• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:31
CEST 16:31
KST 23:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers14Maestros of the Game 2 announced82026 GSL Tour plans announced14Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid24
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion ASL21 Strategy, Pimpest Plays Discussions Pros React To: ASL S21, Ro.16 Group C Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group B [ASL21] Ro16 Group C [ASL21] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Dawn of War IV Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
McBoner: A hockey love story 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1659 users

Blackwater - Corporate Mercenaries

Blogs > {CC}StealthBlue
Post a Reply
Normal
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-11 05:46:32
August 11 2009 05:33 GMT
#1
[image loading]


http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Blackwater/Jeremy-Scahill/e/9781568583945/?itm=1

The unauthorized story of the epic rise of one of the most powerful and secretive forces to emerge from the U.S. military-industrial complex, hailed by the Bush administration as a revolution in military affairs, but considered by others as a dire threat to American democracy.


Though I am still in the process of reading the Book I find it rather interesting, as well as disturbing and the principal behind the guy named Erik Prince.



There are several accusations towards Blackwater and its many other divisions that are connected to it of Weapon Smuggling. One such accusation being that Blackwater was supplying the PKK with weapons, cash, and other forms of aid of which the company had denied. But the interesting things is from Turkish forces:

Turkish security forces have started recovering US made rifles and pistols from dead PKK militants.


In the United States, officials in Washington said the smuggling investigation grew from internal Pentagon and State Department inquiries into U.S. weapons that had gone missing in Iraq. It gained steam after Turkish authorities protested to the U.S. in July that they had seized American arms from the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, rebels.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKK

The PKK, which is fighting for an independent Kurdistan, is banned in Turkey, which has a restive Kurdish population and is considered a “foreign terrorist organization” by the State Department. That designation bars U.S. citizens or those in U.S. jurisdictions from supporting the group in any way.


More Accusations/Evidence:





Along with the current investigation of the Nisoor Square Massacre, along with other random acts of violence:

Her husband was working as a security guard at the Iraqi Media Network, a state broadcaster, when a Blackwater convoy passed them one day in 2007. She says that without warning, the Iraqis were fired upon and three of them were killed. The Blackwater convoy never stopped or sent anyone to check what happened.


Abu Suhad lost his daughter in 2007 when she was driving her car near the Iraqi Foreign Ministry in central Baghdad. He said: “Eyewitnesses told me that four white Blackwater cars went by her. Three were already past when the last one shot her in the head at close range and killed her. The eyewitnesses said they were very bewildered why they shot her. The bullet came from the driver’s window, which means that he got next to her when he shot her. The bullet entered from under the ear and left from the upper side of her skull. There were bits of her hair and skin on the car roof.”


On the Nisoor Square massacre:

Mr Walid remembers the Nisour Square shooting on September 16, 2007 — for Iraqis one of the blacker days of the US occupation. Claiming to have come under fire, Blackwater guards stopped in the middle of a large roundabout and began shooting in all directions.

“I left my car and ran away to hide in a petrol station, which was made of concrete. The shooting was so heavy it was like rain,” he said. “I saw lots of people getting shot. The driver who had been in front of me died and his wife fell out of the car. Her child was killed as well. The shooting went on for about ten minutes.”


Source

Unbelievable. Blackwater was also in New Orleans during post Hurricane Katrina:



In order to carry an automatic weapon such as an AK-47 in the United States, you have to be part of the Government, or the Military, or maybe even Police. If Blackwater wasn't licensed to be there, or even authorized to be there they were breaking the law.

Just shows how powerful corporations with enough money can do.

*
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-11 06:37:43
August 11 2009 06:36 GMT
#2
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.
Marine50
Profile Joined September 2007
Australia1764 Posts
August 11 2009 06:38 GMT
#3
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US is so fucked up and has been for a very long time.

fixed yo
IRIS FIGHTING!!!
eMbrace
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States1300 Posts
August 11 2009 06:41 GMT
#4
Blackwater is so badass
Freyr
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States500 Posts
August 11 2009 06:49 GMT
#5
On August 11 2009 15:41 eMbrace wrote:
Blackwater is so badass


I assume you mean badass in its villainy? (or alleged villainy if you please)
weaksauce
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
369 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-11 07:00:29
August 11 2009 06:58 GMT
#6
They are freaking geniuses, if only for the fact that everyone still refers to them as Blackwater, and not their new name Xe

Its like a magic trick and bam, to the casual observer there is this nice new security firm.
even if he DID detect penis - cubEdin
eMbrace
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States1300 Posts
August 11 2009 07:06 GMT
#7
On August 11 2009 15:49 Freyr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 15:41 eMbrace wrote:
Blackwater is so badass


I assume you mean badass in its villainy? (or alleged villainy if you please)


I have a slight doubt in my mind that Blackwater isn't a villainous corporation.

But hey that's just me -- they are most likely out to conquer the world.
Freyr
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States500 Posts
August 11 2009 07:20 GMT
#8
On August 11 2009 16:06 eMbrace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 15:49 Freyr wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:41 eMbrace wrote:
Blackwater is so badass


I assume you mean badass in its villainy? (or alleged villainy if you please)


I have a slight doubt in my mind that Blackwater isn't a villainous corporation.

But hey that's just me -- they are most likely out to conquer the world.


Glad you are having fun.

So explain - in what way are "they" badass? Please be specific if you have the time.

Thanks
iNcontroL *
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
USA29055 Posts
August 11 2009 07:23 GMT
#9
really nice OP actually.. I read/watched the links and I find it quite informative. I've had to debate on this company several times.. fascinating what is "allowed" these days.

