• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:54
CEST 23:54
KST 06:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202529RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 643 users

Tandem StarCraft - Page 17

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 03:15:46
February 18 2010 03:11 GMT
#321
you can fix the map triggers like i outlined on SEN or you could just have some incentive to move into the middle of the map.

For example,

extra resources for controlling middle (add a turtle-checker and only implement this when it is detected a player is turtling)

or perhaps an area that will allow you to transfer your units to the other side in case your partner needs it
-> if you own most of the map, and you control the 'area' and the other player is turtling, you can send your units to the other players side and effectively 2 vs 1 the other player.

if you have absolute control of the center for 20 minutes you win automatically
by absolute i mean at most 0 enemy units enters the radius of the center
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
February 18 2010 03:41 GMT
#322
On February 18 2010 11:40 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 02:34 Chill wrote:
On February 17 2010 15:36 frogmelter wrote:
Wait you got all 3 races and over 200 pop for Terran?

Yes, there were 2 Terrans (myself being one), a Zerg, and a Protoss in the game. I got units from all of them.



But...

Show nested quote +
Chill wrote:I pushed to my fourth and then I didn't move all game. I spent all my money on Turrets. After I was ready, I just pushed out and raped. Since intrigue's main was Protoss, there was nothing he could do.


This establishes that your enemy is Protoss.

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z/T
Enemy Ally: T/Z

You kill a P unit. It transfers to your ally. Your enemy's ally kills that P unit, and it transfers right back to your enemy. It should have been impossible for you to obtain protoss units in any way.


Yeah that was what I was thinking... Even if there were only one Terran in the game...

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z
Enemy Ally: P

They kill a probe, you build a DA, you MC the enemy's drone that was transferred from your ally. You would have had to tech up for both Protoss and Zerg. If they let you do this, they deserved to get buttfucked like that.
TL+ Member
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
February 18 2010 03:59 GMT
#323
On February 18 2010 11:40 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 02:34 Chill wrote:
On February 17 2010 15:36 frogmelter wrote:
Wait you got all 3 races and over 200 pop for Terran?

Yes, there were 2 Terrans (myself being one), a Zerg, and a Protoss in the game. I got units from all of them.



But...

Show nested quote +
Chill wrote:I pushed to my fourth and then I didn't move all game. I spent all my money on Turrets. After I was ready, I just pushed out and raped. Since intrigue's main was Protoss, there was nothing he could do.


This establishes that your enemy is Protoss.

You: T
Enemy: P
Ally: Z/T
Enemy Ally: T/Z

You kill a P unit. It transfers to your ally. Your enemy's ally kills that P unit, and it transfers right back to your enemy. It should have been impossible for you to obtain protoss units in any way.

I guess I remember wrong.
Moderator
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 08:07:01
February 18 2010 08:05 GMT
#324
I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 09:24:35
February 18 2010 09:13 GMT
#325
Brainstorming possible solution to immortal units recirculating forever. I didn't run across a suggestion like this but it may be here. If so, sorry

units transfer once

Your opponent makes a zealot. You kill it. Your ally gets it. Then if your ally loses it, your opponent doesn't get it. It goes away. Your opponent only gets units made originally by your ally. You only get units originally made by your teammate's opponent. Units you make never come back to you after you lose them.

Hurting your opponent still helps your ally: he gets units. But only if they were made by your opponent. If you kill a unit your ally lost it is now gone. I think I'm just restating this over and over

How to do it? Units that get transferred are hero units, and hero units don't transfer? Is there a way to edit what spells heros have?

