EPTIs this map even remotely balanced? - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Dgtl
Canada889 Posts
| ||
|
Excel Excel
142 Posts
On February 21 2010 14:55 YPang wrote: Stop asking if a map is balanced or not on tl. Just remember instead of wasting your time making the op, all maps submitted by user is Terran favored, and there is nothing you can do to change the opinion of the community that user made maps are totally Terran favored. Edit the map all you want but most people will always say tanks are imba here despite your efforts. *shrug* At least it's less imba than this... ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/maps/201_Battle%20Royal.jpg) | ||
|
JFKWT
Singapore1442 Posts
| ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
stop hatin' | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
On February 22 2010 00:35 Mindcrime wrote: Battle Royal is a great map stop hatin' Yeah man, if you play other match ups instead of ZvZ, it's pretty fun. | ||
|
SkepTicAL
Canada872 Posts
On February 22 2010 00:35 Mindcrime wrote: Battle Royal is a great map stop hatin' ..... I hope that was sarcasm. | ||
|
prOxi.Beater
Denmark626 Posts
| ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On February 22 2010 01:00 konadora wrote: Yeah man, if you play other match ups instead of ZvZ, it's pretty fun. ZvZ is awesome on it. Therefore, BR is awesome too. <3 | ||
|
Stuslegend
Canada168 Posts
actually playing+testing the map > these theory crafters though | ||
|
Excel Excel
142 Posts
On February 22 2010 09:56 Stuslegend wrote: looks like a great map, imo actually playing+testing the map > these theory crafters though This? http://www.repdepot.net/replay.php?id=31889 Last 10 minutes of rep was Terran failing to GG on 0 bases to 6, so the "low" APM is not indicative of actual skill. | ||
|
lavion
Singapore286 Posts
| ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
| ||
|
Excel Excel
142 Posts
On February 22 2010 12:09 SilverSkyLark wrote: why does the main above look bigger than the one below? It's probably the gas placement that makes it look that way, but it's not. I updated with a new version in the OP that hopefully addresses some concerns. He's zerg. What do you expect? XD | ||
|
RageOverdose
United States690 Posts
Even if it is/isn't balanced, it's still fun to try people's maps. Is there a way to get this map, or are you just trying to test it and get it evaluated first before letting anyone try it for funsies? | ||
|
Excel Excel
142 Posts
On February 22 2010 12:33 RageOverdose wrote: I'd love to actually try this map. I'm all for new maps. Better than playing Python all day. Even if it is/isn't balanced, it's still fun to try people's maps. Is there a way to get this map, or are you just trying to test it and get it evaluated first before letting anyone try it for funsies? I can upload this to BWMN along with my other 2 maps later, but I want to be sure that it's at least reasonably balanced before releasing; I learned from the last two times I released. | ||
|
Nal_rAwr
United States2611 Posts
| ||
|
moopie
12605 Posts
On February 22 2010 12:52 Nal_rAwr wrote: the new one is so much better than the previous one Agreed. looks like it could be balanced for PvT. Not sure about z's though. Still, looking good. | ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
| ||
|
KingKRule
United States84 Posts
Terran 60 hp scv rush + lift cc ftw | ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
On February 23 2010 07:26 KingKRule wrote: Yeah, the positions seem pretty imba, there's like 3 starting locations clumped together at the top right and again at the bottom left. Terran 60 hp scv rush + lift cc ftw Those are observer start locations. | ||
| ||