MGS4 might not be far off haha
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
August 11 2009 07:31 GMT
#10
op seems biased
eMbrace
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States1300 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-11 07:47:21
August 11 2009 07:46 GMT
#11
On August 11 2009 16:20 Freyr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 16:06 eMbrace wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:49 Freyr wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:41 eMbrace wrote:
Blackwater is so badass


I assume you mean badass in its villainy? (or alleged villainy if you please)


I have a slight doubt in my mind that Blackwater isn't a villainous corporation.

But hey that's just me -- they are most likely out to conquer the world.


Glad you are having fun.

So explain - in what way are "they" badass? Please be specific if you have the time.

Thanks


Being labeled as a mercenary group of elite ex-special forces guys who are equipped 10x better than our own soldiers and don't follow rules, and have several controversies surrounding some of the actions that certain members of the organization have done -- makes for a very scary, thrilling, interesting story and sometimes a "badass" story that many people would get a kick out of

i wish i wrote the book first -- probably would of made a pretty penny.

as for my personal views on the organization -- well I'll never know the real facts about their business and neither will anyone in this thread.

as it stands, I know they are a private military corporation that our government has paid for assistance for a variety of issues including the war in the middle east and for humanitarian aid after Katrina hit.

they've done good things in Iraq, and then there's some bad things that have been done that this thread is dwelling on -- although our own country's army has committed some war crimes themselves yet I wouldn't call our military villainous by any means.

so IMO, blackwater is interesting to me -- i will always wonder if they are truly a hell-bent corporation of badass ex-special forces trying to preserve christianity through killing Iraqi citizens -- or if they are just a frighteningly successful private military service that has ultimately helped us, albeit with having a few shameful stains on its hands.


the former story sounds much more thrilling though -- and if I was an author or the head of a news broadcast, I'd talk about that side of the story.
Disregard
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
China10252 Posts
August 11 2009 07:48 GMT
#12
I want my own private army.
"If I had to take a drug in order to be free, I'm screwed. Freedom exists in the mind, otherwise it doesn't exist."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 11 2009 08:17 GMT
#13
On August 11 2009 16:46 eMbrace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 16:20 Freyr wrote:
On August 11 2009 16:06 eMbrace wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:49 Freyr wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:41 eMbrace wrote:
Blackwater is so badass


I assume you mean badass in its villainy? (or alleged villainy if you please)


I have a slight doubt in my mind that Blackwater isn't a villainous corporation.

But hey that's just me -- they are most likely out to conquer the world.


Glad you are having fun.

So explain - in what way are "they" badass? Please be specific if you have the time.

Thanks


Being labeled as a mercenary group of elite ex-special forces guys who are equipped 10x better than our own soldiers and don't follow rules, and have several controversies surrounding some of the actions that certain members of the organization have done -- makes for a very scary, thrilling, interesting story and sometimes a "badass" story that many people would get a kick out of

i wish i wrote the book first -- probably would of made a pretty penny.

as for my personal views on the organization -- well I'll never know the real facts about their business and neither will anyone in this thread.

as it stands, I know they are a private military corporation that our government has paid for assistance for a variety of issues including the war in the middle east and for humanitarian aid after Katrina hit.

they've done good things in Iraq, and then there's some bad things that have been done that this thread is dwelling on -- although our own country's army has committed some war crimes themselves yet I wouldn't call our military villainous by any means.

so IMO, blackwater is interesting to me -- i will always wonder if they are truly a hell-bent corporation of badass ex-special forces trying to preserve christianity through killing Iraqi citizens -- or if they are just a frighteningly successful private military service that has ultimately helped us, albeit with having a few shameful stains on its hands.


the former story sounds much more thrilling though -- and if I was an author or the head of a news broadcast, I'd talk about that side of the story.


The charges recently brought up are from former employees. Also the U.S. State Department has recommended that Blackwater/Xe be dropped from the contractors to protect U.S. diplomats in Iraq. Also Xe/Blackwater is also under lawsuit for a string of charges that include Tax evasion, Drug, and Weapons trafficking, as well as Racketeering charges.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater_Baghdad_shootings#Further_court_action
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
August 11 2009 09:08 GMT
#14
In order to carry an automatic weapon such as an AK-47 in the United States, you have to be part of the Government, or the Military, or maybe even Police.

This is an interesting assertion. Civilians are not barred from owning automatic weapons. There are some pretty hefty restrictions of course, but we can have them. Youtube search "knob creek" (hehe knob) sometime.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 11 2009 09:46 GMT
#15
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
August 11 2009 12:55 GMT
#16
thread is quite biased
other than that i mostly agree with the fact that blackwater has committed crimes and should be punished for it
the idea of mercenary armies, however, isn't a bad idea. Otherwise, bigger, badder countries can push around weaker but more industrial nations. Mercenaries are an equalizer.
The hotel I'm staying in right now is actually run by an ex-Blackwater, one who was in Iraq until 3 years ago.

O.O
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
StorrZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States13919 Posts
August 11 2009 13:35 GMT
#17
On August 11 2009 21:55 Caller wrote:
thread is quite biased
other than that i mostly agree with the fact that blackwater has committed crimes and should be punished for it
the idea of mercenary armies, however, isn't a bad idea. Otherwise, bigger, badder countries can push around weaker but more industrial nations. Mercenaries are an equalizer.
The hotel I'm staying in right now is actually run by an ex-Blackwater, one who was in Iraq until 3 years ago.