******

this way, units are not forever. Resources will have to be used to replace them as they go away, perhaps making people need the resources more. It will also mean resources will eventually run out. There is a possible endgame of no more resources and dwindling units, which might help put a cap on max game length., Combined with building destruction giving your ally resources, it might mitigate turtling a little. Mostly just about taking units out of circulation though
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 10:13:42
February 18 2010 09:47 GMT
#326
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage, not because of the lack of mixed units, but because of supply. If B = protoss, and they can only get an influx of protoss units which take up supply limits, players A and C can get ahead simply because they don't have to accommodate for two player's worth of supply (and in the current method, the units cannot die so eventually there will be a point where theyll be maxed with protoss units but the other player will be maxed with his own race plus have the extras from his partners winnings)

In all honesty the hero system works best because they dont take supply and they only transfer once.


I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.


probably the worst idea ever

But whatever. Most of the fun of this game is from the fact that it is a team-based game, but it borders on the familiarity of 1v1. It's something you can play with your prac partners and friends and at the end of the day, balance isn't going to be all that important.
Excel Excel
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
142 Posts
February 18 2010 11:26 GMT
#327
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.
"SCREW OBSERVERS MUST HAVE MOAR ARBITERS!!!11one1" - Famous last words
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 15:41:07
February 18 2010 15:39 GMT
#328
Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8097 Posts
February 18 2010 17:47 GMT
#329
sorry I didnt read all of the thread but is the way that multi-race 2v2 works is it would be like a TZ team vs a TZ team and its a zvt on each side, so if I kill a medic it will go to my teammate etc?
Free Palestine
KameZerg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1762 Posts
February 18 2010 17:59 GMT
#330
I love teamliquid tandem?
asdasdasdasdasd123123123
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 18:10:54
February 18 2010 18:07 GMT
#331
On February 18 2010 17:05 Chef wrote:
I just though of a possible though iffy solution.

What if unit deaths only count at certain locations? That is, expansions, or at least chokes to expansions, do not follow the rules of Tandem SC. But units lost in the middle where wars are raged and units have to move DO. That would mean you could attack an expo without fear of screwing over your ally. The only draw back is that peon harassment won't give your ally workers, and likewise, defending peon harassment (such as reaver drop) won't give your ally the reaver (which makes it a bit more of an attractive strat).

I think this is the first solution I've been able to see that actually solves the turtling issue without breaking the fun of Tandem. Plus is makes getting rid of excess workers possible.


I suppose, but I wonder how often are there battles in the middle? All the ones I played, I essentially camped out in front of their expansion, expanded myself, before pushing in. Maybe it's because of the sort of players my friends are, but most of the battles seem to be at the choke. It would certainly make pushing up easier (a ling defiler push is not very cost effective right now), but would there be much Tandem switching?

The idea of holding multiple points before being able to transfer units to your ally would certainly put the impetus on being more aggressive- the 2v1 danger would be a big motivator. I wonder if it would change the game dynamics too much by creating more point to hold... unless the areas to hold were also x number of expansions in the middle. In this way you would be fighting over expansions as in a normal Starcraft game, only the stakes are raised. (Of course if you're both fighting over expansions, chances are you won't be able to spare units for a 2v1 tranfer.)
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-18 19:59:57
February 18 2010 19:04 GMT
#332
On February 18 2010 20:26 Excel Excel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.


Maybe the teams are equal but it becomes significantly harder for B raced players to win their 1 vs 1... do i really have to explain myself?

Maybe its counter-intuitive for you, sort of like a monty-hall problem.

Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.


As for your concerns with hero units, is it really all because of upgrades? Because in all honesty thats really not a problem in my opinion. Who wants marines without stim/range, or lings without speed, defilers without consume, or hydras without range/speed?

And if you're under the assumption that hero units grant normal units their upgrades - they don't.

Nonetheless, it wouldn't be a problem anyways, since it would really only help players who have an opponent on the other side the same race as them, at which point they're at a racial disadvantage, and most likely have their upgrades already anyways.

