• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:47
CEST 20:47
KST 03:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 710 users

Tandem StarCraft - Page 17

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 03:15:46
February 18 2010 03:11 GMT
#321
you can fix the map triggers like i outlined on SEN or you could just have some incentive to move into the middle of the map.

For example,

extra resources for controlling middle (add a turtle-checker and only implement this when it is detected a player is turtling)

or perhaps an area that will allow you to transfer your units to the other side in case your partner needs it
-> if you own most of the map, and you control the 'area' and the other player is turtling, you can send your units to the other players side and effectively 2 vs 1 the other player.

if you have absolute control of the center for 20 minutes you win automatically
by absolute i mean at most 0 enemy units enters the radius of the center
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
February 18 2010 03:41 GMT
#322
On February 18 2010 11:40 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 02:34 Chill wrote:
On February 17 2010 15:36 frogmelter wrote:
Wait you got all 3 races and over 200 pop for Terran?

Yes, there were 2 Terrans (myself being one), a Zerg, and a Protoss in the game. I got units from all of them.



But...

Show nested quote +
Chill wrote:I pushed to my fourth and then I didn't move all game. I spent all my money on Turrets. After I was ready, I just pushed out and raped. Since intrigue's main was Protoss, there was nothing he could do.


This establishes that your enemy is Protoss.

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z/T
Enemy Ally: T/Z

You kill a P unit. It transfers to your ally. Your enemy's ally kills that P unit, and it transfers right back to your enemy. It should have been impossible for you to obtain protoss units in any way.


Yeah that was what I was thinking... Even if there were only one Terran in the game...

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z
Enemy Ally: P

They kill a probe, you build a DA, you MC the enemy's drone that was transferred from your ally. You would have had to tech up for both Protoss and Zerg. If they let you do this, they deserved to get buttfucked like that.
TL+ Member
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25979 Posts
February 18 2010 03:59 GMT
#323
On February 18 2010 11:40 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 02:34 Chill wrote:
On February 17 2010 15:36 frogmelter wrote:
Wait you got all 3 races and over 200 pop for Terran?

Yes, there were 2 Terrans (myself being one), a Zerg, and a Protoss in the game. I got units from all of them.



But...

Show nested quote +
Chill wrote:I pushed to my fourth and then I didn't move all game. I spent all my money on Turrets. After I was ready, I just pushed out and raped. Since intrigue's main was Protoss, there was nothing he could do.


This establishes that your enemy is Protoss.

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z/T
Enemy Ally: T/Z

You kill a P unit. It transfers to your ally. Your enemy's ally kills that P unit, and it transfers right back to your enemy. It should have been impossible for you to obtain protoss units in any way.

I guess I remember wrong.
Moderator
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 08:07:01
February 18 2010 08:05 GMT
#324
I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 09:24:35
February 18 2010 09:13 GMT
#325
Brainstorming possible solution to immortal units recirculating forever. I didn't run across a suggestion like this but it may be here. If so, sorry

units transfer once

Your opponent makes a zealot. You kill it. Your ally gets it. Then if your ally loses it, your opponent doesn't get it. It goes away. Your opponent only gets units made originally by your ally. You only get units originally made by your teammate's opponent. Units you make never come back to you after you lose them.

Hurting your opponent still helps your ally: he gets units. But only if they were made by your opponent. If you kill a unit your ally lost it is now gone. I think I'm just restating this over and over

How to do it? Units that get transferred are hero units, and hero units don't transfer? Is there a way to edit what spells heros have?

******

this way, units are not forever. Resources will have to be used to replace them as they go away, perhaps making people need the resources more. It will also mean resources will eventually run out. There is a possible endgame of no more resources and dwindling units, which might help put a cap on max game length., Combined with building destruction giving your ally resources, it might mitigate turtling a little. Mostly just about taking units out of circulation though
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 10:13:42
February 18 2010 09:47 GMT
#326
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage, not because of the lack of mixed units, but because of supply. If B = protoss, and they can only get an influx of protoss units which take up supply limits, players A and C can get ahead simply because they don't have to accommodate for two player's worth of supply (and in the current method, the units cannot die so eventually there will be a point where theyll be maxed with protoss units but the other player will be maxed with his own race plus have the extras from his partners winnings)

In all honesty the hero system works best because they dont take supply and they only transfer once.


I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.


probably the worst idea ever

But whatever. Most of the fun of this game is from the fact that it is a team-based game, but it borders on the familiarity of 1v1. It's something you can play with your prac partners and friends and at the end of the day, balance isn't going to be all that important.
Excel Excel
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
142 Posts
February 18 2010 11:26 GMT
#327
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.
"SCREW OBSERVERS MUST HAVE MOAR ARBITERS!!!11one1" - Famous last words
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 15:41:07
February 18 2010 15:39 GMT
#328
Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8088 Posts
February 18 2010 17:47 GMT
#329
sorry I didnt read all of the thread but is the way that multi-race 2v2 works is it would be like a TZ team vs a TZ team and its a zvt on each side, so if I kill a medic it will go to my teammate etc?
Free Palestine
KameZerg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1762 Posts
February 18 2010 17:59 GMT
#330
I love teamliquid tandem?
asdasdasdasdasd123123123
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 18:10:54
February 18 2010 18:07 GMT
#331
On February 18 2010 17:05 Chef wrote:
I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.