O.O


do you feel safe staying in that hotel?
Hwaseung Oz fan for life. Swing out, always swing out.
Fr33t
Profile Joined June 2008
United States1128 Posts
August 11 2009 14:00 GMT
#18
I remember reading about Blackwater a few years ago. Back then, advertised pay was around $550-$650 a day while they were on duty. Unlike they actual military, these guys are allowed to shoot without having to go through all the red tape and letting the person get away/start firing first. Working for them is pretty much any ex-special force's wet dream as far as I'm concerned.
"Wow you could literally transport Lomo's face to a girl and the result would be pretty deceptive."
hahajokes
Profile Joined August 2009
Burundi6 Posts
August 11 2009 14:13 GMT
#19
typical white behavior
hardeharhar
ChaseR
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Norway1004 Posts
August 11 2009 15:28 GMT
#20
The bullet entered from under the ear and left from the upper side of her skull. There were bits of her hair and skin on the car roof.
This made me sick...the horrors of war...for thousands of years, fuck humankind.
MGS4 might not be far off haha
MGS has been telling the future, today, really how far off in the future are genetically engineered soldiers and war has already been a business for a century ._. "What the fuck are we fighting for" was the question soldiers where asking themselves in Iraq.

I can't stand war
Life is not Fucking Fair and Society is not Fucking Logical - "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 14 2009 06:36 GMT
#21
On August 12 2009 00:28 ChaseR wrote:
Show nested quote +
The bullet entered from under the ear and left from the upper side of her skull. There were bits of her hair and skin on the car roof.
This made me sick...the horrors of war...for thousands of years, fuck humankind.
Show nested quote +
MGS4 might not be far off haha
MGS has been telling the future, today, really how far off in the future are genetically engineered soldiers and war has already been a business for a century ._. "What the fuck are we fighting for" was the question soldiers where asking themselves in Iraq.

I can't stand war


Actually it wasn't. You do know that the volunteer and return rate for multiple tours in Iraq is the highest % in any war America has fought and we have an all-volunteer Armed Services. Stop spewing this mis-informed garbage please. The soldiers know and understand that showing Iraqi's freedom and liberty is what they are there for and thats why so many have willingly re-upped and returned so many times.

Politico's =/= Soldier

Even though I disagree with the premise of the invasion, the main reasons for the soldiers do not reflect those of our politicians.

Glad someone from Norway can shed light on the feelings of American servicemen.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Carnac
Profile Blog Joined December 2003
Germany / USA16648 Posts
August 14 2009 07:31 GMT
#22
This whole private military firm scheme is so fucked up on so many levels that I don't even know where to begin
ModeratorHi! I'm a .signature *virus*! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-14 12:14:51
August 14 2009 12:04 GMT
#23
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. There also is no direct line of accountability between the bad things they do and having repercussions for them. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.

I don't think the company is as "dramatic" as most reports, though. It also gets shady because they're not simply an armed force, they've got departments for construction and many other things, and they probably are venturing into geopolitical affairs. Halliburton is a better case of this, since they've got their own private army as well. I don't think it's a stretch to think they might be using their forces to apply pressure to acquire new contracts in other oil states.

On the other hand, you don't exactly want Blackwater employees in regular society. These are very intelligent people (probably all PhDs), but they've got very specialized training to do what they do. They've gone much deeper into the military realm than most people, which usually leaves them out of place in the civilian realm.

BTW, it's not as if Blackwater is the only private military out there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_military_company
Norway's got one too!
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-14 12:11:17
August 14 2009 12:10 GMT
#24
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 14 2009 12:18 GMT
#25
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 14 2009 12:27 GMT
#26
Just to give you an idea of the problem, the US gov't gets headaches thinking about Blackwater but know who loves them the most? UAE states. They get the services of a paramilitary (just like Saudi Arabia!) without needing any military infrastructure of their own, they've got plenty of money to spend on it and indiscretions get completely ignored.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66359 Posts
August 14 2009 12:30 GMT
#27
From a non-American perspective, it looks pretty much fucked up.
POGGERS
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-14 12:46:08
August 14 2009 12:43 GMT
#28
On August 14 2009 21:18 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.


No, I have no problem with people exercising their free wills. People are allowed to turn down jobs, and this means deciding not to re-up for whatever reason. If the stipulation was that all training received in the Military was outlawed once your OBLISERV comes up, no one would join (Especially Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard). We repay whatever training costs back when we sign our contracts specifying you must serve X time if you receive X training, obtaining X rate, etc.

You can't just drop from the Military. Your posts in this thread show an astonishing amount of inadequate knowledge coming from you. None of your posts have any accurate truth to them at all. For instance, you seem to think you can just drop from the Military, that the training you receive in the Military isn't repaid by OBLISERV, and that the vast majority of prior servicemen (Or at least a somewhat significant portion) do not return to normal civilian lives and parlay their training in the Military into an associated field in the Civ. Sector.

"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 14 2009 12:49 GMT
#29
On August 14 2009 21:27 Jibba wrote:
Just to give you an idea of the problem, the US gov't gets headaches thinking about Blackwater but know who loves them the most? UAE states. They get the services of a paramilitary (just like Saudi Arabia!) without needing any military infrastructure of their own, they've got plenty of money to spend on it and indiscretions get completely ignored.


Blackwater is a pin-prick and non factor for our Government. They pose no threat whatsoever. In fact, the greatest threat to this country and our Government is our Government. Focus on the big fish, not the little plankton.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 14 2009 15:23 GMT
#30
On August 14 2009 21:43 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2009 21:18 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.


