02 2025 13:16 GMT
#149
Ok good to know that I missunderstood what you were trying to say.

However, I would still (and I imagine almost anyone who plays or has played a lot of starcraft would still) say that TvZ games (let alone TvT...) are not helpful for analysis of this PvZ game between Bisu and Larva.

The late game 'win conditions' for ZvP are different than for ZvT. A map without much manuverabillity that is easy to defiler push through the center of is really busted for zerg late game versus terran so zergs don't have to worry as much about islands and a war of attrition. You can be behind on bases as a zerg and cast swarm in the terran's natural and steal a win, you cant do that versus protoss. Terrans main defence against that is maintaining map control with agression (which is hard to do on that map due to the limited avenues of attack) and delaying the zerg army with small groups of units while casting irradiates. The scary zerg units die to irradiates, mines, and roving terran armies long before they ever make it near the terran bases if the terran is playing well.

It's very different from PvZ where players can (if they like this play style) attempt to maintain even bases to zerg, camp those bases with cost effective spell casters and reactively try to kill zerg armies and drops at their bases by utilyzing preperation and anticipation skills. Have you ever watched Snow play a PvZ? If I'm remembering correctly Snow had a win versus Effort that showcases this play style in the ASL as well. This is not super advanced Starcraft theory, it's conventional wisdom for most people who have played either of these matchups at even a mid-tier level. It's ok to dispute each of these matchup's conventional wisdom about how they should be played if you want to, but you need to at the very least show examples of the matchups themselves (in this case ZvP and certainly not ZvT let alone TvT...).
Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-10-02 13:54:55
October 02 2025 13:40 GMT
#150
On October 02 2025 22:16 puppykiller wrote:
Ok good to know that I missunderstood what you were trying to say.

However, I would still (and I imagine almost anyone who plays or has played a lot of starcraft would still) say that TvZ games (let alone TvT...) are not helpful for analysis of this PvZ game between Bisu and Larva.

The late game 'win conditions' for ZvP are different than for ZvT. A map without much manuverabillity that is easy to defiler push through the center of is really busted for zerg late game versus terran so zergs don't have to worry as much about islands and a war of attrition. You can be behind on bases as a zerg and cast swarm in the terran's natural and steal a win, you cant do that versus protoss. Terrans main defence against that is maintaining map control with agression (which is hard to do on that map due to the limited avenues of attack) and delaying the zerg army with small groups of units while casting irradiates. The scary zerg units die to irradiates, mines, and roving terran armies long before they ever make it near the terran bases if the terran is playing well.

It's very different from PvZ where players can (if they like this play style) attempt to maintain even bases to zerg, camp those bases with cost effective spell casters and reactively try to kill zerg armies and drops at their bases by utilyzing preperation and anticipation skills. Have you ever watched Snow play a PvZ? If I'm remembering correctly Snow had a win versus Effort that showcases this play style in the ASL as well. This is not super advanced Starcraft theory, it's conventional wisdom for most people who have played either of these matchups at even a mid-tier level. It's ok to dispute each of these matchup's conventional wisdom about how they should be played if you want to, but you need to at the very least show examples of the matchups themselves (in this case ZvP and certainly not ZvT let alone TvT...).

I just show you loss conditions for zerg and you can make your opinion about it. Also, when you say defiler, the whole game Larva almost won without them, got to check if he made any. That is what I mean. You have to ruse the opponent, but sometimes rush times are all that matters. This is why wraiths are in a pvz discussion because they are faster than what protoss has and it is the reference to which you have to come up with, in order to beat zerg in a similar fashion. This is real time strategy after all, everything works, even defilers after a 94.6s delay from a queen however your mileage may vary.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
October 02 2025 14:15 GMT
#151
I can't really see how any... ANY of those points have anything to do with what I wrote...
Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
October 03 2025 06:00 GMT
#152
On October 02 2025 23:15 puppykiller wrote:
I can't really see how any... ANY of those points have anything to do with what I wrote...

It is RTS, I'm just being agreeable. You can see how many posters have commented I have no two ways about what I say, I only speak for zerg and only look for ways to win for zerg. If you don't connect two with two, of course you won't understand me.
PS: this is Starcraft. All we say is just for 1:0. You can do whatever you like on your own, but winning is competitive.
Turrican
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
3098 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-10-03 14:28:49
October 03 2025 14:27 GMT
#153
On October 02 2025 23:15 puppykiller wrote:
I can't really see how any... ANY of those points have anything to do with what I wrote...

He may not have the intention but he's basically a troll on this forum. Presenting crazy ideas and such, while claiming progamers don't know how to play and should think "out of the box" like him. On top of that he writes cryptic sentences, sometimes grammatically incorrect, which are very hard to understand. You read but you don't know what the hell he's refferring to or can't see the relevance between his first and second sentences let alone the relevance to your posts, etc. I believe mods let this guy ran rampant on the forum to drive traffic lol.

Sometimes I read his posts as a kind of entertainment, like trying to solve a puzzle. Basically here (I think) he's trying to say:

- Bisu taking the islands won't solve the problem, referring to a Shine vs Light game in which they took 4 ground bases + 2 islands each, but Light still lost. He's wrong though, Terran's island defence power is nowhere near Protoss. Light died to mass Hydra drops on Goliath Tanks on his islands. Imagine doing that kind of drops against Protoss lol.