I suppose, but I wonder how often are there battles in the middle? All the ones I played, I essentially camped out in front of their expansion, expanded myself, before pushing in. Maybe it's because of the sort of players my friends are, but most of the battles seem to be at the choke. It would certainly make pushing up easier (a ling defiler push is not very cost effective right now), but would there be much Tandem switching?

The idea of holding multiple points before being able to transfer units to your ally would certainly put the impetus on being more aggressive- the 2v1 danger would be a big motivator. I wonder if it would change the game dynamics too much by creating more point to hold... unless the areas to hold were also x number of expansions in the middle. In this way you would be fighting over expansions as in a normal Starcraft game, only the stakes are raised. (Of course if you're both fighting over expansions, chances are you won't be able to spare units for a 2v1 tranfer.)
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 19:59:57
February 18 2010 19:04 GMT
#332
On February 18 2010 20:26 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.


Maybe the teams are equal but it becomes significantly harder for B raced players to win their 1 vs 1... do i really have to explain myself?

Maybe its counter-intuitive for you, sort of like a monty-hall problem.

Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.


As for your concerns with hero units, is it really all because of upgrades? Because in all honesty thats really not a problem in my opinion. Who wants marines without stim/range, or lings without speed, defilers without consume, or hydras without range/speed?

And if you're under the assumption that hero units grant normal units their upgrades - they don't.

Nonetheless, it wouldn't be a problem anyways, since it would really only help players who have an opponent on the other side the same race as them, at which point they're at a racial disadvantage, and most likely have their upgrades already anyways.

And your idea is bad because it rewards macro based players more than aggressive harass-oriented players.
In addition, suppose a battle takes place where one players units are in the location and the other players units aren't. I'm gonna go on a limb and assume you can draw your own conclusion from this. (And people WILL exploit this)

oberon
Profile Joined May 2009
United States1320 Posts
February 18 2010 20:43 GMT
#333
On February 19 2010 04:04 Koltz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 20:26 Excel Excel wrote:
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.


Maybe the teams are equal but it becomes significantly harder for B raced players to win their 1 vs 1... do i really have to explain myself?

Maybe its counter-intuitive for you, sort of like a monty-hall problem.

Show nested quote +
Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.


As for your concerns with hero units, is it really all because of upgrades? Because in all honesty thats really not a problem in my opinion. Who wants marines without stim/range, or lings without speed, defilers without consume, or hydras without range/speed?

And if you're under the assumption that hero units grant normal units their upgrades - they don't.

Nonetheless, it wouldn't be a problem anyways, since it would really only help players who have an opponent on the other side the same race as them, at which point they're at a racial disadvantage, and most likely have their upgrades already anyways.

And your idea is bad because it rewards macro based players more than aggressive harass-oriented players.
In addition, suppose a battle takes place where one players units are in the location and the other players units aren't. I'm gonna go on a limb and assume you can draw your own conclusion from this. (And people WILL exploit this)



The main problem is that not all units have heroes. Specifically important: there are no hero workers. Additionally, upgrades are kinda an issue early on. If you 4 pool and kill 2 marines, your partner shouldn't get two beefy hero 'rines.

--oberon
DreaM)XeRO
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Korea (South)4667 Posts
February 18 2010 20:59 GMT
#334
wow O_O fresh idea
i like this
cw)minsean(ru
3FFA
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States3931 Posts
February 18 2010 21:15 GMT
#335
and the guy who can't even try this out is ignored-.-
"As long as it comes from a pure place and from a honest place, you know, you can write whatever you want."
oberon
Profile Joined May 2009
United States1320 Posts
February 18 2010 21:39 GMT
#336
On February 19 2010 06:15 3FFA wrote:
and the guy who can't even try this out is ignored-.-


Download the Destination version (just because that's the one I made/tested, so I know it works).

Find your SC folder. In that, find the Maps folder. In that, find the Broodwar folder.

Put the map there.

Make sure its name ends in .scx.

Now, open starcraft, go on bnet, create a UMS game, and in your map list you should see it.

--oberon
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
February 18 2010 22:08 GMT
#337
On February 18 2010 18:13 MamiyaOtaru wrote:
Brainstorming possible solution to immortal units recirculating forever. I didn't run across a suggestion like this but it may be here. If so, sorry

units transfer once

Your opponent makes a zealot. You kill it. Your ally gets it. Then if your ally loses it, your opponent doesn't get it. It goes away. Your opponent only gets units made originally by your ally. You only get units originally made by your teammate's opponent. Units you make never come back to you after you lose them.