No, I have no problem with people exercising their free wills. People are allowed to turn down jobs, and this means deciding not to re-up for whatever reason. If the stipulation was that all training received in the Military was outlawed once your OBLISERV comes up, no one would join (Especially Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard). We repay whatever training costs back when we sign our contracts specifying you must serve X time if you receive X training, obtaining X rate, etc.

You can't just drop from the Military. Your posts in this thread show an astonishing amount of inadequate knowledge coming from you. None of your posts have any accurate truth to them at all. For instance, you seem to think you can just drop from the Military, that the training you receive in the Military isn't repaid by OBLISERV, and that the vast majority of prior servicemen (Or at least a somewhat significant portion) do not return to normal civilian lives and parlay their training in the Military into an associated field in the Civ. Sector.

I'm telling you it's going to change, because the government wants lifers and their people are leaving after 7-8 years. Your hypocrisy on this issue is astounding. Patriotism is valorous in 99% of your other posts, but in this case you've got no issue with what they're doing (yet you feel compelled to stay within federal ranks, which means you do feel an obligation to do so.) I didn't say they shouldn't be allowed to. I didn't say it's not rational (I said the opposite, in fact.) I said it sucks. Do you wish more people joined private militaries than remained with the US gov't? I'm guessing the answer is no.

To pretend it's a non issue is like pretending Saudi's stake in Citibank is a non-issue. They're both issues, but neither get any coverage. Like any other corporation, they've got lobbyists influencing policy and the ones they affect end up hurting our military.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 14 2009 22:12 GMT
#31
On August 15 2009 00:23 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2009 21:43 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:18 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.


No, I have no problem with people exercising their free wills. People are allowed to turn down jobs, and this means deciding not to re-up for whatever reason. If the stipulation was that all training received in the Military was outlawed once your OBLISERV comes up, no one would join (Especially Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard). We repay whatever training costs back when we sign our contracts specifying you must serve X time if you receive X training, obtaining X rate, etc.

You can't just drop from the Military. Your posts in this thread show an astonishing amount of inadequate knowledge coming from you. None of your posts have any accurate truth to them at all. For instance, you seem to think you can just drop from the Military, that the training you receive in the Military isn't repaid by OBLISERV, and that the vast majority of prior servicemen (Or at least a somewhat significant portion) do not return to normal civilian lives and parlay their training in the Military into an associated field in the Civ. Sector.

I'm telling you it's going to change, because the government wants lifers and their people are leaving after 7-8 years. Your hypocrisy on this issue is astounding. Patriotism is valorous in 99% of your other posts, but in this case you've got no issue with what they're doing (yet you feel compelled to stay within federal ranks, which means you do feel an obligation to do so.) I didn't say they shouldn't be allowed to. I didn't say it's not rational (I said the opposite, in fact.) I said it sucks. Do you wish more people joined private militaries than remained with the US gov't? I'm guessing the answer is no.

To pretend it's a non issue is like pretending Saudi's stake in Citibank is a non-issue. They're both issues, but neither get any coverage. Like any other corporation, they've got lobbyists influencing policy and the ones they affect end up hurting our military.


Insofar as speaking for the stats within the CG there is no problem whatsoever with retainment. I'm pretty sure it is the same for other Branches as well, especially in the current economic climate. You seem to think its unpatriotic to not always re-enlist once your Enlistment is up, and instead decide to join a Private Security Firm. That is not my belief at all. They have served their time and their country, now they are once again free civilians and can do as they please. This is the American way is it not? We don't compel and force our civilians into the Military, nor do we force our current servicemen into 20 year contracts.

As I said before, when these companies break the law, they should be punished per the law, so I'm not sure how you came up with what your spewing, but I suppose if you believe that Blackwater is actually a threat to America then I can see why you are saying the things you are. I'm just curious since you seem so enthralled and enraged by such a comparatively insignificant company, do you show the same convictions and outrage against the CIA because they are more of a threat than any private company to America?

I don't feel compelled to stay within the Federal ranks, it just so happens that the type of job I enjoy is mostly Federal. I do what I do because first and foremost I enjoy my job.

Let me re-iterate Blackwater is not hurting our Military in any shape or form whatsoever. If you are so concerned with the welfare of the Military then perhaps you should raise the ire against Politicians who haven't fixed the VA system in forever, keep reducing funding, and seek to perform societal experiments on the Military where unit cohesion and morale is most important.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 14 2009 23:12 GMT
#32
There's no point in arguing with you because your views do not change. My goal is to educate other people on the matter, and simply by the fact that you're so vehemently disagreeing with me, I think they'll begin to understand what I'm getting at.

Thanks for helping me prove my point to those people.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-14 23:37:17
August 14 2009 23:35 GMT
#33
On August 15 2009 07:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 00:23 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:43 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:18 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.


No, I have no problem with people exercising their free wills. People are allowed to turn down jobs, and this means deciding not to re-up for whatever reason. If the stipulation was that all training received in the Military was outlawed once your OBLISERV comes up, no one would join (Especially Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard). We repay whatever training costs back when we sign our contracts specifying you must serve X time if you receive X training, obtaining X rate, etc.

You can't just drop from the Military. Your posts in this thread show an astonishing amount of inadequate knowledge coming from you. None of your posts have any accurate truth to them at all. For instance, you seem to think you can just drop from the Military, that the training you receive in the Military isn't repaid by OBLISERV, and that the vast majority of prior servicemen (Or at least a somewhat significant portion) do not return to normal civilian lives and parlay their training in the Military into an associated field in the Civ. Sector.