And your idea is bad because it rewards macro based players more than aggressive harass-oriented players.
In addition, suppose a battle takes place where one players units are in the location and the other players units aren't. I'm gonna go on a limb and assume you can draw your own conclusion from this. (And people WILL exploit this)

oberon
Profile Joined May 2009
United States1320 Posts
February 18 2010 20:43 GMT
#333
On February 19 2010 04:04 Koltz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 20:26 Excel Excel wrote:
On February 18 2010 18:47 Koltz wrote:
Suppose there are two teams T1 and T2
if A, B, C denotes races, and the teams are composed of these races:


T1: A B
T2 : B C

Then players of race B are at a huge disadvantage.


Then each team has one disadvantaged player. Can't see what's wrong here.


Maybe the teams are equal but it becomes significantly harder for B raced players to win their 1 vs 1... do i really have to explain myself?

Maybe its counter-intuitive for you, sort of like a monty-hall problem.

Show nested quote +
Harsh considering you're the one who's brought up an idea suggested so many times, I've given up on explaining why it doesn't work lol. I'd like to know why you think my idea is so bad. Like what gameplay elements do you envision being made unfun because of it? If it's gaining/losing units from attacking/defending expos, well that's kind of the exact problem we're trying to solve and I think it does a nice job of that.


As for your concerns with hero units, is it really all because of upgrades? Because in all honesty thats really not a problem in my opinion. Who wants marines without stim/range, or lings without speed, defilers without consume, or hydras without range/speed?

And if you're under the assumption that hero units grant normal units their upgrades - they don't.

Nonetheless, it wouldn't be a problem anyways, since it would really only help players who have an opponent on the other side the same race as them, at which point they're at a racial disadvantage, and most likely have their upgrades already anyways.

And your idea is bad because it rewards macro based players more than aggressive harass-oriented players.
In addition, suppose a battle takes place where one players units are in the location and the other players units aren't. I'm gonna go on a limb and assume you can draw your own conclusion from this. (And people WILL exploit this)



The main problem is that not all units have heroes. Specifically important: there are no hero workers. Additionally, upgrades are kinda an issue early on. If you 4 pool and kill 2 marines, your partner shouldn't get two beefy hero 'rines.

--oberon
DreaM)XeRO
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Korea (South)4667 Posts
February 18 2010 20:59 GMT
#334
wow O_O fresh idea
i like this
cw)minsean(ru
3FFA
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States3931 Posts
February 18 2010 21:15 GMT
#335
and the guy who can't even try this out is ignored-.-
"As long as it comes from a pure place and from a honest place, you know, you can write whatever you want."
oberon
Profile Joined May 2009
United States1320 Posts
February 18 2010 21:39 GMT
#336
On February 19 2010 06:15 3FFA wrote:
and the guy who can't even try this out is ignored-.-


Download the Destination version (just because that's the one I made/tested, so I know it works).

Find your SC folder. In that, find the Maps folder. In that, find the Broodwar folder.

Put the map there.

Make sure its name ends in .scx.

Now, open starcraft, go on bnet, create a UMS game, and in your map list you should see it.

--oberon
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
February 18 2010 22:08 GMT
#337
On February 18 2010 18:13 MamiyaOtaru wrote:
Brainstorming possible solution to immortal units recirculating forever. I didn't run across a suggestion like this but it may be here. If so, sorry

units transfer once

Your opponent makes a zealot. You kill it. Your ally gets it. Then if your ally loses it, your opponent doesn't get it. It goes away. Your opponent only gets units made originally by your ally. You only get units originally made by your teammate's opponent. Units you make never come back to you after you lose them.

Hurting your opponent still helps your ally: he gets units. But only if they were made by your opponent. If you kill a unit your ally lost it is now gone. I think I'm just restating this over and over

How to do it? Units that get transferred are hero units, and hero units don't transfer? Is there a way to edit what spells heros have?

