EPTtoss is envy
terran is love
Summing up the races - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
toss is envy terran is love | ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
Z: Extremely mobile in both units and tech. Cheap pricing. - Fast and Cheap. P: Tough with a high damage output. Moderate mobility. Expensive pricing. - Strong and Expensive. | ||
|
GuYuTe-
United States550 Posts
Terran: precision race. Intense micro with MM, vults, sci vessels/scanning. Heavy multitask race. Zerg: macro. Takes high skill with all control group keys and flanking techniques and takes a high level understanding of map control/ unit positioning/ unit control. Protoss: brainy race. Takes adept strategical thinking to take full use of their power. Must use every unit to its' maximum efficiency to prevail. | ||
|
yubee
United States3826 Posts
together they make the TRIFORCE | ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
On October 31 2006 00:47 intrigue wrote: zerg is lust toss is envy terran is love I like it | ||
|
pyrogenetix
China5094 Posts
On October 30 2006 13:52 lawl mart wrote: zerg = imba terran = imba protoss = cool hahahahahhaha my thoughts exactly | ||
|
stambe
Bulgaria492 Posts
Protoss - "the ways of the FORCE" Zerg - "fury of the SWARM" | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
Zerg: Adaptable Flexable Mobile Mass (good and bad) Terran is like Resilient Resourceful Powerful (must sacrifice power for mobility though) Protoss Spellcasting Condense/Expand easier (very small and powerful for pinopint attacks or making less room for the other to attack, or can expand and make a big flank with spread out, and therefore less weak to splash units. Potential (alot of their units can suddenly before very very good in smoe situations. Zerg being cheap and many is not accurate at all, that can be good and bad, so it can't be the best trait. :/ (although terous mobile in units an tech hits better to home imo.) Terran middle ground is hardly true either, they have the most powerufl units but they are the slowest. Toss are more like the middleground. I think cost effcient-wise not pure numbers. P.S Evan wins at this thread. ^^ | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On October 30 2006 20:38 Midnight[yR] wrote: Agreed. Protoss are really not that mobile at ALL - all the Protoss do is attract idiots. Just like the Alliance in WoW ... T_T gg toss players =o yea, evans is the best analogy | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
On October 25 2006 22:53 HonestTea wrote: ... Do you not know that Protoss is race of manly men? Zerg is race of tricky fox. Terran is race of boring slug. Honestly though: Protoss - "Be man, fight straight PRZ." Zerg - "Gimme more time, dammit. Go 'way. -_-" Terran - "Mass range units > all, duh." | ||
|
Sadir
Vatican City State1176 Posts
On October 30 2006 18:51 HonestTea wrote: Evan you made me so happy with that post | ||
|
LastWish
2013 Posts
-Strenght in masses(terran is the race of range units with critical masses where a small number is easily killed but a 200/200 is trouble) -Midgame race - weak units for beginning, hardly useful units in the lategame(no Bc/ghosts) Zerg : -Strength in speed(easiest to spread expands to build masses and to move from one part of map to another) -Units potential increases the higher the tech goes -> Lategame race Protoss -Strenth in special abilities(storm, statis...) -Units potential is early game and very late in the game(your army is from beginning to late game mostly of zeal/goon; lategame mass carriers determine the obvious winner if you can get that far) | ||
|
jeddus
United States832 Posts
Zerg = cheap, plentiful but weak army; Terran = middle ground But then again I have only beaten single player (with cheat codes) and have played some bloodbath (BGH is too BIG!) | ||
|
CC Rider
289 Posts
zerg: many small units, many expansions, needs lots of money terran: few powerful units, few expansions, doesn't need a lot of money protoss: middle ground i play protoss btw. so in pvz i need to play like a terran and in pvt i need to play like a zerg. i.e., in pvz you sort of turtle and need to make sure everything you make is well-defended, slowly build up your forces until you move out. and in pvt it's just the opposite, you simply expand all over the place and try to get as huge as possible before the terran moves out. | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On October 30 2006 14:27 Detonate wrote: 1 word to sum up each race... Protoss : Patience Terran : Timing Zerg : Zoo( you got a lot of crazy shit going on everywhere, but if you can handle it youll make a lot of profit...) | ||
|
ATeddyBear
Canada2843 Posts
On October 30 2006 20:15 artofmagic wrote: In Z v T... do anyone think that the zerg user must be more concentrate -intense than the terran user? no offense intended: Z: made in china, (cheap, weak, mass) T: made in korea, (not expensive, nor cheap,) P: made in japan, (expensive, high quality) this. On October 31 2006 00:31 siro) wrote: Z: Asians - small but plentiful T: Whites - average P: Blacks - not as many but strong O_O gogo toss and this. I'm asian and play Zerg, coincidence? and my background is chinese =) whomg h4x | ||
| ||