I'm telling you it's going to change, because the government wants lifers and their people are leaving after 7-8 years. Your hypocrisy on this issue is astounding. Patriotism is valorous in 99% of your other posts, but in this case you've got no issue with what they're doing (yet you feel compelled to stay within federal ranks, which means you do feel an obligation to do so.) I didn't say they shouldn't be allowed to. I didn't say it's not rational (I said the opposite, in fact.) I said it sucks. Do you wish more people joined private militaries than remained with the US gov't? I'm guessing the answer is no.

To pretend it's a non issue is like pretending Saudi's stake in Citibank is a non-issue. They're both issues, but neither get any coverage. Like any other corporation, they've got lobbyists influencing policy and the ones they affect end up hurting our military.


As I said before, when these companies break the law, they should be punished per the law, so I'm not sure how you came up with what your spewing, but I suppose if you believe that Blackwater is actually a threat to America then I can see why you are saying the things you are. I'm just curious since you seem so enthralled and enraged by such a comparatively insignificant company, do you show the same convictions and outrage against the CIA because they are more of a threat than any private company to America?

Let me re-iterate Blackwater is not hurting our Military in any shape or form whatsoever.

I'm not quite sure how you can possibly say that Blackwater is insignificant in any way.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 14 2009 23:58 GMT
#34
On August 15 2009 08:12 Jibba wrote:
There's no point in arguing with you because your views do not change. My goal is to educate other people on the matter, and simply by the fact that you're so vehemently disagreeing with me, I think they'll begin to understand what I'm getting at.

Thanks for helping me prove my point to those people.


Eh, no. It's that you seem to be focusing on the little gold fish in the ocean and either purposefully, or unconciously ignoring the shark.

Come back to me when Blackwater starts firing on American soldiers ok?
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-15 01:30:13
August 15 2009 01:25 GMT
#35
What? Did you miss the part where they detained a group of marines in Iraq (I've heard worse stories from soldiers but this one got made public) or that they've been given immunity on many of their mistakes? What law do you suppose they're breaking when they kill the wrong people? Who's supposed to prosecute them? The FBI investigation already found that they violated RoE in that escort case but they were immediately granted "use immunity" by the State Dept. And what about when they operate at the expense of slaves living in the emirates? Dubai's government going to prosecute them when that's exactly what they wanted? Not to mention the blowback effect they're leaving behind in Iraq or the shitty way they treat our soldiers.

"Secretary Rice's attitude is that if there are individuals who broke rules, laws or regulations they must be held to account," McCormack told reporters. "Every action that she has taken during the course of the aftermath of this incident has been consistent with that approach."
We've seen this time and time again from left and right and it's bullshit. They scape goat on a few individuals, but it's not just a "few bad eggs." it's a fundamental flaw in organizational approaches that allow these things to take place, and for the life of my I can't understand why you can't see that philosophically, mercenaries are a bad idea. Can you name a historical example where paramilitaries have ever worked out well?

To be honest, even if Blackwater were behaving well now, I don't think it's any different from saying "no matter what, in time collectivism always leads to tyranny." The idea of private militaries is fundamentally dangerous and they will degrade to a horrifying level.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
itzme_petey
Profile Blog Joined February 2004
United States1400 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-15 04:43:13
August 15 2009 04:26 GMT
#36
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. There also is no direct line of accountability between the bad things they do and having repercussions for them. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.

I don't think the company is as "dramatic" as most reports, though. It also gets shady because they're not simply an armed force, they've got departments for construction and many other things, and they probably are venturing into geopolitical affairs. Halliburton is a better case of this, since they've got their own private army as well. I don't think it's a stretch to think they might be using their forces to apply pressure to acquire new contracts in other oil states.

On the other hand, you don't exactly want Blackwater employees in regular society. These are very intelligent people (probably all PhDs), but they've got very specialized training to do what they do. They've gone much deeper into the military realm than most people, which usually leaves them out of place in the civilian realm.

BTW, it's not as if Blackwater is the only private military out there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_military_company
Norway's got one too!


although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.

considering the total amount of contracts was close to half a billion over a 5 year span, not one employee is worth 700k/month. do the math, its just not profitable. please dont claim hard numbers without sourcing.

It also gets shady because they're not simply an armed force, they've got departments for construction and many other things, and they probably are venturing into geopolitical affairs. Halliburton is a better case of this, since they've got their own private army as well.

I could not find information on Haliburton Security Forces, I believe you are confusing construction contractors with security contractors. Blackwater does not perform construction, only provide security. If you have info saying other wise, please cite.

On the other hand, you don't exactly want Blackwater employees in regular society. These are very intelligent people (probably all PhDs), but they've got very specialized training to do what they do. They've gone much deeper into the military realm than most people, which usually leaves them out of place in the civilian realm.

All PHD's? Doubt it. Sounds like ex-military men who cant make a living back home and thus go private. All somewhat experienced, but I would not say "PHD" level. Pretty big assertion to say that they've gone much deeper into the military realm.

With in a 3 year span, Blackwater contracts increased from 200k to 500MM. How can a company recruit that much new people to fufill contracts in such a short time period? Companies must have settled for lesser trained/experienced people to fill those roles. Therefore, we end up with fucked up situations where blackwater employees murder innocent iraqis due to their inexperience.*

I understand you are trying to educate people, but please make sure you source and dont try to pull things out of your ass.