Hurting your opponent still helps your ally: he gets units. But only if they were made by your opponent. If you kill a unit your ally lost it is now gone. I think I'm just restating this over and over

How to do it? Units that get transferred are hero units, and hero units don't transfer? Is there a way to edit what spells heros have?

******

this way, units are not forever. Resources will have to be used to replace them as they go away, perhaps making people need the resources more. It will also mean resources will eventually run out. There is a possible endgame of no more resources and dwindling units, which might help put a cap on max game length., Combined with building destruction giving your ally resources, it might mitigate turtling a little. Mostly just about taking units out of circulation though


The hero method won't work. Some units don't have heroes. Heroes will have some upgrades already. Some heroes attack faster [Zeratul attacks a crapton faster]

There is a way to do it but it would be very time consuming
TL+ Member
pheer
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
5390 Posts
February 18 2010 23:04 GMT
#338
Okay so how about this idea, using holding cells.

[image loading]


Imagine P3 and P4 are on a team (I have not actually played the game yet, so assume it's TTvBB). Also assume it's PPvPP for simplicity.

1. P3 loses one zealot.
2. A zealot is spawned in P4's holding cell, as well as on P4's civilian.
3. P4 now loses one zealot. We are never sure if this zealot was the original, we just know he lost a zealot.
4. [important] the game now checks if P4 was "gifted" a zealot by looking for 1 zealot in P4's holding cell. If a zealot is found, it is killed in the holding cell. Nothing is gifted back. If a zealot is NOT found, a zealot is spawned in P3's holding cell, as well as on P3's civilian.

So to build a scenario, let's say P1 loses 2 zealots. That means P2 gets 2 zealots and P2 now has 2 zealots in his cell.
Then let's say P2 loses one of the zealots. One zealot is removed from P2's cell. Now let's say P2 loses two more zealots resulting in -1 net zealots. The remaining zealot in P2's holding cell is removed. But now when the triggers check for the other zealot, nothing is found. So now P1 is given a zealot, and P1's holding cell has 1 zealot.


Some flaws with this...

1. The holding cells must be big enough to hold (maximum) 600 large units. But that is an extreme case where you have 200 ultras, 200 tanks, and 200 reavers, which can't really happen anyway...

2. The triggers could misfire if hypertriggers are not used, because the physical holding cells are constantly being checked and changed.

Some benefits...

1. This should solve the "huge army" problem because each unit type can only be traded back and forth once.

2. The middle area is no-man's land anyway, so putting the cells there is OK

I have not yet wrapped my head around what happens when all 4 players are simultaneously killing and receiving units. I want you guys to figure that part out =]

Moderator
Excel Excel
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
142 Posts
February 18 2010 23:33 GMT
#339
OMG, I already gave a solution that allows transfer only once WITHOUT USING HEROES, and it was ignored.

Simply put: for every unit transferred to P2, add 1 to P2's death count for the corresponding hero and give a regular unit. Next time he loses that unit, decrement both the hero and regular death counts and do not transfer.

For units without heroes just use the death counts of Alan Turret/Duke Turret/Jump Gate/Khaydarin Crystal Formation/Psi Disrupter/Power Generator/Cerebrate/Ion Cannon/Overmind/whatever.
"SCREW OBSERVERS MUST HAVE MOAR ARBITERS!!!11one1" - Famous last words
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 00:26:16
February 19 2010 00:13 GMT
#340
EDIT: OOOohhhh... I feel dumb. I get it now. Each hero can have their own deathcount, that you modify to keep track of everything (which means no physical units lag up the game trying to keep track). Sorry excel excel. That makes sense. Someone implement this immediately lol. If you're doing it, post here so we don't have overlap of horrible, horrible grinding work (might be easier if you know how to use text trigger editors, but I don't T.T).
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti Stream Rumble 4k Edition
RotterdaM800
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 800
mouzHeroMarine 723
Hui .165
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1076
firebathero 265
Stork 258
Dewaltoss 101
sas.Sziky 52
Bonyth 39
PianO 31
Aegong 18
Dota 2
qojqva3828
League of Legends
Grubby2333
Counter-Strike
fl0m1453
flusha358
zeus298
sgares59
Other Games
Beastyqt826
ceh9637
B2W.Neo542
ToD195
Mew2King183
KnowMe175
PGG 165
ArmadaUGS160
oskar144
Trikslyr66
ZombieGrub23
Sick4
mouzStarbuck3
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick51294
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 173
• poizon28 30
• Reevou 6
• Adnapsc2 3
• OhrlRock 1
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 14
• Michael_bg 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis9040
• Jankos2150
• TFBlade1248
Other Games
• imaqtpie1555
• Shiphtur562
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 13m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 13m
WardiTV European League
21h 13m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
The PondCast
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 17h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.