On July 08 2010 22:47 krndandaman wrote: tossgirl isn't hot shes alright though
i second the statement!! haha. shes not "hot" by means of having a great figure and all, but she's hot in the sense that she's somewhat OK with the boys(being able to play with them in SC) and shes really looks nice (she's not too beautiful or but shes not in the range of ugly). =p
and hey shes only 25 yrs old. thats not old!!! some of the most beautiful people are in their mid 20s to their late 30s so how can you call her old?? unless your 15 yrs old. haha
Are half the people on this forum 12 year old brats? She's just one year older than I am. Since when is 25 old? Quit watching MTV's My Super Sweet Sixteen and check back in with real life.
Good job, finding a photo from when she was a teenager. (Heavily photoshopped too).
On July 08 2010 16:52 HaruHaru wrote: i wonder if match fixing had to do with tossgirl breaking up with hwasin :/ that would have been a greater loss than his career imo
lol im pretty sure hwasin can easily get women 1000x hotter than tossgirl. not in jail though...
Sorry, I'd be hard pressed to find somebody 1000x hotter than tossgirl
Tossgirl is not hot at all... Look at pictures of her. She looks like a middle-aged woman with too much makeup. She was definitely cute as a kid, but the years have not been kind to her.
Middle aged women can be hot, and tossgirl definitely still qualifies. She's well above the mean, you only date supermodels?
I really don't like this kind of argument. Reductio Ad Ridiculum. It's where you extend my argument to ridiculous proportions, and then you make fun of the result.
Let's say that I don't like to drink water. Then, you might say, "WTF?! If you never drink water, you'll die in 3 days! You're so stupid." Just because I don't drink water doesn't mean I have gone to the extreme to restrict any form of water intake.
Just because I said TossGirl wasn't hot doesn't mean I automatically date supermodels. That's ridiculous. (Or, Reductio Ad Ridiculum). TossGirl isn't hot. There are plenty of girls in Korea hotter than her. I have dated girls better looking than TossGirl. I have never dated a supermodel.
I disagree with you. I don't believe it's reductio ad ridiculum at all. You said she looks like a "middle-aged woman" which is both extreme and untrue. Then when someone attacks this overly exaggerated stance with the simple premise that your standards are set too high you turn around and accuse him of hyperbole.
He stated that middle-aged women can be hot. True. He stated that toss-girl is above the mean in terms of looks. Most would agree with this.
If we define hotness as above average through to exceedingly gorgeous than we should have no problem with his reasoning. If you decide that hotness is only someone who is exceedingly beautiful and then state that you have dated girls hotter than tossgirl, good for you I say. I love hearing fellow nerds do well - but scarecrow's comment is still valid.
Here's a tip: quoting your 1st year philosophy classes back at people doesn't improve your argument. You did philosophy, maybe you even majored in it. So what. Most of tl are in uni or are graduates. It's condescending to quote this stuff to people.
Wait, who said there was an argument over the middle-aged part? The argument was about him saying, "do you only date supermodels?" Which is ridiculous. He was trying to disprove me by implying, "Do you only date supermodels? No? Then how can you be a critic on beauty?" Anybody can critique beauty.
I said "Tossgirl looks like a middle-aged woman." When you say that someone looked middle-aged, you're definitely not saying she looks hot. You're saying she looks unattractive and old.
Certainly, a middle-aged woman isn't necessarily ugly. Some middle-aged women don't look their age. (Key: Do not look middle-aged.)
And listen to yourself. "If we define hotness as ABOVE AVERAGE..."?? I'm sure "hot" means exceedingly gorgeous all the time. It's not "lukewarm and above".
Question: Are trying to say that you're some kind of professor or super-genius in philosophy? Still, please carefully re-read what the original argument was. You wrote too much stuff on the non-relevant.
I know this has been discussed to death, but whenever I watch the game between Hwasin and Luxury, I'm absolutely stupefied, just like Kim Carrier expressed in that talk show. It was so blatantly fixed, it makes my stomach turn. Everything from the overlord pretending not to see the SCV, to the random "psychic" 3-drone pull toward nothing, to the bad placement of the bunker (wtf? hwasin was supposed to be getting a free-win), to the terrible use of the drones. All the battle micro by Luxury was clearly not A-team level. It's not like they had a lot of units to control.
Did they seriously think anyone was going to buy that? The whole thing is so fucking stupid. Same goes for the Hwasin-Yarnc game. His floating factory was a dead giveaway. No one in their right mind would try to cross that bridge pure SK terran vs lurkers without a single tank. You can see Hwasin sweating in the booth, stalling, letting Yarnc get further and further ahead without stopping him, wishing Yarnc would just come and finish him off. But Yarnc never did, it just dragged on painfully.
Re-watching some of the games that were fixed, I got a little taste of why Kim Carrier was so furious and swearing in front of the camera.
Also, why are some people looking at Hwasin as a victim? He was the one giving testimony, no shit he's going to portray himself as a victim. Yeah, he might have been sucked into the whole match fixing thing, and while that's super duper shitty, he had a choice as well.
if any of you know her sister 서지승 she is literally 50000x better. funnily enough i could say she's a bit more successful than her sister, starred in a few dramas and modeled.
On July 13 2010 14:46 GTR wrote: if any of you know her sister 서지승 she is literally 50000x better. funnily enough i could say she's a bit more successful than her sister, starred in a few dramas and modeled.