* Blackwater Liscence revoked in Iraq
http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2007/09/22/blackwater-kills-civilians-iraq-revokes-license.htm
"Last night, I played a game.. as I recall it was a strategy game.. Peeked around and what did I see, a girl playing starcraft better than me.. and I jizzed in my pants.."
itzme_petey
Profile Blog Joined February 2004
United States1400 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-15 04:41:19
August 15 2009 04:36 GMT
#37
On August 15 2009 08:35 koreasilver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 07:12 Aegraen wrote:
On August 15 2009 00:23 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:43 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:18 Jibba wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:10 Aegraen wrote:
On August 14 2009 21:04 Jibba wrote:
On August 11 2009 18:46 Aegraen wrote:
On August 11 2009 15:36 LaLuSh wrote:
Man. The US just seems so fucked up sometimes. Read and watched all of it -- sounded like it was all taken out of a movie.

All this thread needs now is Aegraen defending blackwater.


I have nothing against the idea of private security firms. I do however believe all transgressions that break the law should be punished per the law.

Lastly, civilians are allowed to have automatic weapons and per the US Constitution is one of our rights to bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.

Unlike you and others that frequent this site, I don't see Corporations as evil entities.

It's a very, very slippery slope, since we're not always the highest bidders. On the ground level, I think it also sucks that they took millions of dollars worth of training from the US gov't and are parlaying it into another job, although it's understandable since some of those guys earn $700k~/month.


What? Took? They served their tours. It's no different than any other branches rating (Infantry, Nuclear Tech, Aviation Survival Tech, etc). You sign up and its understood that you serve your OBLISERV and once you are finished your contract you are free to do as you please.

No one stole anything, nor took anything.

Edit: I fully intend to use my training to obtain a Federal job once I get out of the Service. I took nothing.

You have no problem with someone turning down a job for their government to go with the highest bidder instead? And that's the minimum, but these guys are usually on the officer path and then drop. They're exploring territory that hasn't been covered yet, but I guarantee you if the gov't keeps losing men this deep they're going to change protocol.


No, I have no problem with people exercising their free wills. People are allowed to turn down jobs, and this means deciding not to re-up for whatever reason. If the stipulation was that all training received in the Military was outlawed once your OBLISERV comes up, no one would join (Especially Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard). We repay whatever training costs back when we sign our contracts specifying you must serve X time if you receive X training, obtaining X rate, etc.

You can't just drop from the Military. Your posts in this thread show an astonishing amount of inadequate knowledge coming from you. None of your posts have any accurate truth to them at all. For instance, you seem to think you can just drop from the Military, that the training you receive in the Military isn't repaid by OBLISERV, and that the vast majority of prior servicemen (Or at least a somewhat significant portion) do not return to normal civilian lives and parlay their training in the Military into an associated field in the Civ. Sector.

I'm telling you it's going to change, because the government wants lifers and their people are leaving after 7-8 years. Your hypocrisy on this issue is astounding. Patriotism is valorous in 99% of your other posts, but in this case you've got no issue with what they're doing (yet you feel compelled to stay within federal ranks, which means you do feel an obligation to do so.) I didn't say they shouldn't be allowed to. I didn't say it's not rational (I said the opposite, in fact.) I said it sucks. Do you wish more people joined private militaries than remained with the US gov't? I'm guessing the answer is no.

To pretend it's a non issue is like pretending Saudi's stake in Citibank is a non-issue. They're both issues, but neither get any coverage. Like any other corporation, they've got lobbyists influencing policy and the ones they affect end up hurting our military.


As I said before, when these companies break the law, they should be punished per the law, so I'm not sure how you came up with what your spewing, but I suppose if you believe that Blackwater is actually a threat to America then I can see why you are saying the things you are. I'm just curious since you seem so enthralled and enraged by such a comparatively insignificant company, do you show the same convictions and outrage against the CIA because they are more of a threat than any private company to America?

Let me re-iterate Blackwater is not hurting our Military in any shape or form whatsoever.

I'm not quite sure how you can possibly say that Blackwater is insignificant in any way.


The video is interesting and all, but you all are getting played by the creators. There are only 1000 private employees in Iraq. That is not enough to occupy even a small city or section of that city.* This is a politcal issue that has to do with how closely regulated private security contractor companies should be as well as governments awarding contracts to companies with such close ties to political figures. It's a small problem compared to ethnic tensions in iraq, future elections, and pullout of US troops.

*US surge required 150,000 troops. Only then were they successful in stopping militant violence.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2008-07-16-iraq-surge_N.htm
"Last night, I played a game.. as I recall it was a strategy game.. Peeked around and what did I see, a girl playing starcraft better than me.. and I jizzed in my pants.."
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-15 07:54:23
August 15 2009 07:34 GMT
#38
I got ahead of myself with units when typing those numbers, you're right. The top non-execs can pull around those yearly, not including benefits and everything else. They're not all in service 12 months a year, but some of these guys are pulling around those numbers. The average starting salary is like $10-15k per month so at base you're making about 100k/year as a rookie.

KBR split off from Halliburton 2 years ago, but it's a private military contractor that builds/runs many of our military bases, prisons and some embassies. It's got its own small military detail and it gets contracted out to do training as well. I've also heard KBR does some very shoddy work.

I don't know what Blackwater's new website is (they've been renamed Xe) but if you look at their stuff on web archive, anything called Raven is part of their construction arm. Too bad the website's gone, cause they used to sell sweet apparel and plush dolls.