- Protoss should take note from the "Leta rush" (I believe he refers to a 2 Port Wraith rush or something similar). But he doesn't specify how, and then he basically admits that it's not adaptable for Protoss because Sairs... don't hit ground lol. But take note still he just wants you to.

- I have no idea what he's trying to say with the TvT game lol.

As for your question, yes. Getting dweb would be useful. Tastosis are quite spot on in their cast. Bisu either has to tech to Fleet Beacon (dweb + carriers) or take the islands sooner to win the attrition war. In fact, Bisu already succesfully used corsairs dweb reaver into carriers strat on this map against Zerg already, but for some reason he just tried to brute force his way in this game vs Larva.
mtcn77
Profile Joined September 2013
Turkey639 Posts
October 03 2025 19:08 GMT
#154
On October 03 2025 23:27 TMNT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 23:15 puppykiller wrote:
I can't really see how any... ANY of those points have anything to do with what I wrote...

He may not have the intention but he's basically a troll on this forum. Presenting crazy ideas and such, while claiming progamers don't know how to play and should think "out of the box" like him. On top of that he writes cryptic sentences, sometimes grammatically incorrect, which are very hard to understand. You read but you don't know what the hell he's refferring to or can't see the relevance between his first and second sentences let alone the relevance to your posts, etc. I believe mods let this guy ran rampant on the forum to drive traffic lol.

Sometimes I read his posts as a kind of entertainment, like trying to solve a puzzle. Basically here (I think) he's trying to say:

- Bisu taking the islands won't solve the problem, referring to a Shine vs Light game in which they took 4 ground bases + 2 islands each, but Light still lost. He's wrong though, Terran's island defence power is nowhere near Protoss. Light died to mass Hydra drops on Goliath Tanks on his islands. Imagine doing that kind of drops against Protoss lol.

- Protoss should take note from the "Leta rush" (I believe he refers to a 2 Port Wraith rush or something similar). But he doesn't specify how, and then he basically admits that it's not adaptable for Protoss because Sairs... don't hit ground lol. But take note still he just wants you to.

- I have no idea what he's trying to say with the TvT game lol.

As for your question, yes. Getting dweb would be useful. Tastosis are quite spot on in their cast. Bisu either has to tech to Fleet Beacon (dweb + carriers) or take the islands sooner to win the attrition war. In fact, Bisu already succesfully used corsairs dweb reaver into carriers strat on this map against Zerg already, but for some reason he just tried to brute force his way in this game vs Larva.

Light lost because he didn't have air advantage and lost all his dropships while he tried to bruteforce an 11' o'clock landing.
Also, I don't get you trying to rewrite my sentences. You are the main proponent of wrong guesses and continually downplay winning strategies.
Turrican
puppykiller
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States3137 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-10-04 13:13:19
October 04 2025 13:12 GMT
#155
On October 03 2025 23:27 TMNT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2025 23:15 puppykiller wrote:
I can't really see how any... ANY of those points have anything to do with what I wrote...

He may not have the intention but he's basically a troll on this forum. Presenting crazy ideas and such, while claiming progamers don't know how to play and should think "out of the box" like him. On top of that he writes cryptic sentences, sometimes grammatically incorrect, which are very hard to understand. You read but you don't know what the hell he's refferring to or can't see the relevance between his first and second sentences let alone the relevance to your posts, etc. I believe mods let this guy ran rampant on the forum to drive traffic lol.

Sometimes I read his posts as a kind of entertainment, like trying to solve a puzzle. Basically here (I think) he's trying to say:

- Bisu taking the islands won't solve the problem, referring to a Shine vs Light game in which they took 4 ground bases + 2 islands each, but Light still lost. He's wrong though, Terran's island defence power is nowhere near Protoss. Light died to mass Hydra drops on Goliath Tanks on his islands. Imagine doing that kind of drops against Protoss lol.

- Protoss should take note from the "Leta rush" (I believe he refers to a 2 Port Wraith rush or something similar). But he doesn't specify how, and then he basically admits that it's not adaptable for Protoss because Sairs... don't hit ground lol. But take note still he just wants you to.

- I have no idea what he's trying to say with the TvT game lol.

As for your question, yes. Getting dweb would be useful. Tastosis are quite spot on in their cast. Bisu either has to tech to Fleet Beacon (dweb + carriers) or take the islands sooner to win the attrition war. In fact, Bisu already succesfully used corsairs dweb reaver into carriers strat on this map against Zerg already, but for some reason he just tried to brute force his way in this game vs Larva.


Thanks for the translation. I actually didn't watch an English cast for those games so I guess I didn't realize how cold my take was.
Why would I play sctoo when I can play BW?
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Patches Events
23:00
5.4k Patch Clash #9
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft515
elazer 128
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 717
NaDa 40
Dota 2
monkeys_forever305
League of Legends
JimRising 22
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor124
Other Games
summit1g12258
shahzam798
Maynarde104
Mew2King89
ViBE43
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1246
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 103
• davetesta30
• Mapu4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 17
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5370
Other Games
• imaqtpie2013
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 15m
Wardi Open
10h 15m
StarCraft2.fi
14h 15m
Monday Night Weeklies
15h 15m
Replay Cast
22h 15m
WardiTV 2025
1d 10h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 14h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 23h
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV 2025
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Tarson vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Revival: Season 3
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.