******

this way, units are not forever. Resources will have to be used to replace them as they go away, perhaps making people need the resources more. It will also mean resources will eventually run out. There is a possible endgame of no more resources and dwindling units, which might help put a cap on max game length., Combined with building destruction giving your ally resources, it might mitigate turtling a little. Mostly just about taking units out of circulation though


The hero method won't work. Some units don't have heroes. Heroes will have some upgrades already. Some heroes attack faster [Zeratul attacks a crapton faster]

There is a way to do it but it would be very time consuming
TL+ Member
pheer
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
5390 Posts
February 18 2010 23:04 GMT
#338
Okay so how about this idea, using holding cells.

[image loading]


Imagine P3 and P4 are on a team (I have not actually played the game yet, so assume it's TTvBB). Also assume it's PPvPP for simplicity.

1. P3 loses one zealot.
2. A zealot is spawned in P4's holding cell, as well as on P4's civilian.
3. P4 now loses one zealot. We are never sure if this zealot was the original, we just know he lost a zealot.
4. [important] the game now checks if P4 was "gifted" a zealot by looking for 1 zealot in P4's holding cell. If a zealot is found, it is killed in the holding cell. Nothing is gifted back. If a zealot is NOT found, a zealot is spawned in P3's holding cell, as well as on P3's civilian.

So to build a scenario, let's say P1 loses 2 zealots. That means P2 gets 2 zealots and P2 now has 2 zealots in his cell.
Then let's say P2 loses one of the zealots. One zealot is removed from P2's cell. Now let's say P2 loses two more zealots resulting in -1 net zealots. The remaining zealot in P2's holding cell is removed. But now when the triggers check for the other zealot, nothing is found. So now P1 is given a zealot, and P1's holding cell has 1 zealot.


Some flaws with this...

1. The holding cells must be big enough to hold (maximum) 600 large units. But that is an extreme case where you have 200 ultras, 200 tanks, and 200 reavers, which can't really happen anyway...

2. The triggers could misfire if hypertriggers are not used, because the physical holding cells are constantly being checked and changed.

Some benefits...

1. This should solve the "huge army" problem because each unit type can only be traded back and forth once.

2. The middle area is no-man's land anyway, so putting the cells there is OK

I have not yet wrapped my head around what happens when all 4 players are simultaneously killing and receiving units. I want you guys to figure that part out =]

Moderator
Excel Excel
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
142 Posts
February 18 2010 23:33 GMT
#339
OMG, I already gave a solution that allows transfer only once WITHOUT USING HEROES, and it was ignored.

Simply put: for every unit transferred to P2, add 1 to P2's death count for the corresponding hero and give a regular unit. Next time he loses that unit, decrement both the hero and regular death counts and do not transfer.

For units without heroes just use the death counts of Alan Turret/Duke Turret/Jump Gate/Khaydarin Crystal Formation/Psi Disrupter/Power Generator/Cerebrate/Ion Cannon/Overmind/whatever.
"SCREW OBSERVERS MUST HAVE MOAR ARBITERS!!!11one1" - Famous last words
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 00:26:16
February 19 2010 00:13 GMT
#340
EDIT: OOOohhhh... I feel dumb. I get it now. Each hero can have their own deathcount, that you modify to keep track of everything (which means no physical units lag up the game trying to keep track). Sorry excel excel. That makes sense. Someone implement this immediately lol. If you're doing it, post here so we don't have overlap of horrible, horrible grinding work (might be easier if you know how to use text trigger editors, but I don't T.T).
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 236
Livibee 88
Liquid`TLO 82
ForJumy 65
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 72
NaDa 20
League of Legends
Grubby4644
Dendi1028
syndereN252
Counter-Strike
fl0m2087
Fnx 1377
flusha469
Foxcn327
Super Smash Bros
PPMD89
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu601
Other Games
summit1g10484
tarik_tv4928
FrodaN2073
C9.Mang0203
ViBE91
Sick52
rubinoeu9
Liquid`Ken6
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21617
League of Legends
• Doublelift3551
Other Games
• imaqtpie1430
• Scarra10
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 6m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 12h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.