I'm pretty sure even Aegrean will back me up on their training. They don't hire young kids, they recruit strictly from SF and usually require that you have higher education at a Master's level or beyond. They've since scrapped everything, but their old recruiting page had some ridiculous requirements for training and education. The argument that they're lesser trained, inexperienced or fucked in the head is simply not true. They're excellent soldiers with the best training, but there's an organizational culture that leads to those kinds of mistakes. Calling it a few bad eggs is such a fucking cop out, whether we're talking about Abu Ghraib, My Lai or even Enron.

There's a lot more than 1,000 private employees in Iraq. I don't know what Xe is doing, but there's still operations like Triple Canopy and Falcon which had very close ties to Blackwater, and they're operating in a few other countries. Afghanistan and Pakistan, obviously, but they're being deployed in Somalia as well and I think they're getting set to enter Mexico. It is an issue because they're not just hired by the US government and the lines between these groups is blurry. Before the name change, they lost all their contracts in Iraq yet they were still working there because they were sub-sub contracted by other firms. And they're still mercenaries. Read the Prince if you don't get why it's a problem.

The only role I think they should be fulfilling is the securing/guarding of prime international targets, paid for by multiple countries, such taking control of Pakistan's nuclear bases when the government collapses, so we don't have a ridiculous crisis when India does it instead.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Daigomi
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
South Africa4316 Posts
August 15 2009 19:59 GMT
#39
On August 15 2009 16:34 Jibba wrote:
I'm pretty sure even Aegrean will back me up on their training. They don't hire young kids, they recruit strictly from SF and usually require that you have higher education at a Master's level or beyond. They've since scrapped everything, but their old recruiting page had some ridiculous requirements for training and education. The argument that they're lesser trained, inexperienced or fucked in the head is simply not true.

Sorry, but I have great difficulty that believing that a Masters degree is necessary for being part of an army (unless you meant necessary for management or something). How many soldiers are there that complete six years of formal education, before going out there and risking their lives? It just doesn't make any sense to me. I can believe you if you say that it's very important for them to be intelligent, and that they only hire individuals who are proven to be intelligent, but if you limit yourself to only soldiers with a masters degree, you'll cut out such a large employee base that there's no way that you'll get the "top" soldiers.

Also, there are much better ways for them to test if a soldier is intelligent than demanding that he gets a Masters degree. That's like having the requirement for joining a tennis team be that the members needed to have completed a 50 mile marathon. Sure the members that do join are likely to be very fit, but if you want to guarantee fit team members, there are ways to do it that are much less restrictive, and way more relevant, than demanding that they have to have run a marathon.

(btw, I'm not debating the points I'm making here, I'm just saying why I think the masters thing is unlikely. if you have a source regarding it, I'll readily concede though)
Moderator
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 15 2009 20:25 GMT
#40
Their site has vanished, so no, I don't. But a lot of the men they take are upper twenties/early thirties, and they're educated in things related to their work. Aegrean can correct me, but I don't think the military schools operate as formal 4 year institutions. I think the time frame is set up to accommodate enlisted men.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Daigomi
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
South Africa4316 Posts
August 15 2009 20:32 GMT
#41
Well, like I said, it just seems like an extremely ineffecient requirement to me. It's possible that they aim for soldiers with higher degrees, or that soldiers with degrees like that can earn more money there, but I can't believe that it would be a requirement.
Moderator
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
November 11 2009 07:44 GMT
#42
Bumping this due to a article on the AP:


Former top executives at Blackwater Worldwide say the U.S. security contractor sent about $1 million to its Iraq office with the intention of paying off officials in the country who were angry about the fatal shootings of 17 civilians by Blackwater employees, The New York Times reported Tuesday.


The former executives told the Times that the payments were approved by the company's then-president, Gary Jackson. They did not know if he came up with the idea.

It's also not clear whether the payments were actually delivered, or which Iraqi officials were intended to receive them. Any payments would have been illegal under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bans bribes to foreign officials. The company has paid legitimate compensation to several victims of the shootings, the Times reported.

Two of the former executives said they were directly involved in discussions about paying Iraqi officials, and the other two said they were told about the discussions by others at Blackwater.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
theron[wdt]
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States395 Posts
November 11 2009 08:04 GMT
#43
thats the problem with the private sector, they let all the power and the money go to their head and when shit starts piling on them, they shit a bit of the money out of their ass and think it's gonna make things right. Politically correct mercs is what they are, not a "security" force.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
November 11 2009 08:15 GMT
#44
What can you do when your previous administration essentially created a hollow government by outsourcing EVERYTHING.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-25 05:39:46
November 25 2009 05:33 GMT
#45
Hm... This one is from the Nation, same author of the book I talked about in my OP. Blackwater said to be operating in Pakistan:


The source, who has worked on covert US military programs for years, including in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has direct knowledge of Blackwater's involvement. He spoke to The Nation on condition of anonymity because the program is classified. The source said that the program is so "compartmentalized" that senior figures within the Obama administration and the US military chain of command may not be aware of its existence.


For years, Kestral has done a robust business in defense logistics with the Pakistani government and other nations, as well as top US defense companies. Blackwater owner Erik Prince is close with Kestral CEO Liaquat Ali Baig, according to the former Blackwater executive. "Ali and Erik have a pretty close relationship," he said. "They've met many times and struck a deal, and they [offer] mutual support for one another." Working with Kestral, he said, Blackwater has provided convoy security for Defense Department shipments destined for Afghanistan that would arrive in the port at Karachi. Blackwater, according to the former executive, would guard the supplies as they were transported overland from Karachi to Peshawar and then west through the Torkham border crossing, the most important supply route for the US military in Afghanistan.

