EPT[Fantasy] PL 09-10 R2 Signups - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
okum
France5779 Posts
| ||
|
orcsmash
Canada319 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36401 Posts
On December 01 2009 05:53 okum wrote: It would be interesting if, instead of a maximum cost for the main team and a minimum cost for the anti team, you had a single balance (with the cost for the anti team being subtracted). Then you could gamble by picking more highly priced players for the anti team in order to allow more expensive players also on your main team... with the obvious risk that your anti team might lose a lot of points for you. We considered this and might add it for a future round, I think there are enough changes in scoring currently between R1 and R2. | ||
|
okum
France5779 Posts
On December 01 2009 05:55 Hot_Bid wrote: We considered this and might add it for a future round, I think there are enough changes in scoring currently between R1 and R2. Cool, good to know. It would be fun just for the variation. I like the present changes, btw. | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
Game Loss (Ace included): -2 Points So for this would the following be true?  Bisu < Map >  sAviOr NaDa < Map > BoxeRCanata < Map > fantasyJaedong < Map > fantasyBisu < Map > sAviOrSo Bisu would get 4 points for game 1 win, 2 points for ace appearance, 4 points for game 5 win, and 1 point for team win?On the other side, sAviOr would get -2 points for game 1 loss, 2 points for ace appearance, and -2 points for game 5 loss? | ||
|
LiminalMadness
Germany88 Posts
how long does r2 last? | ||
|
orcsmash
Canada319 Posts
On December 01 2009 06:06 kOre wrote: Game Win (Ace included): 4 Points Game Loss (Ace included): -2 Points So for this would the following be true? Bisu < Map > sAviOrNaDa < Map > BoxeRCanata < Map > fantasyJaedong < Map > fantasyBisu < Map > sAviOrSo Bisu would get 4 points for game 1 win, 2 points for ace appearance, 4 points for game 5 win, and 1 point for team win?On the other side, sAviOr would get -2 points for game 1 loss, 2 points for ace appearance, and -2 points for game 5 loss?Seems right for me. Except for savior being sent for ace, I mean cmon.. | ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
| ||
|
KP_CollectoR
United States744 Posts
| ||
|
SteffoDeffo
Germany48 Posts
 | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
Can't wait, this will be more exciting with this new scoring system. | ||
|
Kyuukyuu
Canada6263 Posts
Anyway sounds good, picking the sKyHigh of R2 for anti will be major points  | ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
| ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
3-1 Victory: 4 Points 3-2 Victory: 2 Points 2-3 Defeat: 0 Point 1-3 Defeat: -1 Points 0-3 Defeat: -2 Points we should give more points to team wins imo | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
The removal of the lineup appearance point seems very significant :O | ||
|
pripple
Finland1714 Posts
so now if you pick a player who has a bad start you're gonna be even more stuck with him, making comebacks even harder? as that -4 for Bisu is gonna lower his tradevalue shitloads? | ||
|
Trezeguet
United States2656 Posts
To me the ace match victory should be worth 5 points since it is arguably tougher to win the ace match since it often between the two top players for their respective teams. Also, the ace match is more important than the other ones. Edit: also what pripple is saying has me worried as well since a lot of the fun is trading and improving | ||
|
Crunchums
United States11144 Posts
| ||
TheFallofTroy
Canada780 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36401 Posts
On December 01 2009 06:44 emucxg wrote: 3-0 Victory: 6 Points 3-1 Victory: 4 Points 3-2 Victory: 2 Points 2-3 Defeat: 0 Point 1-3 Defeat: -1 Points 0-3 Defeat: -2 Points we should give more points to team wins imo Teams this round are designed so that they are going to roughly equal a player of a similar cost. | ||
| ||