According to the former executive, Blackwater operatives also integrate with Kestral's forces in sensitive counterterrorism operations in the North-West Frontier Province, where they work in conjunction with the Pakistani Interior Ministry's paramilitary force, known as the Frontier Corps (alternately referred to as "frontier scouts"). The Blackwater personnel are technically advisers, but the former executive said that the line often gets blurred in the field. Blackwater "is providing the actual guidance on how to do [counterterrorism operations] and Kestral's folks are carrying a lot of them out, but they're having the guidance and the overwatch from some BW guys that will actually go out with the teams when they're executing the job," he said. "You can see how that can lead to other things in the border areas." He said that when Blackwater personnel are out with the Pakistani teams, sometimes its men engage in operations against suspected terrorists. "You've got BW guys that are assisting... and they're all going to want to go on the jobs--so they're going to go with them," he said. "So, the things that you're seeing in the news about how this Pakistani military group came in and raided this house or did this or did that--in some of those cases, you're going to have Western folks that are right there at the house, if not in the house." Blackwater, he said, is paid by the Pakistani government through Kestral for consulting services. "That gives the Pakistani government the cover to say, 'Hey, no, we don't have any Westerners doing this. It's all local and our people are doing it.' But it gets them the expertise that Westerners provide for [counterterrorism]-related work."



http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091207/scahill
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
s_side
Profile Joined May 2009
United States700 Posts
November 25 2009 06:26 GMT
#46
Actually, in states that respect the constitution and the rights of the individual, you do not need to be anything other than a non-felon without a history of mental illness to own an AK-47.

If you want an automatic weapon, silencer or any other "class 3" destructive device, you need to simply pass a federal background check and pay a nominal fee upon receipt of said "device."

How many of you in this thread have actually ever discharged an automatic weapon? Probably about as many as those in congress who passed the absurd "assault weapon ban."

Why should people who know absolutely nothing about firearms and even less about the constitution be dictating policy to law-abiding Americans.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 04 2010 18:39 GMT
#47

WASHINGTON – The security company Blackwater Worldwide formed a network of 30 shell companies and subsidiaries to try to get millions of dollars in government business after the company faced strong criticism for reckless conduct in Iraq, The New York Times reported Friday.

The newspaper said that it was unclear how many of the created companies got American contracts but that at least three of them obtained work with the U.S. military and the CIA.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
May 15 2011 01:47 GMT
#48
Major bump, the United Arab Emirates has hired Mr. Prince who sold Blackwater know known simply as Xe to build a small but lethal fighting force that would help prevent terrorist attacks, protect oil pipelines but also quell internal revolts such as pro-democracy uprisings, from the New York Times:

The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest or were challenged by pro-democracy demonstrations in its crowded labor camps or democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

The U.A.E.’s rulers, viewing their own military as inadequate, also hope that the troops could blunt the regional aggression of Iran, the country’s biggest foe, the former employees said. The training camp, located on a sprawling Emirati base called Zayed Military City, is hidden behind concrete walls laced with barbed wire. Photographs show rows of identical yellow temporary buildings, used for barracks and mess halls, and a motor pool, which houses Humvees and fuel trucks. The Colombians, along with South African and other foreign troops, are trained by retired American soldiers and veterans of the German and British special operations units and the French Foreign Legion, according to the former employees and American officials.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
muse5187
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
1125 Posts
May 15 2011 01:57 GMT
#49
On August 11 2009 14:33 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
In order to carry an automatic weapon such as an AK-47 in the United States, you have to be part of the Government, or the Military, or maybe even Police. If Blackwater wasn't licensed to be there, or even authorized to be there they were breaking the law.
.


I know I'm beating a dead horse but it isn't illegal to own a automatic weapon. My father and cousin own quite a few.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
11:00
Playoffs Day 2
ShoWTimE vs RogueLIVE!
WardiTV929
Ryung 786
IntoTheiNu 328
IndyStarCraft 234
Rex100
3DClanTV 60
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 786
Lowko441
IndyStarCraft 234
Rex 100
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 50684
Sea 12889
BeSt 781
EffOrt 661
Soma 496
Light 465
Mini 461
Larva 419
Stork 418
ZerO 307
[ Show more ]
firebathero 281
Snow 233
actioN 218
Soulkey 190
Leta 153
Zeus 145
hero 144
Hyun 106
ToSsGirL 63
Sharp 52
JYJ 46
Barracks 42
Aegong 38
sorry 35
Sexy 25
910 23
Rock 20
HiyA 19
scan(afreeca) 17
zelot 14
IntoTheRainbow 12
SilentControl 12
yabsab 11
Noble 9
GoRush 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Terrorterran 3
Shine 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6861
qojqva1196
BananaSlamJamma115
League of Legends
Reynor32
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2248
byalli1110
allub201
zeus15
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King121
Other Games
singsing1947
B2W.Neo969
hiko741
DeMusliM346
Hui .175
XaKoH 158
crisheroes124
QueenE71
ArmadaUGS54
RotterdaM53
Trikslyr28
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream20533
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 87
• poizon28 22
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV215
League of Legends
• Nemesis2374
• TFBlade1644
Upcoming Events
OSC
29m
CranKy Ducklings
9h 29m
Escore
19h 29m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 20h
Universe Titan Cup
1d 20h
Rogue vs Percival
Ladder Legends
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
Ladder Legends
3 days
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-22
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W4
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.